Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Right Wing Watch)   Intelligence Chief Nominee John Ratcliffe says all intel on Russia and Ukraine is but a hoax. Who's a good toady? You're a good toady, John   (rightwingwatch.org) divider line
    More: Creepy, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, President of the United States, United States presidential election, 2008, Democratic Party, President Donald Trump, United States, Rep. John Ratcliffe  
•       •       •

1112 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Mar 2020 at 7:59 AM (18 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



42 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2020-03-04 2:42:31 AM  
More proof that Ratcliffe knows his nomination is a sham that has no hope of getting confirmed.  He's just a tool to make sure Grenell can spend enough time in his position to make sure all the bodies are buried and our most sensitive secrets are handed over to the Kremlin.

The formal nomination of Ratcliffe allows Grenell to serve in an acting capacity for 210 days while Ratcliffe's nomination is pending before the Senate and, if the nomination is rejected or withdrawn, for another 210 days.
 
2020-03-04 3:39:07 AM  
That is a guy who has zero gag reflex and who is willing to give it his all for a few dollars more...
 
2020-03-04 4:28:17 AM  
Check him for a Bratva tattoo.
 
2020-03-04 8:01:51 AM  
Blood.
 
2020-03-04 8:02:57 AM  
Obviously, everything that doesn't jibe with trump's fantastical vision of the world is a "hoax".
 
2020-03-04 8:04:28 AM  
Russia is a made up country.
Russia is a hoax.
There's only East Ukraine.
 
2020-03-04 8:05:37 AM  
Hoax News!
 
2020-03-04 8:05:39 AM  

J_Kushner: Russia is a made up country.
Russia is a hoax.
There's only East Ukraine.


Username checks out.
 
2020-03-04 8:06:45 AM  
At some point you'd think guys like this would "accidentally" fall down a empty elevator shaft while visiting CIA headquarters.
 
2020-03-04 8:08:58 AM  

UncleDirtNap: At some point you'd think guys like this would "accidentally" fall down a empty elevator shaft while visiting CIA headquarters.


You think they actually ever interface with actual intelligence officers?  They stay far away so they don't accidentally learn something that would conflict with their deeply held religious convictions.
 
2020-03-04 8:09:47 AM  

UncleDirtNap: At some point you'd think guys like this would "accidentally" fall down a empty elevator shaft while visiting CIA headquarters.


Why. The intelligence community hasn't really cared that the right have spent 4 years shiatting on them. At least not in any meaningful way
 
2020-03-04 8:10:01 AM  

BizarreMan: UncleDirtNap: At some point you'd think guys like this would "accidentally" fall down a empty elevator shaft while visiting CIA headquarters.

You think they actually ever interface with actual intelligence officers?  They stay far away so they don't accidentally learn something that would conflict with their deeply held religious convictions.


Or expose something that would result in being held after convictions.
 
2020-03-04 8:10:12 AM  

hubiestubert: That is a guy who has zero gag reflex and who is willing to give it his all for a few dollars more...


Stop trying to sell me on him; it's not gonna work.
 
2020-03-04 8:10:14 AM  
pocho.comView Full Size
 
2020-03-04 8:10:51 AM  
If we ever needed proof that there is no secret government organization running around killing people who are a direct threat to America the trump regime is all you would need.

So we now know the CIA didn't kill Kennedy at least.

/user name checks out comment.
// all conservatives are the enemy of a free and fair society.
/// three for the republic, if we can keep it.
 
2020-03-04 8:11:41 AM  
FTFA: "despite the fact that throughout this process ... whether it's the Russia hoax or the Ukraine hoax-in every instance, the president's been right. The president's been the one that's been telling the truth with respect to what's happening."

I can't believe the amount of easily refutable bullshiat these ballsniffers are willing to peddle.
 
2020-03-04 8:21:28 AM  
FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.
 
2020-03-04 8:33:20 AM  

fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.


Shut-up, Alex Jones. We're trashing you in another thread.
 
2020-03-04 8:44:51 AM  

Brainsick: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.

Shut-up, Alex Jones. We're trashing you in another thread.


So you don't have an answer either.
 
2020-03-04 8:50:54 AM  

fernt: Brainsick: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.

