Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Law and Crime)   If the DNA evidence will exonerate him, why is he fighting so hard against releasing it?   (lawandcrime.com) divider line
    More: Interesting, Supreme Court of the United States, President Donald Trump, Court's Preliminary Conference Order, United States, State supreme court, Appeal, President of the United States, New York Supreme Court  
•       •       •

5507 clicks; posted to Politics » and Main » on 11 Aug 2020 at 8:50 AM (5 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



96 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2020-08-11 7:43:30 AM  
Because it could be used to prove that Eric is really his son, or Gary Busey's. Neither is good news.
 
2020-08-11 7:57:11 AM  
Because 99.9999% of the time, everything he says is opposite.
He knows it will condemn him.
 
2020-08-11 8:03:14 AM  
Even if it clears him of this case, the evidence can and will be used against him in others.
 
2020-08-11 8:16:26 AM  
The President has left a lot of semen in a lot of places that he really shouldn't have.  He makes Bill Clinton look like a saint.
 
2020-08-11 8:28:44 AM  
He objects on principle- the principle that no one can make him do anything.  It's the only principle he's got, and he's sticking with it.
 
2020-08-11 8:36:05 AM  
Maybe I overlooked it in TFA, but:  what do they have DNA from, that they're hoping to compare with his?
 
2020-08-11 8:45:46 AM  
"As a result of that decision, the relevant deadlines in the Court's Preliminary Conference Order dated December 12, 2020 are no longer 'temporarily stayed," the letter sent to Trump attorney Marc Kasowitz notes. "This letter sets forth our understanding of the current status of this case and discovery in this case as a result of the Court's recent decision."

Looks like someone's been farking around with Obama's time machine again.
 
2020-08-11 8:53:50 AM  

Marcus Aurelius: The President has left a lot of semen in a lot of places that he really shouldn't have.  He makes Bill Clinton look like a saint.


Maybe they could swap Ivanka for it?
 
2020-08-11 8:55:18 AM  

Naido: Maybe I overlooked it in TFA, but:  what do they have DNA from, that they're hoping to compare with his?


A dress that she's kept
 
2020-08-11 8:56:19 AM  
He's afraid the DNA will reveal he's reptilian
 
2020-08-11 8:59:03 AM  

Naido: Maybe I overlooked it in TFA, but:  what do they have DNA from, that they're hoping to compare with his?


Jean Carroll has a dress with stains on it, because this is the laziest timeline.
 
2020-08-11 9:00:33 AM  
Ditto for his tax returns. And given his penchant for projection and apparent desire to break every law on the books, I'm curious about his 'long form' birth certificate and college transcripts and whatever other unreasonable shiat he demanded from Obama.
 
2020-08-11 9:00:43 AM  
Just put it on Maury Povich & he'll be all about it.
 
2020-08-11 9:01:26 AM  
I think it is time to remind the GOP that Clinton turned his over.  Someone should call Kenneth Starr and ask him what the difference was between a consensual relationship and rape.
 
2020-08-11 9:01:33 AM  

Im_Gumby: Because 99.9999% of the time, everything he says is opposite.
He knows it will condemn him.


I don't think his voters will believe their God-King could do wrong.  Even proof that he raped someone, whether it be an adult in a changing room, or a 13-year-old at one of Epstein's parties, would likely be rationalized with she-was-asking-for-it and he-can-grab-my-pussy, or they will just live in fantasy land where Trump is an orange Jesus.
 
2020-08-11 9:01:51 AM  
I could be totally wrong about this because I am pretty awful at science, but could Mary Trump's DNA be used to at least show a related match to whatever DNA evidence Carroll has? I imagine it would not be a match the way Trump's would be, but it would still be a much higher percentage of a match than a random person's DNA.

Mary Trump might be willing to give a sample for the sake of science.

/Science!
 
2020-08-11 9:01:59 AM  
Because it matches other unsolved rapes
 
2020-08-11 9:02:38 AM  

LordJiro: Ditto for his tax returns. And given his penchant for projection and apparent desire to break every law on the books, I'm curious about his 'long form' birth certificate and college transcripts and whatever other unreasonable shiat he demanded from Obama.


The plan with all this shiat is to appeal it into oblivion until he either croaks or touches down in a non-extradition jurisdiction.
 
2020-08-11 9:03:55 AM  

LordJiro: Ditto for his tax returns. And given his penchant for projection and apparent desire to break every law on the books, I'm curious about his 'long form' birth certificate and college transcripts and whatever other unreasonable shiat he demanded from Obama.


Seeing how eloquent he is with his tweets, I want to see proof that he actually went to an Ivy League school and not Whatsamatta U.
 
2020-08-11 9:04:07 AM  
A DNA database of every aborted fetus would sure be interesting.
 
2020-08-11 9:04:57 AM  
Two reasons:

1. Much like heartbeats, you are given a certain amount of DNA at birth. You cannot have parts of you scraped away like that.

2. He's afraid that once technology advances sufficiently they will be able to clone him from his DNA and he will find himself a slave in a dystopian future. No wait, that's my fear.
 
