Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Buzzfeed)   Milo Snuffaluffagus' emails obtained and turned over to Buzzfeed and wow that is way more Nazis than I was expecting   ( buzzfeed.com) divider line
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

16050 clicks; posted to Main » on 06 Oct 2017 at 9:25 AM (9 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



566 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-10-06 11:46:37 AM  

Ned Stark: Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Ned Stark: Huggermugger: Ned Stark: All trends have their exceptions, and yeah that is one I knew about.

/Maybe this data just means white women mudsharks are hard to like with
//That's stolen

Isn't that the term you people usually use?  At least in private conversation and on alt-right message boards.

That doesn't call back to the higher imaginary WM/WF divorce rate and really seems more like genuine ragey misogyny than a tongue in cheek joke. Probably wouldn't have stolen that version.

FTFY. We already covered how the original study asserting higher divorce rates in mixed marriages was shown to be flawed, and following studies showed greater parity between mixed and same race/ethnicity.

What, exactly, is mixed about a WM/WF marriage?


I'll cop to it - that mistake is entirely on me. I was still thinking about the original the original argument you were going for for most of this thread about the reason for not dating outside your race as because the divorce rates show they're absolutely doomed to fail. 

So... wait. Are you claiming that it's the other way around now?
 
2017-10-06 11:46:45 AM  
Gay attention whore who just married black man courts Nazis, who would like to kill him for pretty much everything he is.

That, my friends, is 'Suicidal Stupidity' in action.

Right now he's just a Useful Idiot.
 
2017-10-06 11:46:56 AM  

Boxingoutsider: Well thats some projecting there.   In saying that if i dont chant black lives matter on a college campus when a rally busts into a library, im a racist.   If I don't agree with your desire to identify as a man/woman/x/dragon/attack helicopter I'm saying you dont exist.   If I dare to support gun rights I favor mass murder.

We can agree to disagree on some stuff and still pull the oars in the same general direction of justice, peace, morality, etc.


You should keep posting, several people have done an excellent job of proving your point for you.  I don't know if anything helps your case better than that.
 
2017-10-06 11:47:35 AM  

Boxingoutsider: Safe spaces, micro aggressions, that stuff is already permeating society. Look at that article and how Google employees got mad because the stupid reminder was identified as male.


How small a reminder that your race is inferior and that people in power don't want you to have your job, your place in school, your place in society is too small for you to care about?  I mean, and this is going to take this super-hard thing called "empathy," is is somewhere below random fans calling Terelle Pryor the n-word as he walks into the stadium?  Is it somewhere above random dudes accosting Asian students at our local college telling them to "go back to their country?"  Perhaps the people who get triggered by "press 1 for English" deserve a safe space, after all.  It may be hilarious to watch Milo embarrass poor debaters because he's comfortable debasing himself in public for that sweet cheddar, but do you really think that the world would be better if we were all more like Milo and trashing everyone for having empathy?
 
2017-10-06 11:48:43 AM  

Lady J: JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: The article is about literal Nazis. WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really? Nazis?

I just realized how successfully BoxingOutsider has hijacked the conversation away from the fact that the farkING GOP COLLABORATED WITH NEO-farkING-NAZIS.

Not if you've got him on ignore!!!! Wooo!!!!!


This is part of the issue too.   I cant handle what this person is saying so I'm going to block it out.  As if that helps in any way.   You should want to engage with your perceived enemies.

But snowflakes cant be bothered with that.
 
2017-10-06 11:49:28 AM  

willfullyobscure: Yep. There's a big ol' Nazi. Oh yeah. lmao

[img.fark.net image 654x459]


Because sexists never marry women and bigots never marry people of colour.

*biggest eyeroll ever*

That said, I'm mad curious what Milo's husband seems in him. To be a fly on the wall!
 
2017-10-06 11:49:51 AM  

factoryconnection: The Envoy: Ned Stark: It once came up here that i think interracial dating is probably a bad idea.

Which is really all that was ment.

All.  ALL?  What the actual fark?

*looks around the room*  Can anybody help me out, or was that exactly as farking disgusting, disturbed and retarded as it appears to be?

