Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   Court upholds ruling that Duchess of Cambridge's boobs are worth €75,000 each   ( theguardian.com) divider line
    More: Followup, Appeal, euro fines, grainy paparazzi shots, Paris, United States, court, France, absolutely unacceptable breach  
•       •       •

5764 clicks; posted to Main » on 19 Sep 2018 at 11:29 PM (4 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



41 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2018-09-19 09:36:58 PM  
And if they won their appeal this would've merited a Boobies tag!
 
2018-09-19 11:17:38 PM  
At that rate Pippa's arse must be worth billions.
 
2018-09-19 11:31:19 PM  
What if I can only afford one?
 
2018-09-19 11:36:31 PM  
Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.
 
2018-09-19 11:40:39 PM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


You know how I know you're gay?

/or a straight Farkette
//NTTAWWT
 
2018-09-19 11:40:44 PM  
I need to see to judge
 
2018-09-19 11:41:14 PM  
Forgot to add:

/BIE
//EIP
 
2018-09-19 11:47:25 PM  
Grainy Boobs was going to be my band's name until someone said "Granny boobs is your band's name?" then I changed the name to Granny Boobs since that was better.
 
2018-09-19 11:49:29 PM  
Are they real?

Are they spectacular?
 
2018-09-19 11:50:41 PM  

Birnone: Grainy Boobs was going to be my band's name until someone said "Granny boobs is your band's name?" then I changed the name to Granny Boobs since that was better.


So with a name like Granny Boobs, I'm guessing it's a swing band.
 
2018-09-19 11:50:49 PM  

gerbilpox: syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.

You know how I know you're gay?

/or a straight Farkette
//NTTAWWT


Just yesterday I saw a license plate that had the heart (as in "I love ") emblem, followed by BEWBS.
Surprised no one that the DMV caught that. Or maybe they did, and also loved bewbs.
 
2018-09-19 11:53:16 PM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-20 12:01:20 AM  
Tit for tat ruling nips it in the bud , lets stop milking it.
 
2018-09-20 12:01:30 AM  
Would have to examine said boobs first hand to judge.
 
2018-09-20 12:02:22 AM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-20 12:03:38 AM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


And your husband sucked his mother's boob.....
 
2018-09-20 12:04:29 AM  

stuffy: Would have to examine said boobs first hand to judge.


Not safe for work or lunch:  https://dailydeets.com/the-deets-shee​t​-jim-carreys-moobs-vs-kate-middletons-​boobs/
 
2018-09-20 12:05:14 AM  
Neutral Milk Hotel is my Neutral Milk Hotel cover band.
 
2018-09-20 12:10:46 AM  

TylerParry: Neutral Milk Hotel is my Neutral Milk Hotel cover band.


Wow. Did you think of that all by yourself?
 
2018-09-20 12:11:20 AM  

studebaker hoch: What if I can only afford one?


Fark could take up a collection and own them both, for the common good.
 
2018-09-20 12:15:12 AM  

Prof. Frink: TylerParry: Neutral Milk Hotel is my Neutral Milk Hotel cover band.

Wow. Did you think of that all by yourself?


Yea, I just wanted to say Neutral Milk Hotel twice. Sorry, dude.
 
2018-09-20 12:17:32 AM  

Gordon Bennett: At that rate Pippa's arse must be worth billions.


You're looking at my what-now?
images.nickjr.comView Full Size


For the record, this idea is Rule 34 compliant.
 
2018-09-20 12:25:30 AM  
The ruling was 45,000 Euros each, subs.
 
2018-09-20 12:38:16 AM  

Brynden Rivers: The ruling was 45,000 Euros each, subs.


The magazine's editor, Laurence Pieau, and its publisher, Ernesto Mauri, were fined €45,000 last year while the photographers were ordered to pay €5,000, with another €5,000 payable if they reoffended.
The magazine was also ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple, considerably lower than the €1.5m the couple's legal team had demanded.

Sorry if you understood there would be no math, but 45,000 + 5,000 + 100,000 / 2 = 75,000

/Math guy//Not subby
 
2018-09-20 12:46:02 AM  

get real: syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.

And your husband sucked his mother's boob.....


I've never thought of this before, but:

When a girl meet's her boyfriend'/girlfriend's mother for the first time, are they both thinking "he's/she's sucked on my tits, too" ?
 
2018-09-20 12:52:56 AM  
"Upholds"
*snerk*
 
2018-09-20 01:32:58 AM  

Farking Clown Shoes: Brynden Rivers: The ruling was 45,000 Euros each, subs.

The magazine's editor, Laurence Pieau, and its publisher, Ernesto Mauri, were fined €45,000 last year while the photographers were ordered to pay €5,000, with another €5,000 payable if they reoffended.
The magazine was also ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple, considerably lower than the €1.5m the couple's legal team had demanded.

