Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   The FBI accidentally leaked the name of the mysterious "third man" who assisted the 9/11 attackers. Turns out, the help was coming from inside the Saudi embassy all along   (news.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Awkward, Federal Bureau of Investigation, September 11 attacks, Saudi Arabia, name of a Saudi official, United States, Al-Qaeda terrorists, Fahd of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates  
•       •       •

5989 clicks; posted to Main » and Politics » on 13 May 2020 at 2:34 PM (7 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



82 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2020-05-13 1:32:41 PM  
Surely time to arrest Obama for collusion, right?
 
2020-05-13 1:40:20 PM  
Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah was mistakenly named by a top FBI official in a court declaration filed last month - in a move described by a 9/11 families' representative as a "giant screw-up".


Mistakenly or accidentally?  Are they saying that's not the murderous accomplice?
 
2020-05-13 2:01:59 PM  

SoundOfOneHandWanking: Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah was mistakenly named by a top FBI official in a court declaration filed last month - in a move described by a 9/11 families' representative as a "giant screw-up".


Mistakenly or accidentally?  Are they saying that's not the murderous accomplice?


Including the name was the screw up.  From what I've read elsewhere, the FBI believes this is the guy, but since they never charged him, and it's been 20 years, they didn't want his name appearing in documents.
 
2020-05-13 2:31:49 PM  
Obvious tag is getting the bonesaw.
 
2020-05-13 2:34:07 PM  

SoundOfOneHandWanking: Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah was mistakenly named by a top FBI official in a court declaration filed last month - in a move described by a 9/11 families' representative as a "giant screw-up".


Mistakenly or accidentally?  Are they saying that's not the murderous accomplice?


Maybe the FBI is sick of Jared and tossed a wrench into his little plans

/Obama DERP State agents!
 
2020-05-13 2:38:40 PM  
And that man's name was Saddam Hussein.  At last!  The invasion has been justified!
 
2020-05-13 2:40:51 PM  
So 15/19 hijackers were Saudis, funded by Saudi money, and given assistance by Saudi embassy folks, and all associated with a terror group that hung out in Pakistan. Yes, it makes perfect sense now why we attacked Iraq. Very clever.
 
2020-05-13 2:41:14 PM  
"Accidently" on purpose.
 
2020-05-13 2:41:21 PM  

bthom37: SoundOfOneHandWanking: Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah was mistakenly named by a top FBI official in a court declaration filed last month - in a move described by a 9/11 families' representative as a "giant screw-up".


Mistakenly or accidentally?  Are they saying that's not the murderous accomplice?

Including the name was the screw up.  From what I've read elsewhere, the FBI believes this is the guy, but since they never charged him, and it's been 20 years, they didn't want his name appearing in documents.


also because, you know, we can't have the American public figuring out just how much Saudi Arabia was responsible for 9/11
 
2020-05-13 2:41:24 PM  
That's okay, Saudi Arabia, when several Americans decide to hijack an airliner and run it into your oil refineries and royal palaces, try keeping the fact that they're American under your hat.
 
2020-05-13 2:42:35 PM  
wait, are you saying the Saudis had something to do with this?
 
2020-05-13 2:43:23 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-05-13 2:44:00 PM  
Saudi Arabia--our partners in peace.
 
2020-05-13 2:44:10 PM  
I read this last night on WaPo, and they didn't print the person's name...

Good jorb, Sun.

/only half snarkastic
 
2020-05-13 2:44:32 PM  
What will Mohammad Bone Sawman do?
 
2020-05-13 2:44:56 PM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: So 15/19 hijackers were Saudis, funded by Saudi money, and given assistance by Saudi embassy folks, and all associated with a terror group that hung out in Pakistan. Yes, it makes perfect sense now why we attacked Iraq. Very clever.


And we're still buddy-buddy with Saudi Arabia
 
2020-05-13 2:46:43 PM  
Aha! This is the Obamagate that Trump was talking about!
 
2020-05-13 2:47:13 PM  
Good thing we declared war on Iraq
 
2020-05-13 2:47:44 PM  
I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.
 