Ned is apparently unaware that white people are completely capable of crashing and burning almost every serious relationship they enter with other whites.  I've been happily married for almost 14 years and I have three serious, adult relationships that absolutely DIAF without any of his supposed magic disaster powder that comes from mixing races.

How about this, Ned: instead of saying "never date a brown person because it is hard" you could say


Who the fark said never? Stop arbitrarily turning the intensity to 11 on things people say in your own head and then accusing them of believing crazy extreme things.

"dating outside your race requires you to recognize the differences that American society pushes on people of different races, and navigating that can be a challenge."
definitely stop quoting my own position back at me as though it were something new.
 
2017-10-06 11:50:31 AM  
BUZZFEED .. lots of words .. no point ..
 
2017-10-06 11:51:02 AM  

Boxingoutsider: Lady J: JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: The article is about literal Nazis. WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really? Nazis?

I just realized how successfully BoxingOutsider has hijacked the conversation away from the fact that the farkING GOP COLLABORATED WITH NEO-farkING-NAZIS.

Not if you've got him on ignore!!!! Wooo!!!!!

This is part of the issue too.   I cant handle what this person is saying so I'm going to block it out.  As if that helps in any way.   You should want to engage with your perceived enemies.

But snowflakes cant be bothered with that.


the fact that you think other people 'can't handle what milo is saying' really shows the level you yourself are at
 
2017-10-06 11:51:12 AM  

JimmyTheHutt: You don't actually support the same stuff as the Democratic party.



Well, we don't actually know that, which I think is part of the problem he brought up.

Is he pro-union?
Is he pro-choice?
Is he pro-banking reform?
Is he pro-healthcare reform?
Is he pro-progressive taxation?

He could be rabidly positive on all of the above, but because he is "meh..." on other portions of the platform, you proclaim him a DINO.

And really, unless you think he is lying about pulling the lever for a [D] 99.9% of the time then you should really overlook the difference and be happy that he isn't voting [R].
 
2017-10-06 11:51:39 AM  

Boxingoutsider: America first and build a wall dont make someone a Nazi dude.


"America first" it should be pointed out was absolutely a white supremacist, Nazi sympathizer slogan.  Why should we help out against the Germans?  Let's think of America First.  I didn't create it, and we're allowed to look to history because words mean things.

Go talk to the adoring crowds from the upper rust belt about why they think "the wall" will brighten their lives so much.  It may not be Nazi reasons, but I bet i has a lot to do with Mexicans being an invading horde of rapists and murderers, just like our President said.
 
2017-10-06 11:52:00 AM  

Cynicism101: willfullyobscure: Yep. There's a big ol' Nazi. Oh yeah. lmao

[img.fark.net image 654x459]

Because sexists never marry women and bigots never marry people of colour.

*biggest eyeroll ever*

That said, I'm mad curious what Milo's husband seems in him. To be a fly on the wall!


lol, this.
 
2017-10-06 11:52:29 AM  

Boxingoutsider: I know I'm in the minority, but I just hate identity politics.   If you dont agree with me you dont think I should be alive or have rights.   Which is bullshiat.


I think you should be hating the system more.

Women weren't viewed as equal, so they had to raise a fuss and complain and politics and get in people's faces until a change was made.
Black people weren't viewed as equal, so they had to raise a fuss and complain and politics and get in people's faces until a change was made.
Gay people weren't viewed as equal, so they had to raise a fuss and complain and politics and get in people's faces until a change was made.
Trans people weren't viewed as equal, so they had to...

You could get pissed at trans people for making their issues part of the election, or you can get pissed at Republicans for making oppression part of their platform. Republicans make bathroom bills and ban trans soldiers from serving because they are trying to tap into people like you.

Republicans are the ones that make identity politics a thing. Democrats don't necessarily campaign on it.
 
2017-10-06 11:52:35 AM  

haknudsen: Ned Stark: Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Ned Stark: Or do you believe, rather, that the differences in worldview, beliefs, personality, etc. That arise because of race are uniquely except from causing tension in a relationship in exactly the same way as those asising from money or whatever by some mysterious force? Why woul this be so?

