Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Page Six)   Like clockwork, in preparation for Oprah's interview Buckingham Palace starts leaking like a tire as bald as Prince William about what a horror Meghan Markle was to staff   (pagesix.com) divider line
    More: Obvious, British Royal Family, Bullying, Pleading, Royal family, Allegation, Abuse, Monarch, Oprah Winfrey  
•       •       •

1186 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 03 Mar 2021 at 9:50 AM (5 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



55 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2021-03-03 8:52:21 AM  
Yes, she's the worst person in history, and now she's gone forever.  Why are you still whining?
 
2021-03-03 9:48:52 AM  
So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.
 
2021-03-03 9:58:46 AM  
Oliver Cromwell approves.
 
2021-03-03 10:01:44 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
:
So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.
 
2021-03-03 10:16:12 AM  
For somebody who purportedly hated the spotlight, she sure does miss it
 
2021-03-03 10:24:51 AM  
Okay, now she's a bully who made grown men cry.

Next time around, we'll learn that she ate corgy puppies for breakfast.
 
2021-03-03 10:31:26 AM  
Man, it's gonna smart when we finally learn which royal called her the N-word.

I'm betting it was Kate.
 
2021-03-03 10:35:19 AM  
My problem with Meghan and Harry is that they want all the cache of being a Duke and Duchess while doing none of the work. Whatever your opinion of royalty or the British Royal Family specifically, William and Catherine work. Maybe not the kind of work we do, but they work. Obviously, they aren't doing as much right now as they were before the pandemic, but they're still keeping busy. I'm sure they have moments of hating it, who wouldn't, but they understand the immense privilege they live with and don't want to appear as though they take it for granted. So, even when they'd probably rather stay home with their kids (who are all farking adorable), they get out there and take care of business.

You don't marry a royal prince and become a royal duchess, then complain that you have to do what your sister-in-law and brother-in-law are doing. Yes, the tabloid media over there is insidious, and yes, I believe there is a racial component to a lot of the hate Meghan has received, but some of it has nothing to do with the fact she's biracial or an American or previously divorced.

They're both acting like spoiled, petulant coonts, and I mean that in the accepted British usage of that word.
 
2021-03-03 10:35:41 AM  
For people that said they want to be left alone, they're doing a lot of interviews.

I would do HORRIBLE having servants.  I couldn't do it.  I would be more like Mr. Deeds and have them sit at the table with me and talk about things.
No way I could have people waiting on me like that.  I feel guilty in restaurants, for Pete's sake!
 
2021-03-03 10:44:56 AM  
Nobody going to point out the irony of that a person who works as a servant for the royal family monarchy is now complaining of being mistreated?
 
2021-03-03 10:44:58 AM  

buntz: For people that said they want to be left alone, they're doing a lot of interviews.

I would do HORRIBLE having servants.  I couldn't do it.  I would be more like Mr. Deeds and have them sit at the table with me and talk about things.
No way I could have people waiting on me like that.  I feel guilty in restaurants, for Pete's sake!


I'm the same way.  I've stayed with folks who have live-in servants and that shiat is deeply uncomfortable.  But then, its also uncomfortable for them when you try to "relate" by being their friend.

The best thing I've found is the obvious middle ground: don't be a dick.  Treat them politely and respectfully, but at arms-length, so they can just do their jobs.
 
2021-03-03 10:47:41 AM  
I'm just here to iterate how little I care about everyone in this story.

Oh, and also for the gangbang. When is that, exactly?
 
2021-03-03 10:53:35 AM  

H31N0US: I'm just here to iterate how little I care about everyone in this story.

Oh, and also for the gangbang. When is that, exactly?


Gangbang after abuse. But are you unpetulant and unspoiled enough to earn it?
 