Shut-up, Alex Jones. We're trashing you in another thread.

So you don't have an answer either.


https://www.rferl.org/amp/why-was-ukr​a​ine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin​/30181445.html

Activists say the case had been sabotaged by Shokin himself. As an example, they say two months before Hunter Biden joined Burisma's board, British authorities had requested information from Shokin's office as part of an investigation into alleged money laundering by Zlochevskiy (Owner of Burisma) . Shokin ignored them.

Kaleniuk
(executive director of the Kyiv-based Anti-Corruption Action Center)  and AntAC published a detailed timeline of events surrounding the Burisma case, an outline of evidence suggesting that three consecutive chief prosecutors of Ukraine -- first Shokin's predecessor, then Shokin, and then his successor -- worked to bury it.

"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.


And, just in case you need help understanding the big words: www.rewordify.com

We all have the answer. You're just an idiot.
 
2020-03-04 8:51:52 AM  

fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-us​a​-trump-whistleblower-ukraine-buris/ukr​aine-agency-says-allegations-against-b​urisma-cover-period-before-biden-joine​d-idUSKBN1WC1LV

The period Shokin was investigating was before Hunter Biden was hired and the complaints were that he was slow-walking the investigation and actually interfered in a British case against the head of Burisma by refusing to turn over documents that the British government needed for the case against him.

The evidence seems to point much more to Burisma being corrupt and hired Hunter Biden to convince American authorities to turn a blind eye to the comfy arrangement that they had with Shokin protecting them from him ever acting on the probe. That still speaks very poorly to Hunter Biden's judgement, but the need to claim that Shokin was innocent and that evil Joe Biden fired him for his son leads us to the very weird position we are in now where Republican Senators who called for Shokin to be fired for corruption are trying to claim ignorance if he was really corrupt or not.
 
2020-03-04 8:52:14 AM  

fernt: Brainsick: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.

Shut-up, Alex Jones. We're trashing you in another thread.

So you don't have an answer either.


This is what happens when you lie all the time. People get sick of your shiat and they get sick of you.
 
2020-03-04 8:54:44 AM  

fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/bu​s​iness/media/fact-check-biden-ukraine-b​urisma-china-hunter.html

The allegation at the heart of the controversy is that while Mr. Biden was vice president, he pushed to have Ukraine's top prosecutor removed for investigating a company connected to Mr. Biden's son Hunter, the Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma. Videos pushing this theory began appearing on Twitter in late September and early October and have been viewed tens of millions of times. Mr. Trump's campaign has also asserted the claim in ads on Facebook.

Vice President Biden was overseeing American policy toward Ukraine at the time, and he did push for the removal of the country's top prosecutor, who was seen as corrupt or ineffectual by the United States and Western European governments. But there is no evidence he did so to benefit Hunter Biden or the oligarch who owns Burisma, Mykola Zlochevsky.
 
2020-03-04 8:58:52 AM  
The sole purpose of Ratcliffe is to "clean house" at the DNI and fire everyone who doesn't suck the shroom and basically gut the entire absolutely vital agency. This is dangerous as fark....make no mistake.
He's a disposable napkin to do Trump's dirty work of destroying America for lord Putin whether he knows it or not.
 
2020-03-04 9:00:01 AM  

fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.


Ask Senators. Rob Portman (R-OH), Ron Johnson (R-WI), and Mark Kirk (R-IL) about it.
They are all signatories of the February 12, 2016 letter to the Ukrainian president about some much-needed reforms in the prosecutor's office. Specifically, to get rid of prosecutor Viktor Shokin because of his refusal to investigate corruption at a number of large corporations, including Burisma.

That's right: Joe Biden, a bunch of Senators, and representatives from a number of European countries wanted more investigations of possible (probable) corruption that might have got Hunter Biden in trouble.


But the only reason any of this is back in the news in because Biden is doing well in the primaries.
 
2020-03-04 9:06:04 AM  

berylman: The sole purpose of Ratcliffe is to "clean house" at the DNI and fire everyone who doesn't suck the shroom and basically gut the entire absolutely vital agency. This is dangerous as fark....make no mistake.
He's a disposable napkin to do Trump's dirty work of destroying America for lord Putin whether he knows it or not.


