Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Buzzfeed)   Milo Snuffaluffagus' emails obtained and turned over to Buzzfeed and wow that is way more Nazis than I was expecting   ( buzzfeed.com) divider line
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

15888 clicks; posted to Main » on 06 Oct 2017 at 9:25 AM (10 days ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



566 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-10-06 10:50:58 AM  

Magorn: Yarvin, a software engineer who under the nom de plume Mencius Moldbug helped create the "neoreactionary" movement, which holds that Enlightenment democracy has failed and that a return to feudalism and authoritarian rule is in order. 

This...this is an actual thing?  Here and Now?


Yes it is. Moldbug is one of those socially retarded ass-pies who is obsessed with "functional programming" (an idiotic approach to coding that resonates with folks who can see the world only in terms of black and white), and thinks authoritarianism is a great idea. Like most people who hold moronic views like that, he's not self-aware enough to realize that, if authoritarian rule were instituted, he'd be one of the first ones against the wall. But he's sure he's one of the supermen who will be allowed to rule the rest.

For some reason the Venn diagram of "likes Nazis," "takes video games way too seriously," "enjoys functional programming," "wears fedoras and describes self as a 'nice guy'," "can't get laid," "hates women" is pretty large.
 
2017-10-06 10:50:58 AM  

shroom: JimmyTheHutt: Boxingoutsider: But keep telling me about how I vote and what I support.

You keep doing a fine job of that all on your own.  So far, you don't support protections for marginalized groups like LGBTQ or PoC.  You don't support police reform.  You don't support any sort of restrictions on firearm ownership.

Sounds like a farking Republican to me.

I believe the term is "Fark Independent"


I believe its someone who votes democrat 99.99% of the time unless the Democrat is an overt criminal but because I dont use the right buzz words or hate the things you do with the same passion I'm a dino.   You guys laugh your asses off at the republicans assaulting Rinos, but do the same thing here all the time.   I love it actually.   Its actually a little bit enjoyable to watch people try to ascribe all kinds of shiat to you just because you don't fall into lockstep with their views.
 
2017-10-06 10:51:41 AM  

tuxq: I'm just wondering when all of you realize we're being pitted against each other for the "betterment" of the rich. Drop the left and right think ... it's ALL propaganda.


Yes, we should certainly join forces with people who talk about how us or our family or our friends (or just other people) are subhuman. It's definitely our responsibility to join forces with despicable people because once we eat the rich they will suddenly be filled with brotherly love and compassion.
 
2017-10-06 10:51:55 AM  

Destructor: I know the author desperately wants to make a connection between Breitbart and hate organizations. But at every turn it seems that Breitbart is trying to distance themselves from them.


LOLWUT? Stopped reading there. Premise is flawed.
 
2017-10-06 10:52:01 AM  

Boxingoutsider: Where did I say fark them? How did I say that? This is precisely what I'm talking about. I dont use your language, dont fall into lock Step with your version of politics and I'm tossing them into gas chambers.

You. Youre the problem with the democratic party and politics as a whole. No more agree to disagree but still support the same stuff mostly. No more "well I see how you could think that", just purity tests, hot button issues that divide and invective if you don't toe the line. And this is on both sides.

Believe what I do or you are a Nazi. Believe what I do or you're a godless communist socialist atheist gay loving turtle marrying scum bag.

Nuance dude. Heres a quick fact. Many people who vote democrat loyally faithfully year after year, decade after decade think like me.


You were reveling in Milo upsetting and outing trans people earlier in the thread.  You consider your issues as "short old ball player" to be the equivalent of one the marginalized groups targeted for violence most often.

You don't actually support the same stuff as the Democratic party.  You don't support police reform.  You don't support protections for marginalized groups.  You don't support any restrictions on the 2nd Amendment.  These are all your positions.  That you've stated and owned.  In this thread.

So, yeah, you're a farking Republican.  You might as well just change your registration now.  Because if you can't even get behind even the most basic principles of fairness and equality, and clearly, you can't, then get the fark out.
 
