Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   At least they had the good sense to put it where they don't have to look at it themselves (NSFW)   ( dailymail.co.uk) divider line
    More: Fail, Tariq Tahir, EDT  
•       •       •

7123 clicks; posted to Geek » on 04 Nov 2017 at 11:28 PM (13 days ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



28 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2017-11-04 09:28:15 PM  
Your gallery begins with two photos, obviously photoshopped, and declaring "they must have had laser removal and a new tattoo!" when it clearly is the same lower back template, down to the tags sticking out of the pants.

This link is horseshiat, and you'd get better results from a simple GIS for "bad back tattoos".
 
2017-11-04 09:32:37 PM  
images1.browardpalmbeach.com

Trump Stamp
 
2017-11-04 09:53:44 PM  

RJReves: [images1.browardpalmbeach.com image 745x550]

Trump Stamp


One man's Love at First sight is another man's total boner killer.
 
2017-11-04 10:13:55 PM  
Some lower back tattoos look good. The ones from TFA:

img.fark.net
 
2017-11-04 11:36:10 PM  
img.fark.net

billions and billions served
 
2017-11-04 11:59:00 PM  
img.fark.net

Crypto geeks, get to work
 
2017-11-05 12:26:23 AM  

Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work



B E S U R E T O D R I N K Y O U R O V A L T I N E
 
2017-11-05 12:28:37 AM  

Snapper Carr: Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work


B E S U R E T O D R I N K Y O U R O V A L T I N E


sonofa....
 
2017-11-05 12:34:52 AM  
Stephen Lynch - Tattoo (Full song)
Youtube xwAiFWCiOH8

NSFW
 
2017-11-05 12:37:21 AM  

Saiga410: Snapper Carr: Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work


B E S U R E T O D R I N K Y O U R O V A L T I N E

sonofa....


Looks like a bunch of birth dates- nothing above 12 in the first two columns, nothing above 31 in the next two. I would say dates for a family, but the joker in the deck is the range- 35 to 06, dates grouped oddly. If the two earliest are the elders, there should be some in the late fifties or low sixties, but I only see one. Then another gap to the eighties, then mid 90s forward.

I'm going with family birth dates, but a really odd distribution.
 
2017-11-05 12:45:07 AM  

Sword and Shield: Saiga410: Snapper Carr: Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work


B E S U R E T O D R I N K Y O U R O V A L T I N E

sonofa....

Looks like a bunch of birth dates- nothing above 12 in the first two columns, nothing above 31 in the next two. I would say dates for a family, but the joker in the deck is the range- 35 to 06, dates grouped oddly. If the two earliest are the elders, there should be some in the late fifties or low sixties, but I only see one. Then another gap to the eighties, then mid 90s forward.

I'm going with family birth dates, but a really odd distribution.


non British convention
 
2017-11-05 01:11:55 AM  

Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work

Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work


As others said before, they're definitely dates of something. Possibly in alphabetical order of the family by first name.

/ooh numbers, she must math!
//Idiot "journalist"
 
2017-11-05 01:33:23 AM  
I have a warning sign on my upper back
 
2017-11-05 02:38:53 AM  

drjekel_mrhyde: I have a warning sign on my upper back


Hard Hat Area?
 
2017-11-05 03:14:33 AM  

Slypork: [YouTube video]
NSFW


tramp stamp (she's one of my relatives) has a tiny little Tinker Belle on her lower back. That's the only tattoo anyone I'm tracebly related to has.
 
2017-11-05 06:33:34 AM  

croesius: Your gallery begins with two photos, obviously photoshopped, and declaring "they must have had laser removal and a new tattoo!" when it clearly is the same lower back template, down to the tags sticking out of the pants.

This link is horseshiat, and you'd get better results from a simple GIS for "bad back tattoos".


It's daily mail so now i doubt those tattoos really exist.
 
2017-11-05 06:37:51 AM  

Dead for Tax Reasons: [img.fark.net image 345x465]

billions and billions served


I'm not gonna eat there. ..
 
2017-11-05 07:47:56 AM  

ThatGuyOverThere: Dead for Tax Reasons: [img.fark.net image 345x465]

billions and billions served

I'm not gonna eat there. ..


I've poked around in a few of those places.
 
2017-11-05 08:09:27 AM  
Aside from it being a Photoshop, the hand wash only, do not machine wash, do not iron tattoo is kind of funny. I don't think it's such a failed attempt at being witty as the author does. Course the author also didn't understand the numbers=dates which was pretty obvious.
 
2017-11-05 08:12:06 AM  
The chimpanzee one is kind of cool.
 
2017-11-05 09:34:06 AM  
Capital 'B' on the left cheek,  lower case 'b' on the right.....  correct, Bob ?
 
2017-11-05 10:02:50 AM  

vinniethepoo: The chimpanzee one is kind of cool.


Except that, knowing what we're looking at, they think it's a monkey on their back.
 
2017-11-05 01:34:47 PM  

ThatGuyOverThere: croesius: Your gallery begins with two photos, obviously photoshopped, and declaring "they must have had laser removal and a new tattoo!" when it clearly is the same lower back template, down to the tags sticking out of the pants.

This link is horseshiat, and you'd get better results from a simple GIS for "bad back tattoos".

It's daily mail so now i doubt those tattoos really exist.


Wow that joke never gets old. Farkers are so original.
 
2017-11-05 03:42:10 PM  
I was at a department store yesterday and the cashier was a 20 something woman with plunging neckline and ample cleavage with the end of some sort of tattoo between her bewbs that evidently continued on to her bewb

I normally try not to stare but this was pretty mesmerizing and she had apparently constructed this costume for the purpose of drawing stares

Don't like tattoos but this was interesting
 
2017-11-05 10:39:12 PM  

Saiga410: [img.fark.net image 634x447]

Crypto geeks, get to work


Hex colors.
 
2017-11-05 10:44:33 PM  

devilskware: ThatGuyOverThere: croesius: Your gallery begins with two photos, obviously photoshopped, and declaring "they must have had laser removal and a new tattoo!" when it clearly is the same lower back template, down to the tags sticking out of the pants.

This link is horseshiat, and you'd get better results from a simple GIS for "bad back tattoos".

It's daily mail so now i doubt those tattoos really exist.

Wow that joke never gets old. Farkers are so original.

You missed the advanced use of the old "joke" in a serious context.
In this case we know at least one of those tattoos must be false - thus causing reasonable doubt that either one ever actually existed. So it wasn't really a joke at all.
 
2017-11-05 10:45:43 PM  

Jacobin: I was at a department store yesterday and the cashier was a 20 something woman with plunging neckline and ample cleavage with the end of some sort of tattoo between her bewbs that evidently continued on to her bewb

I normally try not to stare but this was pretty mesmerizing and she had apparently constructed this costume for the purpose of drawing stares

Don't like tattoos but this was interesting


in that case, you are pretty much allowed to "notice" the tattoo and ask about it, in which case you're almost guaranteed to at least see a picture on her phone.
 
2017-11-06 08:56:44 AM  

ThatGuyOverThere: Jacobin: I was at a department store yesterday and the cashier was a 20 something woman with plunging neckline and ample cleavage with the end of some sort of tattoo between her bewbs that evidently continued on to her bewb

I normally try not to stare but this was pretty mesmerizing and she had apparently constructed this costume for the purpose of drawing stares

Don't like tattoos but this was interesting

in that case, you are pretty much allowed to "notice" the tattoo and ask about it, in which case you're almost guaranteed to at least see a picture on her phone.


If she shows you the picture tell her that it looks photoshopped and you need to see it in person.
 
Displayed 28 of 28 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report