2020-05-13 2:47:51 PM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: So 15/19 hijackers were Saudis, funded by Saudi money, and given assistance by Saudi embassy folks, and all associated with a terror group that hung out in Pakistan. Yes, it makes perfect sense now why we attacked Iraq. Very clever.


Still open for business:

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2020-05-13 2:48:24 PM  
The article I saw yesterday didn't mention the name in text but did inline images of the document with the name.
 
2020-05-13 2:48:36 PM  
I think we should have invaded in 2003, I just think the country we should have invaded was Saudi Arabia.

We should have made an example out of the Royal family that would be talked about over there for a thousand years.
 
2020-05-13 2:50:06 PM  

bughunter: I read this last night on WaPo, and they didn't print the person's name...

Good jorb, Sun.

/only half snarkastic


It needed to be posted, but I doubt it will do a damned bit of good at this point, as no one gave a flying shiat two decades ago so what difference will it make now? Will America suddenly rise up and demand that Saudi Arabia finally pay for and have an accounting for their sins against us?

uploads.disquscdn.comView Full Size
 
2020-05-13 2:53:01 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.


Okay, Ambassador Bolton.
 
2020-05-13 2:53:42 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size


"There was a third man..."
 
2020-05-13 2:54:17 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.


Just stick to nuking, it's enough really. It is long past high time that we show the world that if provoked, we are more than capable of not wasting our time with another pointless ground war. Hell, I'm amazed that ol' carrot top hasn't already rushed the option to the Join Chiefs, as eliminating Saudi would solve an awful lot of porblems for his support base in Texass and Russia.

Honestly, just nuking the Kaaba and proving that Allah doesn't care would solve an awful lot of problems once and for all. Or possibly make a whole new problem, who knows with those types?
 
2020-05-13 2:56:27 PM  
Gosh, its almost as if the FBI is farking inept at everything they try.

They couldn;t even get rid of Trump, and he is about as smart as a tube of paste.
 
2020-05-13 2:57:39 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.


OK big bada-boomer.
 
2020-05-13 3:00:42 PM  

winedrinkingman: I think we should have invaded in 2003, I just think the country we should have invaded was Saudi Arabia.

We should have made an example out of the Royal family that would be talked about over there for a thousand years.


Invading would be too much of club, we need a scalpel. Pick out one of the other tribes and finance them to do a revolution.
 
2020-05-13 3:01:37 PM  

moresugar: [Fark user image 720x480]

"There was a third man..."

nebula.wsimg.comView Full Size
 
2020-05-13 3:03:20 PM  
Number two works for the turd man
 
2020-05-13 3:03:34 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-05-13 3:04:17 PM  

thespindrifter: AmbassadorBooze: I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.

Just stick to nuking, it's enough really. It is long past high time that we show the world that if provoked, we are more than capable of not wasting our time with another pointless ground war. Hell, I'm amazed that ol' carrot top hasn't already rushed the option to the Join Chiefs, as eliminating Saudi would solve an awful lot of porblems for his support base in Texass and Russia.

Honestly, just nuking the Kaaba and proving that Allah doesn't care would solve an awful lot of problems once and for all. Or possibly make a whole new problem, who knows with those types?


I don't think nuking will be enough.  Let us say we nuke the capitol, then they have a few factions fight over power, but they won't unconditionally surrender.  We have to at LEAST make them eat their own, a 9 vs 1 feast.  10% of the men, 10% of the women, and 10% of the children.  All have to be eaten live while screaming and thrashing.  And they should stream each feast on youtube.  We need to know that they are surrendering unconditionally.
 
2020-05-13 3:04:21 PM  
Trump wasn't the first republican to give a pass to the Saudis

compote.slate.comView Full Size


/traitors all the way down
 
2020-05-13 3:05:29 PM  

petec: Trump wasn't the first republican to give a pass to the Saudis

[compote.slate.com image 205x150]

/traitors all the way down


OK, I propose that when Biden or Hillary is elected, they do the honorable thing and Nuke the Saudis.
 
2020-05-13 3:06:04 PM  
I wonder if that fugger was on the only plane flying the next day, thanks to the recently rehabilitated Dubya.
 