2017-10-06 10:52:27 AM  

Lady J: Ned Stark: Lady J: Ned Stark: guestguy: Ned Stark: LL316: HotWingConspiracy: the "natural conservatives" (people who think different ethnic groups should stay separate for scientific reasons)

LOL, one of them posts here. He'll be in this thread later for sure.

Wtf are scientific reasons for not farking who you wanna fark?

There aren't many, and they aren't really important enough to waste time being concerned with.

HotwingConspiracy just determinedly interperets moderate intensity dating advice as though it were a call for a eugenics program.

Wat?

It once came up here that i think interracial dating is probably a bad idea.

Which is really all that was ment. Interracial relationships blow up more often than ones that aren't. It's a bad idea in exactly the same way that, say, dating wildly out of your income bracket or education level is. There is simply a greater chance of sorrow and pain in your future.

But apparently I'm a hardcore defender of the purity of the whit race?

What's youir thoughts on Muslims? Just generally.

They're largly caught up in a really ugly cultural/religious complex at the moment. I expect the situation to start improving slowly but steadily once the Saudis get what's coming to them.

In relevant practical terms, I think Europe should be less eager to let a bunch of them into their countries but more proactive about helping "on site". US policy is fine.

why?


Because
caught up in a really ugly cultural/religious complex at the moment

That shiat doesn't go away quick, nor are the people fleeing from it immune to it, quite the opposite even.
 
2017-10-06 10:52:41 AM  

shroom: I believe the term is "Fark Independent"


Precisely.
 
2017-10-06 10:52:49 AM  
"... You are magenalia [sic]."

You are... magenta?
You are magnolia?
You are my genitalia?
 
2017-10-06 10:53:32 AM  

LL316: HotWingConspiracy: the "natural conservatives" (people who think different ethnic groups should stay separate for scientific reasons)

LOL, one of them posts here. He'll be in this thread later for sure.

Wtf are scientific reasons for not farking who you wanna fark?


The men's rights crowd is the dating equivalent of the people who think videogames are more fun when you turn off all the graphics settings and suck the humanity out of the experience.

For them, women aren't human beings, they're a set of game mechanics which can be manipulated to achieve successful outcomes.  The fact women don't understand why I do this, quite frankly, it's no wonder they're so stoopid.
 
2017-10-06 10:54:22 AM  

Boxingoutsider: shroom: JimmyTheHutt: Boxingoutsider: But keep telling me about how I vote and what I support.

You keep doing a fine job of that all on your own.  So far, you don't support protections for marginalized groups like LGBTQ or PoC.  You don't support police reform.  You don't support any sort of restrictions on firearm ownership.

Sounds like a farking Republican to me.

I believe the term is "Fark Independent"

I believe its someone who votes democrat 99.99% of the time unless the Democrat is an overt criminal but because I dont use the right buzz words or hate the things you do with the same passion I'm a dino.   You guys laugh your asses off at the republicans assaulting Rinos, but do the same thing here all the time.   I love it actually.   Its actually a little bit enjoyable to watch people try to ascribe all kinds of shiat to you just because you don't fall into lockstep with their views.


No it isnt.  You want to be taken seriously as a wise sage who independently evaluates all things with a free mind and is respected for it.  It's why you keep trying to define yourself that way.  You hate it when people cast you off as a person not worth taking seriously.
 
2017-10-06 10:54:42 AM  
I'm with Boxingoutsider on this one.  Dem's went batshiat crazy and you're not allowed to think for yourself anymore.  That's my experience, anyway.
 
2017-10-06 10:54:44 AM  

Lady J: Ned Stark: L
In relevant practical terms, I think Europe should be less eager to let a bunch of them into their countries but more proactive about helping "on site". US policy is fine.

why?


I'll bet the answer is something along the lines of "Because they're totally incompatible with Western CivilisationTM", even though recent data shows that Muslims who live in Western countries tend to accept progressive attitudes pretty readily. IIRC, the most recent data showed that Muslims in the US are actually a lot more on board with homosexuality than white evangelicals.
 
