Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MSN)   Want to know if your food is genetically modified? Look for this hidden code on them   (msn.com) divider line
    More: Interesting, Genetically modified food, Genetically modified organism, food labels, GMO Project's Product Verification, Organic food, Maize, Golden rice, Monsanto  
•       •       •

1101 clicks; posted to Food » on 15 Mar 2019 at 12:35 PM (9 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



41 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2019-03-15 12:47:39 PM  
Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it
 
2019-03-15 12:50:26 PM  
Like the author's fear of GMO, this is still a hypothetical issue.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffre​y​-smith/plu-codes-do-not-indicate_b_473​088.html

And GMO's are safe
 
2019-03-15 12:59:35 PM  
I only buy high quality, organic produce grown in the scenic hamlet of Pripyat, so I know I'm safe.
 
2019-03-15 12:59:46 PM  
I wonder what percentage of anti-vaxxers are anti-GMO?
 
2019-03-15 01:22:53 PM  
technovelgy.comView Full Size

Fish?
 
2019-03-15 01:27:46 PM  

Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it


I'd sit and argue how wrong you are, but I'm going to take my castrated wolf out of his cage in my apartment and walk over to the Sea World protest.
 
2019-03-15 01:35:45 PM  

Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it


That's knee-jerk ignorant bleating just like the anti-GMO hysterics.

GMO is not selective breeding, and the possibilities from genetic modification are orders of magnitude greater than selective breeding.

You can insert genes from other species into a plant. You can precisely alter the genome within a single generation. Nothing like that is possible with selective breeding.

GMO crops have to be carefully managed, because you can instantly introduce unintended bad consequences, for your yield and the surrounding ecosystem. With selective breeding, it's slower and there is a lot more opportunity to observe the results over time.

I'm not anti-GMO. They're coming to our store shelves. The benefits make it commercially inevitable. But they are not a simple flawless solution. There are trade-offs.
 
2019-03-15 01:48:19 PM  
David Friedman, ND, doctor of naturopathy, board certified in alternative medicine and integrative medicine

I know one person who uses the word "naturopathy". She also is a fan of "integrative medicine", homeopathy, and Scientology.

She just about killed her dad after he had a stroke and she took the lead in managing his care. It turns out going gluten free and drinking homeopathic water are not the sufficient treatment.

Thank goodness after a couple of weeks her siblings intervened.
 
2019-03-15 01:49:28 PM  

Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it


There is an article from awhile back which showed how small things like peaches and watermelon were.

https://www.businessinsider.com/foods​-​before-genetic-modification-2015-8
 
2019-03-15 01:56:06 PM  
I would hardly call the sticker I must remove from my food as "hidden".
 
2019-03-15 02:01:44 PM  

CFitzsimmons: I would hardly call the sticker I must remove from my food as "hidden".


That's exactly what they want you to believe!
 
2019-03-15 02:15:47 PM  

olrasputin: I only buy high quality, organic produce grown in the scenic hamlet of Pripyat, so I know I'm safe.


Do your food choice theory would be called Pripyat-ism?
 
2019-03-15 02:18:44 PM  
i.stack.imgur.comView Full Size
 
2019-03-15 02:21:23 PM  
I don't need to know cause I don't care. I'm not paying a dollar more for a green pepper because they "claim" they're organic.
 
2019-03-15 02:23:37 PM  

Drunky Smurf: olrasputin: I only buy high quality, organic produce grown in the scenic hamlet of Pripyat, so I know I'm safe.

Do your food choice theory would be called Pripyat-ism?


So, not do.
I'm not really as dumb as I look.
 
2019-03-15 02:29:59 PM  
David Friedman, ND, doctor of naturopathy, board certified in alternative medicine and integrative medicinebullshiat.

I'm tired of mincing words with quacks.
 
2019-03-15 02:32:27 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size

Was partially funded by the Stark family.  Tony Stark not known to be involved.
 