2021-03-03 10:53:40 AM  
So lemme get this straight - the Queen, who has her servants break in her shoes and taste her food for her, who won't let people use the word "perfume" in her presence and makes you stop eating when she does, whose sister used servants literally as human ashtrays, whose son makes his servants iron his shoelaces, is saying that Meghan Markle was too demanding? The same Meghan Markle who walked away from all that bullshiat?

If it were possible for me to care even less about that people, I might. Fortunately I come from a country that fought a war specifically to get away from them.
 
2021-03-03 10:56:37 AM  
I'm beginning to think headlines should be pier revued before green lighting them
 
2021-03-03 11:06:36 AM  
wow, this article is so enlightening. (NOT)

"In one alleged incident, a royal aide who had been anticipating a confrontation with Markle told a colleague: "I can't stop shaking."
Two senior members of the palace staff were allegedly bullied into leaving their jobs, the UK newspaper reported.
A third former aide said they had been personally "humiliated" by the former TV actress."

""The Duchess seems intent on always having someone in her sights," Knauf reportedly continued. "She is bullying Y and seeking to undermine her confidence. We have had report after report from people who have witnessed unacceptable behavior towards Y.""

So no details of what they considered bullying? just endlessly repeating that aides didn't want to work for her?
 
2021-03-03 11:08:07 AM  

Coco LaFemme: My problem with Meghan and Harry is that they want all the cache of being a Duke and Duchess while doing none of the work. Whatever your opinion of royalty or the British Royal Family specifically, William and Catherine work. Maybe not the kind of work we do, but they work. Obviously, they aren't doing as much right now as they were before the pandemic, but they're still keeping busy. I'm sure they have moments of hating it, who wouldn't, but they understand the immense privilege they live with and don't want to appear as though they take it for granted. So, even when they'd probably rather stay home with their kids (who are all farking adorable), they get out there and take care of business.

You don't marry a royal prince and become a royal duchess, then complain that you have to do what your sister-in-law and brother-in-law are doing. Yes, the tabloid media over there is insidious, and yes, I believe there is a racial component to a lot of the hate Meghan has received, but some of it has nothing to do with the fact she's biracial or an American or previously divorced.

They're both acting like spoiled, petulant coonts, and I mean that in the accepted British usage of that word.


For real question - What does work consist of for a Duke and Duchess?
 
2021-03-03 11:11:42 AM  
I don't have a dog in this hunt, but I notice that there are no names and zero specific details in the accusations against Markle.
 
2021-03-03 11:13:25 AM  

JolobinSmokin: Man, it's gonna smart when we finally learn which royal called her the N-word.

I'm betting it was Kate.


Phillip. Book it, done.

/unless he called her "the d@rkey"
 
2021-03-03 11:13:40 AM  
Thudfark:

pier revued

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-03-03 11:16:04 AM  

LL316: Coco LaFemme: My problem with Meghan and Harry is that they want all the cache of being a Duke and Duchess while doing none of the work. Whatever your opinion of royalty or the British Royal Family specifically, William and Catherine work. Maybe not the kind of work we do, but they work. Obviously, they aren't doing as much right now as they were before the pandemic, but they're still keeping busy. I'm sure they have moments of hating it, who wouldn't, but they understand the immense privilege they live with and don't want to appear as though they take it for granted. So, even when they'd probably rather stay home with their kids (who are all farking adorable), they get out there and take care of business.

You don't marry a royal prince and become a royal duchess, then complain that you have to do what your sister-in-law and brother-in-law are doing. Yes, the tabloid media over there is insidious, and yes, I believe there is a racial component to a lot of the hate Meghan has received, but some of it has nothing to do with the fact she's biracial or an American or previously divorced.

They're both acting like spoiled, petulant coonts, and I mean that in the accepted British usage of that word.

For real question - What does work consist of for a Duke and Duchess?


At least they're not welcoming Nazi leaders, like the last set.
 
2021-03-03 11:16:37 AM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.


Do you know what I hate?
 
2021-03-03 11:17:20 AM  
Every time I see Meghan, my mind's eye sees Miranda Sings.  I envision very similar personalities.
 
