Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NPR)   Erections have consequences   (npr.org) divider line
    More: Dumbass, Sexual intercourse, Criminal law, rapist Harvey Weinstein, Rape, Los Angeles County District Attorney, Human sexual behavior, Beverly Hills, DA Jackie Lacey's office  
•       •       •

3232 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 03 Oct 2020 at 2:53 AM (21 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



19 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2020-10-03 12:23:20 AM  
Bravo submitter. +1

Some of us are more discerning what we do with them, but don't ever let one go to waste.
 
2020-10-03 1:16:25 AM  
Shut up and take your +1, subby
 
2020-10-03 2:29:07 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-10-03 3:33:21 AM  

TwowheelinTim: Bravo submitter. +1

Some of us are more discerning what we do with them, but don't ever let one go to waste.


That's an awful lot of waking up in the middle of the night.
 
2020-10-03 4:05:57 AM  
A lot of love for Subby but I'm saying no, erections are inconsequential. Insisting on acting on the basis of the erection (aka thinking with one's dick) is up to the owner.

Love that line in Spies Like Us about how thinking with his dick got Chevy's character through high school...

encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.comView Full Size
 
2020-10-03 4:09:26 AM  

Aussie_As: A lot of love for Subby but I'm saying no, erections are inconsequential. Insisting on acting on the basis of the erection (aka thinking with one's dick) is up to the owner.

Love that line in Spies Like Us about how thinking with his dick got Chevy's character through high school...

[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 268x188]


reported for rape content!
 
2020-10-03 6:30:52 AM  
So basically most of Harvey's interactions with women consisted of, raping them, and wrecking their careers.
 
2020-10-03 8:12:07 AM  
Harvey's in deep doodoo again I see.
 
2020-10-03 8:20:11 AM  
Harvey is a scumbag, no doubt about it but FTFA "Weinstein allegedly raped another woman at a Beverly Hills hotel on two separate occasions in November 2009 and November 2010." The woman is claiming he raped her twice in a year. Why would she go back for seconds?
 
2020-10-03 8:47:55 AM  

Yellow Beard: Harvey is a scumbag, no doubt about it but FTFA "Weinstein allegedly raped another woman at a Beverly Hills hotel on two separate occasions in November 2009 and November 2010." The woman is claiming he raped her twice in a year. Why would she go back for seconds?


You seem stupid, so I'll try to make this simple for you.

Weinstein used sophisticated methods to bring women into his sole presence and trap them there: luring them to his hotel room under the pretense of a job offer, employing women to act as Judas goats (i.e. a woman typically feels less threatened in the presence of an unfamiliar man if there is another woman present) etc.

And he did this whilst working in the entertainment industry, targeting women in the entertainment industry.

Women who he raped had to meet him at social and business events after he had raped them, and pretend he didn't make their skin crawl. He was wealthy and connected - revealing that he had raped them would have destroyed their careers and (pre-MeToo) would not have harmed him.

Many actors and producers proclaimed shock and disbelief over the accusations against Weinstein - some spoke in defence of him. How is one 'literally who' supposed to convince people Weinstein was a rapist when most of the Hollywood A-list protect him?

His repeat victims, did not, as you seem to imagine, show up at his door daring him to rape them a second time. They likely wanted to move on with their lives whilst working in the industry they knew. Sadly, he would target them again.

Victim blame if you want, you're not making his victims look stupid, just yourself.
 
2020-10-03 8:48:03 AM  

Yellow Beard: Harvey is a scumbag, no doubt about it but FTFA "Weinstein allegedly raped another woman at a Beverly Hills hotel on two separate occasions in November 2009 and November 2010." The woman is claiming he raped her twice in a year. Why would she go back for seconds?


Because he had the power to ruin her career?
 
2020-10-03 9:27:49 AM  

Flappyhead: Yellow Beard: Harvey is a scumbag, no doubt about it but FTFA "Weinstein allegedly raped another woman at a Beverly Hills hotel on two separate occasions in November 2009 and November 2010." The woman is claiming he raped her twice in a year. Why would she go back for seconds?

Because he had the power to ruin her career?


And had done so befire with women who had told him "no".
 
2020-10-03 11:01:25 AM  

Yellow Beard: Harvey is a scumbag, no doubt about it but FTFA "Weinstein allegedly raped another woman at a Beverly Hills hotel on two separate occasions in November 2009 and November 2010." The woman is claiming he raped her twice in a year. Why would she go back for seconds?


Stockholm Syndrome...or something like it.  You want a career in Hollywood, you're raped by fat ugly men.  Only, it's not limited to Hollywood.  Want to feed your family working as a hotel maid?  Out-of-town rapers.  And so on, pretty much every industry inbetween.
 
2020-10-03 11:24:00 AM  
Gwyneth Paltrow on How Brad Pitt Stood Up to Harvey Weinstein
Youtube uWtoR5_-EbU
 
2020-10-03 11:41:05 AM  
A rich man's Sam Losco. Freaking caveman.
 
2020-10-03 2:48:36 PM  
Weinstein is garbage, but how can you prosecute something that is at this point 15/16 years old?  There is zero physical evidence.  It's all hearsay.  This in no way means he isn't guilty, but wouldn't it be he said/she said?
 
2020-10-03 3:59:39 PM  
Erections have consequences, Subby?

They sure do!

Look in a mirror.

{|P^D>
 
2020-10-03 4:09:46 PM  

mjbok: Weinstein is garbage, but how can you prosecute something that is at this point 15/16 years old?  There is zero physical evidence.  It's all hearsay.  This in no way means he isn't guilty, but wouldn't it be he said/she said?


Testimony is a kind of evidence. The accuser's testimony is evidence. Testimony from witnesses is evidence.
 
2020-10-03 5:11:43 PM  
In this case, it's where ya stick it.
Without permission...

No trespassing
Unless you're invited
 
Displayed 19 of 19 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.