2019-03-15 02:36:10 PM  
bullsh*t article.  I worked in a grocery store 30 years ago and we had the four-digit produce lookup codes.
 
2019-03-15 02:43:35 PM  

jaytkay: Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it

That's knee-jerk ignorant bleating just like the anti-GMO hysterics.

GMO is not selective breeding, and the possibilities from genetic modification are orders of magnitude greater than selective breeding.

You can insert genes from other species into a plant. You can precisely alter the genome within a single generation. Nothing like that is possible with selective breeding.

GMO crops have to be carefully managed, because you can instantly introduce unintended bad consequences, for your yield and the surrounding ecosystem. With selective breeding, it's slower and there is a lot more opportunity to observe the results over time.

I'm not anti-GMO. They're coming to our store shelves. The benefits make it commercially inevitable. But they are not a simple flawless solution. There are trade-offs.


Please cite some credible sources, how is adding or replacing specific genes to a genome going to "instantly" add unintended consequences?  You realize chemical or radiation mutagenesis is even worse for scrambling genomes to get results? even line breeding can have unintended consequences when breeding various varieties for traits. Using resistant traits in crops cuts pesticide use drastically and that is good for the environment.
 
2019-03-15 03:44:17 PM  

Labrat407: jaytkay: Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it

That's knee-jerk ignorant bleating just like the anti-GMO hysterics.

GMO is not selective breeding, and the possibilities from genetic modification are orders of magnitude greater than selective breeding.

You can insert genes from other species into a plant. You can precisely alter the genome within a single generation. Nothing like that is possible with selective breeding.

GMO crops have to be carefully managed, because you can instantly introduce unintended bad consequences, for your yield and the surrounding ecosystem. With selective breeding, it's slower and there is a lot more opportunity to observe the results over time.

I'm not anti-GMO. They're coming to our store shelves. The benefits make it commercially inevitable. But they are not a simple flawless solution. There are trade-offs.

Please cite some credible sources, how is adding or replacing specific genes to a genome going to "instantly" add unintended consequences?  You realize chemical or radiation mutagenesis is even worse for scrambling genomes to get results? even line breeding can have unintended consequences when breeding various varieties for traits. Using resistant traits in crops cuts pesticide use drastically and that is good for the environment.


*checks username*
Sure, you've been trained to say that. Which is actually pretty impressive. Okay, I'm in. Go science!
 
2019-03-15 03:49:54 PM  

jaytkay: David Friedman, ND, doctor of naturopathy, board certified in alternative medicine and integrative medicine

I know one person who uses the word "naturopathy". She also is a fan of "integrative medicine", homeopathy, and Scientology.

She just about killed her dad after he had a stroke and she took the lead in managing his care. It turns out going gluten free and drinking homeopathic water are not the sufficient treatment.

Thank goodness after a couple of weeks her siblings intervened.


Crap.  beat me to the point.  Cheers!
 
2019-03-15 03:50:29 PM  

Labrat407: jaytkay: Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it

That's knee-jerk ignorant bleating just like the anti-GMO hysterics.

GMO is not selective breeding, and the possibilities from genetic modification are orders of magnitude greater than selective breeding.

You can insert genes from other species into a plant. You can precisely alter the genome within a single generation. Nothing like that is possible with selective breeding.

GMO crops have to be carefully managed, because you can instantly introduce unintended bad consequences, for your yield and the surrounding ecosystem. With selective breeding, it's slower and there is a lot more opportunity to observe the results over time.

I'm not anti-GMO. They're coming to our store shelves. The benefits make it commercially inevitable. But they are not a simple flawless solution. There are trade-offs.

Please cite some credible sources, how is adding or replacing specific genes to a genome going to "instantly" add unintended consequences?  You realize chemical or radiation mutagenesis is even worse for scrambling genomes to get results? even line breeding can have unintended consequences when breeding various varieties for traits. Using resistant traits in crops cuts pesticide use drastically and that is good for the environment.