Fark user imageView Full Size


This is the stuff that keeps me awake. The people in charge now are the people who advised Trump do illegal things and the people being shown the door are the people who tried telling him it was illegal. How do you come back from the sort of brain drain on display? Decades of experience being sliced away in service of the president's ego, with the conceit that if he wishes to try to seek dirt on opponents again it will not see any resistance.
 
2020-03-04 9:08:23 AM  
OldRod:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/bu​s​iness/media/fact-check-biden-ukraine-b​urisma-china-hunter.html

Grungehamster
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-us​a​-trump-whistleblower-ukraine-buris/ukr​aine-agency-says-allegations-against-b​urisma-cover-period-before-biden-joine​d-idUSKBN1WC1LV


Thank you for those. I am 100% certain this will close the book on people asking how and why this claim is debunked.

Yessir. The book on people "just asking questions" is closed for sure.
 
2020-03-04 9:24:30 AM  
Evertbody knew Trump* was going to hire guys like this, even for crucially important jobs.
He said he was gonna.
Vote this time.
 
2020-03-04 9:24:47 AM  
Intelligence Chief Nominee John Ratcliffe says all intel on Russia and Ukraine is but a hoax.

CREEPY tag must have creeped out DUMBASS tag.
 
2020-03-04 9:25:27 AM  
I think the fart gas blew away... for now.  Duh-duh-duuuuuuhhhhhhh!
 
2020-03-04 9:27:32 AM  

OldRod: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/bus​iness/media/fact-check-biden-ukraine-b​urisma-china-hunter.html

The allegation at the heart of the controversy is that while Mr. Biden was vice president, he pushed to have Ukraine's top prosecutor removed for investigating a company connected to Mr. Biden's son Hunter, the Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma. Videos pushing this theory began appearing on Twitter in late September and early October and have been viewed tens of millions of times. Mr. Trump's campaign has also asserted the claim in ads on Facebook.

Vice President Biden was overseeing American policy toward Ukraine at the time, and he did push for the removal of the country's top prosecutor, who was seen as corrupt or ineffectual by the United States and Western European governments. But there is no evidence he did so to benefit Hunter Biden or the oligarch who owns Burisma, Mykola Zlochevsky.


Saying there's no evidence is an understatement. The facts don't even fit the possibility that the reason to fire that prosecutor could be linked to Hunter Biden. Not only was the investigation done for the prosecution not covering the time HB was employed, that investigation had been closed by the time he was hired. Also, you'd need evidence that all those European countries that were also pushing for the firing also had ulterior motives or were strong armed by the VP.

Hunter Biden was hired much for the same reason BP oil may donate to the Sierra club. It's window dressing. It affords them an air of respectability so their public relations people can tone down the image of corruption or the association with the ongoing destruction of the environment. It's farked up but entirely legal.
 
2020-03-04 9:29:43 AM  

Running Wild: fernt: Brainsick: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.

Shut-up, Alex Jones. We're trashing you in another thread.

So you don't have an answer either.

https://www.rferl.org/amp/why-was-ukra​ine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin​/30181445.html

Activists say the case had been sabotaged by Shokin himself. As an example, they say two months before Hunter Biden joined Burisma's board, British authorities had requested information from Shokin's office as part of an investigation into alleged money laundering by Zlochevskiy (Owner of Burisma) . Shokin ignored them.

Kaleniuk(executive director of the Kyiv-based Anti-Corruption Action Center)  and AntAC published a detailed timeline of events surrounding the Burisma case, an outline of evidence suggesting that three consecutive chief prosecutors of Ukraine -- first Shokin's predecessor, then Shokin, and then his successor -- worked to bury it.

"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.

And, just in case you need help understanding the big words: www.rewordify.com

We all have the answer. You're just an idiot.


From your linked article:

"...Ukrainian prosecutors and anti-corruption activists with knowledge of the matter..."

That's your evidence of proof that the allegation was "debunked," the opinion (not sworn testimony) of which Ukrainian prosecutors and unnamed "activists."

That's not a systematic debunking with sworn testimony - it's just a more eloquently repetition of the left's position that it has been disproved.

In other words, "There is no argument."

Yeah there is.

