Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Right Wing Watch)   Publisher of The Federalist wants Republicans to start getting physical and attack BLM protesters   (rightwingwatch.org) divider line
    More: Murica, Centre-right, Republican Party, Democratic Party, Police, Abraham Lincoln, bunch of South Philly Italian bros, Social conservatism, Ronald Reagan  
•       •       •

2694 clicks; posted to Politics » on 25 Jun 2020 at 5:58 AM (8 days ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



138 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2020-06-24 9:55:26 PM  
Thank gawd they took their comment section down, right?

Right?
 
2020-06-24 10:03:28 PM  
Ben's been spending too much ogling Meghan's ample bosoms;


https://thefederalist.com/2016/06/23/m​en-did-greater-things-when-it-was-hard​er-to-see-boobs/
 
2020-06-24 10:09:45 PM  
Sure, let's beat up the protesters.  That's hardly OKKK and we did Not see that coming?  Am I doing it right?
 
2020-06-24 10:32:54 PM  
Who is really running this shiatstain of a party? McConnel or this guy?
 
2020-06-24 10:46:22 PM  
That doughy bastard has never gotten physical with anyone unless it was to sucker punch somebody.
 
2020-06-24 10:53:05 PM  

Badmoodman: Ben's been spending too much ogling Meghan's ample bosoms;

https://thefederalist.com/2016/06/23/m​en-did-greater-things-when-it-was-hard​er-to-see-boobs/


Pregnant Meghan is staying at an undisclosed location for her safety, her bosom must be gigantic
 
2020-06-24 11:08:58 PM  
These punk ass biatches have been clamoring for a revolution for ages, let them try.
Cooler heads will prevail, it is just a matter of how bad it has to get for them to act.
What a stupid time to be alive.
 
2020-06-25 12:08:49 AM  
They have. They're called "police."
 
2020-06-25 3:43:40 AM  
Old and busted (pardon the pun):

The Federalist's Ben Domenech is worried that it could, with the rise of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump representing the proverbial canary in the coal mine. "Donald Trump could transform the Republican Party into a coalition focused on white identity politics," reads the subhead on Domenech's article. "We've seen this in Europe, and it's bad."

https://reason.com/2015/08/21/republi​c​an-party-white-identity-politics/

Seriously, they were REALLY concerned that Trump might damage the brand back then:

https://thefederalist.com/2015/08/21/a​re-republicans-for-freedom-or-white-id​entity-politics/
 
2020-06-25 3:47:39 AM  
He look like a shifty-eyed nazi Ricky Gervais.
 
2020-06-25 3:51:17 AM  
From the Reason article above:

In some circumstances, this pox-on-both-their-houses frustration feeds into a fondness for libertarian ideals and limited-government candidates. But in the case of Trump supporters, the frustration seems to stem from Democratic and Republican inaction in areas-such as tightening border security and stanching immigration-where libertarian policies will likely provide little solace. Still, it's perhaps not all bad news for liberty if the GOP becomes purely the party of white butthurt.

It's been clear for years that the old-school conservative coalition of classical liberals, crony capitalists, disgruntled working-class whites, and "values voters" isn't really working. What's more, millennials are fleeing the GOP en masse, even as they embrace certain typically-Republican values, like capitalism and abortion opposition, more than recent-generations past did in their youth. Maybe a Republican Party built largely on white identity politics (à la European populist movements) could actually aid in the birth of that libertarian moment we keep talking about.


/Actually, it is now glaringly obvious that having one of the two major political parties become purely the party of white butthurt is bad.
//Very, very, farking bad!
///Because the birth of the libertarian movement as an alternative didn't actually happen, and like "fetch," it's never gonna happen.
////It's almost as if these libertarians are only concerned about liberty for butthurt white people who DON'T want any liberty for black people.
//Did I say "almost"?
 
2020-06-25 3:56:54 AM  
"Hey, maybe if the laissez-faire ideology of the GOP becomes so acceptable to overt racists, normal people will flock to OUR party, even though OUR laissez-faire ideology is just as attractive to overt racists!"

/LOL!
 