2021-03-03 11:19:47 AM  

cannibalparrot: Thudfark:

pier revued

[Fark user image 220x123] [View Full Size image _x_]


i.imgflip.comView Full Size
 
2021-03-03 11:24:35 AM  

H31N0US: I'm just here to iterate how little I care about everyone in this story.

Oh, and also for the gangbang. When is that, exactly?


at 6...sharp.  And again at 9...ish.
 
2021-03-03 11:59:02 AM  
psst, we'll feed you whatever crap you want to read, just don't ask about Andrew.
 
2021-03-03 12:15:02 PM  
We get it, she's black, AND unrepentantly American. Pretty much not gonna take any racist smack off of people that worship a family that is an example of the dangers of inbreeding
 
2021-03-03 12:42:12 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.


I got chastised hard here for criticizing her. I don't trust her. I think everything is calculated with them. And it wouldn't surprise me if she holds the reigns on it.
 
2021-03-03 12:51:41 PM  
Why do the spares always seem more full of themselves than the heirs?
 
2021-03-03 1:03:15 PM  

LL316: Coco LaFemme: My problem with Meghan and Harry is that they want all the cache of being a Duke and Duchess while doing none of the work. Whatever your opinion of royalty or the British Royal Family specifically, William and Catherine work. Maybe not the kind of work we do, but they work. Obviously, they aren't doing as much right now as they were before the pandemic, but they're still keeping busy. I'm sure they have moments of hating it, who wouldn't, but they understand the immense privilege they live with and don't want to appear as though they take it for granted. So, even when they'd probably rather stay home with their kids (who are all farking adorable), they get out there and take care of business.

You don't marry a royal prince and become a royal duchess, then complain that you have to do what your sister-in-law and brother-in-law are doing. Yes, the tabloid media over there is insidious, and yes, I believe there is a racial component to a lot of the hate Meghan has received, but some of it has nothing to do with the fact she's biracial or an American or previously divorced.

They're both acting like spoiled, petulant coonts, and I mean that in the accepted British usage of that word.

For real question - What does work consist of for a Duke and Duchess?


For real answer - like all members of the BRF, they both have charities and other patronages they lend their time and names to. A lot of it consists of personal appearances, public speaking, and the like. For example, one of Catherine's big issues is childhood development, including healthy eating/exercise. So, she goes to a lot of schools to meet with people about what kinds of food are provided for the kids, what kind of opportunities for exercise do they get, etc. That involves a lot of hobnobbing with complete strangers, making small talk, things that you and I wouldn't consider work in the slightest, but for them it is.
 
2021-03-03 1:06:49 PM  

TwilightZone: Why do the spares always seem more full of themselves than the heirs?


Because they can afford to be. Harry will never be king, not unless William and all three of his children die. The Queen's sister Margaret was much the same way. Look at Prince Andrew. Though he was third-born, males inherited before females (at least at the time he was born, it has since been changed), so he ranks ahead of his older sister Anne. He was the "spare" to Charles. Once William and Harry were born, he was kicked down the list, but even before then, he got the nickname "Randy Andy" for a reason.
 
2021-03-03 1:13:41 PM  

4seasons85!: Benevolent Misanthrope: So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.

I got chastised hard here for criticizing her. I don't trust her. I think everything is calculated with them. And it wouldn't surprise me if she holds the reigns on it.


Yeah, she's not of that world - her career is fame, not service.  And Harry, god bless him, is a really nice guy who is incapable of thinking with anything other than his dick, so it's pretty obvious she's the brains of the outfit.
 
2021-03-03 1:14:25 PM  
I'm not sure how much of "The Crown" is based on fact. But I do remember the episode where the Royal Family invited Margaret Thatcher to the country retreat, and how badly they supposedly treated her.

