Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(SFGate)   Silicon Valley investor sparks privilege backlash after advertising for 'best teacher in Bay Area' to create micro-school of seven kids in his backyard and promising a salary that will 'beat whatever they are getting paid'   (sfgate.com) divider line
    More: Murica, Silicon Valley, High school, San Francisco Bay Area, Education, School, Twitter, San Jose, California, School districts  
•       •       •

2596 clicks; posted to Main » on 06 Aug 2020 at 5:30 AM (16 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

 
2020-08-06 5:50:49 AM  
15 votes:
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this other than the optics. I am a firm believers the top ~ 12% of kids regardless of race, creed, color, or socio-economic status should be be removed from regular public schools and put in charter schools designed to train them to run America with extra money given to the parents (based on means testing) to support their entire family at a comfortable family income.
 
2020-08-06 6:20:15 AM  
14 votes:

tuxq: If this were not a pandemic, I'd probably feel the same way the author wants me to feel. What he's doing is socially responsible for both the teacher and children. Small class, outdoors, and good pay for the teacher?

There used to be a time where we didn't use groupthink to convince ourselves that envy is someone else's fault. Take your ass to jelly school because if I had school-age kids right now and could afford to hire a private teacher, you bet your ass I would.


Or he could put his money into ensuring that all kids get the same or similar opportunities as his own kids. The erosion of greater societal responsibility, civics, and concepts of brotherhood in this country has done a ridiculous amount of damage. People regressing harder and harder to this state ("me and mine" mentalities, even for good and understandable reasons like wanting the best for your kids) moves us further and further away from the idea that all people are created equal.
 
2020-08-06 6:24:14 AM  
10 votes:

Harry_Seldon: I see absolutely nothing wrong with this other than the optics. I am a firm believers the top ~ 12% of kids regardless of race, creed, color, or socio-economic status should be be removed from regular public schools and put in charter schools designed to train them to run America with extra money given to the parents (based on means testing) to support their entire family at a comfortable family income.


Sounds like you want to start some sort of Foundation to oversee this.
 
2020-08-06 6:30:35 AM  
6 votes:
That's a very good idea.  Ordinary parents could get on board with this too, pool money and hire teachers for their kids.  Or maybe even start whole schools.  Heck, maybe the government could pitch in and use tax dollars to open "public" schools that anyone could enroll in. And by making the schools public we can take agency completely out of the parents' hands and the government could decide how and what to teach kids!  Just think, we can make "education" mean whatever we want!  Finally, a chance to clean up history; we just need to teach it in the most inclusive context possible, since as we all know, the least important things about history is what actually happened... We need to make sure western culture is put in the correct perspective, because even though it generated the mightiest and freest nation to ever grace the Earth, it did a lot of mean things along the way and hence must be reviled.  I guess we can take a crack at teaching math and science too, but who really cares about those, let's just double down on social indoctrination.  And we will lump bad students together with good students to make sure everyone has equal outcomes!

...On second thought, maybe the private teacher isn't such a bad idea after all.
 
2020-08-06 5:43:26 AM  
6 votes:
If this were not a pandemic, I'd probably feel the same way the author wants me to feel. What he's doing is socially responsible for both the teacher and children. Small class, outdoors, and good pay for the teacher?

There used to be a time where we didn't use groupthink to convince ourselves that envy is someone else's fault. Take your ass to jelly school because if I had school-age kids right now and could afford to hire a private teacher, you bet your ass I would.
 
2020-08-06 6:29:39 AM  
5 votes:

hissatsu: Harry_Seldon: I see absolutely nothing wrong with this other than the optics. I am a firm believers the top ~ 12% of kids regardless of race, creed, color, or socio-economic status should be be removed from regular public schools and put in charter schools designed to train them to run America with extra money given to the parents (based on means testing) to support their entire family at a comfortable family income.

Sounds like you want to start some sort of Foundation to oversee this.


Two foundations. One at either end of the country.
 
2020-08-06 6:24:45 AM  
4 votes:
Fark user imageView Full Size

He's also in Epstein's little black book. Take that for what you will.
 
2020-08-06 6:01:39 AM  
4 votes:
I now have a nanny watching my toddler. Should I fire her because other people cannot afford nannies ?
 