2020-05-13 3:06:06 PM  
Presidential Pardon in 3..2..1...
 
2020-05-13 3:09:15 PM  

SoundOfOneHandWanking: in a move described by a 9/11 families' representative as a "giant screw-up".


I don't understand why the families would consider that a screw up.  If I were one of them, I would want to know the name, national ID number and current location of everyone who had a part in that.

And then I would send 1000 letters to various random people in the city those people reside in, each with a 100$ bill in it.  The letter would say, "Ship me his dick, and you get 100,000$ more to the return address."

If OUR government can't figure out how to get justice, and the Saudi's won't, I bet cash can.
 
2020-05-13 3:09:31 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: thespindrifter: AmbassadorBooze: I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.

Just stick to nuking, it's enough really. It is long past high time that we show the world that if provoked, we are more than capable of not wasting our time with another pointless ground war. Hell, I'm amazed that ol' carrot top hasn't already rushed the option to the Join Chiefs, as eliminating Saudi would solve an awful lot of porblems for his support base in Texass and Russia.

Honestly, just nuking the Kaaba and proving that Allah doesn't care would solve an awful lot of problems once and for all. Or possibly make a whole new problem, who knows with those types?

I don't think nuking will be enough.  Let us say we nuke the capitol, then they have a few factions fight over power, but they won't unconditionally surrender.  We have to at LEAST make them eat their own, a 9 vs 1 feast.  10% of the men, 10% of the women, and 10% of the children.  All have to be eaten live while screaming and thrashing.  And they should stream each feast on youtube.  We need to know that they are surrendering unconditionally.


Did someone you love die on 9/11? Just curious. At the rate the Arabs in general are going right now, it really won't be too much longer before they kinda-sorta do "eat" their own anyway. No one but a complete sociopath would be capable of enforcing your idea even if anyone agreed to it. We just don't have enough Marines anymore, we're too spread thin.
 
2020-05-13 3:11:15 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: petec: Trump wasn't the first republican to give a pass to the Saudis

[compote.slate.com image 205x150]

/traitors all the way down

OK, I propose that when Biden or Hillary is elected, they do the honorable thing and Nuke the Saudis.


You know, a part of me believes that Hillary just might. Maybe. Depends on who is pulling her strings. What do the bankers get out of the deal?
 
2020-05-13 3:11:28 PM  

I am Tom Joad's Complete Lack of Surprise: Surely time to arrest Obama for collusion, right?


What did Kenya have to do with 9/11?
 
2020-05-13 3:12:20 PM  

thespindrifter: Honestly, just nuking the Kaaba and proving that Allah doesn't care would solve an awful lot of problems once and for all. Or possibly make a whole new problem, who knows with those types?


Nuking Mecca would cause far more problems than it would solve. It's the kind of response best reserved for an Islamist nuclear attack.

On the other hand, the only people who actually like the House of Saud are western conservatives (especially Republicans) and Israel's Likud. Provided the Americans broke from their pattern and did not install yet another murderous dictator as a replacement, deposing the Saudi royal family would increase, rather than decrease, America's standing among most of the world's Muslims.
 
2020-05-13 3:12:49 PM  

brizzle365: Gosh, its almost as if the FBI is farking inept at everything they try.

They couldn;t even get rid of Trump, and he is about as smart as a tube of paste.


They are extremely competent taking down those without money/power/connections.
It's almost like societal rules aren't applicable to the controlling class.
 
2020-05-13 3:13:17 PM  

SurfaceTension: I am Tom Joad's Complete Lack of Surprise: Surely time to arrest Obama for collusion, right?

What did Kenya have to do with 9/11?


Didn't you hear? they shot down Helen Keller's plane after she escaped from the Nazis and was trying to be the first woman to fly around the world.
 
2020-05-13 3:17:09 PM  

thespindrifter: AmbassadorBooze: thespindrifter: AmbassadorBooze: I say we nuke Saudi Arabia.  At least the Capitol.  Then tell the survivors they may choose between total sterilization of their country via nuclear fusion, or they may surrender unconditionally, with every last male being castrated and enslaved, even toddler males or newborn males, and the women taken as concubines and war brides.