On the other hand, Charles did treat Diana pretty shabbily, and there is the scandal of two cousins which the Royal Family hid away in a mental institution. So I'm not in shock that Meagan was some dragon lady who upended the genteel Monarchy.
 
2021-03-03 1:22:48 PM  

Coco LaFemme: LL316: Coco LaFemme: My problem with Meghan and Harry is that they want all the cache of being a Duke and Duchess while doing none of the work. Whatever your opinion of royalty or the British Royal Family specifically, William and Catherine work. Maybe not the kind of work we do, but they work. Obviously, they aren't doing as much right now as they were before the pandemic, but they're still keeping busy. I'm sure they have moments of hating it, who wouldn't, but they understand the immense privilege they live with and don't want to appear as though they take it for granted. So, even when they'd probably rather stay home with their kids (who are all farking adorable), they get out there and take care of business.

You don't marry a royal prince and become a royal duchess, then complain that you have to do what your sister-in-law and brother-in-law are doing. Yes, the tabloid media over there is insidious, and yes, I believe there is a racial component to a lot of the hate Meghan has received, but some of it has nothing to do with the fact she's biracial or an American or previously divorced.

They're both acting like spoiled, petulant coonts, and I mean that in the accepted British usage of that word.

For real question - What does work consist of for a Duke and Duchess?

For real answer - like all members of the BRF, they both have charities and other patronages they lend their time and names to. A lot of it consists of personal appearances, public speaking, and the like. For example, one of Catherine's big issues is childhood development, including healthy eating/exercise. So, she goes to a lot of schools to meet with people about what kinds of food are provided for the kids, what kind of opportunities for exercise do they get, etc. That involves a lot of hobnobbing with complete strangers, making small talk, things that you and I wouldn't consider work in the slightest, but for them it is.


If you think hobnobbing with complete strangers and making small talk doesn't sound like work to me, then I guess you just don't know me very well now do you?
 
2021-03-03 1:35:47 PM  

4seasons85!: Benevolent Misanthrope: So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.

I got chastised hard here for criticizing her. I don't trust her. I think everything is calculated with them. And it wouldn't surprise me if she holds the reigns on it.


okay, so lets say everything about their media appearances IS calculated. everything IS because she wants to be famous and rich.

What does that have to do with staff of the royal family claiming she's a cruel bully? Wanting to be famous and rich isn't a character flaw. There's lot of celebrities who deliberately set out to be famous and rich. That doesn't mean she's a bad person.

btw, they did renounce the titles. All they have left is honorary titles- just like Sir Ian McKellan and Dame Judy Hench.

/don't truly know whether or not Meghan and Harry are good people, and I don't care
//just don't like the presumption that because a woman has ambitious that means she's a bad person
 
2021-03-03 1:36:20 PM  
has ambitions*
 
2021-03-03 1:48:57 PM  

Katie98_KT: What does that have to do with staff of the royal family claiming she's a cruel bully? Wanting to be famous and rich isn't a character flaw. There's lot of celebrities who deliberately set out to be famous and rich. That doesn't mean she's a bad person.

btw, they did renounce the titles. All they have left is honorary titles- just like Sir Ian McKellan and Dame Judy Hench.

/don't truly know whether or not Meghan and Harry are good people, and I don't care
//just don't like the presumption that because a woman has ambitious that means she's a bad person


The staff are under a strict NDA not to ever complain about treatment from the Royal Family ever as long as they live. The fact that they are complaining about Markle doesn't really tell us anything other than the fact that they have been released from their NDA as far as she is concerned. If they released all current and former servants from *all* NDAs, then we would start hearing some interesting things about the entire sordid family, and would know how to judge Markle in comparison.

This reminds me of the stories about Lynda Carter back in the 1980's, she had a reputation of being a bully and being hard to work with. Years later it came out that "Being a bully and hard to work with" was code for "Being an outspoken strong woman, who insisted that she and the other women on the set be treated with respect." I'm sure Carter is a strong personality and some people found her abrasive, but she was coming from the right place. I wouldn't be surprised if the situation with Markle is similar.