2020-08-06 8:44:35 AM  
3 votes:
smbc-comics.comView Full Size
 
2020-08-06 7:59:54 AM  
3 votes:

Chief Superintendent Lookout: [images.fineartamerica.com image 850x646]

So, basically a one-room school house, which was typical in the US through the early 20th Century.  This was actually socialisms because the people of the town would collective gather money and materials to build a school and hire a teacher or two.  That's how the US went down the toilet, because the socialisms got us early.

Lock him up!!!


People had the ability to opt out then. Not so with modern-day socialism you seem to champion. Big difference.
 
2020-08-06 7:53:40 AM  
3 votes:
I wouldn't last a week working for a rich douchebag. Hell, I've had two jobs in my life where I was working with country club types. Both jobs I quit after the first day.
 
2020-08-06 7:22:23 AM  
3 votes:
images.fineartamerica.comView Full Size


So, basically a one-room school house, which was typical in the US through the early 20th Century.  This was actually socialisms because the people of the town would collective gather money and materials to build a school and hire a teacher or two.  That's how the US went down the toilet, because the socialisms got us early.

Lock him up!!!
 
2020-08-06 6:54:49 AM  
3 votes:
Holy shiat it smells libertarian in here.

/nachos and ballsack, if you're wondering
 
2020-08-06 5:58:39 AM  
3 votes:

CarnySaur: Sounds like we're reverting to the 19th century.  Yipee!


hey, the chicks were easier back then.
 
2020-08-06 5:57:45 AM  
3 votes:

Harry_Seldon: ds regardless of race, creed, color, or socio-economic status should be be removed from regular public schools and put in charter schools designed to train them to run America with extra money given to the parents (based on means testing) to support their entire family at a comfortable family income.


I started to agree with you and then you lost me.  I have also discussed doing this with Mrs. SLEZE but we certainly can't afford it.  Good for him if he can.  People send their kids to private school.  People have private tutors (hell, I took SAT prep classes like a lot of kids do).  This is no different.

That being said, a good public school will prepare kids as well as any prep school.
 
2020-08-06 12:14:47 PM  
2 votes:
Hey dumb fooks:

capitalism = system of privilege is for sale

If there is no capped top end to what you can buy and privatize, then there isn't and as it is we the people it means  that's what we wanted.
We want privilege. Humans the world over desire personal privileges.

The bell curve rules and that's what we are.

So stop acting like that's not true, and that when you dam someone for theirs your a hypocrite f you take the privilege of eating a meal is any of your fellow citizens go without today.
Or the privilege of sleeping in doors when your fellow citizens go without.
 
2020-08-06 9:55:01 AM  
2 votes:
And there's so many homeless miniature giraffes he could buy with that money.
 
2020-08-06 9:53:47 AM  
2 votes:
I'm sure all that jealousy privilege shaming will make him change his ways.
 
2020-08-06 9:07:08 AM  
2 votes:
I guess "education should be accessible for everyone regardless of class" is a big controversial stance in here.
 
2020-08-06 6:38:53 AM  
2 votes:
Here's an idea. How 'bout we pay teachers what they're worth?
 
2020-08-06 6:27:23 AM  
2 votes:
Good.  Maybe if enough rich twats decided to snipe teachers for private tutors, the public schools will be forced to pay teachers more.

Hahahahaha that will never happen.  It will be like the businesses looking for someone with a Master's degree in computer science and 5 years experience with software that has been out for one year, willing to start at $8 an hour, and wondering why nobody is applying for the job.
 
2020-08-06 6:02:23 AM  
2 votes:
The only reason I don't do something like this myself is a lack of money.

We currently pay more on school fees than our mortgage, to send our kids to a private school that is better in all the ways we care about than the local taxpayer funded schools.

The local high school in particular has serious issues with bullying, and I will quite happily pay serious money to avoid exposing our kids to that.

I've never understood the anger directed at people able to buy a better life for their family. Especially when a lot of that anger is to be found among proponents of the systems the rich can buy their freedom from.

It comes over a little as a refusal to admit that there can be something wrong with socialised systems.
 
2020-08-06 2:40:55 PM  
1 vote:
There would be absolutely nothing wrong with this.

IF, and ONLY IF, there were laws around this kind of educational activity which forced the private provider to give half the places in these micro-schools to academically bright students from schools in poor areas.

THEN all would be well.

As he is doing this now though it is a huge expression of rich people's sense of privilege.
 
2020-08-06 2:26:51 PM  
1 vote:
What else are rich people not allowed to have because you can't afford it.?
 