Nobody is claiming that it doesn't have the potential to cause tension.

So we're all secretly on the same page and im getting called a nazi gamergator altright racist because... reasons?

No it would be your posting history because I had you favorited as Racist a long time ago.


from cop threads, I imagine?
 
2017-10-06 11:54:24 AM  

Mike_LowELL: mainsail: Which can be a point of all these- if you get turned off on politics and don't participate, they have fewer people to control. More power for less work.

But here's the problem: Only 30,000 people voted in the original 1792 election.  If you truly believe that we must respect the original intent of the Constitution, as I do, then why does it make sense to have 110 million people voting?

I think we need to create a system in which successful people are the ones with the right to vote.  Keep it at 30,000, and make sure they represent a wide range of the country.  Rich.  White.  Male.  Pull people from all social groups to elect the next Republican.

That's why I support Steve Bannon in private online conversations that could never leak out into the public where they could destroy my reputation.  The man just wants white people to be happy again.  Why do you hate white people, for being happy?


My bloodline has been here since the 1740's and voted in the very first election so I say deport Milo and Bannon and the Kochs back to whatever euro shiat hole they came from.
 
2017-10-06 11:54:30 AM  

Cubicle Jockey: because he is "meh..." on other portions of the platform, you proclaim him a DINO.


For cases where "meh" == "anti".
Those are the issues that matter to him, quite clearly, because he's the one that brought them up.  They upset him and matter to him a great deal.  Not the rest of it.
 
2017-10-06 11:55:33 AM  
Yo guys, just to be clear, I wasn't mad that the courts integrated my school, it was about forced bussing.  I had to bus fifteen miles in the snow, barefoot, in order to get to that place.  Took nearly 30 minutes.  Sad.
 
2017-10-06 11:56:53 AM  

Ned Stark: definitely stop quoting my own position back at me as though it were something new.


If that's your position, then you need to learn how to communicate it.  The way you write it and then defend it sucks.  Your conclusion that it "should be avoided" is a lightning rod and a bad conclusion and you should know better.
 
2017-10-06 11:57:11 AM  
2020 can't get here soon enough. 2018 for that matter. These people are a cancer.
 
2017-10-06 11:58:12 AM  

FormlessOne: FLMountainMan: Just them though, right?  Feeding debate questions to candidates ahead of time, photoshopping pictures, and openly cheering for candidates is all kosher if our team does it, right?

...huh?!

Oh, I mean, I get it - you're on the "Both Sides Are Bad Concern Trollapalooza" bus - but attempting to claim that a concerted, years-long effort, funded by some of the richer right-wing assholes this country has to offer, to embrace neo-Nazis, white nationalists, teabaggers, MRAs, and all of the conservative disaffected that they could scrape up in an effort to rebrand them as an "alt-right" movement, is somehow equal to the foolishness you've posted is a study in moronic equivocation.

Being an alt-right apologist is bad enough, but to know - to actually see evidence in front of you - that these assholes were working with neo-Nazis and white nationalists, all the while lying about it through their farking teeth to anyone & everyone who confronted or even suspected them, and to then post this weak-ass concern troll shiat? It ill becomes you.


Welcome to my favorites list.
I'm not sure how you escaped it for so long.
 
2017-10-06 11:59:33 AM  

factoryconnection: Boxingoutsider: Safe spaces, micro aggressions, that stuff is already permeating society. Look at that article and how Google employees got mad because the stupid reminder was identified as male.

How small a reminder that your race is inferior and that people in power don't want you to have your job, your place in school, your place in society is too small for you to care about?  I mean, and this is going to take this super-hard thing called "empathy," is is somewhere below random fans calling Terelle Pryor the n-word as he walks into the stadium?  Is it somewhere above random dudes accosting Asian students at our local college telling them to "go back to their country?"  Perhaps the people who get triggered by "press 1 for English" deserve a safe space, after all.  It may be hilarious to watch Milo embarrass poor debaters because he's comfortable debasing himself in public for that sweet cheddar, but do you really think that the world would be better if we were all more like Milo and trashing everyone for having empathy?