It's not that hard to imagine a hypothetical where GMO can have drastic consequences. For example, say you develop a generous that leads to exceptional insect resistance, that horizontally transfers to milk weed, and now all the Monarch butterflies are dead.

I agree that GMO seems like an arbitrary line to draw on human actions given everything else we do, but let's not pretend that it has zero chance of externalities.
 
2019-03-15 04:23:45 PM  

jaytkay: Klivian: Any crop that is produced for mass consumption is genetically modified. We have been selectively breeding crops for eons. Get over it

That's knee-jerk ignorant bleating just like the anti-GMO hysterics.

GMO is not selective breeding, and the possibilities from genetic modification are orders of magnitude greater than selective breeding.

You can insert genes from other species into a plant. You can precisely alter the genome within a single generation. Nothing like that is possible with selective breeding.

GMO crops have to be carefully managed, because you can instantly introduce unintended bad consequences, for your yield and the surrounding ecosystem. With selective breeding, it's slower and there is a lot more opportunity to observe the results over time.

I'm not anti-GMO. They're coming to our store shelves. The benefits make it commercially inevitable. But they are not a simple flawless solution. There are trade-offs.


Then they should come up with a better term for it, selective breeding is genetic modification. This shiat is just scare mongering
 
2019-03-15 04:29:07 PM  

Labrat407: Please cite some credible sources, how is adding or replacing specific genes to a genome going to "instantly" add unintended consequences?


If you're asking how genes are replaced, here you go: Gene Splicing Overview & Techniques
 
2019-03-15 04:32:01 PM  

chitownmike: Then they should come up with a better term for it, selective breeding is genetic modification.


GMO does not mean traditional selective breeding. To pretend you don't know that is being deliberately obtuse.
 
2019-03-15 04:35:45 PM  

Cervetus: I agree that GMO seems like an arbitrary line to draw on human actions


It's not arbitary at all. Inserting genes into a generation is a huge step beyond selective breeding over generations. The genes don't have to be related. You can put animal genes in a plant and vice versa.

It's like publishing over the internet compared to monks having to copy books by hand.
 
2019-03-15 04:50:56 PM  

jaytkay: chitownmike: Then they should come up with a better term for it, selective breeding is genetic modification.

GMO does not mean traditional selective breeding. To pretend you don't know that is being deliberately obtuse.


No it's using words for what they mean
 
2019-03-15 05:09:19 PM  

chitownmike: jaytkay: chitownmike: Then they should come up with a better term for it, selective breeding is genetic modification.

GMO does not mean traditional selective breeding. To pretend you don't know that is being deliberately obtuse.

No it's using words for what they mean


I see. It's the condition where a person can't understand social cues and is flummoxed by the normal nuances of human language. Anything not rigidly and precisely defined is frustrating.

There's a lot of you on Fark.
 
2019-03-15 05:31:29 PM  

jaytkay: chitownmike: jaytkay: chitownmike: Then they should come up with a better term for it, selective breeding is genetic modification.

GMO does not mean traditional selective breeding. To pretend you don't know that is being deliberately obtuse.

No it's using words for what they mean

I see. It's the condition where a person can't understand social cues and is flummoxed by the normal nuances of human language. Anything not rigidly and precisely defined is frustrating.

There's a lot of you on Fark.


The fact that you don't understand that people have been genetically modified everything for ever has nothing to do with my grasp of the English language
 
2019-03-15 06:00:15 PM  
 
2019-03-15 06:29:35 PM  

jaytkay: Cervetus: I agree that GMO seems like an arbitrary line to draw on human actions

It's not arbitary at all. Inserting genes into a generation is a huge step beyond selective breeding over generations. The genes don't have to be related. You can put animal genes in a plant and vice versa.

It's like publishing over the internet compared to monks having to copy books by hand.