2020-08-06 1:50:23 PM  
1 vote:

Chief Superintendent Lookout: So, basically a one-room school house, which was typical in the US through the early 20th Century. This was actually socialisms because the people of the town would collective gather money and materials to build a school and hire a teacher or two.


Actually the opposite of socialism, because the most common way to build and fund these schools was to ask for voluntary donations, or charge the parents, instead of taxing everyone in town.

Back then, you only got tax-funded schools in the bigger towns, not the ones with one room schoolhouses.
 
2020-08-06 1:12:53 PM  
1 vote:
I feel like the addition of $2000 UBEREATS gift cards just completes this whole thing.
Not only offering a bounty but a bounty in a fiat currency of a company that dehumanizes people, but also exploits them.
While trying to hire someone as a way to separate him and his family from the impacts of COVID.

Like if that isn't a double BINGO I don't know what is.
 
2020-08-06 1:02:52 PM  
1 vote:

Chief Superintendent Lookout: [images.fineartamerica.com image 850x646]

So, basically a one-room school house, which was typical in the US through the early 20th Century.  This was actually socialisms because the people of the town would collective gather money and materials to build a school and hire a teacher or two.  That's how the US went down the toilet, because the socialisms got us early.

Lock him up!!!


Socialism? I thought that was an autonomous collective.
 
2020-08-06 11:16:30 AM  
1 vote:

astelmaszek: thatboyoverthere: duncan_bayne: cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.

So, how did you wind up with taxpayer funded education that is both more expensive and of poorer quality?

My observations from half a lifetime ago...

1. Teachers Unions opposed to any form of performance based pay for teachers.

2. Government imposed curricula at least a decade behind current research.

3. Schools unable to expel pupils pretty much regardless of how disruptive or toxic they were.

4. Education tailored to the middle of the bell curve with no support for the struggling or the bright.

Okay. How do you objectively measure performance without giving the teacher incentive to just rig the results?

How long does the government need to wait to see if the research actually pans out before they implement it?

Should the education get rid of it's mandate that every child gets an education?

And if they don't aim to educate as many children as possible on the curve, how many kids should they educate?

The old president of Nebraska teachers union had the displeasure of having me in 11th grade. The woman would copy the book onto transparency, project onto the screen, read it verbatim and then 30% of your grade was taking notes which she would review. That's all I ever  need to know about sending my kids to public schools.


So because you lived in a state run by Republicans, that means all public schools are bad? And none of this addresses my questions. Just you using your bad experience to say it much be the same everywhere.
 
2020-08-06 10:48:35 AM  
1 vote:

thatboyoverthere: duncan_bayne: cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.

So, how did you wind up with taxpayer funded education that is both more expensive and of poorer quality?

My observations from half a lifetime ago...

1. Teachers Unions opposed to any form of performance based pay for teachers.

2. Government imposed curricula at least a decade behind current research.

3. Schools unable to expel pupils pretty much regardless of how disruptive or toxic they were.

4. Education tailored to the middle of the bell curve with no support for the struggling or the bright.

Okay. How do you objectively measure performance without giving the teacher incentive to just rig the results?

How long does the government need to wait to see if the research actually pans out before they implement it?

Should the education get rid of it's mandate that every child gets an education?

And if they don't aim to educate as many children as possible on the curve, how many kids should they educate?


The old president of Nebraska teachers union had the displeasure of having me in 11th grade. The woman would copy the book onto transparency, project onto the screen, read it verbatim and then 30% of your grade was taking notes which she would review. That's all I ever  need to know about sending my kids to public schools.
 
2020-08-06 10:41:57 AM  
1 vote:

Hell Poodle: I guess "education should be accessible for everyone regardless of class" is a big controversial stance in here.


Well, of course it should be.  But it's not illegal to have your children opt out of public schools and go to private ones (or be homeschooled).

The only actual legal issue here is whether or not having six of seven families pool their resources change the thing from "home school" to full on "private school", requiring meeting a whole bunch of legal requirements.

Also note that this issue, like many, is partly based on the conservative bias that our constitution gives to the Senate.  Public schools right now get most of their money from the state, not the Feds.  But due to the virus and the fact that lots of money generating things are closed or banned, state tax revenues are down significantly, while at the same time costs are up.  The Democrats in Congress have passed bills to bail out the states and therefore public schools, but McConnell won't even let such come up for a vote.
 
