Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   2025: A Space Odyssey   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line
    More: Cool  
•       •       •

1183 clicks; posted to STEM » and Main » on 01 Mar 2021 at 2:30 PM (7 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



39 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2021-03-01 2:34:12 PM  
I don't believe that for a minute.
 
2021-03-01 2:34:36 PM  
Do I get to have a bush baby for my birthday?
 
2021-03-01 2:39:17 PM  
Yeah. Never gonna happen.
 
2021-03-01 2:39:53 PM  
Dont forget to mention that the taxpayer will pay most of the costs and the company stock owners will be taking most of the profits.
 
2021-03-01 2:42:54 PM  
Guaranteed to be a complete boondoggle, and in the end, everybody will be asking where all the money went?
 
2021-03-01 3:16:40 PM  
You could put up a station with 3-4 inflatable modules from Bigelow, but that ain't gonna hold 100 people.
 
2021-03-01 3:17:24 PM  
It's Daily Mail. Now I know the atmosphere is a lie and Terra is just encased in a sphere with holes poked in it so we believe in stars.
 
2021-03-01 3:18:53 PM  
This has to stop.  If you're not going there to live there, you're just a tourist, and you should feel bad about your behavior.  Next thing you know there will be trophy hunters chasing big asteroids through the solar system, posing for pictures once captured, then tearing them to shreds for the delicious elements they contain.  They don't care that little Timmy the asteroid needed that gravity well.
 
2021-03-01 3:21:45 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-03-01 3:27:32 PM  
Laughable launch date of 2027 aside, I would like to point out that all of these pictures show stunning views of the earth. Wouldn't those views make you very dizzy considering the rotation of the space station?
 
2021-03-01 3:27:46 PM  

FrancoFile: You could put up a station with 3-4 inflatable modules from Bigelow, but that ain't gonna hold 100 people.


I bet I could make 'em fit.
 
2021-03-01 3:49:39 PM  

aungen: This has to stop.  If you're not going there to live there, you're just a tourist, and you should feel bad about your behavior.  Next thing you know there will be trophy hunters chasing big asteroids through the solar system, posing for pictures once captured, then tearing them to shreds for the delicious elements they contain.  They don't care that little Timmy the asteroid needed that gravity well.


"Won't anybody think of the satellites?"
 
2021-03-01 3:49:49 PM  

Sail The Wide Accountancy: Laughable launch date of 2027 aside, I would like to point out that all of these pictures show stunning views of the earth. Wouldn't those views make you very dizzy considering the rotation of the space station?


i.dailymail.co.ukView Full Size

Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.
 
2021-03-01 3:51:32 PM  
In fact, at that size, you could go up to 0.5G and it would be quite comfortable, at a mere 1.5 rotations per minute.
 
2021-03-01 4:04:13 PM  
I want one.
 
2021-03-01 4:10:37 PM  
Cinemas? For what? Some numbskull dullard is going to pay big bucks to go to space then get bored and want to watch xman comic shiat?
 
2021-03-01 4:11:29 PM  
Jem - They - Official Video
Youtube k53NGe64RBU
 
2021-03-01 4:11:37 PM  

duckpoopy: Cinemas? For what? Some numbskull dullard is going to pay big bucks to go to space then get bored and want to watch xman comic shiat?


Watching an IMAX film like "To Fly" in zero-G would be even more vertigo-inducing than it would be on earth.
 
2021-03-01 5:28:50 PM  
Considering how many people are rich enough to afford this, and how many of those are crazy enough to shell out for a ticket to space, they're seriously overestimating their capacity level.
 
2021-03-01 6:13:32 PM  

Theaetetus: Sail The Wide Accountancy: Laughable launch date of 2027 aside, I would like to point out that all of these pictures show stunning views of the earth. Wouldn't those views make you very dizzy considering the rotation of the space station?

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 850x478]
Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.


That's still pushing it, as far as I'm concerned.  But it's way better than zero-G.
 
2021-03-01 6:57:28 PM  

FrancoFile: duckpoopy: Cinemas? For what? Some numbskull dullard is going to pay big bucks to go to space then get bored and want to watch xman comic shiat?

Watching an IMAX film like "To Fly" in zero-G would be even more vertigo-inducing than it would be on earth.


is that how they spell vomit in England?
 
2021-03-01 7:00:43 PM  

FrancoFile: duckpoopy: Cinemas? For what? Some numbskull dullard is going to pay big bucks to go to space then get bored and want to watch xman comic shiat?

Watching an IMAX film like "To Fly" in zero-G would be even more vertigo-inducing than it would be on earth.


You owe me a new keyboard because I barfed all over mine just thinking about that.
 
2021-03-01 7:03:46 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-03-01 7:18:17 PM  

Xythero: I don't believe that for a minute.


Agreed. Show me their business plan, signed contracts with the current proven carriers, and that they have at least $500B in some bank to finance the first 1/3 of construction.
 
2021-03-01 7:22:11 PM  

dittybopper: FrancoFile: You could put up a station with 3-4 inflatable modules from Bigelow, but that ain't gonna hold 100 people.

I bet I could make 'em fit.


Black module of Calcutta?

The real story is the stuff of nightmares.
 
2021-03-01 7:25:53 PM  

aungen: Theaetetus: Sail The Wide Accountancy: Laughable launch date of 2027 aside, I would like to point out that all of these pictures show stunning views of the earth. Wouldn't those views make you very dizzy considering the rotation of the space station?

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 850x478]
Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.

That's still pushing it, as far as I'm concerned.  But it's way better than zero-G.