2017-10-06 10:55:08 AM  

bacchanalias and consequences: Boxingoutsider: bacchanalias and consequences: Boxingoutsider: JerseyTim: This really is a terrific piece of journalism.

On top of being a racist and overall horrible person, the fact that Bannon doesn't spell out "are" and "you" and writes things like "Dude!!! LMAO! ... Epic" in emails makes him that much more despicable.

That's what I hated most.   Ill admit I'm a closet milo video binge watcher.   I hate the way the college campuses especially seem to have become breeding grounds for a new kind of fascist identity politics where whoever is the most aggrieved becomes the most influential.   So . . . .I get off on watching him annihilate and trigger these pussy ass kids were raising.

But . . . that was really troubling.  I'm not going to vote republican ever, and I don't support white supremacy or Nazis or any of that shiat.   But. . . . like many people cited in that article,I am a long time leftist kind of pissed off with where we are going as a movement.

Its interesting how guys like milo and to a lesser extent Shapiro really resonate with many democrats who secretly despise snowflake liberalism but would almost never actually vote republican.  People like me who want there to be freedom and equality but don't want to be lectured about how intolerant they are because they arent super comfy with whatever the latest identity politics trend is.  Democrats who don't think cops are scum.   Democrats who own guns and like guns.   Democrats who believe in border security and don't want to be lectured on the cruelty of a wall or securing the border.

This is why the current gun debate is so important.  Pushing away moderates and chastising them because they aren't as angry as you or angry with the same things is just foolish.   Its partly why we have trump as our president.

To me that article painted milo as an attention seeking avaricious and obsequious kind of toady at the feet of real movers and shakers.   It painted bannon as thinking he's the man, but really being the same ki ...

Based on your last post, you seem half-way decent so I won't harangue you, but the double-tapped space bar is classic old person typing. It's not a typewriter or old computer. One space after a period is enough.


My phone is given to wall of text formatting.   And I truly wanted to give the opinion of a closet milo video watcher who hates college snowflake assholes but loves freedom (the real kind, not the republican kind) and justice (again the real kind) but also doesnt want to just crush cops and call everyone Nazis.  A solid lifelong democrat who's protested a shiatload of excellent causes in his life.   Era, nuclear disarmament, anti Iraq war (the gw bush one).

I know I'm in the minority, but I just hate identity politics.   If you dont agree with me you dont think I should be alive or have rights.   Which is bullshiat.
 
2017-10-06 10:55:47 AM  

Ned Stark: It once came up here that i think interracial dating is probably a bad idea.

Which is really all that was ment. Interracial relationships blow up more often than ones that aren't. It's a bad idea in exactly the same way that, say, dating wildly out of your income bracket or education level is. There is simply a greater chance of sorrow and pain in your future.

But apparently I'm a hardcore defender of the purity of the whit race?


Espousing racist ideology is a good way to get classified as a racist.  Avoid that in the future, whether you believe it to be true or not.

That's free advice.
 
2017-10-06 10:55:56 AM  
BuzzFeed v Milo.

Its a right/left attention whore fest.
 
2017-10-06 10:56:14 AM  
Oh, by the way, you guys remember that movie with all the violence in it?  That's what this thread reminds me of.  It's great.
 
2017-10-06 10:56:38 AM  

aungen: you're not allowed to think for yourself anymore


What does this even mean?
 
2017-10-06 10:56:51 AM  

Boxingoutsider: but I just hate identity politics.


Or what everyone else calls civil rights for People of Color, and LGBTQ people, and women.
 
2017-10-06 10:57:12 AM  

shastacola: aungen: you're not allowed to think for yourself anymore

What does this even mean?


He read it somewhere.
 
2017-10-06 10:57:55 AM  

Rapmaster2000: Lady J: Ned Stark: Lady J: Ned Stark: guestguy: Ned Stark: LL316: HotWingConspiracy: the "natural conservatives" (people who think different ethnic groups should stay separate for scientific reasons)

LOL, one of them posts here. He'll be in this thread later for sure.

Wtf are scientific reasons for not farking who you wanna fark?

There aren't many, and they aren't really important enough to waste time being concerned with.