"Report: Former Ukraine Prosecutor Files Complaint Charging Biden - Not Trump - Abused Power"

"The former Ukrainian prosecutor whose firing played centrally in the Democratic House's impeachment of President Donald Trump reportedly filed a complaint with Ukraine's National Bureau of Investigation demanding an investigation be opened against Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden.
The French news site Les Crises posted a copy of the complaint in English in which Viktor Shokin charges that Biden wrongfully orchestrated his ouster as Ukraine's prosecutor general.

"Throughout the last months of 2015 and the first months of 2016 Joseph Biden, taking advantage of his position, came several times on official visits to Ukraine in order to negotiate with the leaders of the country my eviction and, consequently, the closing of the objective investigation into the offenses committed by persons associated with the company 'Burisma Holding Limited' (Cyprus), including the son of the aforementioned US official," Shokin's complaint reads."

https://www.westernjournal.com/report-​former-ukraine-prosecutor-files-compla​int-charging-biden-not-trump-abused-po​wer/
 
2020-03-04 9:42:18 AM  

fernt: Running Wild: fernt: Brainsick: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


In other words, "There is no argument."

Yeah there is.

"Report: Former Ukraine Prosecutor Files Complaint Charging Biden - Not Trump - Abused Power"

"The former Ukrainian prosecutor whose firing played centrally in the Democratic House's impeachment of President Donald Trump reportedly filed a complaint with Ukraine's National Bureau of Investigation demanding an investigation be opened against Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden.
The French news site Les Crises posted a copy of the complaint in English in which Viktor Shokin charges that Biden wrongfully orchestrated his ouster as Ukraine's prosecutor general.

"Throughout the last months of 2015 and the first months of 2016 Joseph Biden, taking advantage of his position, came several times on official visits to Ukraine in order to negotiate with the leaders of the country my eviction and, consequently, the closing of the objective investigation into the offenses committed by persons associated with the company 'Burisma Holding Limited' (Cyprus), including the son of the aforementioned US official," Shokin's complaint reads."


So, the guy that every legitimate government in Europe accused of being corrupt, was investigated for corruption, and removed for corruption, filed a complaint demanding that Biden be investigated for pressuring Ukraine to remove the him because he was corrupt.

Yeah, that's a rock solid counterargument.
 
2020-03-04 10:25:42 AM  

fernt: came several times on official visits to Ukraine


Those there are the operative words, imo. This was a policy decision, not an under-the-table solicitation to rig an election.
 
2020-03-04 10:48:36 AM  

RobotSpider: fernt: came several times on official visits to Ukraine

Those there are the operative words, imo. This was a policy decision, not an under-the-table solicitation to rig an election.


Fernt's not great with the dictionary and what-not.
 
2020-03-04 11:03:49 AM  
Wtf?! I thought this was the kind of domestic threat the CIA would assassinate. Apearantly working for our enemies isn't such a big deal anymore.
 
2020-03-04 11:38:39 AM  

Grungehamster: berylman: The sole purpose of Ratcliffe is to "clean house" at the DNI and fire everyone who doesn't suck the shroom and basically gut the entire absolutely vital agency. This is dangerous as fark....make no mistake.
He's a disposable napkin to do Trump's dirty work of destroying America for lord Putin whether he knows it or not.

[Fark user image image 425x513]

This is the stuff that keeps me awake. The people in charge now are the people who advised Trump do illegal things and the people being shown the door are the people who tried telling him it was illegal. How do you come back from the sort of brain drain on display? Decades of experience being sliced away in service of the president's ego, with the conceit that if he wishes to try to seek dirt on opponents again it will not see any resistance.


If I were an intelligence professional I'd defect to another Five Eyes country and leave this one to rot.

What would be the point of going back to work under President Biden when four tees from now another psychopath is just going to fark everything up again?

We don't recover from this, period.
 
2020-03-04 12:06:55 PM  

fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.


Brainiac, you know there is this wonderful tool called Google:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/bu​s​iness/media/fact-check-biden-ukraine-b​urisma-china-hunter.html
 
2020-03-04 12:09:13 PM  
Explain this fernt:

In 2014, Hunter joined the board of Burisma, which was then mired in a corruption scandal. Authorities in Ukraine, Britain and the United States had opened investigations into the company's operations. Mr. Zlochevsky had also been accused of marshaling government contracts to companies he owned and embezzling public money.