2020-08-11 9:06:26 AM  

Glorious Golden Ass: Im_Gumby: Because 99.9999% of the time, everything he says is opposite.
He knows it will condemn him.

I don't think his voters will believe their God-King could do wrong.  Even proof that he raped someone, whether it be an adult in a changing room, or a 13-year-old at one of Epstein's parties, would likely be rationalized with she-was-asking-for-it and he-can-grab-my-pussy, or they will just live in fantasy land where Trump is an orange Jesus.


They literally say that he talks about a consensual relationship when people bring up the whole "walk up and grab them by the pussy, when you're powerful they let you".. all because he said that "they let you"
 
2020-08-11 9:06:34 AM  
Why?  Ima guess it's because you only have so much DNA--A person, like a battery, is born with a finite amount of energy DNA .
 
2020-08-11 9:06:48 AM  

Marcus Aurelius: The President has left a lot of semen in a lot of places that he really shouldn't have.  He makes Bill Clinton look like a saint.


Basically this. He likely has no idea whether he did, or didn't, do what she is accusing him of, because he did (and likely still does) shiat like that all the time but her individuality has been lost in the sea of women he has assaulted. It's like asking a traveling business person to remember a specific Yellow Cab in Manhattan during the 80's.
 
2020-08-11 9:07:46 AM  

Glorious Golden Ass: Im_Gumby: Because 99.9999% of the time, everything he says is opposite.
He knows it will condemn him.

I don't think his voters will believe their God-King could do wrong.  Even proof that he raped someone, whether it be an adult in a changing room, or a 13-year-old at one of Epstein's parties, would likely be rationalized with she-was-asking-for-it and he-can-grab-my-pussy, or they will just live in fantasy land where Trump is an orange Jesus.


why would they, he indulges in everything they could ever wish for but will never achieve
he's as shiat as they are
 
2020-08-11 9:11:17 AM  

saywhonow: Marcus Aurelius: The President has left a lot of semen in a lot of places that he really shouldn't have.  He makes Bill Clinton look like a saint.

Maybe they could swap Ivanka for it?


Swap Ivanka for a DNA sample

Seems like a fair trade
 
2020-08-11 9:12:50 AM  
He made his DNA sign an NDA, AND you can suck a NAD, DAN.

/ADN
 
2020-08-11 9:13:07 AM  
Thinking about trump leaving DNA everywhere isn't really how I planned to spend my morning
 
2020-08-11 9:13:47 AM  
Here's her initial accusation:

https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald​-​trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hid​eous-men.html

(It's a pain to find it in Google, so there it is. I'd like to note that while, even with this accusation, Trump is at #20 on her list of hideous men, Roger Ailes is casually noted as #16. So Trump can't even top *this* list.)
 
2020-08-11 9:15:30 AM  
Maybe he is a member of the central park five.
 
2020-08-11 9:17:39 AM  

LordJiro: Ditto for his tax returns. And given his penchant for projection and apparent desire to break every law on the books, I'm curious about his 'long form' birth certificate and college transcripts and whatever other unreasonable shiat he demanded from Obama.


"shiat he demanded from Obama"

This.....this is the s*** that p***es me off - the sheer, gargantuan, bald-faced freaking hypocrisy of the man.
 
2020-08-11 9:19:17 AM  

toejam: Two reasons:

1. Much like heartbeats, you are given a certain amount of DNA at birth. You cannot have parts of you scraped away like that.


You are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me, you don't. I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about. This is how bad info gets passed around. If you don't know about the topic.  Don't make yourself sound like you do, because some Farkers believe anything they hear.

Your body can make additional copies of DNA, but they are just that.  Copies.  You know what happens at work when you lose something so you make a copy of a copy and then copy it a few more times?  It starts to get errors.  Those errors show up as black spots on the paper at work, but in your body they are cancer.
 
2020-08-11 9:19:49 AM  

Cyber Duck: He's afraid the DNA will reveal he's reptilian


images-wixmp-ed30a86b8c4ca887773594c2.wixmp.comView Full Size
 
2020-08-11 9:19:50 AM  

Harry Wagstaff: Maybe he is a member of the central park five.


That would have involved running. I doubt Donnie has the stamina to chase down a jogger even so long ago
 
2020-08-11 9:20:26 AM  
Because he's guilty?  And he knows it?  And every re-publican conservative moron knows it?
 
2020-08-11 9:23:27 AM  

Dr Dreidel: Jean Carroll has a dress with stains on it


I sure hope she's pre-Marie Kondo!
 
2020-08-11 9:25:32 AM  

Officer Barrelroll: I could be totally wrong about this because I am pretty awful at science, but could Mary Trump's DNA be used to at least show a related match to whatever DNA evidence Carroll has? I imagine it would not be a match the way Trump's would be, but it would still be a much higher percentage of a match than a random person's DNA.

Mary Trump might be willing to give a sample for the sake of science.

/Science!


Yes, she could help establish a likely familial match.
 
2020-08-11 9:26:29 AM  
Narrator: It won't.
 