No, I get that you would want the spin, but wouldn't you not get a static view of the earth and stars and instead a constantly spinning one from your relative frame of reference?
 
2021-03-01 8:58:17 PM  

LewDux: [iFrame https://www.youtube.com/embed/k53NGe64​RBU?autoplay=1&widget_referrer=https%3​A%2F%2Fwww.fark.com&start=0&enablejsap​i=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fark.com&​widgetid=1]


Is she truly, truly outrageous. And where were the Holograms?
 
2021-03-01 8:59:42 PM  
About as believable as reviving a body that has been spaced for a millennia.
 
2021-03-01 9:09:50 PM  
I want to do it in zero G, not under artificial gravity. The whole point is to experience weightlessness, otherwise I might as well take a cruise and hang out near the pool.
 
2021-03-01 9:14:09 PM  

Saiga410: About as believable as reviving a body that has been spaced for a millennia.


How hard can it be?

Oh yeah. Practically impossible.

But how hard can it be?
 
2021-03-01 9:24:31 PM  

Sail The Wide Accountancy: aungen: Theaetetus: Sail The Wide Accountancy: Laughable launch date of 2027 aside, I would like to point out that all of these pictures show stunning views of the earth. Wouldn't those views make you very dizzy considering the rotation of the space station?

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 850x478]
Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.

That's still pushing it, as far as I'm concerned.  But it's way better than zero-G.

No, I get that you would want the spin, but wouldn't you not get a static view of the earth and stars and instead a constantly spinning one from your relative frame of reference?


You would, but it's slow. Not enough to make you dizzy.
 
2021-03-01 10:45:32 PM  

Theaetetus: Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.


OK, but docking those 24 shuttles ass-in to the outer edge of a rotating ring is going to be super fun... Hope they brought enough RCS fuel to share.
 
2021-03-01 11:29:11 PM  

LoneVVolf: Theaetetus: Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.

OK, but docking those 24 shuttles ass-in to the outer edge of a rotating ring is going to be super fun... Hope they brought enough RCS fuel to share.


My guess is that those are tiny escape shuttles so you wouldn't have to dock 'em, they'd be built in place. Otherwise, yeah, that would suck. Maybe dock them in the center, and then have a Canadarm to grab them and ferry them out to a resting place at the end?
 
2021-03-01 11:34:40 PM  

LoneVVolf: Theaetetus: Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.

OK, but docking those 24 shuttles ass-in to the outer edge of a rotating ring is going to be super fun... Hope they brought enough RCS fuel to share.


Looks to me like there's a central docking hub that doesn't rotate or maybe only rotates slowly.  You can see in the photo there's a larger ship docked there.  The ones around edges might be like escape life boats like Theasaurus or whatever said, so no need to dock them.
 
2021-03-02 12:14:18 AM  
Spoiler
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
My God, it's full of stars
Youtube -1KIMiKTKPw


And you just know that if you do manage to get up there, Kanye will be there talking about himself nonstop the whole time you're up there. Also the trip up and the voyage home.
 
2021-03-02 12:26:03 AM  

indy_kid: Xythero: I don't believe that for a minute.

Agreed. Show me their business plan, signed contracts with the current proven carriers, and that they have at least $500B in some bank to finance the first 1/3 of construction.


Yeah, do we even have the technology to do rotation at that scale in that environment?
 
2021-03-02 12:41:25 AM  

KarmicDisaster: I want to do it in zero G, not under artificial gravity. The whole point is to experience weightlessness, otherwise I might as well take a cruise and hang out near the pool.


Weightlessness is hard on the body. Almost immediately your head begins to swell with blood and you feel like it's going to pop, and as a result you develop acute headaches, you lose your sense of taste and smell, food isn't digested properly and there's no gravity to assist it when it comes out, you eventually develop cataracts and varicose veins, and ultimately your muscles and bones soften and decalcify.

It's a fun thing to do for a few minutes (couple hours tops), but you wouldn't want to live in that environment for any extended period of time. Astronauts go through extensive training and they have a vigorous workout regimen to keep themselves fit during long term space missions, and when they come back they can barely walk.

Your body evolved in a gravity well and it needs at least some semblance of downward pressure on it to continue functioning properly.
 
2021-03-02 6:17:53 AM  

Theaetetus: Sail The Wide Accountancy: Laughable launch date of 2027 aside, I would like to point out that all of these pictures show stunning views of the earth. Wouldn't those views make you very dizzy considering the rotation of the space station?

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 850x478]
Nah... Going by the first picture and assuming that's supposed to be SpaceX's Starship, it's 50m tall, so the ring looks approximately 200m in diameter. They talk about having lunar-equivalent acceleration, or 1.62m/s^2. Plug those numbers in here, and you get 0.86 rotations per minute. I think most people could ride that without being the slightest bit dizzy.


I have BPPV.  So aside the fact that the mixed signals I'd be getting from my eyes and ears would turn me into a lawn sprinkler of vomit, it would be wonderful to go up there and see the 'night sky' without an atmosphere.

then I remember that I'm not at minimum a millionaire and would never be able to afford this, and I feel better on missing out.
 
2021-03-02 2:51:18 PM  

indy_kid: dittybopper: FrancoFile: You could put up a station with 3-4 inflatable modules from Bigelow, but that ain't gonna hold 100 people.

I bet I could make 'em fit.

Black module of Calcutta?

The real story is the stuff of nightmares.


I was thinking more along the lines of "some disassembly required", but whateves.
 
Displayed 39 of 39 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.