At the time of his board appointment, the younger Mr. Biden had just been discharged from the Navy Reserve for drug use. He had no apparent experience in Ukraine or natural gas. And while accepting the board position was legal, it reportedly raised some eyebrows in the Obama administration. The Burisma board position was lucrative: Mr. Biden received payments that reached up to $50,000 per month.

A year later, Viktor Shokin became Ukraine's prosecutor general, a job similar to the attorney general in the United States. He vowed to keep investigating Burisma amid an international push to root out corruption in Ukraine.

But the investigation went dormant under Mr. Shokin. In the fall of 2015, Joe Biden joined the chorus of Western officials calling for Mr. Shokin's ouster. The next March, Mr. Shokin was fired. A subsequent prosecutor cleared Mr. Zlochevsky.
 
2020-03-04 12:38:05 PM  
It's a little know fact that all intel stories on Russia and Ukraine are hoaxes.

desmogblog.comView Full Size
 
2020-03-04 1:43:15 PM  

fernt: Running Wild: fernt: Brainsick: fernt: FTFA: "Ratcliffe also repeated the debunked claim that Biden demanded the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin because the prosecutor was investigating Burisma..."


I'll repeat the question asked in the Senate impeachment trial: exactly who, what agency, "debunked" this claim and how was the conclusion reached?

Schiff and Nadler didn't have an answer for that.

Shut-up, Alex Jones. We're trashing you in another thread.

So you don't have an answer either.

https://www.rferl.org/amp/why-was-ukra​ine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin​/30181445.html

Activists say the case had been sabotaged by Shokin himself. As an example, they say two months before Hunter Biden joined Burisma's board, British authorities had requested information from Shokin's office as part of an investigation into alleged money laundering by Zlochevskiy (Owner of Burisma) . Shokin ignored them.

Kaleniuk(executive director of the Kyiv-based Anti-Corruption Action Center)  and AntAC published a detailed timeline of events surrounding the Burisma case, an outline of evidence suggesting that three consecutive chief prosecutors of Ukraine -- first Shokin's predecessor, then Shokin, and then his successor -- worked to bury it.

"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.

And, just in case you need help understanding the big words: www.rewordify.com

We all have the answer. You're just an idiot.

From your linked article:

"...Ukrainian prosecutors and anti-corruption activists with knowledge of the matter..."

That's your evidence of proof that the allegation was "debunked," the opinion (not sworn testimony) of which Ukrainian prosecutors and unnamed "activists."

That's not a systematic debunking with sworn testimony - it's just a more eloquently repetition of the left's position that it has been disproved.

In other words, "There is no argument."

Yeah there is.

"Report: Former Ukraine Prosecutor Files Complaint Charging Biden - Not Trump - Abused Power"

"The former Ukrainian prosecutor whose firing played centrally in the Democratic House's impeachment of President Donald Trump reportedly filed a complaint with Ukraine's National Bureau of Investigation demanding an investigation be opened against Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden.
The French news site Les Crises posted a copy of the complaint in English in which Viktor Shokin charges that Biden wrongfully orchestrated his ouster as Ukraine's prosecutor general.

"Throughout the last months of 2015 and the first months of 2016 Joseph Biden, taking advantage of his position, came several times on official visits to Ukraine in order to negotiate with the leaders of the country my eviction and, consequently, the closing of the objective investigation into the offenses committed by persons associated with the company 'Burisma Holding Limited' (Cyprus), including the son of the aforementioned US official," Shokin's complaint reads."

https://www.westernjournal.com/report-​former-ukraine-prosecutor-files-compla​int-charging-biden-not-trump-abused-po​wer/


Despite my instinct to correct your astoundingly warped sense of credulity, trolls only get one reply.

Now git.
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2020-03-04 4:52:28 PM  
Wouldn't be the first time that the Commies Russians managed to plant either a useful idiot or a straight-up traitor into a major intelligence agency.

I miss the olden days, when people like Donald Trump and his Flying Monkey Legion of Doom would not have been allowed within 1000 miles of Washington DC. Or been allowed within 100,000 miles of the nuclear launch codes.
 
Displayed 42 of 42 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter




In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.