2020-08-06 10:35:43 AM  
1 vote:

karl2025: [smbc-comics.com image 684x799]


The mom in that comic apparently thinks a full time student only takes 2 classes per year?  (And also that exotic pets have no upkeep costs.)
 
2020-08-06 9:46:26 AM  
1 vote:
As someone who has several teachers in their family, I just wanted to address some of these points:
1.    Teachers Unions opposed to any form of performance-based pay for teachers.
Why may performance-based pay be a problem? It depends on what factors are being evaluated. Most unions are against using standardized tests instead evaluating the growth of an individual students. Say you have a teacher with 30 kids, 3 are from recent immigrant families and don't have the reading level to do well on the test, 3 kids come from traumatic backgrounds and are struggling with life in general (the district office decided to cut the school counselor from the budget), 2 kids are on the spectrum and have trouble with testing, 2 kids transferred from a different district last week. 1/3 of the class doesn't score highly on the test- the teacher may be really good but the scores won't indicate that.
Am not saying that teachers should not be evaluated, any schools already have annual evaluations. The methods pushed by legislators tend to be blunt and don't take many factors into account.
Additional reading
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insight​s​/does-performance-based-pay-improve-te​aching
https://www.epi.org/publication/books​-​teachers_performance_pay_and_accountab​ility/

2. Government imposed curricula at least a decade behind current research.
This is a seriously complicated issue. The states get to determine the standards, the Fed can limit funding and has tried to have basic standards. There is nothing stopping states from working to exceed those standards- but when you have test score tied to funding without consideration of the numerous challenges faced by teachers and students, well, what do you expect?

3. Schools unable to expel pupils pretty much regardless of how disruptive or toxic they were.
Yeah, that is a problem.

4. Education tailored to the middle of the bell curve with no support for the struggling or the bright.
There used to be programs for the struggling and those who wanted to take the curriculum further. When I was a kid (long, long ago) the parents complained this wasn't fair and the district dropped them. This is something you can push for at a district level.

Not even getting into the issue of self-segregation and how always sending rich kids to school with other rich kids is a great way to prevent them from seeing the reality everyone else lives in.
 
2020-08-06 9:41:09 AM  
1 vote:
So we're supposed to be mad at a private citizen for doing what we want the government to do, i.e. pay the teacher a decent wage and provide a safe learning environment for the students? Is that the gist of it?

What a stupid farking thing to be upset about.
 
2020-08-06 9:26:27 AM  
1 vote:
Elite schooling has never been about intelligence or technical knowledge or deep-dive learning into any subject.  It's always and only about networking and developing the 'classy' veneer to be able to meld in socially.

Those 'elite' super-expensive schools like Eton and Le Rosey are not to learn extensively about history or art or literature or calculus.  They're to learn how to act socially in case you end up at a cocktail party on the yacht of a Duke.

Sure, there's a base-level of knowledge you're expected to know, but other than that you can be as dumb as any Trump, but if you've attended the 'right' schools, then you're 'in'.
 
2020-08-06 9:21:15 AM  
1 vote:

kukukupo: Zeb Hesselgresser: duncan_bayne:

My observations from half a lifetime ago...

1. Teachers Unions opposed to any form of performance based pay for teachers.

2. Government imposed curricula at least a decade behind current research.

3. Schools unable to expel pupils pretty much regardless of how disruptive or toxic they were.

4. Education tailored to the middle of the bell curve with no support for the struggling or the bright.


My only comment would be that it is unfair to have #1 without #3 and #4.  If I can't remove a kid who is disrupting the others - it will always leave the class lagging in general.  Also - who wants the group of kids that have to be removed from the classroom if they are getting paid poorly for it? (Hardest job - least pay)


Counter point:  why should a teacher get paid more because a kid is smart and comes from a good family?

Oh wait!

Maybe pay based on the PROGRESS made.
 
2020-08-06 9:17:50 AM  
1 vote:

Hell Poodle: I guess "education should be accessible for everyone regardless of class" is a big controversial stance in here.


I don't think anyone is arguing about that. It's more like there is no safe way to reopen schools so some people are coming up with their own solution. Then some other Twitter chucklefark complains about it.
 
2020-08-06 9:08:42 AM  
1 vote:
What's the big deal?  It's his money, and if he can find someone willing to tutor for a great salary, then it seems like everyone is winning here.
 