2020-06-25 4:06:17 AM  
So, they want to start a second civil war over statues?
Statues of the LOSERS of the first Civil War?

<jackie-chan-confused.png>
 
2020-06-25 4:22:19 AM  
"What I want to see right now more than anything is elected officials and community leaders who are willing and ready to link arms with these cops and physically take part in cleaning up this mess and defying the mob."

You first, broflake.
 
2020-06-25 4:31:28 AM  
Ben, please. The last time that your audience got physical it involved karaoke night and a hit by Olivia Newton John.
Olivia Newton-John - Physical (Official Video)
Youtube vWz9VN40nCA
 
2020-06-25 5:01:42 AM  
You first, beardo.
 
2020-06-25 5:28:17 AM  
These guys cannot wait for their Krystallnacht. I mean, their rage boner can practically be seen from space...
 
2020-06-25 6:06:47 AM  
Great, now I'm going to have to become a "BLM protester".
 
2020-06-25 6:10:34 AM  
I don't think you want to approach a BLM protest this time - mainly because they wised up from several years ago and purchased firearms for their protection. You should be happy that they did that and don't rely on government employees for that purpose, right?
 
2020-06-25 6:13:13 AM  
Well, go right ahead, pussy. Head on down to Lafayette Square and stand up to the people that want to take those monuments down.

Man the fark up, tough guy.
 
2020-06-25 6:16:51 AM  
Careful, he might show up without his mask on.
 
2020-06-25 6:17:40 AM  

Markoff_Cheney: These punk ass biatches have been clamoring for a revolution for ages, let them try.
Cooler heads will prevail, it is just a matter of how bad it has to get for them to act.
What a stupid time to be alive.


I don't agree with everything he ever wrote, and he got a lot of things wrong, but Heinlein was weirdly prescient in some ways.

Welcome to the Crazy Years.
 
2020-06-25 6:19:06 AM  
He's angry the people he's blindly supported have used him and his ilk as thr rubes they are.

Good for getting reelected every x years, forgot about otherwise.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer shiatstain of a subculture.
 
2020-06-25 6:19:34 AM  
I would love nothing more than some little republican shiat to take a swing at me first. Please, proceed you waspy mayo loving small dick having little lickspittle.
 
2020-06-25 6:20:48 AM  

HighOnCraic: Old and busted (pardon the pun):

The Federalist's Ben Domenech is worried that it could, with the rise of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump representing the proverbial canary in the coal mine. "Donald Trump could transform the Republican Party into a coalition focused on white identity politics," reads the subhead on Domenech's article. "We've seen this in Europe, and it's bad."

https://reason.com/2015/08/21/republic​an-party-white-identity-politics/

Seriously, they were REALLY concerned that Trump might damage the brand back then:

https://thefederalist.com/2015/08/21/a​re-republicans-for-freedom-or-white-id​entity-politics/


Their concern seems largely resolved.   The GOP has decided they're mostly fine with white identity politics.   And most of their media boosters saw which way the wind was blowing themselves.
 
2020-06-25 6:21:47 AM  
You first.
 
2020-06-25 6:33:23 AM  

Badmoodman: Ben's been spending too much ogling Meghan's ample bosoms;


https://thefederalist.com/2016/06/23/m​en-did-greater-things-when-it-was-hard​er-to-see-boobs/


Didn't most women go around topless when we built the pyramids?
 
2020-06-25 6:34:49 AM  

Badmoodman: Ben's been spending too much ogling Meghan's ample bosoms;


https://thefederalist.com/2016/06/23/m​en-did-greater-things-when-it-was-hard​er-to-see-boobs/


They're double plus good now, she's bunning an oven. Ovening a bunny. Boobs.
 
2020-06-25 6:37:58 AM  
If I had a dog that looked like this guy, I'd put a wig on its ass and teach it to walk backwards.
 
2020-06-25 6:46:43 AM  
Oh, by all means, step up, Cletus.  I want popcorn and a beer, tho.

Mariachi band too much?  : )
 
2020-06-25 6:48:46 AM  
From the people who gave   us the US Supreme Court via Moscow Mitch -- the Aristocrats
 
2020-06-25 6:49:22 AM  
Dear Federalist Publisher, Please lead by example. We will be waiting.