HotwingConspiracy just determinedly interperets moderate intensity dating advice as though it were a call for a eugenics program.

Wat?

It once came up here that i think interracial dating is probably a bad idea.

Which is really all that was ment. Interracial relationships blow up more often than ones that aren't. It's a bad idea in exactly the same way that, say, dating wildly out of your income bracket or education level is. There is simply a greater chance of sorrow and pain in your future.

But apparently I'm a hardcore defender of the purity of the whit race?

What's youir thoughts on Muslims? Just generally.

They're largly caught up in a really ugly cultural/religious complex at the moment. I expect the situation to start improving slowly but steadily once the Saudis get what's coming to them.

In relevant practical terms, I think Europe should be less eager to let a bunch of them into their countries but more proactive about helping "on site". US policy is fine.

why?

Because it's a them.  You have to keep away from them.  There's always a them.


I will say this. I have family in Europe, and they are telling me of some of the problems arising. I have NO doubt that some of those problems are manufactured. You have a somewhat homogenous population all of a sudden encountering people who not only don't look like them, but are culturally COMPLETELY different.

That being said....they'll get over it. I have a theory. Europe isn't any more or less racist than America except when it comes to gypsies. Why? European memories are long. The Turkish invasions of Europe were an incredibly trying time for much of Europe and I don't think that butthurt has gone away. It is my belief that this is a huge factor.
 
2017-10-06 10:58:07 AM  

shastacola: What does this even mean?


It means that if you don't understand LGBTQ people, or PoC, you shouldn't feel bad about enacting policies to leave them unprotected.
 
2017-10-06 10:59:25 AM  

JerseyTim: This really is a terrific piece of journalism.

On top of being a racist and overall horrible person, the fact that Bannon doesn't spell out "are" and "you" and writes things like "Dude!!! LMAO! ... Epic" in emails makes him that much more despicable.


This.

Bannon comes across as weirdly inarticulate -- borderline illiterate -- for a guy who is ostensibly intelligent, and, weirder, works in the media.

Maybe it's just the gin talking.
 
2017-10-06 10:59:28 AM  

aungen: I'm with Boxingoutsider on this one.  Dem's went batshiat crazy and you're not allowed to think for yourself anymore.  That's my experience, anyway.


The article is about literal Nazis.  WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really?  Nazis?
 
2017-10-06 11:00:40 AM  

bacchanalias and consequences: Ned Stark: loonatic112358: Ned Stark: It once came up here that i think interracial dating is probably a bad idea.

Which is really all that was ment. Interracial relationships blow up more often than ones that aren't. It's a bad idea in exactly the same way that, say, dating wildly out of your income bracket or education level is. There is simply a greater chance of sorrow and pain in your future.

But apparently I'm a hardcore defender of the purity of the whit race?

unless you can come up with some stats, this sounds like BS "Interracial relationships blow up more often than ones that aren't."

I'll agree dating wildly out of your income bracket or education level is a bad idea, which i suspect might be what happens most often with the prior statement

You don't think what race you are has an important impact on the way you interact with the world and hence your ultimate worldview, personality, set of beliefs, etc, in the same way that having money or education will? If so, i'm pretty sure you need to check your privilige.

Or do you believe, rather, that the differences in worldview, beliefs, personality, etc. That arise because of race are uniquely except from causing tension in a relationship in exactly the same way as those asising from money or whatever by some mysterious force? Why woul this be so?

Look, man, your interpretation is dumb on its face. I have not lived in the US for six years. I've dated women from Spain, Ghana, Taiwan, Mexico, Italy, Japan, Thailand, and many more. Never has race mattered. Culture came up sometimes but never race. Why is how a person looks relevant as long as you find them hot?


Don't forget your wife, Morgan Fairchild.
 
2017-10-06 11:01:06 AM  

weddingsinger: The article is about literal Nazis. WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really? Nazis?


I just realized how successfully BoxingOutsider has hijacked the conversation away from the fact that the farkING GOP COLLABORATED WITH NEO-farkING-NAZIS.
 
