Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   Ex-FBI Director of Counterintelligence says we won't be getting anything resembling the Mueller Genuine Draft. More like Meuller Lite   (rawstory.com) divider line
    More: Followup, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Frank Figliuzzi, Law enforcement agency, J. Edgar Hoover, Attorney General William Barr, former director of counterintelligence, Debut albums, half of the Russian investigation report  
•       •       •

1088 clicks; posted to Politics » on 15 Apr 2019 at 3:56 PM (4 days ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



51 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
4 days ago  
invite Mueller to testify and have him read it into the record.
 
4 days ago  
rollingpaperwarehouse.comView Full Size


Oh, wait,,,
 
4 days ago  
Or suggest he leave a copy in an unlocked truck (report + supporting materials and evidence) at the House Office Building entrance.
 
4 days ago  
Now taking odds on this going to the Supreme I like Beer.
 
4 days ago  
For a document that completely, totally 100% exonerates Trump, the GOP sure is doing a major dick dance to keep it under wraps.

I'm starting to think there's more to this investigation than we know about.
 
4 days ago  

markie_farkie: For a document that completely, totally 100% exonerates Trump, the GOP sure is doing a major dick dance to keep it under wraps.

I'm starting to think there's more to this investigation than we know about.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp2Hw​i​9qM48
 
4 days ago  

markie_farkie: For a document that completely, totally 100% exonerates Trump, the GOP sure is doing a major dick dance to keep it under wraps.

I'm starting to think there's more to this investigation than we know about.


Just protecting the House and the public from the illegal spying, illegal lies and illegal coup. For your own good. You can't handle the illegality.
 
4 days ago  
I expect there to be some obvious error like leaving in information that is beneficial to Trump but is also totally classified to completely discredit the redactions on the whole thing.
These are not very bright guys.
 
4 days ago  
Obvious tag is drunk.
 
4 days ago  

FlashHarry: invite Mueller to testify and have him read it into the record.


We have to know this is never, ever going to happen.
 
4 days ago  
Water Wet, Grass Green, Sky Blue, Republicans are assholes, day ending in Y.

/yawn.
 
4 days ago  
Great case, or less shilling?
 
4 days ago  

dionysusaur: Or suggest he leave a copy in an unlocked truck (report + supporting materials and evidence) at the House Office Building entrance.


If there isnt an iron-clad chain of custody, the GOP can cry "Fabrication!"
 
4 days ago  

Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste: FlashHarry: invite Mueller to testify and have him read it into the record.

We have to know this is never, ever going to happen.


not to be snarky, but what leads you to believe this? didn't Nadler say this was going to happen anyway? that they were giving Barr a chance... who could stop them from doing this?
 
4 days ago  
FTFA:

"Experts have been saying look for anywhere from 50% to 70% to be redacted."

Who are these "experts?" Oh...sorry, this is what passes for a news story these days and nobody cares who the sources are. They've been so right so many times.
 
MFK
4 days ago  
so first he's going to insult Congress and make them go through the courts.... which Trump and McConnell have stacked with partisans.

shiat. He might actually get away with this.
 
4 days ago  

fernt: FTFA:

"Experts have been saying look for anywhere from 50% to 70% to be redacted."

Who are these "experts?" Oh...sorry, this is what passes for a news story these days and nobody cares who the sources are. They've been so right so many times.


Fox News claims to have experts.  How come you're saying that only Fox News can have experts?
 
4 days ago  
It's simple really. He's cutting out everything that makes his boss Trumpy look bad. Which is 80% of the document. The things taken out are for national security.. ie covering Donald's disgusting pale ass.
 
4 days ago  

Hack Patooey: dionysusaur: Or suggest he leave a copy in an unlocked truck (report + supporting materials and evidence) at the House Office Building entrance.

If there isnt an iron-clad chain of custody, the GOP can cry "Fabrication!"


Then, they will have to provide one with an iron clad chain of custody to set the record straight.

