Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Click On Detroit)   Biden only has a fraction of the campaign money Trump has for a fall ad buy, that fraction being 2/1   (clickondetroit.com) divider line
    More: News, Elections, Democracy, Joe Biden's Democratic presidential campaign, Election, Voting, Donald Trump, Biden campaign, Trump campaign  
•       •       •

1362 clicks; posted to Politics » on 05 Aug 2020 at 9:04 AM (11 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



106 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2020-08-05 1:30:45 PM  
Didn't Hillary Clinton have a truckload more money in 2016 than Two Scoops?  Didn't matter then, and Biden's lead now doesn't matter either.
 
2020-08-05 2:20:17 PM  

Tarl3k: texanjeff: It doesn't matter how much money you spend advertising for dog food if the dogs don't wanna eat it no one is going to buy it.

I haven't seen a remotely effective Trump campaign ad in a year they're all just replays of the greatest hits from 2016 but the world is different now. And Hillary Clinton is no longer running against him.

I think it's actually more important for Democrats to financially support Senate candidates because Biden is definitely going to win

[Fark user image image 356x200]


Look at my Handle.

Do you think my vote counts in the electoral college? Not really. If Republican loses Texas likely lost already.

But getting our Cornyn would be awesome.
 
2020-08-05 2:21:30 PM  

inglixthemad: texanjeff: It doesn't matter how much money you spend advertising for dog food if the dogs don't wanna eat it no one is going to buy it.

I haven't seen a remotely effective Trump campaign ad in a year they're all just replays of the greatest hits from 2016 but the world is different now. And Hillary Clinton is no longer running against him.

I think it's actually more important for Democrats to financially support Senate candidates because Biden is definitely going to win

I think we need to support both, because there are no guarantees in politics. Plus, if we get more voters to the polls to vote for Uncle Joe, then statistically the Democratic Party Senate candidates will do better in their races.


But money doesn't really get people to the polls does it?

It's not like you see an ad on TV and think, well NOW i am really going to go vote!!!
 
2020-08-05 2:30:47 PM  

texanjeff: inglixthemad: texanjeff: It doesn't matter how much money you spend advertising for dog food if the dogs don't wanna eat it no one is going to buy it.

I haven't seen a remotely effective Trump campaign ad in a year they're all just replays of the greatest hits from 2016 but the world is different now. And Hillary Clinton is no longer running against him.

I think it's actually more important for Democrats to financially support Senate candidates because Biden is definitely going to win

I think we need to support both, because there are no guarantees in politics. Plus, if we get more voters to the polls to vote for Uncle Joe, then statistically the Democratic Party Senate candidates will do better in their races.

But money doesn't really get people to the polls does it?

It's not like you see an ad on TV and think, well NOW i am really going to go vote!!!


Yes. Yes it does. The more you keep nudging the more people you can move. So by being able to have more volunteers, which require more "back of house" support, and more front of house ad buying, you keep reminding people.The goal is end up with a core of regular voters. That takes money. Lots and lots of money.
 
2020-08-05 2:48:14 PM  
Shaitstain's man at the campaign :  "They are going to notice sir!"
YOURE FIRED!
"i'll make sure you get the first count, sir! says new man.
 
2020-08-05 3:12:51 PM  

Glorious Golden Ass: I'm still very worried about how stupid people are.  The ghost of Bernie Sanders or I'm-not-voting is still possessing a few friends.  Apparently, there is a video going around implying Joe Biden is a child molester because he sometimes touches children standing in front of him on their shoulders when posing for pictures.


Biden got "handsy" with some women. If they had been children or teens, I'd be the first to dismiss him. And I primaried for Warren, so you know I wouldn't miss him.

Women who can afford to be close enough for a senator to get handsy with, are folks I don't know. I can't afford to attend political fundraisers, and the two rallies I've been to, (both for Obama) I was so far away from the brotha that it didn't matter anyway.

I believe the women, sure. And there are women who think they can't support someone they don't know personally, but dislike, because he apparently got to smell a privileged woman's hair. Okay, you do you.

Trump had got to go. If voting for Biden is the "lesser of two evils" then please, feel free to pick "the lesser of two evils." We have no other viable candidates. But some people still insist on believing that their ideology counts more than actual reality.

I'm so tired of trying to convince those on the fence that this is truly a matter of life or death for millions of people. That just because you "got it good" now, doesn't mean it will be that way tomorrow, especially during an farking pandemic.

But I guess fence sitters will be fence sitters. Purists will be purists. Do whatever the fark you want. I'm tired of caring about it.
 
Displayed 6 of 106 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.