2017-10-06 11:01:49 AM  

Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Ned Stark: Or do you believe, rather, that the differences in worldview, beliefs, personality, etc. That arise because of race are uniquely except from causing tension in a relationship in exactly the same way as those asising from money or whatever by some mysterious force? Why woul this be so?

Nobody is claiming that it doesn't have the potential to cause tension.


So we're all secretly on the same page and im getting called a nazi gamergator altright racist because... reasons?
 
2017-10-06 11:02:34 AM  

Rapmaster2000: Boxingoutsider: shroom: JimmyTheHutt: Boxingoutsider: But keep telling me about how I vote and what I support.

You keep doing a fine job of that all on your own.  So far, you don't support protections for marginalized groups like LGBTQ or PoC.  You don't support police reform.  You don't support any sort of restrictions on firearm ownership.

Sounds like a farking Republican to me.

I believe the term is "Fark Independent"

I believe its someone who votes democrat 99.99% of the time unless the Democrat is an overt criminal but because I dont use the right buzz words or hate the things you do with the same passion I'm a dino.   You guys laugh your asses off at the republicans assaulting Rinos, but do the same thing here all the time.   I love it actually.   Its actually a little bit enjoyable to watch people try to ascribe all kinds of shiat to you just because you don't fall into lockstep with their views.

No it isnt.  You want to be taken seriously as a wise sage who independently evaluates all things with a free mind and is respected for it.  It's why you keep trying to define yourself that way.  You hate it when people cast you off as a person not worth taking seriously.


Nah.   An idiot calling me an idiot means nothing to me.   Someone saying I dont embody any democratic ideals is just an idiot.

I love to engage, especially with people who are smart and educated and disagree with me.   Tests my views, forces me to be smarter and better.  I dont mind losing an argument or a discussion or changing my views.

But . . . .and both sides do this way too much, when its all about purity tests and identity politics (you support gay rights that means you are against my god,or you don't support safe spaces on college campuses defined by race which means you are a virulent racist) its ridiculous nonsense to me.

But. . . . .thats where we are.   Both parties figured out its wildly effective and cheap.  It may turn off 15% of your base give or take, but someone like me will always vote democrat even if we nominated a candidate who wanted to ban so called micro aggressions.  Energizing the base and trying to grab a little piece of the middle in key spots seems preferable to broad based support that may turn off your base.  Thats why both partys candidates have to bow and grovel to the issue of the day to their base, regardless of whether they think its worthwhile to do so.
 
2017-10-06 11:03:40 AM  

Some Guy In A Waistcoat: Lady J: Ned Stark: L
In relevant practical terms, I think Europe should be less eager to let a bunch of them into their countries but more proactive about helping "on site". US policy is fine.

why?

I'll bet the answer is something along the lines of "Because they're totally incompatible with Western CivilisationTM", even though recent data shows that Muslims who live in Western countries tend to accept progressive attitudes pretty readily. IIRC, the most recent data showed that Muslims in the US are actually a lot more on board with homosexuality than white evangelicals.


Fascinatingly enough, i noted US policy as being fine.
 
2017-10-06 11:04:14 AM  

Ned Stark: So we're all secretly on the same page and im getting called a nazi gamergator altright racist because... reasons?


You're getting called a racist because you have racist opinions.
 
2017-10-06 11:06:02 AM  

Boxingoutsider: Nah.   An idiot calling me an idiot means nothing to me.   Someone saying I dont embody any democratic ideals is just an idiot.

I love to engage, especially with people who are smart and educated and disagree with me.   Tests my views, forces me to be smarter and better.  I dont mind losing an argument or a discussion or changing my views.

But . . . .and both sides do this way too much, when its all about purity tests and identity politics (you support gay rights that means you are against my god,or you don't support safe spaces on college campuses defined by race which means you are a virulent racist) its ridiculous nonsense to me.