It's also possible she found out she hated the whole Royal thing and was acting out. In either case I wouldn't judge her. She and her husband are Californians now, they haven't caused any problems out here.
 
2021-03-03 1:52:09 PM  
So reading these critical posts, it's clear that she's a cruel and conniving woman who has tricked this poor, dumb man into living a life subservient to her.  Harry, a guy who went to the best schools, to Eton and to the Royal Academy, then served in Afghanistan where by all accounts he was competent and responsible - is a complete idiot who has been tricked and only you are smart enough to see it.  A guy who is likely to have had to deal with palace intrigue his entire life, to deal with understanding how a system came to kill his mother, and has likely had thousands of perfect women try to catch his eye and who could have any woman in England he wants has been fooled into "thinking with his dick" by this one particular woman.

This might say more about you than it does about him.
 
2021-03-03 2:09:32 PM  

Rapmaster2000: This might say more about you than it does about him.


Hoda Kotb, is that you??
 
2021-03-03 2:10:47 PM  

buntz: Rapmaster2000: This might say more about you than it does about him.

Hoda Kotb,


Is that a kebab place?
 
2021-03-03 2:15:47 PM  
Man, the royal family has always sorta come off like they're only barely holding themselves back from going on a racist tirade of some kind in public, but this almost completely unremarkable, inoffensive woman coming briefly into their lives has still managed to rip the mask off to an astonishing degree.

Like, this is the family that literally wears nazi uniforms to costume parties and shiat, and the extent to which they've gone from "quiet west-coast movie producer" racism to "shotgun-waving average Mississippi resident in a stained wife beater attaching a rope to the back of their rust-covered pickup truck" racism is still surprising.

// Markle comes from an actual trashy family even by US standards, full of borderline abusers and mooches who constantly pull trailer park level drama even once you compensate for tabloid shiattiness.  That the royal family came out looking like the worse party when they went all gap-toothed redneck in-law feud really says something about how shiat that family is.
 
2021-03-03 2:39:37 PM  

skinink: I'm not sure how much of "The Crown" is based on fact. But I do remember the episode where the Royal Family invited Margaret Thatcher to the country retreat, and how badly they supposedly treated her.

On the other hand, Charles did treat Diana pretty shabbily, and there is the scandal of two cousins which the Royal Family hid away in a mental institution. So I'm not in shock that Meagan was some dragon lady who upended the genteel Monarchy.


Isn't the case that the Bowes-Lyons his them away, not the Windsors?
 
2021-03-03 2:40:56 PM  

Rannuci: skinink: I'm not sure how much of "The Crown" is based on fact. But I do remember the episode where the Royal Family invited Margaret Thatcher to the country retreat, and how badly they supposedly treated her.

On the other hand, Charles did treat Diana pretty shabbily, and there is the scandal of two cousins which the Royal Family hid away in a mental institution. So I'm not in shock that Meagan was some dragon lady who upended the genteel Monarchy.

Isn't the case that the Bowes-Lyons his them away, not the Windsors?


Man, autocorrect hates me:

Isn't it the case that the Bowes-Lyons hid them away, not the Windsors?
 
2021-03-03 2:41:34 PM  

Jim_Callahan: Man, the royal family has always sorta come off like they're only barely holding themselves back from going on a racist tirade of some kind in public, but this almost completely unremarkable, inoffensive woman coming briefly into their lives has still managed to rip the mask off to an astonishing degree.

Like, this is the family that literally wears nazi uniforms to costume parties and shiat, and the extent to which they've gone from "quiet west-coast movie producer" racism to "shotgun-waving average Mississippi resident in a stained wife beater attaching a rope to the back of their rust-covered pickup truck" racism is still surprising.