/personally, I wouldn't want to touch the VHS cassette rubber banded to the report
 
4 days ago  
At least we can play along.

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
4 days ago  

snocone: Now taking odds on this going to the Supreme I like Beer.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
4 days ago  

fernt: FTFA:

"Experts have been saying look for anywhere from 50% to 70% to be redacted."

Who are these "experts?" Oh...sorry, this is what passes for a news story these days and nobody cares who the sources are. They've been so right so many times.


After hanging onto anything Trump says (including birtherism & cheering NY Muslims on 9/11) now you're concerned about proper sources?
 
MFK
4 days ago  

snocone: markie_farkie: For a document that completely, totally 100% exonerates Trump, the GOP sure is doing a major dick dance to keep it under wraps.

I'm starting to think there's more to this investigation than we know about.

Just protecting the House and the public from the illegal spying, illegal lies and illegal coup. For your own good. You can't handle the illegality.


Well, If we're being honest, seeing the unreacted report will probably be incredibly damaging to the stability of the nation.

Honestly, I my biggest disappointment in all of this is that we didn't flood the streets as soon as Barr said, "There's no collusion, no obstruction but you can't see the report for yourselves."

Nobody really believes that the Department of Republican Justice is going to let us see the full report and frankly, I'd be surprised if the  Supreme Republican Court did anything about it.
 
4 days ago  
Yeah, that ain't gonna cut it.
 
4 days ago  
im5.ezgif.comView Full Size
 
4 days ago  

MFK: snocone: markie_farkie: For a document that completely, totally 100% exonerates Trump, the GOP sure is doing a major dick dance to keep it under wraps.

I'm starting to think there's more to this investigation than we know about.

Just protecting the House and the public from the illegal spying, illegal lies and illegal coup. For your own good. You can't handle the illegality.

Well, If we're being honest, seeing the unreacted report will probably be incredibly damaging to the stability of the nation.

Honestly, I my biggest disappointment in all of this is that we didn't flood the streets as soon as Barr said, "There's no collusion, no obstruction but you can't see the report for yourselves."

Nobody really believes that the Department of Republican Justice is going to let us see the full report and frankly, I'd be surprised if the  Supreme Republican Court did anything about it.


If what is happening now is "stability" then it needs to be disrupted. Dead people are stable as shiat, but nobody's going to forego resuscitation just to maintain that kind of stability.
 
4 days ago  
I like how a report that proves he didn't do anything wrong with a foreign nation in regards to our Nation and national security needs to be so heavily redacted. After all, what super secret things could they have been doing if none of this stuff ever took place and never happened?
 
4 days ago  

snocone: Now taking odds on this going to the Supreme I like Beer.


Squee and Donkey Dong Doug nod in agreement, do the Eiffel Tower. Mark it on your calendar.
 
4 days ago  

fernt: FTFA:

"Experts have been saying look for anywhere from 50% to 70% to be redacted."

Who are these "experts?" Oh...sorry, this is what passes for a news story these days and nobody cares who the sources are. They've been so right so many times.


media.giphy.comView Full Size
 
4 days ago  
img.fark.netView Full Size

2019 George Washington looks like Mueller.
 
4 days ago  

ViolentEastCoastCity: [img.fark.net image 850x531]
2019 George Washington looks like Mueller.


Great, you're going to get Trump started on "George Washington and his 18 angry Democrats!".
 
4 days ago  
In a couple of years there might be another group of people in charge of that document. If they feel like it, it can be released then and further actions taken, and the current obstructionist can only tweet about it. But by that time there's a lot more getting revealed.
 
4 days ago  

ViolentEastCoastCity: [img.fark.net image 850x531]
2019 George Washington looks like Mueller.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
4 days ago  

ToeCheeseGrater: ViolentEastCoastCity: [img.fark.net image 850x531]
2019 George Washington looks like Mueller.

[img.fark.net image 850x531]


Clicking on 'Funny' because there is no 'Evil' button.
 