No.   Its not admirable from a moral point of view.   Morally wed all sit down together, talk about things calmy, organize into factions of like minded individuals and then debate individually and as groups to influence each other with facts, calm reasoned debate and open minds.

Milo is just a reaction.   Theres people on the left like this too.  Extremism generated feedback.   Thats why we have trump to an extent.

However, for all the criticism of the right, and there is plenty plenty to go around, they at least arent suppressing free speech through violence on college campuses.   They'll gerrymander and vote suppress and use many deapicable methods themselves, but they aren't breaking windows, storming buildings and rioting.   Now, a hover round doesn't move quick enough to storm anything, but even the Charlottesville Nazis were calm aside from the maniac driver.   They may bring enough weaponry to start a war, but they tend to be non violent weirdly enough.
 
2017-10-06 12:00:55 PM  

21-7-b: Boxingoutsider: Lady J: JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: The article is about literal Nazis. WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really? Nazis?

I just realized how successfully BoxingOutsider has hijacked the conversation away from the fact that the farkING GOP COLLABORATED WITH NEO-farkING-NAZIS.

Not if you've got him on ignore!!!! Wooo!!!!!

This is part of the issue too.   I cant handle what this person is saying so I'm going to block it out.  As if that helps in any way.   You should want to engage with your perceived enemies.

But snowflakes cant be bothered with that.

the fact that you think other people 'can't handle what milo is saying' really shows the level you yourself are at


People absolutely cannot.   Dude, watch the videos.   People go absolutely ape shiat,   just because youre mature enough to not act like a baby doesnt mean everyone is.
 
2017-10-06 12:01:21 PM  

JimmyTheHutt: Cubicle Jockey: because he is "meh..." on other portions of the platform, you proclaim him a DINO.

For cases where "meh" == "anti".
Those are the issues that matter to him, quite clearly, because he's the one that brought them up.  They upset him and matter to him a great deal.  Not the rest of it.



He brought them up in a discussion about Milo. Milo isn't talking on campuses about unions, the ACA or progressive taxation. And the only thing I think Boxingoutsider is "anti" on based on his posts is the gun control issue. And there are several other fark posters on this side that lean left and are pro gun (I want to think that Dimensio is one, but I may be confusing him with someone else).
 
2017-10-06 12:01:27 PM  

factoryconnection: Ned Stark: definitely stop quoting my own position back at me as though it were something new.

If that's your position, then you need to learn how to communicate it.  The way you write it and then defend it sucks.  Your conclusion that it "should be avoided" is a lightning rod and a bad conclusion and you should know better.


It's a lesson we all have to learn from time to time... if you set out your stall poorly, on an emotionally charged topic, get ready to defend the dickens out of it.

I know cos I did it last week.
 
2017-10-06 12:01:31 PM  

Destructor: I wonder what the internal communiques are like at Huffpo.


You sound concerned.
 
2017-10-06 12:01:55 PM  

Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Ned Stark: Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Ned Stark: Huggermugger: Ned Stark: All trends have their exceptions, and yeah that is one I knew about.

/Maybe this data just means white women mudsharks are hard to like with
//That's stolen

Isn't that the term you people usually use?  At least in private conversation and on alt-right message boards.

That doesn't call back to the higher imaginary WM/WF divorce rate and really seems more like genuine ragey misogyny than a tongue in cheek joke. Probably wouldn't have stolen that version.

FTFY. We already covered how the original study asserting higher divorce rates in mixed marriages was shown to be flawed, and following studies showed greater parity between mixed and same race/ethnicity.

What, exactly, is mixed about a WM/WF marriage?

I'll cop to it - that mistake is entirely on me. I was still thinking about the original the original argument you were going for for most of this thread about the reason for not dating outside your race as because the divorce rates show they're absolutely doomed to fail. 

So... wait. Are you claiming that it's the other way around now?


No? Chase this quote line back to the top. It starts with some guy pointing out that one study found a lower divorce rate for WM/BF than for WM/WF relationships. I agreed that every trend has it's exceptions and that I had seen the same data myself, then shared a quip someone posted the last time we talked about that study(for indeed, everything has happened before.) After that it's just huggermugger doing some dumb ftfy shiat and me explaining why what he said is nonsensical.
 