                                    Si​gned everyone who is fed up w/ your Bullshiat!
 
2020-06-25 6:56:29 AM  
"Wrapping themselves in the language of the Founding Fathers, filling their buildings with quotes, books, busts, statues, and artist's renderings, conservatives have thrived by making themselves the defenders of American history against a verbally iconoclastic left."

"Additionally conservatives are incredibly attractive. They excel like no other in art, science and sport. They are in peak phsyical condition and live long glorious lives in service to White Jebus™, the greatest conservative to ever exist. Also conservative passion and kindness is unparalleled, and they make the best chocolate chip cookies."

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-06-25 7:02:00 AM  
They think they will win with a series of tactical victories, and by fighting dirty.

Forgetting, of course, that two can fight dirty. Also forgetting, of course, that both the Confederacy and the Axis started their wars with superior leadership and cunning strategies.

Cunning strategy doesn't help when the other side can simple mass enough forces to pulverize your forces, march on your cities, and burn them to the ground.

There are 330,000,000 in the United States. 25% of the population affiliates with the GOP. Do the math.
 
2020-06-25 7:02:49 AM  
Yeah, there are some major problems with this.  First, the only people who give a fat rat's ass about those statues are the radicals who are tearing them down.  Which accomplishes what exactly?  Ohhh, I'm so butthurt about a statue!  Hey, get a life, eh?

The second reason is that the SCOTUS has given blacks special snowflake civil rights protection.  So if they attack the statues, the race card allows them to say "oh, it's an act of civil disobedience".  But if you attack them, that same race card allows them to get an army of civil rights attorneys, already assembled by the Southern Poverty Law Center and paid for by the United States government-- and charge you with a hate crime.   With the media circus of the progressive press doing their victory dance on your ruined life.

So even if you actually care about those statues (why?) if you have any assets at all you wouldn't risk them.  Unless you're a complete fool.
 
2020-06-25 7:05:39 AM  

I want that sauce Morty!: Badmoodman: Ben's been spending too much ogling Meghan's ample bosoms;


https://thefederalist.com/2016/06/23/m​en-did-greater-things-when-it-was-hard​er-to-see-boobs/

Didn't most women go around topless when we built the pyramids?


Nobody spent much time staring at tits when you could see everybody's tits all the time.

The idea that they're a secret shameful sexual organ intended to entice men is a recent invention.

(And I for one am grateful for the invention.)
 
2020-06-25 7:07:36 AM  
Your base literally eats fried butter, so good luck with that.
 
2020-06-25 7:19:50 AM  

varmitydog: Yeah, there are some major problems with this.  First, the only people who give a fat rat's ass about those statues are the radicals who are tearing them down.  Which accomplishes what exactly?  Ohhh, I'm so butthurt about a statue!  Hey, get a life, eh?

The second reason is that the SCOTUS has given blacks special snowflake civil rights protection.  So if they attack the statues, the race card allows them to say "oh, it's an act of civil disobedience".  But if you attack them, that same race card allows them to get an army of civil rights attorneys, already assembled by the Southern Poverty Law Center and paid for by the United States government-- and charge you with a hate crime.   With the media circus of the progressive press doing their victory dance on your ruined life.

So even if you actually care about those statues (why?) if you have any assets at all you wouldn't risk them.  Unless you're a complete fool.


So people tearing down statues of racist pieces of sh*t that committed treason against the US are "radicals"? What the ever loving f*ck is wrong with you?
If there was still a Mussolini statue in Italy and people tore it down, would they be "radicals" too?
 
2020-06-25 7:24:34 AM  
"Memeber that White guy who decided to take a bow and arrow and defeat the BLM protesters?  His car was turned over and torched and he had a very bad time.  There's a lesson there.
 
2020-06-25 7:27:23 AM  
'Member that White, pro-Trump, anti-BLM protester in New York who goaded people into a fight and begged his daddy to let'em at the Black guy who was willing to take him up on the offer?  He was lucky to just be embarrassed by getting shoved down.  Lesson number 2.
 
