Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Science News Magazine)   Homo Sapien art from 70,000 years ago really left a lot to be desired. I mean, I may not know art but I know what I like   ( sciencenews.org) divider line
    More: Interesting, South African cave, Human, pigment, 70,000-year-old pigment chunks, Tiny pigment particles, Ancient pigment wielders, Cave painting, Rock  
•       •       •

1920 clicks; posted to Geek » on 14 Sep 2018 at 5:55 PM (8 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



38 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2018-09-14 01:53:45 PM  
I guess homos weren't always that artistic.
 
2018-09-14 04:57:04 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 06:02:53 PM  
 
2018-09-14 06:03:46 PM  
No subby, you will like cute pictures of kittys

images4.fanpop.comView Full Size

Because, look how farking cute that kitten is.
 
2018-09-14 06:11:10 PM  
img00.deviantart.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 06:12:15 PM  
It's a schooner.
 
2018-09-14 06:32:29 PM  

Fano: [img00.deviantart.net image 850x620]


Why does Maryanne look pissed at Ginger?
 
2018-09-14 06:40:08 PM  
Is it a Banksy?
 
2018-09-14 06:40:49 PM  
I couldn't draw a stone that well.
 
2018-09-14 06:46:18 PM  
Holy shiat. That is woke AF.
 
2018-09-14 07:01:21 PM  
This science is bad. Shame on these clowns. Also Stone Age Crayons is the name of my Jet Screamer cover band.
 
2018-09-14 07:25:52 PM  
encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.comView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 07:27:37 PM  

doglover: [encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com image 190x211]


Damn, tig ol bitties.
 
2018-09-14 07:35:48 PM  
This is what they were drawing...or, I'm crazy, you decide
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 07:40:02 PM  
This is what I see:

getdrawings.comView Full Size


Scary?

Scary!
 
2018-09-14 08:12:17 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 09:07:51 PM  
Or maybe it's not a drawing at all and it's just discoloration on a rock.
 
2018-09-14 09:19:14 PM  
After hours of careful research I'm pretty sure I've found what would have been the original, complete image.

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 09:30:09 PM  

doglover: [encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com image 190x211]


Accompanied by this
 
2018-09-14 09:46:19 PM  

TylerParry: Holy shiat. That is woke AF.


Are there really degrees of woke? Seems to me it's inherently a binary thing. Either I'm asleep or I'm woke. Do people really go around saying "holy shiat, that is slightly woke"?
 
2018-09-14 09:50:32 PM  
'Huh.  My kiddygardner could draw that.  An' somebody spent more'n a hunnerd dollars for that...'
 
2018-09-14 09:51:27 PM  

itcamefromschenectady: TylerParry: Holy shiat. That is woke AF.

Are there really degrees of woke? Seems to me it's inherently a binary thing. Either I'm asleep or I'm woke. Do people really go around saying "holy shiat, that is slightly woke"?


Sounds like you need to read you some Carlos Castenada.
 
2018-09-14 10:38:51 PM  
First 'Artist' in the World and First 'Critic'
Youtube 3H7IUbwFG40
 
2018-09-14 11:10:00 PM  
What if all these cave drawings historians are trying to attach profound meaning to were really only graffiti?
 
2018-09-14 11:13:35 PM  
pbs.twimg.comView Full Size
 
2018-09-14 11:40:15 PM  

itcamefromschenectady: TylerParry: Holy shiat. That is woke AF.

Are there really degrees of woke? Seems to me it's inherently a binary thing. Either I'm asleep or I'm woke. Do people really go around saying "holy shiat, that is slightly woke"?


So "woke" is a word that we're using now? I know it has an older meaning but now it's like an urban dictionary thing?
 
2018-09-14 11:47:06 PM  

itcamefromschenectady: Do people really go around saying "holy shiat, that is slightly woke"?


If they don't yet, they should
 
2018-09-15 02:42:29 AM  

uncoveror: What if all these cave drawings historians are trying to attach profound meaning to were really only graffiti?


Everything has profound meaning if it happened long ago enough
 
2018-09-15 02:57:52 AM  

uncoveror: What if all these cave drawings historians are trying to attach profound meaning to were really only graffiti?


People being people, they were probably about relating territory and ownership to the other tribe members.

"Hands off", in other words.

They sure as hell weren't concerned with what we might make of them now.
 
2018-09-15 04:20:45 AM  

Slypork: doglover: [encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com image 190x211]

Accompanied by this


D*ckstones
Meet the D*ckstones
They're a sexy stone age family.
 
2018-09-15 07:54:37 AM  
Clearly tentacle porn.
 
2018-09-15 09:13:02 AM  
STEELY DAN ► The Caves of Altamira【HQ】
Youtube 3Omjl5_AveM
 
2018-09-15 11:15:26 AM  

Brawndo: [img.fark.net image 300x253]


Flying Spaghetti Monster transcends time and is blessing early man with his noodly appendages.
 
2018-09-15 01:19:11 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-09-15 01:27:11 PM  
The singular is "sapiens"
 
2018-09-15 01:36:11 PM  

al-Mundane: The singular is "sapiens"


Sapi?
 
2018-09-15 07:35:28 PM  
It's a hashtag.
 
2018-09-15 10:53:19 PM  

Birnone: This is what they were drawing...or, I'm crazy, you decide
[img.fark.net image 600x578]


It looks like someone sharpened something on it. I'm not sure its art, as much as tool scoring.
 
Displayed 38 of 38 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report