2017-10-06 12:01:56 PM  

Diogenes: And it still makes no sense.  It's really baffling.  Bannon used the gay European NAMBLA enthusiast to attract Nazis, White Christian Nationalists, and people having conniptions over imaginary child abuse in a non-existent basement of a pizza joint.

Their hatred and loathing and fear of The Other is so damned powerful that it's made them all band together and mesh seamlessly.

Aided in no small part by their apologists, like the one we see here in this thread.


See, this is where it really gets me.  I mean, sure, it's all just party-hacks and "it's OK when WE do it!" people, but they rally'd around a useful-idiot who admits he wants to fark minors to rail at a non-existent group that was allegedly farking minors!
 
2017-10-06 12:02:55 PM  

Destructor: shastacola: Destructor: I wonder what the internal communiques are like at Huffpo.

Probably not filled with boot licking Nazis.Your whataboutism needs some work.

Help me out here.

I know the author desperately wants to make a connection between Breitbart and hate organizations. But at every turn it seems that Breitbart is trying to distance themselves from them. Which is what you'd expect anyone to do. Maybe it isn't actually super-subtle secret code after all. Maybe they were actually trying to do what they actually said.

It's like the DNC distancing themselves from Antifa... Or just full on socialists and communists. Sure, those guys are DNC supporters. They vote Democrat because (as it is often noted here) it's a 2 party system...


Do you know how money laundering works? You take that was earned in a criminal act, funnel it through a legitimate business, then the money looks legal.

Articles written by self-described racists, funneled through a couple vaguely brown looking fellas suddenly seems not racist.

Breibart is just laundered racism.
 
2017-10-06 12:03:11 PM  

factoryconnection: Boxingoutsider: America first and build a wall dont make someone a Nazi dude.

"America first" it should be pointed out was absolutely a white supremacist, Nazi sympathizer slogan.  Why should we help out against the Germans?  Let's think of America First.  I didn't create it, and we're allowed to look to history because words mean things.

Go talk to the adoring crowds from the upper rust belt about why they think "the wall" will brighten their lives so much.  It may not be Nazi reasons, but I bet i has a lot to do with Mexicans being an invading horde of rapists and murderers, just like our President said.


Dude.   Its not the 1930s and the average america firster now doesnt have any frame of reference for that.

In not saying that there arent America first Nazis, real Nazis in america.   But . . . .America first does not equal Nazi.   Thats all I was trying to say.
 
2017-10-06 12:03:37 PM  

Lady J: factoryconnection: Ned Stark: definitely stop quoting my own position back at me as though it were something new.

If that's your position, then you need to learn how to communicate it.  The way you write it and then defend it sucks.  Your conclusion that it "should be avoided" is a lightning rod and a bad conclusion and you should know better.

It's a lesson we all have to learn from time to time... if you set out your stall poorly, on an emotionally charged topic, get ready to defend the dickens out of it.

I know cos I did it last week.


Fills the time between audits coming in, at least.
 
2017-10-06 12:03:57 PM  
It's always amusing when the racists show up in a thread and then whine about being called racists.

Wait, "amusing" is not the right word. "Tiresome" is what I meant.

It's always tireseome when the racists show up in a thread and then whine about being called racists.
 
2017-10-06 12:04:08 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size

img.fark.netView Full Size


Good lord this thread is gold!
 
2017-10-06 12:04:26 PM  

beakerxf: Destructor: shastacola: Destructor: I wonder what the internal communiques are like at Huffpo.

Probably not filled with boot licking Nazis.Your whataboutism needs some work.

Help me out here.

I know the author desperately wants to make a connection between Breitbart and hate organizations. But at every turn it seems that Breitbart is trying to distance themselves from them. Which is what you'd expect anyone to do. Maybe it isn't actually super-subtle secret code after all. Maybe they were actually trying to do what they actually said.

It's like the DNC distancing themselves from Antifa... Or just full on socialists and communists. Sure, those guys are DNC supporters. They vote Democrat because (as it is often noted here) it's a 2 party system...

