Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reason Magazine)   Baptists, bootleggers, censors, and omniphobes   (reason.com) divider line
    More: Interesting, Twitter, Regulation, Social media, Privacy law, Privacy, Prohibition in the United States, Form of the Good, Prohibition  
•       •       •

796 clicks; posted to Geek » on 29 May 2020 at 6:30 PM (9 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



7 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2020-05-29 6:37:43 PM  
Omniphobes?  I suppose the president's surface layer is rather repellent.
 
2020-05-29 7:12:58 PM  
Mugs, pugs, things, dimwits, nitwits, half-wits, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists?
 
2020-05-29 7:13:40 PM  
[NEW HERO - NOW PLAYABLE] Baptiste Origin Story | Overwatch
Youtube ZfWgcjeG83E
 
2020-05-29 7:14:27 PM  
The thing is, do Twitter and Facebook allow content that targets and harms specific individuals? Yes. Happens all the time.

Do Twitter and Facebook shadowban Right-Wing political content? More to the point, do they do so with a bias -- do they do so more than they squelch other kinds of political content? I've never seen any substantive evidence that they do.

This isn't a Both Sides thing. Is there a coalition of enemies on this? I don't really see one. The MAGATs want to stop Twitter and Facebook from being able to block lies and harmful speech, whereas the SJWs want Twitter and Facebook to block lies and harmful speech. Those are opposite goals.

Any private social media site or company can censor content willy-nilly. Any competent site has rules and moderators. Twitter and Facebook intentionally fail at it, but in the pursuit of money. Any other bias is coincidental and governed by market forces, so, uh, you know, the Right doesn't really have a complaint, there.
 
2020-05-29 7:17:34 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-05-30 11:15:18 AM  

Bondith: Mugs, pugs, things, dimwits, nitwits, half-wits, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists?


cf.geekdo-images.comView Full Size
 
2020-05-30 9:06:33 PM  

RandomAxe: Do Twitter and Facebook shadowban Right-Wing political content? More to the point, do they do so with a bias -- do they do so more than they squelch other kinds of political content? I've never seen any substantive evidence that they do.


Well, if they did it right, you WOULDN'T see any evidence, now would you?
 
Displayed 7 of 7 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.