But. . . . .thats where we are.   Both parties figured out its wildly effective and cheap.  It may turn off 15% of your base give or take, but someone like me will always vote democrat even if we nominated a candidate who wanted to ban so called micro aggressions.  Energizing the base and trying to grab a little piece of the middle in key spots seems preferable to broad based support that may turn off your base.  Thats why both partys candidates have to bow and grovel to the issue of the day to their base, regardless of whether they think its worthwhile to do so.


Hey, I'm just like you.  I don't bow down to the Republicrats or the Democans.  I'm my own man.

I'm a libertarian, Dottie... a rebel.
 
2017-10-06 11:07:13 AM  

JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: The article is about literal Nazis. WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really? Nazis?

I just realized how successfully BoxingOutsider has hijacked the conversation away from the fact that the farkING GOP COLLABORATED WITH NEO-farkING-NAZIS.


Well, in truth not really the gop itself, the establishment hacks.   Moreso this new breed of radicals who have hijacked the party.   And the most important part is how the specifically virulently racist parts of that collaboration fueled the rise of the new breed of republican politician.
 
2017-10-06 11:07:32 AM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: Ned Stark: So we're all secretly on the same page and im getting called a nazi gamergator altright racist because... reasons?

You're getting called a racist because you have racist opinions.


An opinion some guy in a waistcoat asserted you all share, which if true, would maske your condemnation pretty puzzling.
 
2017-10-06 11:07:52 AM  

JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: The article is about literal Nazis. WTF do Dems have to do with it, and even if you think the far left is over bearing.... really? Nazis?

I just realized how successfully BoxingOutsider has hijacked the conversation away from the fact that the farkING GOP COLLABORATED WITH NEO-farkING-NAZIS.


Collaborate?  Not fair!  They just... hired them....

to work in the White House...

but it was only, like, three or four of them on Trump's personal staff... that's not even 50%!  And Ivanaka was there to bring him back to the mainstream!

img.fark.net

Oh, man, we're all gonna die, aren't we?
 
2017-10-06 11:08:43 AM  

Rapmaster2000: Boxingoutsider: Nah.   An idiot calling me an idiot means nothing to me.   Someone saying I dont embody any democratic ideals is just an idiot.

I love to engage, especially with people who are smart and educated and disagree with me.   Tests my views, forces me to be smarter and better.  I dont mind losing an argument or a discussion or changing my views.

But . . . .and both sides do this way too much, when its all about purity tests and identity politics (you support gay rights that means you are against my god,or you don't support safe spaces on college campuses defined by race which means you are a virulent racist) its ridiculous nonsense to me.

But. . . . .thats where we are.   Both parties figured out its wildly effective and cheap.  It may turn off 15% of your base give or take, but someone like me will always vote democrat even if we nominated a candidate who wanted to ban so called micro aggressions.  Energizing the base and trying to grab a little piece of the middle in key spots seems preferable to broad based support that may turn off your base.  Thats why both partys candidates have to bow and grovel to the issue of the day to their base, regardless of whether they think its worthwhile to do so.

Hey, I'm just like you.  I don't bow down to the Republicrats or the Democans.  I'm my own man.

I'm a libertarian, Dottie... a rebel.


shiat, i bow to democrats.   I pull that lever every damn time.   Regardless of however i feel we may be losing our way a bit, its still better than the alternative.
 
2017-10-06 11:08:50 AM  

weddingsinger: Oh, man, we're all gonna die, aren't we?


Yep.
 
2017-10-06 11:09:06 AM  

guestguy: Ned Stark: LL316: HotWingConspiracy: the "natural conservatives" (people who think different ethnic groups should stay separate for scientific reasons)

LOL, one of them posts here. He'll be in this thread later for sure.

Wtf are scientific reasons for not farking who you wanna fark?

There aren't many, and they aren't really important enough to waste time being concerned with.

HotwingConspiracy just determinedly interperets moderate intensity dating advice as though it were a call for a eugenics program.

Wat?


I think it's like High Intensity Interval Training for dating. So you date the fark out of different people really quickly. I think the more different they are, the more you get out of it. So I've heard.
 
2017-10-06 11:09:08 AM  

skyotter: Destructor: But at every turn it seems that Breitbart is trying to distance themselves from them.

