Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Politico)   House unanimously approves resolution calling for full release of Mueller report, on to the next step of being completely ignored in Mitch McConnell's Senate   (politico.com) divider line
    More: Interesting, United States Senate, President of the United States, Mitch McConnell, United States House Committee on the Judiciary, Party leaders of the United States Senate, Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, Republican Party, Democratic Party  
•       •       •

836 clicks; posted to Politics » on 14 Mar 2019 at 2:35 PM (10 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



47 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2019-03-14 01:04:38 PM  
It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.
 
2019-03-14 01:24:26 PM  

markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.


Go all Gravel-anch on that biatch!
 
2019-03-14 01:42:43 PM  
McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics
 
2019-03-14 02:17:10 PM  

somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics


Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?
 
2019-03-14 02:23:23 PM  
Isn't bipartisanship what the senile old turtle wants?
 
2019-03-14 02:26:51 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?


stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true
 
2019-03-14 02:35:03 PM  

somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true


I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.
 
2019-03-14 02:36:14 PM  

Jake Havechek: Isn't bipartisanship what the senile old turtle wants?


Yes. As long as everyone agrees to republican policies.
 
2019-03-14 02:37:46 PM  

markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.


So, a nuclear option could be used on the nuclear option user?
 
2019-03-14 02:38:03 PM  

Jake Havechek: Isn't bipartisanship what the senile old turtle wants?


As long as 'bipartisanship' means the Democrats do exactly what the Republicans want, then sure.
 
2019-03-14 02:38:40 PM  
I didn't think the House was allowed to pass anything that the Senate Republicans wouldn't unanimously approve of!
 
2019-03-14 02:38:50 PM  

markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.


I would definitely take the day off from work to watch that
 
2019-03-14 02:39:26 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2019-03-14 02:39:42 PM  
"Republicans said the resolution was unnecessary and a waste of time.."

Nothing is unnecessary when it come to republicans, if you leave any room whatsoever they will twist, worm, weasel, and spin things.
 
2019-03-14 02:39:53 PM  
Unbinding resolution aside, I'm casually optimistic that it was passed unanimously.
 
2019-03-14 02:41:00 PM  

markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.


The four "present" votes:
Gaetz
Goser
Amash
Massie
 
2019-03-14 02:42:02 PM  

Lord_Baull: Unbinding resolution aside, I'm casually optimistic that it was passed unanimously.


That surprised me a little, as I figured there would be at least some token GOP pushback.

That said, I'd wager that our definition of "making the report public" is significantly different from theirs.
 
2019-03-14 02:42:29 PM  
This vote is kind of surprising to me, despite how obvious it should be. Hell, just from Kansas Ron Estes would have given Trump a hand job if he thought it would have been necessary during the campaign.
 
2019-03-14 02:42:35 PM  

fiddlehead: markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.

The four "present" votes:
Gaetz
Goser
Amash
Massie


So Grapefruit Boy and Louie "Herp a Derp" Gohmert voted for it, but these losers wouldn't?
 
2019-03-14 02:43:00 PM  
If this timeline ever comes to an end, I hope McConnell pays the price for his major part of it.  He's giving the car keys to an habitual drunk driver.
 
2019-03-14 02:43:04 PM  

Boo_Guy: "Republicans said the resolution was unnecessary and a waste of time.."

Nothing is unnecessary when it come to republicans, if you leave any room whatsoever they will twist, worm, weasel, and spin things.



Coming from the party that votes against their own bills, not surprised.
 
2019-03-14 02:43:43 PM  

EyeballKid: I didn't think the House was allowed to pass anything that the Senate Republicans wouldn't unanimously approve of!


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2019-03-14 02:44:26 PM  

fiddlehead: markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.

The four "present" votes:
Gaetz
Goser
Amash
Massie


Disappointed to see Amash on there.
 
2019-03-14 02:45:37 PM  

jake_lex: fiddlehead: markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.

The four "present" votes:
Gaetz
Goser
Amash
Massie

So Grapefruit Boy and Louie "Herp a Derp" Gohmert voted for it, but these losers wouldn't?