What I mean is, humans are obliterating the environment left and right with deforestation, pollution, and a million other things, so all the hand-wringing over GMO's potential damage seems arbitrary.
 
2019-03-15 09:21:55 PM  

jaytkay: chitownmike: The fact that you don't understand that people have been genetically modified everything for ever has nothing to do with my grasp of the English language

I understand genetics just fine. And I understand the language.

Here you go. You're welcome.

"Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be defined as organisms (i.e. plants, animals or microorganisms) in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination."

In recent times, it has become possible to modify the genetic make-up of living cells and organisms using techniques of modern biotechnology called gene technology. The genetic material is modified artificially to give it a new property (e.g. a plant's resistance to a disease, insect or drought, a plant's tolerance to a herbicide, improving a food's quality or nutritional value, increased yield).
Such organisms are called "genetically modified organisms" (GMOs).

"A GMO, or genetically modified organism, is a plant, animal, microorganism or other organism whose genetic makeup has been modified in a laboratory using genetic engineering or transgenic technology."

"Genetically modified (GM) organisms are organisms that have had their genomes changed in a way that does not happen naturally."


Post all the links you want, the description is wrong, it's not your fault obviously there are a
 
2019-03-15 09:24:52 PM  
Lot of other people who are wrong about it. Words have meaning and definition
 
2019-03-15 10:04:22 PM  

chitownmike: Lot of other people who are wrong about it. Words have meaning and definition


Stamp your little feet and hold your breath until the botanists and all the world see how wrong they are. Enjoy.
 
2019-03-15 10:48:28 PM  

jaytkay: chitownmike: Lot of other people who are wrong about it. Words have meaning and definition

Stamp your little feet and hold your breath until the botanists and all the world see how wrong they are. Enjoy.


You probably buy organic salt
 
2019-03-16 06:44:51 AM  

ShonenBat: [technovelgy.com image 400x201]
Fish?


Noo...Snake scale....
 
2019-03-16 02:38:19 PM  

Timmy the Tumor: bullsh*t article.  I worked in a grocery store 30 years ago and we had the four-digit produce lookup codes.


Yeah and damn near can't forget those codes. I worked at a grocer 20 years ago and still remember some of the codes. I love it when I tell the cashiers at my local store the codes to items I'm buying.
 
2019-03-16 06:18:16 PM  
Two thirds of the maize (corn) crop and soya bean (soya byproduct crop, not be confused with tofu, which is a fermented product and good for you) is genetically modified in the US and Canada.

If you are eating highly processed food, you are eating lots of GMO. Fortunately, the ersatz food will kill you long before any genetic anomaly will. Add that this food is also too full of lard, vegetable oils, simple carbs, sugars, salt and chemicals that are not tested singly or in groups, and you can be pretty sure it will not be the GMO that will get you. It's the toxic crap you already eat too much of, you poor obese swine-man.
 
2019-03-16 06:21:10 PM  
The average American was found to contain over 93 man-made industrial chemicals (pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, etc).

Congratulations, you are more toxic than a Super Fund Site!

I am sure you have heard the old expression "digging your graves with your teeth". Lots of luck with that.

By the way, don't eat the wheat or the corn if you keep Kosher. They probably have pig genes in them.
 
2019-03-16 08:09:13 PM  

brantgoose: The average American was found to contain over 93 man-made industrial chemicals (pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, etc).

Congratulations, you are more toxic than a Super Fund Site!


The average human (not just Americans) contains uranium, radium, thorium, and lots of other stuff. Luckily, these are "all natural"!
 
2019-03-16 08:12:09 PM  

chitownmike: You probably buy organic salt


I've always been irritated by the idea that "sea salt" has some healthy aura. "Regular" salt is from ancient oceans before humans screwed up the environment, and is refined to be pure. So called "sea salt" is from modern polluted oceans, and especially when it's some funny color, obviously has additional chemicals in it besides the salt itself.
 
Displayed 41 of 41 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter




In Other Media
Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report