// Markle comes from an actual trashy family even by US standards, full of borderline abusers and mooches who constantly pull trailer park level drama even once you compensate for tabloid shiattiness.  That the royal family came out looking like the worse party when they went all gap-toothed redneck in-law feud really says something about how shiat that family is.


I tend to think it was the other way around.  He say a women who he could love that WASNT part of the palace culture.  She even had enough money to keep herself happy.   His plan could have been to get out, met her and found that easiest way to move to LA, have a few kids.  Be rich, in a place with a lot of rich folks. As to not get too much attention.     Yea the paps might take a picture of him and kids at the beach, but some dumb "star" of the moment show up on the beach nearly nude and they go chasing after her and leave them alone.
 
2021-03-03 2:47:07 PM  
"Off with their heads!"
 
2021-03-03 2:50:11 PM  
Man, I don't care about any of this.  So when is the interview on?
 
2021-03-03 3:46:50 PM  

Katie98_KT: 4seasons85!: Benevolent Misanthrope: So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.

I got chastised hard here for criticizing her. I don't trust her. I think everything is calculated with them. And it wouldn't surprise me if she holds the reigns on it.

okay, so lets say everything about their media appearances IS calculated. everything IS because she wants to be famous and rich.

What does that have to do with staff of the royal family claiming she's a cruel bully? Wanting to be famous and rich isn't a character flaw. There's lot of celebrities who deliberately set out to be famous and rich. That doesn't mean she's a bad person.

btw, they did renounce the titles. All they have left is honorary titles- just like Sir Ian McKellan and Dame Judy Hench.

/don't truly know whether or not Meghan and Harry are good people, and I don't care
//just don't like the presumption that because a woman has ambitious that means she's a bad person


I'm ambitious.  I still treat people well. That's a just an excuse.

Could this all be tabloid gossip with no foundation? Sure. But I'm just not convinced.  I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if this interview, or something else comes along that shows otherwise.  Not that they are required to show me anything.
 
2021-03-03 6:00:10 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-03-03 7:24:28 PM  
Given the stark contrast in media headlines between Kate and Meghan, it's tough to believe she gets fair treatment. Perhaps she is a non-royal biatch, I dunno, but I suspect that's not the problem the crown and media engine really has with her.

https://www.boredpanda.com/uk-media-do​uble-standarts-royal-meghan-markle-kat​e-middleton/
 
2021-03-03 8:14:40 PM  

4seasons85!: Katie98_KT: 4seasons85!: Benevolent Misanthrope: So a briefcase model who married into a super-rich, super-privileged family and has a husband with the IQ of a carrot and the popularity of ice cream acted like an entitled biatch? Wow. Shocker.

If life in the royal family was so unsurvivable, why does she still call herself a Duchess? I mean, if they don't want that job, if the whole thing is bullshiat, why not renounce the title?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.

I got chastised hard here for criticizing her. I don't trust her. I think everything is calculated with them. And it wouldn't surprise me if she holds the reigns on it.

okay, so lets say everything about their media appearances IS calculated. everything IS because she wants to be famous and rich.

What does that have to do with staff of the royal family claiming she's a cruel bully? Wanting to be famous and rich isn't a character flaw. There's lot of celebrities who deliberately set out to be famous and rich. That doesn't mean she's a bad person.

btw, they did renounce the titles. All they have left is honorary titles- just like Sir Ian McKellan and Dame Judy Hench.

/don't truly know whether or not Meghan and Harry are good people, and I don't care
//just don't like the presumption that because a woman has ambitious that means she's a bad person

I'm ambitious.  I still treat people well. That's a just an excuse.

Could this all be tabloid gossip with no foundation? Sure. But I'm just not convinced.  I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if this interview, or something else comes along that shows otherwise.  Not that they are required to show me anything.


I wasn't saying being ambitious was an excuse for being mean/cruel. I was saying what leviosaurus said- that people like to paint women who are ambitious as cruel/biatchy, without cause.
 
Displayed 50 of 55 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.