Do you know how money laundering works? You take that was earned in a criminal act, funnel it through a legitimate business, then the money looks legal.

Articles written by self-described racists, funneled through a couple vaguely brown looking fellas suddenly seems not racist.

Breibart is just laundered racism.


Great great analogy.  I'm going to steal that.
 
2017-10-06 12:05:22 PM  

Flab: Destructor: I wonder what the internal communiques are like at Huffpo.

You sound concerned curious.


FTFY
 
2017-10-06 12:05:29 PM  

AdamK: Mike_LowELL: mainsail: Which can be a point of all these- if you get turned off on politics and don't participate, they have fewer people to control. More power for less work.

But here's the problem: Only 30,000 people voted in the original 1792 election.  If you truly believe that we must respect the original intent of the Constitution, as I do, then why does it make sense to have 110 million people voting?

I think we need to create a system in which successful people are the ones with the right to vote.  Keep it at 30,000, and make sure they represent a wide range of the country.  Rich.  White.  Male.  Pull people from all social groups to elect the next Republican.

That's why I support Steve Bannon in private online conversations that could never leak out into the public where they could destroy my reputation.  The man just wants white people to be happy again.  Why do you hate white people, for being happy?

My bloodline has been here since the 1740's and voted in the very first election so I say deport Milo and Bannon and the Kochs back to whatever euro shiat hole they came from.


Oh, so it's okay to kick people out of the country, if they're white.  Who's the real racist now?

Probably still me.  Sigh.  *sigh*
 
2017-10-06 12:06:43 PM  

Cubicle Jockey: JimmyTheHutt: Cubicle Jockey: because he is "meh..." on other portions of the platform, you proclaim him a DINO.

For cases where "meh" == "anti".
Those are the issues that matter to him, quite clearly, because he's the one that brought them up.  They upset him and matter to him a great deal.  Not the rest of it.


He brought them up in a discussion about Milo. Milo isn't talking on campuses about unions, the ACA or progressive taxation. And the only thing I think Boxingoutsider is "anti" on based on his posts is the gun control issue. And there are several other fark posters on this side that lean left and are pro gun (I want to think that Dimensio is one, but I may be confusing him with someone else).


Im even for some gun controls.  And a lot of gun controls if you could guarantee that there wouldnt be mass confiscations based off the data at some point.
 
2017-10-06 12:07:27 PM  
Can you imagine waking up and feeling compelled to defend Milo Yiannopolis and Steve Bannon on the internet all morning?
 
2017-10-06 12:07:59 PM  
Really weird stuff.  It seems like you've got a lot of racist-lite types happily and eagerly running around with hardcore racists.  They all unite under the conservative/right-wing banner.  But then they realize they have to sell this.  One, there's money in it, but two, they want to sell the ideas to people because they do legit believe in a lot of it.  But reading all this it all feels so fake.  Like they're just hucksters and con artists.  Like if you truly believe in something and I don't agree with your politics, I can at least, usually, respect that you at least truly believe in whatever it is.  But all of this just sounds like racist snake oil.
 
2017-10-06 12:09:20 PM  

sigdiamond2000: Can you imagine waking up and feeling compelled to defend Milo Yiannopolis and Steve Bannon on the internet all morning?


Im a tiny bit of a milo fan and I'm not defending him.   I actually don't think anyone is.
 
2017-10-06 12:10:01 PM  
Wow. Lotta neck beards with Russian paychecks in here.

/You aren't fooling anyone.
 
2017-10-06 12:11:15 PM  

Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Snuffleupagus


Bears pointing out that someone FINALLY (and subtly) pointed out Subby's total fail in spelling.
 
2017-10-06 12:11:26 PM  

Cubicle Jockey: He brought them up in a discussion about Milo. Milo isn't talking on campuses about unions, the ACA or progressive taxation.


Boxingoutsider: If I don't agree with your desire to identify as a man/woman/x/dragon/attack helicopter


Uh huh.  Remember, folks, the Attack Helicopter meme is definitely not transphobic.  Totally.  Trust us.
 
2017-10-06 12:12:48 PM  

JimmyTheHutt: Cubicle Jockey: He brought them up in a discussion about Milo. Milo isn't talking on campuses about unions, the ACA or progressive taxation.

