Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Senator Kamala Harris is truly in "unpresidented" waters with her seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee and her role as Vice President nominee   (yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Interesting, Supreme Court of the United States, United States Senate, Sen. Kamala Harris, Vice President of the United States, President of the United States, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Calvin Coolidge, campaign trail  
•       •       •

1487 clicks; posted to Politics » on 28 Sep 2020 at 7:02 PM (4 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



47 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2020-09-28 1:26:25 PM  
Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.
 
2020-09-28 1:43:17 PM  

Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.


No, silly, on libs can be biased. Conservatives are always perfectly fair and even (One could even say balanced) in their judgments.

/s
 
2020-09-28 5:58:12 PM  

Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.


Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.
 
2020-09-28 6:33:22 PM  

Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


Some say troll, I say threadkiller
 
2020-09-28 6:53:37 PM  
When did conflicts of interest start mattering again? I ask because there's a nasty orange man who seems to be made of nothing but conflicts of interest that nobody seems to be doing anything about.....
 
2020-09-28 7:06:11 PM  

Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


How full of shiat can you become?
 
2020-09-28 7:06:59 PM  

Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


Do not refer to human women as "females," you dumb man. This isn't a farking Attenborough special.
 
2020-09-28 7:07:28 PM  

Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


It's easy to provide an unbiased up down vote when the president nominates someone with under 5 years experience and blatant issues with established precedents. It's not much of a headscratcher to determine whether or not a cultist who is open about their fringe beliefs should be on the highest court.
 
2020-09-28 7:08:32 PM  

semiautomagic: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

Do not refer to human women as "females," you dumb man. This isn't a farking Attenborough special.


It's incel speak.  Explains a lot.
 
2020-09-28 7:09:21 PM  
Every Democrat on the committee should yield their time to Harris
 
2020-09-28 7:10:32 PM  

Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?


I have him farkied as "true to farkonym"
 
2020-09-28 7:10:41 PM  

Flappyhead: semiautomagic: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

Do not refer to human women as "females," you dumb man. This isn't a farking Attenborough special.

It's incel speak.  Explains a lot.


Yes, it is, and yes, it does. Though the username explains a lot in itself.
 
2020-09-28 7:11:26 PM  

Il Douchey: Kammie Harris already alienates most females;


I guess because no one is familiar with her?

Because i don't think Kamala Harris is alienating females.
 
2020-09-28 7:13:08 PM  
Just report it and move on, Farkers.
 
2020-09-28 7:14:21 PM  

Flappyhead: semiautomagic: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

Do not refer to human women as "females," you dumb man. This isn't a farking Attenborough special.

It's incel speak.  Explains a lot.


Hey, at least he didn't use "femoid"
 
2020-09-28 7:14:24 PM  
You're not getting a conservative court, bra.  Your majority will last only as long enough for Dems to add seats to the USSC and Biden to nominate the new justices.

The country isn't moving backwards on health, the environment or women's rights.  Especially not due to the last couple of decades of republicans gaming the system.

If you want to end a right to legal abortion then you're going to have to do it the old-fashioned way: by convincing enough of your countrymen of the righteousness of your position that they vote your way in a democratic election.  Your going to have to talk to the people you disagree with, not play war games fantasizing about killing them.

That you have all but given up on that speaks to both the weakness of your moral position and that you have internalized on some level that these issues are something others have given a lot of consideration to but have reached different conclusions than you.  You want to pretend the choice to get an abortion is as easy as ordering a latte but you know in your hearts that practically every woman that makes that choice struggles mightily with the decision.
 
2020-09-28 7:15:08 PM  
Let's see if she actually kicks this religious cray cray to the curb.
 
2020-09-28 7:16:21 PM  
Let her do her best Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction impersonation.
Can't wait.
 
2020-09-28 7:18:36 PM  

Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?


MORE?
 
2020-09-28 7:20:59 PM  

Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


what if "ACB" is allowed to have her husband at the hearings to help her answer Harris's attacks?
 
2020-09-28 7:21:31 PM  

Bootleg: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

No, silly, on libs can be biased. Conservatives are always perfectly fair and even (One could even say balanced) in their judgments.

/s


You joke, but they unironically believe that they are paragons of rationality and the people who disagree with them are actually disagreeing with cold hard "logic" and not, in fact, the flimsy after-the-fact rationalizations used to cover up what they've already decided is true.
 
2020-09-28 7:21:43 PM  

dionysusaur: Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?

I have him farkied as "true to farkonym"


Makes sense.
 
2020-09-28 7:22:11 PM  

semiautomagic: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

Do not refer to human women as "females," you dumb man. This isn't a farking Attenborough special.


He's still butthurt that Senator Harris made Brett Kavanagh cry.
 
2020-09-28 7:23:11 PM  

NM Volunteer: Just report it and move on, Farkers.


I've recently also:

Fark user image

It cleaned this mess up nicely.
 