2020-08-06 9:04:45 AM  
1 vote:

TheDirtyNacho: LowbrowDeluxe: Holy shiat it smells libertarian in here.

/nachos and ballsack, if you're wondering

I resemble that!

No really though, I'm pretty far from libertarian and complaining about this is asinine. It's a problem in need of a right-now solution and this is how it's being done.


Less about the incident from the article (although attempting to hire away actual school teachers instead of just looking for tutors/home instructors was kind of a biatch move in terms of how he phrased it) and more about the giant screeds against public education in general in the thread.  If it doesn't apply to you then it doesn't.
 
2020-08-06 9:03:50 AM  
1 vote:

LowbrowDeluxe: Holy shiat it smells libertarian in here.

/nachos and ballsack, if you're wondering


Its amazing that when government and society at large farks up some people find that unacceptable and look for their own solutions. While no man is an island, it helps to be able and willing to swim when necessary.
 
2020-08-06 8:47:44 AM  
1 vote:
I fail to see the outrage.  The learning pod concept is one of the only real options at this point today, and there's a cost associated with them.

Wanting a good education for your children is kind of a basic thing in parenting.  Right up there with feeding them, and ensuring they have a safe environment.
 
2020-08-06 8:33:20 AM  
1 vote:

Mister Peejay: cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.

You forgot the expenses for books, other materials, etc.


So add another couple of hundred bucks per student. Books that aren't "official schoolbooks" tend to be much, much cheaper, and cover the same subjects. "The Elements of Style" is $5 off of Amazon, for example. There are plenty of good history survey books that are under $20 each (instead of $100+ for a textbook, in many cases). Most "other materials" in school are "here, watch a movie while T take this hour off." If a class needs to see a particular video, buy a copy for $10 or $20, or rent it for $4. Or watch it on YouTube.

You don't need to bus them across town, you don't need all of the support staff, you don't need a lot of the things that go with modern schools. So you can pay the teacher instead.
 
2020-08-06 8:20:15 AM  
1 vote:

Zeb Hesselgresser: duncan_bayne:

My observations from half a lifetime ago...

1. Teachers Unions opposed to any form of performance based pay for teachers.

2. Government imposed curricula at least a decade behind current research.

3. Schools unable to expel pupils pretty much regardless of how disruptive or toxic they were.

4. Education tailored to the middle of the bell curve with no support for the struggling or the bright.



My only comment would be that it is unfair to have #1 without #3 and #4.  If I can't remove a kid who is disrupting the others - it will always leave the class lagging in general.  Also - who wants the group of kids that have to be removed from the classroom if they are getting paid poorly for it? (Hardest job - least pay)
 
2020-08-06 8:18:57 AM  
1 vote:

Pharmdawg: 6-7 kids is basically a homeschool.  What's the problem?


The liberal outrage machine has been maxed at 11 since 2016 and they've become a self-parody by this point.
 
2020-08-06 8:16:31 AM  
1 vote:

cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.


Yup. Our city spends nearly $30k per pupil for the most piss poor results I can find. I'd rather keep that $30k and send my kids to the best private schools in the area and have enough left over to feed and clothe them for the year.
 
2020-08-06 8:13:21 AM  
1 vote:
Wait ... how is this any different from private schooling - aside from the fact private school teachers mostly earn LESS than their public counterparts?

I see no issue with this. Private tutoring has been a staple for as long as I can remember.

https://www.theatlantic.com/education​/​archive/2013/10/why-are-private-school​-teachers-paid-less-than-public-school​-teachers/280829/
 
2020-08-06 8:12:27 AM  
1 vote:

duncan_bayne: cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.

So, how did you wind up with taxpayer funded education that is both more expensive and of poorer quality?

My observations from half a lifetime ago...

1. Teachers Unions opposed to any form of performance based pay for teachers.

2. Government imposed curricula at least a decade behind current research.

3. Schools unable to expel pupils pretty much regardless of how disruptive or toxic they were.

4. Education tailored to the middle of the bell curve with no support for the struggling or the bright.


Okay. How do you objectively measure performance without giving the teacher incentive to just rig the results?

How long does the government need to wait to see if the research actually pans out before they implement it?

Should the education get rid of it's mandate that every child gets an education?

And if they don't aim to educate as many children as possible on the curve, how many kids should they educate?
 
