Number 216: Good for him[Fark user image 425x457]A slingshot would've worked too
FirstDennis: If you have to operate it with a remote control it's not a robot.Just sayin
SuperChuck: Doesn't it defeat the purpose of social distancing if they end up eating the candy that you were handling a few minutes before?
morg: I don't know if I'd trust a robot to deliver candy. Aren't they usually stealing old people's medicine?
Wine Sipping Elitist: traffic lights are robots, and at intersections we would look for the control box
lukeyes: "If you have to operate it with a remote control it's not a robot.Just sayin" - yeah, I hear that a lot. I originally started with him being autonomous, but I'm just a guy in his garage and quickly learned that some sonar sensors and a camera are not enough to make a human-sized robot safe around kids. But hey, if you got any code to share that can help me out - I'm all for it.
Wine Sipping Elitist: FirstDennis: If you have to operate it with a remote control it's not a robot.Just sayinI've always told my kids that the automatic doors at grocery stores and traffic lights are robots
Want more stories with less ads? Try
It's what the cool kids are doing.It also helps us pay the bills.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2020 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Nov 25 2020 23:49:53
Runtime: 0.342 sec (341 ms)