Or if people are adverse to the whole castration and slavery thing, we make them decimate themselves through cannibalism  Men, women, and children.  Make them eat one tenth of their own.  Alive.  Anybody who does not partake in the feast is taken to point memo and then nuked.  Oh, and we take their oil.  If they complain, nuke the oil fields.  Then nuke their population centers.

Just stick to nuking, it's enough really. It is long past high time that we show the world that if provoked, we are more than capable of not wasting our time with another pointless ground war. Hell, I'm amazed that ol' carrot top hasn't already rushed the option to the Join Chiefs, as eliminating Saudi would solve an awful lot of porblems for his support base in Texass and Russia.

Honestly, just nuking the Kaaba and proving that Allah doesn't care would solve an awful lot of problems once and for all. Or possibly make a whole new problem, who knows with those types?

I don't think nuking will be enough.  Let us say we nuke the capitol, then they have a few factions fight over power, but they won't unconditionally surrender.  We have to at LEAST make them eat their own, a 9 vs 1 feast.  10% of the men, 10% of the women, and 10% of the children.  All have to be eaten live while screaming and thrashing.  And they should stream each feast on youtube.  We need to know that they are surrendering unconditionally.

Did someone you love die on 9/11? Just curious. At the rate the Arabs in general are going right now, it really won't be too much longer before they kinda-sorta do "eat" their own anyway. No one but a complet ...


You don't need marines.  You nuke them if even a single person doesn't submit totally and unconditionally.  If even a toddler raises a hand to your small cannibalism enforcement crew, you nuke them over and over until the mantel starts bubbling to the surface.  You show their glowing plasma that they should have just completely surrendered.  And done what they were told.  Of course you have them sign a declaration of total and unconditional surrender before you send in the cannibalism enforcement team.  That way when you start nuking them into the mantel other countries go "well they did agree to this, and they should have had the toddler resrtrained"

Mr. Nice guy doesn't work in this world.  Every country should evacuate from every other country.  No more world police.  Just total annihlation of the enemy.
 
2020-05-13 3:22:32 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: Just total annihlation [sic] of the enemy.


Well, at least that part is effective.
 
2020-05-13 3:26:17 PM  
I forgot that mecca and Medina are in Saudis Arabia.

We forgo the initial nuking.  We demand unconditional surrender and that they cannibal decimate themselves.  Total random eating of 10% of the men, 10% of the women, and 10% of the children.  Including randomized royals.  And we take their oil, forever.  And the surrender forever.  If at any point even a single hand is raised in anger by any Saudi towards any person in earth, we dirty bomb Medina on the second holiest day.  The second time a hand is raised we dirty bomb mecca on the holiest day.  Then every year on those days, dirty bombs are blown up in those places.
 
2020-05-13 3:27:34 PM  

Atomic Jonb: I don't understand why the families would consider that a screw up. If I were one of them, I would want to know the name, national ID number and current location of everyone who had a part in that.


The article says the name was previously disclosed to he families.
 
2020-05-13 3:41:27 PM  

AmbassadorBooze: I forgot that mecca and Medina are in Saudis Arabia.

We forgo the initial nuking.  We demand unconditional surrender and that they cannibal decimate themselves.  Total random eating of 10% of the men, 10% of the women, and 10% of the children.  Including randomized royals.  And we take their oil, forever.  And the surrender forever.  If at any point even a single hand is raised in anger by any Saudi towards any person in earth, we dirty bomb Medina on the second holiest day.  The second time a hand is raised we dirty bomb mecca on the holiest day.  Then every year on those days, dirty bombs are blown up in those places.


This cannibalism fixation... is odd. Is everything okay at home? Were you recently released from a German prison?
 
2020-05-13 3:43:58 PM  

brizzle365: Gosh, its almost as if the FBI is farking inept at everything they try.

They couldn;t even get rid of Trump, and he is about as smart as a tube of paste.


The secret? They don't want to get rid of Trump or do anything against the Saudis.

Holds for the CIA, too.
 
Displayed 50 of 82 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter




In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.