Well, knowing Gaetz, he probably thought he was voting himself a gift.
 
2019-03-14 02:48:16 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.


McConnell probably believes that he is invulnerable.  He owns the state of Kentucky, and he has oceans of dark money he can use.

The sad thing is he's probably right.
 
2019-03-14 02:49:47 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.


It won't be. He'll save some embarrassment for the party and Trump and it won't hurt him. Holding a vote, pass or fail, is worse for him than not. He'll call it "liberal House overreach" or something, declare it ridiculous and move on.
 
2019-03-14 02:50:31 PM  

Lord_Baull: jake_lex: fiddlehead: markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.

The four "present" votes:
Gaetz
Goser
Amash
Massie

So Grapefruit Boy and Louie "Herp a Derp" Gohmert voted for it, but these losers wouldn't?


Well, knowing Gaetz, he probably thought he was voting himself a gift.


Gaetz sayth:
"I've said to millions of Americans on television that I support releasing the Mueller report. I didn't need to embrace Nancy Pelosi's foreword to it today. I take specific exception to the elements of the resolution noting praise for Mueller, without also noting the criticism of his very biased staffing decisions. It's like he was fishing for talent in the Hillary Clinton fan club aquarium,"

Fark off, Gaetz.
 
2019-03-14 02:52:17 PM  

jake_lex: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.

McConnell probably believes that he is invulnerable.  He owns the state of Kentucky, and he has oceans of dark money he can use.

The sad thing is he's probably right.


There's a reason "smart as a Kentucky voter" isn't a common expression.
 
2019-03-14 02:55:12 PM  

jake_lex: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.

McConnell probably believes that he is invulnerable.  He owns the state of Kentucky, and he has oceans of dark money he can use.

The sad thing is he's probably right.


Yep. This invulnerability is being used by the entirety of the nazi senate to tank any tough decisions: if it might get problematic, just don't bring it to the floor, and let the backlash hit yertle square in the nose...to no avail whatsoever because kentucky is that stupid.

/those aren't typos, these assholes don't get capital letters anymore
 
2019-03-14 02:57:03 PM  
Don't be fooled, the Republicans only want it made public to give fuel for every single possible conspiracy theory they can make up about the illegitimacy of it. Every single person will be hounded for the tiniest connection to anything liberal, and they'll use it for generations to show how oppressed they are.
 
2019-03-14 02:57:27 PM  
Yes, release it all! After 2 1/2 years of this insanity we deserve to see what we paid for in this investigation.
 
2019-03-14 02:57:54 PM  

EyeballKid: jake_lex: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.

McConnell probably believes that he is invulnerable.  He owns the state of Kentucky, and he has oceans of dark money he can use.

The sad thing is he's probably right.

There's a reason "smart as a Kentucky voter" isn't a common expression.


it isn't now, but I'm sure as hell gonna start using it sarcastically
 
2019-03-14 02:58:37 PM  
59-41, Senate votes to block emergency declaration over border wall, setting up Trump's first veto
 
2019-03-14 03:02:19 PM  
Well slap my ass and call me Nancy.  I'm honestly shocked McConnell took it directly to a vote.

Anyone want to give the over/under on the override vote?
 
2019-03-14 03:02:45 PM  

ValisIV: Don't be fooled, the Republicans only want it made public to give fuel for every single possible conspiracy theory they can make up about the illegitimacy of it. Every single person will be hounded for the tiniest connection to anything liberal, and they'll use it for generations to show how oppressed they are.


I imagine Hannity is drawing up new yarn-wall charts to have at the ready!
 
2019-03-14 03:02:55 PM  
420-0

I look forward to 69 senators voting for it.
 
2019-03-14 03:04:01 PM  

PenguinCam: markie_farkie: It won't matter what that fark Yertle does at this point.

With unanimous (minus the four "present" votes) consent established now, the House Intelligence Committee can just subpoena Mueller personally to read the report out loud into the Congressional Record.

So, a nuclear option could be used on the nuclear option user?


That would be such a beautiful thing to see. To watch it happen would make it worth almost anything.

As long as Trump didn't try to cut the cable. I do know one thing, though. He will not leave voluntarily, and he has to go. He cannot be allowed to complete his term. America can't afford it.
 