2020-09-28 7:23:12 PM  
That article reminded me that Robert Bork is dead, and the world is a better place.
 
2020-09-28 7:24:13 PM  
A lot of things are unprecedented these days.  Mostly on the Republican side of things.
 
2020-09-28 7:24:16 PM  
/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


i just tasted a little vomit in the back of my throat
 
2020-09-28 7:24:59 PM  

NM Volunteer: Just report it and move on, Farkers.


That would work if the moderators actually cared.  Since it generates replies they are more then happy with it.   Might even be an alt.
 
2020-09-28 7:26:06 PM  
share.gifyoutube.comView Full Size
 
2020-09-28 7:29:07 PM  

WithinReason: what if "ACB" is allowed to have her husband at the hearings to help her answer Harris's attacks?


Every question should end with that.  "Now, do you need to check with your husband before you answer the question I just asked?"

Come on, Senators!  Do it. DOooooo ittttt.
 
2020-09-28 7:32:06 PM  

Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.


Reich wing lunatics are completely invincible to accusations of hypocrisy because they *actually* believe there should be one set of rules that frees them from consequence and another than chains everyone else.
 
2020-09-28 7:37:31 PM  
Barrett might believe she has to take orders from her husband, but she doesn't think she has to take orders from you.  These Christianist terrorists only believe in a hierarchy among themselves.  Everyone else is beneath them.  If you're not one of them, they hold you in the utmost contempt.  Every sneering "Do you have to ask your husband first?" comment is useless coming from you, because you're filth to them.  You're ants.  They don't care.
 
2020-09-28 7:40:26 PM  

Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?


Septic tanks have envy
 
2020-09-28 7:42:49 PM  

Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?


None more full.
 
2020-09-28 7:44:00 PM  

Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.


When was the last time you got laid bud? Pretty sure it's been an... involuntarily long stretch of celibacy.
 
2020-09-28 7:47:32 PM  

NM Volunteer: Just report it and move on, Farkers.


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-09-28 7:52:21 PM  

DrD'isInfotainment: Let her do her best Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction impersonation.
Can't wait.


NSFW!
Samuel L. Jackson Takes Down Kavanaugh In Hilarious Mash-Up Of The Senate Hearing & 'Pulp Fiction'
Youtube pR5ushM2_gQ
 
2020-09-28 7:55:46 PM  

Surrender your boo-tah: When was the last time you got laid bud? Pretty sure it's been an... involuntarily long stretch of celibacy.


Weird, since your bolding highlighted the contrast and made concentrated my annoyance... That is less offensive, to me, and less telling than the name used for the senator and VP nominee.
 
2020-09-28 7:57:51 PM  

BMulligan: Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?

None more full.


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-09-28 7:59:54 PM  
Oh goody, I can add "ACB", a nickname that is both gross and unearned, to "Democrat Party" on my easy way to spot a Farker who has nothing worthwhile to contribute list.
 
2020-09-28 8:05:54 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-09-28 8:10:56 PM  

Mitt Romneys Tax Return: Oh goody, I can add "ACB", a nickname that is both gross and unearned, to "Democrat Party" on my easy way to spot a Farker who has nothing worthwhile to contribute list.


You might as well go ahead and add "referring to women as 'females'" to that list.  You'll find a whole lot of overlap between them, though, so maybe it's redundant.
 
2020-09-28 8:15:49 PM  

Katolu: Il Douchey: Serious Black: Difficulty: if Senator Harris is too biased to provide a fair up-or-down vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to sit on SCOTUS, Amy Coney Barrett is too biased to provide a fair vote on a Biden v. Trump or Trump v. Biden SCOTUS case.

Senator Harris will absolutely get to provide a "fair up-or down vote" on ACB just like every other Senator.  The Judiciary Committee just runs the hearings, if they have them.  I hope they do have them because Kammie Harris already alienates most females; seeing her try to attack another woman should turn even more people off to her.

/Difficulty overcome, SeriousB.!  -I think now we can all agree that ACB is unbiased enough to provide a fair vote should there be a Trump v. Biden case.

How full of shiat can you become?


So full that his eyes are dark brown and it oozes out of his ears.
 
2020-09-28 8:18:43 PM  

Bovine Diarrhea Virus: That article reminded me that Robert Bork is dead, and the world is a better place.


It is truly sad that his name has come to mean unjustly screwing someone over.

Bork deserved to be in jail, not on the Supreme Court.
 
2020-09-28 8:20:40 PM  
New Farkin User Name:

Organic gynoid?
 
2020-09-28 8:43:37 PM  
I really wanna disappoint the hell out of her
 
2020-09-29 11:21:33 AM  
It's going to be a shiatshow with a Presidential Candidate leading the charge against Trump's stupid vapid religious nut.   The derpers are going to have a field day with this.
 
Displayed 47 of 47 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.