2020-08-11 9:27:33 AM  

RogermcAllen: toejam: Two reasons:

1. Much like heartbeats, you are given a certain amount of DNA at birth. You cannot have parts of you scraped away like that.

You are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me, you don't. I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about. This is how bad info gets passed around. If you don't know about the topic.  Don't make yourself sound like you do, because some Farkers believe anything they hear.

Your body can make additional copies of DNA, but they are just that.  Copies.  You know what happens at work when you lose something so you make a copy of a copy and then copy it a few more times?  It starts to get errors.  Those errors show up as black spots on the paper at work, but in your body they are cancer.


Plenty of Farkers are getting a kick out of this comment...
 
2020-08-11 9:28:19 AM  

Marcus Aurelius: The President has left a lot of semen in a lot of places that he really shouldn't have.  He makes Bill Clinton look like a saint.


*hurl* Yeah, but they're like Homer Simpson's sperm, swimming around bouncing off each other. How else can you explain Don Jr?
 
2020-08-11 9:30:13 AM  
Can we all agree that at he most likely has not been depositing DNA for at least 5-10 years by now?  He is old and not in good shape, doubtful he can still do those things, and I doubt Melanoma would allow it without further adjustments to the prenup.
 
2020-08-11 9:30:48 AM  
The DNA will prove once and for all that Martin Shkreli is his kid.

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-08-11 9:31:32 AM  
Supposedly there are other kids, with his housekeeper for example, that could be outed by DNA.
 
2020-08-11 9:32:13 AM  
thisshiatagain?.jpg
 
2020-08-11 9:35:41 AM  
Possibilities?

1. He is afraid somebody will clone him, so after he loses, the United States will be able to hang him over and over again for his treason
2. He is actually a reptilian of the ruling class, and is afraid of being exposed
3. He's afraid the DNA will reveal his various mental issues, and scientists will be able to determine his actual low double digit IQ
4. He is the real Zodiac Killer, and his DNA will prove that. Ted Cruz, the sycophant that he is, is actually just covering for him.
5. He's afraid of being told, by Maury Povich, "you ARE NOT the father" of (Substitute: Junior or Barron)
6. He's afraid of being told, by Maury Povich, "you ARE the father" of Eric
 
2020-08-11 9:37:05 AM  

fernt: thisshiatagain?.jpg


Now fernt it
Into shape
Shape it up
Get straight
Go forward
Move ahead
Try to detect it
It's not too late
To fernt it
Fernt it good
 
2020-08-11 9:38:49 AM  

RogermcAllen: toejam: Two reasons:

1. Much like heartbeats, you are given a certain amount of DNA at birth. You cannot have parts of you scraped away like that.

You are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me, you don't. I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about. This is how bad info gets passed around. If you don't know about the topic.  Don't make yourself sound like you do, because some Farkers believe anything they hear.

Your body can make additional copies of DNA, but they are just that.  Copies.  You know what happens at work when you lose something so you make a copy of a copy and then copy it a few more times?  It starts to get errors.  Those errors show up as black spots on the paper at work, but in your body they are cancer.


I thought my answers were so absurd that they no one could possibly think I was serious. In this timeline I shouldn't be surprised that someone did. Unless you're joking. I can't tell any more.
 
2020-08-11 9:43:09 AM  
If he had been this strict about controlling access to his DNA his entire life, he wouldn't be in this damn mess now would he?
 
2020-08-11 9:43:55 AM  

Officer Barrelroll: I could be totally wrong about this because I am pretty awful at science, but could Mary Trump's DNA be used to at least show a related match to whatever DNA evidence Carroll has? I imagine it would not be a match the way Trump's would be, but it would still be a much higher percentage of a match than a random person's DNA.

Mary Trump might be willing to give a sample for the sake of science.

/Science!


I had the same thought, except then #2Scoops* would simply crow that it was Mary did all of the rapes! [law & order sound dot AIFF]
(or, something-something dark family secret, she was adopted or mitosisized from a lizard-people scraping, or something.)

/mar-a-lago delenda est.
//be pretty thigh-larious to clock DNA ancestry on the entirety of #TrumpCrimeFamily, though!
///turns out I'M ERIC is cognate to... slime molds and failed orthodontists.
 
2020-08-11 9:45:31 AM  

Officer Barrelroll: I could be totally wrong about this because I am pretty awful at science, but could Mary Trump's DNA be used to at least show a related match to whatever DNA evidence Carroll has? I imagine it would not be a match the way Trump's would be, but it would still be a much higher percentage of a match than a random person's DNA.

Mary Trump might be willing to give a sample for the sake of science.

/Science!


I see what you're getting at here, but alas, no, that won't work.

DNA is much more complicated than that.  Some 99.9% of ALL human DNA is the same.  That's what makes us a species.  That .1% is what is used to make a match to a single human.  Trump's children would be a closer match.  And even THAT wouldn't be accurate enough.  They have DNA from one of 3 different wives also...  Trump's niece is so far removed, that he DNA might be closer to yours than to Trump's.
 
Displayed 50 of 96 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.