Boxingoutsider: If I don't agree with your desire to identify as a man/woman/x/dragon/attack helicopter

Uh huh.  Remember, folks, the Attack Helicopter meme is definitely not transphobic.  Totally.  Trust us.


Here we go.   Joke about it and your "phobic"     great example of precisely what I'm talking about.

Thanks for playing.
 
2017-10-06 12:13:42 PM  

Boxingoutsider: Im a tiny bit of a milo fan and I'm not defending him.

Boxingoutsider: If I don't agree with your desire to identify as a man/woman/x/dragon/attack helicopter

media.tenor.comView Full Size

 
2017-10-06 12:13:45 PM  

Adjective Bird Whiskey: Really weird stuff.  It seems like you've got a lot of racist-lite types happily and eagerly running around with hardcore racists.  They all unite under the conservative/right-wing banner.  But then they realize they have to sell this.  One, there's money in it, but two, they want to sell the ideas to people because they do legit believe in a lot of it.  But reading all this it all feels so fake.  Like they're just hucksters and con artists.  Like if you truly believe in something and I don't agree with your politics, I can at least, usually, respect that you at least truly believe in whatever it is.  But all of this just sounds like racist snake oil.


Actually it is similar to the anti-abortion Catholics who were more than happy to get into bed with evangelical Christians with whom they share absolutely nothing in terms of tradition, beliefs or ethics. The result was that those Right-Catholics have taken on some of the evangelical beliefs that are blatantly not Catholic (like the Rapture or economic policy based upon prosperity gospel).

Anyone on either side who tries to say "these people have a point..." without critiquing their totality of beliefs will be open to this same thing.
 
2017-10-06 12:14:31 PM  

Boxingoutsider: sigdiamond2000: Can you imagine waking up and feeling compelled to defend Milo Yiannopolis and Steve Bannon on the internet all morning?

Im a tiny bit of a milo fan and I'm not defending him.   I actually don't think anyone is.


I don't get how you can be a fan of him.

He is what 4chan looks like when they think they are trying to be christopher hitchens, given human form.
 
2017-10-06 12:14:48 PM  

JimmyTheHutt: Boxingoutsider: Im a tiny bit of a milo fan and I'm not defending him.
Boxingoutsider: If I don't agree with your desire to identify as a man/woman/x/dragon/attack helicopter

[media.tenor.com image 320x190]


Aww.  How cute.   A gif.  Good work.   Do you want a freeze pop now?
 
2017-10-06 12:14:53 PM  

Boxingoutsider: sigdiamond2000: Can you imagine waking up and feeling compelled to defend Milo Yiannopolis and Steve Bannon on the internet all morning?

Im a tiny bit of a milo fan and I'm not defending him.   I actually don't think anyone is.


You're running interference for him, which is a defensive position.

What's the point? He's human garbage.
 
2017-10-06 12:14:56 PM  

Boxingoutsider: Joke about it and your "phobic"


How dare people not like me saying mean shiat about people that get shiat on constantly?

You have to be so mad that people look at you funny when you say the "n" word.
 
2017-10-06 12:16:57 PM  

Boxingoutsider: People absolutely cannot.   Dude, watch the videos.   People go absolutely ape shiat,   just because youre mature enough to not act like a baby doesnt mean everyone is.


no, you're thinking what he wants you to think

i can discuss something like fascism calmly. i can make intelligent points, backed with evidence, to undermine a fascist's arguments. i can do that online, or in person. sometimes, say as is the case with a very, very, very old person i know, i might say no more than 'well, I'm not so sure about that, but i don't know and that's just my opinion' or something like that. in fact i might even just tut and roll my eyes with a half smile. doesn't mean to say i have no other route open to me, doesn't mean to say i can't make an argument to embarrass their argument. but that is the route i prefer to take in that instance. other people I could see myself being willing to engage in a much more forthright exchange, perhaps beyond reasoned debate. that there are a variety of responses that people might feel more appropriate according to the circumstances as they see them doesn't mean to say 'they can't handle it.'
 
Displayed 50 of 566 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report