2019-03-14 03:06:59 PM  

Boo_Guy: "Republicans said the resolution was unnecessary and a waste of time.."

Nothing is unnecessary when it come to republicans, if you leave any room whatsoever they will twist, worm, weasel, and spin things.


Or just blatantly lie.
 
2019-03-14 03:16:10 PM  

EyeballKid: jake_lex: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.

McConnell probably believes that he is invulnerable.  He owns the state of Kentucky, and he has oceans of dark money he can use.

The sad thing is he's probably right.

There's a reason "smart as a Kentucky voter" isn't a common expression.


Come on they are all the "Common Clay of the West"
 
2019-03-14 03:20:30 PM  

jayhawk88: This vote is kind of surprising to me, despite how obvious it should be. Hell, just from Kansas Ron Estes would have given Trump a hand job if he thought it would have been necessary during the campaign.


Because they think they'll be vindicated. Since DOJ won't indict a sitting Pres, and won't include negative info on those they chose not to indict, however dirty, there won't be anything about 2Scoops in the report.

This could backfire on them, fingers crossed.
 
2019-03-14 03:23:03 PM  

EyeballKid: jake_lex: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.

McConnell probably believes that he is invulnerable.  He owns the state of Kentucky, and he has oceans of dark money he can use.

The sad thing is he's probably right.

There's a reason "smart as a Kentucky voter" isn't a common expression.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2019-03-14 03:24:06 PM  

KCinPA: Yes, release it all! After 2 1/2 years of this insanity we deserve to see what we paid for in this investigation.


We paid nothing - it made money, thanks to Manafort.
 
2019-03-14 03:41:17 PM  

SharkInfested: jayhawk88: This vote is kind of surprising to me, despite how obvious it should be. Hell, just from Kansas Ron Estes would have given Trump a hand job if he thought it would have been necessary during the campaign.

Because they think they'll be vindicated. Since DOJ won't indict a sitting Pres, and won't include negative info on those they chose not to indict, however dirty, there won't be anything about 2Scoops in the report.

This could backfire on them, fingers crossed.


Mueller can petition the court to forward the grand jury evidence (normally sealed) to the House. That is what the Watergate prosecutors did for Nixon.
 
2019-03-14 03:47:27 PM  

palelizard: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: Benevolent Misanthrope: somedude210: McConnell may not want to do it, but optics will dictate he probably should hold a vote. Trump vetoing will be a terrible look, even for a president who excels at terrible optics

Since when does Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party give a tinker's fart about optics?

stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Trump vetoes, it makes him seem like he has even more to hide (if there's NO COLLUSION, then the report will state that, no?)

McConnell may not care if the rumors of him not seeking reelection are true

I just look to his actions around the shutdown, and how unutterably bad it looked for him to refuse to take up anything to stop it.  He had absolutely no f*cks to give about how it looked, he was toeing the Party Line all the way.  Why would this rock and hard place be different?.

It won't be. He'll save some embarrassment for the party and Trump and it won't hurt him. Holding a vote, pass or fail, is worse for him than not. He'll call it "liberal House overreach" or something, declare it ridiculous and move on.


This sounds right to me.
 
2019-03-14 03:56:34 PM  
We don't have to make every decision based on what Turtle wants or doesn't want or might say or do.

fark Turtle. fark him and all the Republicans.
 
2019-03-14 06:25:11 PM  
OF COURSE the House Republicans want the report released.  Once it's released, the Democrats have nothing further they can throw at Trump.  Since Pelosi has already conceded that Trump's not getting removed from office via impeachment, making the report public does less damage than keeping it a secret and giving Democrats a platform to harp on "what are they hiding?"
 
2019-03-15 12:53:40 AM  

Lord_Baull: Boo_Guy: "Republicans said the resolution was unnecessary and a waste of time.."

Nothing is unnecessary when it come to republicans, if you leave any room whatsoever they will twist, worm, weasel, and spin things.


Coming from the party that votes against filibusters their own bills, not surprised.


Even more ridiculous.
 
Displayed 47 of 47 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter




In Other Media
Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report