We read very different articles.  Got a link to the one you read?


Imagine a neutral party looking at the Fark political tab as an example of actual political discussion. (Hilarious, I know.) How would they evaluate the constant (for example) denigration of Ann Coulter, etc? Similar because the people admit to harboring a dark sense of humor (sound familiar?)

That's what these internal email exchanges might be like. Hard to say since we only have been exposed to the cherry pickings tainted further by the suggestions of the author.
 
2017-10-06 11:09:19 AM  

Ned Stark: An opinion some guy in a waistcoat asserted you all share,


i0.kym-cdn.com
 
2017-10-06 11:09:39 AM  
heeee-oooollyyyyyyyyyy nut-bars Batman these people are nuttier than squirrel shiat. Calling everyone who doesn't buy in to their insanity 'normies' is probably the only thing about these people grounded in reality. If one could harness the cognitive dissonance from these clowns as energy you could power the world.
whether it's the idea of someone who get's triggered into a reeeeeeeee-rage over feminist, blacks, and liberals calling out others as "snowflakes" or the fact that people who's ultimate goal is to strip people of their rights constantly whining about how they imagine their rights are being restricted I think it's pretty clear that this point that these are some seriously damaged people who need to be dumped into the fetted waste bin of political history sooner rather than later.
 
2017-10-06 11:09:47 AM  
Yep. There's a big ol' Nazi. Oh yeah. lmao

img.fark.net
 
2017-10-06 11:09:58 AM  

Ned Stark: guestguy: Ned Stark: LL316: HotWingConspiracy: the "natural conservatives" (people who think different ethnic groups should stay separate for scientific reasons)

LOL, one of them posts here. He'll be in this thread later for sure.

Wtf are scientific reasons for not farking who you wanna fark?

There aren't many, and they aren't really important enough to waste time being concerned with.

HotwingConspiracy just determinedly interperets moderate intensity dating advice as though it were a call for a eugenics program.

Wat?

It once came up here that i think interracial dating is probably a bad idea.

Which is really all that was ment. Interracial relationships blow up more often than ones that aren't. It's a bad idea in exactly the same way that, say, dating wildly out of your income bracket or education level is. There is simply a greater chance of sorrow and pain in your future.

But apparently I'm a hardcore defender of the purity of the whit race?


Why make an inflammatory statement like that if you have absolutely no data whatsoever to back it up?
 
2017-10-06 11:10:07 AM  

aungen: I'm with Boxingoutsider on this one.  Dem's went batshiat crazy and you're not allowed to think for yourself anymore.  That's my experience, anyway.


Reclusive Republican billionaires are funding a racist media conspiracy to undermine the foundations of democracy with the tech industry that goes all the way to the highest levels of the White House and you complain about Democrats???
 
2017-10-06 11:10:34 AM  

guestguy: doubled99: OOGA BOOGA!!!
NAZIS EVERYWHERE!!!

Stop courting nazis, and people will stop pointing out that you're courting nazis...


There have been more articles in the last 3 months about nazis than there are actual nazis.
 
2017-10-06 11:11:10 AM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: Magorn: Yarvin, a software engineer who under the nom de plume Mencius Moldbug helped create the "neoreactionary" movement, which holds that Enlightenment democracy has failed and that a return to feudalism and authoritarian rule is in order. 

This...this is an actual thing?  Here and Now?

Yes it is. Moldbug is one of those socially retarded ass-pies who is obsessed with "functional programming" (an idiotic approach to coding that resonates with folks who can see the world only in terms of black and white), and thinks authoritarianism is a great idea. Like most people who hold moronic views like that, he's not self-aware enough to realize that, if authoritarian rule were instituted, he'd be one of the first ones against the wall. But he's sure he's one of the supermen who will be allowed to rule the rest.

For some reason the Venn diagram of "likes Nazis," "takes video games way too seriously," "enjoys functional programming," "wears fedoras and describes self as a 'nice guy'," "can't get laid," "hates women" is pretty large.