Sorry if you understood there would be no math, but 45,000 + 5,000 + 100,000 / 2 = 75,000

/Math guy//Not subby


But you also forgot that was the minimum, since €45,000 was the max award.
 
2018-09-20 01:42:17 AM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


I endorse the Nippon more of "Often seen seldom noticed."
 
Oak
2018-09-20 01:45:04 AM  

Peter von Nostrand: Are they real?

Are they spectacular?


Are they calm?
 
2018-09-20 01:51:57 AM  
How am I supposed to evaluate this ruling without seeing the pics?
 
2018-09-20 05:12:47 AM  
How much is that per ounce?
 
2018-09-20 06:27:42 AM  

ol' gormsby: get real: syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.

And your husband sucked his mother's boob.....

I've never thought of this before, but:

When a girl meet's her boyfriend'/girlfriend's mother for the first time, are they both thinking "he's/she's sucked on my tits, too" ?


And the award for most "Incel" comment of the day goes to...
 
2018-09-20 07:49:13 AM  

ol' gormsby: get real: syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.

And your husband sucked his mother's boob.....

I've never thought of this before, but:

When a girl meet's her boyfriend'/girlfriend's mother for the first time, are they both thinking "he's/she's sucked on my tits, too" ?


Bonus points if the mother wonders whose was sucked more recently. Extra bonus points if the boyfriend/girlfriend is wondering the same thing.
 
2018-09-20 08:05:23 AM  

Farking Clown Shoes: Brynden Rivers: The ruling was 45,000 Euros each, subs.

The magazine's editor, Laurence Pieau, and its publisher, Ernesto Mauri, were fined €45,000 last year while the photographers were ordered to pay €5,000, with another €5,000 payable if they reoffended.
The magazine was also ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple, considerably lower than the €1.5m the couple's legal team had demanded.

Sorry if you understood there would be no math, but 45,000 + 5,000 + 100,000 / 2 = 75,000

/Math guy//Not subby


You're all way off.  If you actually read the article correctly, the magazine's editor and its publisher were both fined €45,000, there were two photographers, each fined €5,000, and the magazine itself was fined €100,000.

So it's 45,000 + 45,000 + 5,000 + 5,000 + 100,000 = 200,000.

So €100,000 per booby.
 
2018-09-20 08:21:17 AM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-20 08:52:39 AM  

syzygy whizz: Aw, for cryin' out loud.

WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!

Get over it.


Not only that, but they're soft, too.
http://pvponline.com/comic/all-the-ri​g​ht-notes
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-20 09:03:05 AM  
For fark's sake -- there are millions of women out there happy to show their boobs.  Respect the privacy of those who aren't and move on.  I hope that fine was a lot more than the magazine made on that issue.
 
2018-09-20 10:17:16 AM  
But I ain't got 75000!
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-20 11:22:59 AM  
It's not like her face hasn't already been 'shopped onto the body of every porn actress alive.

Not to threadjack or to downplay the #metoo movement, but there are stories about women being required to do a nude scene in their first big Hollywood production.  Sandra Bolluck in "Fire On the Amazon" (which has the worst leading male, bad costumes, etc.) or Julie Warner in "Doc Hollywood" come to mind.  Bullock's scene was really awkward, while Warner seemed to treat it like a pro.

If you hit it big, you KNOW you're going to be 'shopped into every Rule 34 category, so why not set up a legit site and get it over with?  Notarized statements with each picture attesting to their authenticity.  The stars (women and men) would get a fair cut of the access fee, instead of nothing right now.  Hire a top photographer who understands composition and lighting, and has a full staff to help out.  Make it worthy for a dorm poster, so you can cash in even more.  Offer signed copies at $200 each.  Blurry, grainy pix taken from 1,000 yards won't stand a chance.

I'm thinking some folks wouldn't mind being able to look back at themselves from 50 years ago and say, "Damn, I was smoking hot back then."

To each his or her own, but the 'shops are going to happen, whatever you try to do.  Best to control the content yourself than to leave it to some incel in his Mom's basement.
 
2018-09-20 12:00:48 PM  
intensityadvisors.comView Full Size
 
2018-09-20 04:53:14 PM  

Farking Clown Shoes: Brynden Rivers: The ruling was 45,000 Euros each, subs.

The magazine's editor, Laurence Pieau, and its publisher, Ernesto Mauri, were fined €45,000 last year while the photographers were ordered to pay €5,000, with another €5,000 payable if they reoffended.
The magazine was also ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple, considerably lower than the €1.5m the couple's legal team had demanded.

Sorry if you understood there would be no math, but 45,000 + 5,000 + 100,000 / 2 = 75,000

/Math guy//Not subby


umm no, what you put is 100,000=50,000. (45,000 + 5,000 + 100,000 )/ 2 = 75,000 is correct
 
Displayed 41 of 41 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report