4 days ago  
Experts say...

Well, that should do it then.
 
4 days ago  
I'm sure from what we do see it will be enough to get the gist of the report.
 
4 days ago  
I assume [obvious] and [sick] are both passed out from downing prescription sleep meds with red wine to deal with watching the attempted murder of the world's first rule-of-law democracy...
 
4 days ago  
The report is coming out. It may take a while, but all of Piggy's shiatholes and all of Piggy's hacks can't put Piggy back together again. The fact that they are so desperate to keep it hidden is a blinking neon arrow pointing at the certainty that it has some really bad stuff in it. The fact that 80% of the people want the whole thing released means it *will* come out. The political price of keeping it buried will be too high.

Squeal, pig.
 
4 days ago  
Fine.  I don't care if the public release is that redacted.  However, I find it completely unacceptable for my reps to not see the unredacted report.  So fark this bullshiat!
 
4 days ago  

JDAT: I'm sure from what we do see it will be enough to get the gist of the report.


Yes, in the same way that reading a mystery novel with 50-70% of the words removed gives you the gist of the book.
 
4 days ago  

vrax: Fine.  I don't care if the public release is that redacted.  However, I find it completely unacceptable for my reps to not see the unredacted report.  So fark this bullshiat!


Not all of "your reps" are cleared for classified intelligence I bet. Even on the Judiciary Committee, there are probably only 4 members who qualify to see that bullshiat...

Even still, IF they see it it'll be in closed-door secret viewing of the report for a limited amount of time only...with no copies available for release and/or no note taking allowed.
 
4 days ago  
I get that there are elements that need to be kept confidential. All I want is a congresional committee with clearances to have the full report. Then redact away, I just want to at least have some bi-partisan eyes on the difference between the two.
 
4 days ago  

r8doman: vrax: Fine.  I don't care if the public release is that redacted.  However, I find it completely unacceptable for my reps to not see the unredacted report.  So fark this bullshiat!

Not all of "your reps" are cleared for classified intelligence I bet. Even on the Judiciary Committee, there are probably only 4 members who qualify to see that bullshiat...

Even still, IF they see it it'll be in closed-door secret viewing of the report for a limited amount of time only...with no copies available for release and/or no note taking allowed.


Fark that!  The law needs to be changed then.  They cannot do what the GOP did with that idiotic report they produced where people could only see it in some "vault" for like 20 minutes.  It's supposed to be 400 pages.  This is pure, obstructionist nonsense.
 
4 days ago  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
4 days ago  

dionysusaur: Or suggest he leave a copy in an unlocked truck (report + supporting materials and evidence) at the House Office Building entrance.


Daniel Ellsberg wanted on the white phone! White phone for Daniel Ellsberg!!
 
4 days ago  
Obvious tag too busy buying russian stock in Fark?

FlashHarry: invite Mueller to testify and have him read it into the record.


The democrats won't do that, because it might get something done.


/so why wont they do it? Yea shut up chucklefarks.
 
4 days ago  

vrax: Fine.  I don't care if the public release is that redacted.  However, I find it completely unacceptable for my reps to not see the unredacted report.  So fark this bullshiat!


Exactly. It's called oversight, and it's one of the most important jobs congress has.
 
4 days ago  
I'd prefer the Mueller High Life report. It's the champagne of incriminating documents.
 
4 days ago  
Somebody leak the summaries already!
 
4 days ago  

fernt: FTFA:

"Experts have been saying look for anywhere from 50% to 70% to be redacted."

Who are these "experts?" Oh...sorry, this is what passes for a news story these days and nobody cares who the sources are. They've been so right so many times.


If Barr runs true to form, he will redact 50%-70%.

Then he'll lie about the contents of what he redacted from the report. https://www.justsecurity.org/​63635/bar​rs-playbook-he-misled-congress-when-om​itting-parts-of-justice-dept-memo-in-1​989/
 
Displayed 50 of 51 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter




In Other Media
Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report