Yeah in retrospect, I ran into a LOT of that Venn Diagram hanging around Sci-Fi Cons in the early 90's but I wasn't aware enough to know what I was looking at.  They were almost all men, working in comp-sci jobs, had limited to non-existent social skills and grooming habits and most had a nasty case of the Madonna-whore complex to boot.   They'd worship the women who actually went to cons, A lot less nerd girls back int he day)....right up to the point where the object of their affection turned them down, and then they often got angry and on occasion violent about that (Back then I was 6'2 and 325 my self and  some of of that wasn't pure fat so Con security was my favorite gig) Eric Raymond was a fixture those cons who was sorta the archetype of the breed.

A smart friend of mine from those days who was a frequent object of those affections and is now a trained anthropologist tells me that toxic tribalism we see in Gamergate and elsewhere isn't new but festered in SF and Geek circle for a LONG time but was  just a bit more muted because of the lack of a platform like the internet where people like that could find validation and reinforcement
 
2017-10-06 11:11:40 AM  

PanicMan: Reclusive Republican billionaires are funding a racist media conspiracy to undermine the foundations of democracy with the tech industry that goes all the way to the highest levels of the White House and you complain about Democrats???


Well, yeah, because Democrats support Civil Rights protections for LGBTQ and People Of Color.  Can't have that.
 
2017-10-06 11:12:05 AM  

JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: Oh, man, we're all gonna die, aren't we?

Yep.


Nope.   Nazis are on the run since Charlottesville.
 
2017-10-06 11:12:47 AM  

JimmyTheHutt: weddingsinger: Oh, man, we're all gonna die, aren't we?

Yep.


Oh, god....  hold me.

img.fark.net
 
2017-10-06 11:13:10 AM  

Ned Stark: All trends have their exceptions, and yeah that is one I knew about.

/Maybe this data just means white women mudsharks are hard to like with
//That's stolen


Isn't that the term you people usually use?  At least in private conversation and on alt-right message boards.
 
2017-10-06 11:13:46 AM  
Nazi n me finishin' that farking article today.
 
2017-10-06 11:13:47 AM  

Boxingoutsider: Rapmaster2000: Boxingoutsider: Nah.   An idiot calling me an idiot means nothing to me.   Someone saying I dont embody any democratic ideals is just an idiot.

I love to engage, especially with people who are smart and educated and disagree with me.   Tests my views, forces me to be smarter and better.  I dont mind losing an argument or a discussion or changing my views.

But . . . .and both sides do this way too much, when its all about purity tests and identity politics (you support gay rights that means you are against my god,or you don't support safe spaces on college campuses defined by race which means you are a virulent racist) its ridiculous nonsense to me.

But. . . . .thats where we are.   Both parties figured out its wildly effective and cheap.  It may turn off 15% of your base give or take, but someone like me will always vote democrat even if we nominated a candidate who wanted to ban so called micro aggressions.  Energizing the base and trying to grab a little piece of the middle in key spots seems preferable to broad based support that may turn off your base.  Thats why both partys candidates have to bow and grovel to the issue of the day to their base, regardless of whether they think its worthwhile to do so.

Hey, I'm just like you.  I don't bow down to the Republicrats or the Democans.  I'm my own man.

I'm a libertarian, Dottie... a rebel.

shiat, i bow to democrats.   I pull that lever every damn time.   Regardless of however i feel we may be losing our way a bit, its still better than the alternative.


My only advice is don't cave to their assertions of reality.  I work in an office, and one of my coworkers is a trump voter.  He's a good guy, he means well and likely just drank the kool aid while he was unemployed about how Trump can save us. 
He's got three kids and he tries to teach them right from wrong.  He's not the embodiment of white power, heck he's awkward and stutters but he means well.

Point is, don't buy into this belief of duality, we are all shades of different colors.  Heck the only commonality is that we are all meatbags slowing moving towards our eventual demise, a flicker in a infinite void.

So don't let the "putting people in boxes brigade" get you down.  Just get involved with local politics and realize that its a damn impressive thing that some of your neighbors are able to both have pants and shirts on because my god is there lots of dumb people.
 
Displayed 50 of 566 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report