2020-08-06 8:05:14 AM  
1 vote:
My neighborhood is forming an educational collective where two teachers in the neighborhood who are not working right now will receive pay for teaching a group of kindergarten aged children one day each and the other three days will be covered by a parent.  Since everyone here is fortunate enough to work from home and everyone is a lib, the neighborhood is pretty well-quarantined.  I only worry about one little girl who has a teenage brother because I've noticed teenagers don't really take any of this seriously.
 
2020-08-06 7:51:03 AM  
1 vote:
"We are offering 100% scholarships for folks who can't afford to chip in. If you live in the bay and are in the 4th or 5th grade we will take applications based on merit."

"Scholarships on merit"?!?  Them's fighting words to those who feel the only aid should go to the "special" learning-disabled child.
 
2020-08-06 7:44:09 AM  
1 vote:
I can't blame someone for taking matters into their own hands to ensure that their children receive a proper education.  If school districts remain closed and teachers refuse to work, parents should have other options.  If that means vouchers, so be it.
 
2020-08-06 7:40:34 AM  
1 vote:

tuxq: If this were not a pandemic, I'd probably feel the same way the author wants me to feel. What he's doing is socially responsible for both the teacher and children. Small class, outdoors, and good pay for the teacher?

There used to be a time where we didn't use groupthink to convince ourselves that envy is someone else's fault. Take your ass to jelly school because if I had school-age kids right now and could afford to hire a private teacher, you bet your ass I would.


I can't muster up any outrage at all.  If he wants to and he can, why shouldn't he?  Lots of stuff to be pissed about right now but this isn't one of them.
 
2020-08-06 7:16:55 AM  
1 vote:
me and my ex are doing this very thing
 
2020-08-06 7:13:41 AM  
1 vote:

Mister Peejay: YouPeopleAreCrazy: Mister Peejay: cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.

You forgot the expenses for books, other materials, etc.

And the state mandated safety inspections, ADA accommodations, etc.

Not needed for a private tutor, though.

Or a "building" and all the maintenance expenses that go along with that.


A private tutor for your kids, no problem.
Get several families to pool their resources, and it starts to look like a "school". And some state functionary will see it that way.
 
2020-08-06 6:57:02 AM  
1 vote:

Mister Peejay: cirby: Financially, this could be a good move for some.

Suppose you get six kids from different families. You hire one really good teacher for $120,000 per year, or four part-timers for $30K each to cover different subjects. Each family kicks in $20,000 per year. You have them take classes in a spare room at your big house in the suburbs.

That's about the same tuition as the average California private school, and a bit less than double what public schools in California spend per pupil ($12,000 or so).

If you went with twelve students ($10,000 each), it's actually cheaper per student than the public schools.

You forgot the expenses for books, other materials, etc.


And the state mandated safety inspections, ADA accommodations, etc.
 
2020-08-06 6:41:47 AM  
1 vote:
I think I'd want a hot teacher, though.
 
2020-08-06 6:40:14 AM  
1 vote:

Maturin: Here's an idea. How 'bout we pay teachers what they're worth?


This guy is proposing to do just that. Watch where the outcry is coming from, and ponder.
 
2020-08-06 6:26:40 AM  
1 vote:
So what is the difference besides wording and a lot of other job offers?

I fail to see a problem with this, maybe not the nicest thing to do but you can bet your ass when Google, Microsoft, or Apple is looking to hire a developer they do the same although they may word it better. Free enterprise it is what it is whether snow flake approved or not.
 
2020-08-06 6:05:52 AM  
1 vote:
My critique is slightly different. If he really wanted the best teacher...he'd offer double, not to beat their current salary.
 
2020-08-06 5:58:01 AM  
1 vote:
This has been common all through history for the most affluent. Ever hear the word Governess? Tutor? In times of Coronavirus 19, how could you not expect this to happen among some of the affluent.

Likewise, many people with "median" incomes are deciding to home school rather than return kids to school during a pandemic.

Freedom is a wonderful thing. Each of us should use it the best we can.
 
2020-08-06 5:40:32 AM  
1 vote:
Slowly easing our way back into the feudal system.
 
2020-08-06 5:39:25 AM  
1 vote:
Sounds like we're reverting to the 19th century.  Yipee!
 
151
2020-08-06 5:34:51 AM  
1 vote:
Jason Calacanis is the biggest douche to ever have douched.
 
Displayed 61 of 61 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.