2020-06-25 7:28:58 AM  
fark your traitor statues.
 
2020-06-25 7:32:03 AM  
Start?
 
2020-06-25 7:33:56 AM  
The Republican party has turn into a hate group and needs to be treated as such.
 
2020-06-25 7:34:45 AM  
Lead by example, right Dom? Yeah, didn't think so.
 
2020-06-25 7:38:23 AM  
chickenhawk implores others to do the fighting.

He has the face of someone who thinks, "Go out there and die for my trust fund."

files.rightwingwatch.orgView Full Size
 
2020-06-25 7:46:18 AM  

varmitydog: Yeah, there are some major problems with this.  First, the only people who give a fat rat's ass about those statues are the radicals who are tearing them down.  Which accomplishes what exactly?  Ohhh, I'm so butthurt about a statue!  Hey, get a life, eh?

The second reason is that the SCOTUS has given blacks special snowflake civil rights protection.  So if they attack the statues, the race card allows them to say "oh, it's an act of civil disobedience".  But if you attack them, that same race card allows them to get an army of civil rights attorneys, already assembled by the Southern Poverty Law Center and paid for by the United States government-- and charge you with a hate crime.   With the media circus of the progressive press doing their victory dance on your ruined life.

So even if you actually care about those statues (why?) if you have any assets at all you wouldn't risk them.  Unless you're a complete fool.


wat.

Oh, l@@k, another old account that no one has ever heard of and who has never posted anything that I can remember posting unintelligible drivel.
 
2020-06-25 7:47:40 AM  

Billy Bathsalt: If I had a dog that looked like this guy, I'd put a wig on its ass and teach it to walk backwards.


An oldie, but a goodie😅
 
2020-06-25 7:47:43 AM  

HighOnCraic: Old and busted (pardon the pun):

The Federalist's Ben Domenech is worried that it could, with the rise of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump representing the proverbial canary in the coal mine. "Donald Trump could transform the Republican Party into a coalition focused on white identity politics," reads the subhead on Domenech's article. "We've seen this in Europe, and it's bad."

https://reason.com/2015/08/21/republic​an-party-white-identity-politics/

Seriously, they were REALLY concerned that Trump might damage the brand back then:

https://thefederalist.com/2015/08/21/a​re-republicans-for-freedom-or-white-id​entity-politics/


Yeah, sorry Ben, that ship sailed with Goldwater.
 
2020-06-25 7:49:27 AM  
So he's saying someone should punch him right in his whore mouth? Cause that's what I'm hearing here.
 
2020-06-25 7:53:10 AM  

varmitydog: Yeah, there are some major problems with this.  First, the only people who give a fat rat's ass about those statues are the radicals who are tearing them down.  Which accomplishes what exactly?  Ohhh, I'm so butthurt about a statue!  Hey, get a life, eh?

The second reason is that the SCOTUS has given blacks special snowflake civil rights protection.  So if they attack the statues, the race card allows them to say "oh, it's an act of civil disobedience".  But if you attack them, that same race card allows them to get an army of civil rights attorneys, already assembled by the Southern Poverty Law Center and paid for by the United States government-- and charge you with a hate crime.   With the media circus of the progressive press doing their victory dance on your ruined life.

So even if you actually care about those statues (why?) if you have any assets at all you wouldn't risk them.  Unless you're a complete fool.


Is this a joke?  The SPLC is donor funded, not government funded.  BLM is not strictly an African American movement, it now includes NFL team owners, police officers, and folks from every race, religion, and occupation.
And it's true, those Miranda rights the police must tell you by order of the SCOTUS inform of your right to not talk to the police and that an attorney will be provided free if you can't afford one.  We also have a bunch of other civil rights, enshrined in the constitution and other SCOTUs decisions.  But who actually uses public defenders more?  Poor white people of course.
BTW, the majority of monuments so far have been removed lawfully by local and state governments, back in 2017.
You might want to read about the Lost Cause, Christopher Columbus and his sponsor's crimes against humanity, and realize that any defense of the confederacy, Christopher Columbus (or his conquistador peers), is rooting for the bad guys.
 
Displayed 50 of 138 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter




In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.