Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(News4Jax)   Trump has "decided" on Iran nuclear deal, but won't tell what he "decided" except he will announce how Trump "decided" later. "Decided"   ( news4jax.com) divider line
    More: Unlikely, Barack Obama, Trump, United States, Democratic Party, President Donald Trump, Trump administration, deal, Iran nuclear deal  
•       •       •

467 clicks; posted to Politics » on 20 Sep 2017 at 5:05 PM (17 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



58 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-09-20 02:45:14 PM  
He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.
 
2017-09-20 03:06:17 PM  
So would that make him the Decider in Chief?

/mission accomplished
 
2017-09-20 03:20:04 PM  
It doesn't take a Job Creator to know that whatever Obama did, he's against.
 
2017-09-20 03:26:56 PM  

Serious Black: He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.


But it is Trump so he probably doesn't think Iran is IN Asia...
 
2017-09-20 03:34:33 PM  
farking buffoon...
 
2017-09-20 04:07:55 PM  

Nadie_AZ: So would that make him the Decider in Chief?

/mission accomplished


Exactly where I was going

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-09-20 04:15:01 PM  

andrewagill: Nadie_AZ: So would that make him the Decider in Chief?

/mission accomplished

Exactly where I was going

[img.fark.net image 850x400]


Roger Smith has something to say about that.
 
2017-09-20 04:20:43 PM  

Serious Black: He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.


Trump can't bomb the Norks, and Iran has no nukes, so Iran it is.
 
2017-09-20 04:20:43 PM  
"I'm the decider and I..." Oh.

/late to the party
 
2017-09-20 04:24:15 PM  
I'm gonna go out on a limb and speculate that he's decided to fark it up completely.
 
2017-09-20 04:48:57 PM  
Iran having nukes is going to all but assure that Saudi will start developing their own. This is not a situation that any sane person wants. Good thing we elected a possibly senile con artist with narcissistic personality disorder.
 
2017-09-20 05:04:42 PM  
Well, when we pull out and they decide to ratchet up their program, we'll see if they really are 6 months from a nuke. Good job, dumbass!
 
2017-09-20 05:07:58 PM  

Cagey B: Iran having nukes is going to all but assure that Saudi will start developing their own. This is not a situation that any sane person wants. Good thing we elected a possibly senile con artist with narcissistic personality disorder.


Don't blame me.  I voted for Hillary three times.
 
2017-09-20 05:08:41 PM  
He will announce his decision after Saudi Arabia makes another donation to Ivanka's Foundation.
 
2017-09-20 05:09:09 PM  
He has no idea what that 'deal' is about beyond his inane Ahab-level hatred of Obama. That means the 'deal' is dead.
 
2017-09-20 05:09:32 PM  
It's almost like we're living in a reality TV show hosted by a lobotomized egomaniac bellowing random superlatives.

Almost.
 
2017-09-20 05:09:34 PM  

Cagey B: Iran having nukes is going to all but assure that Saudi will start developing their own. This is not a situation that any sane person wants. Good thing we elected a possibly senile con artist with narcissistic personality disorder.


I believe it's understood that Saudi Arabia has a couple nukes on 'reserve's with Pakistan.

Also, at this point why wouldn't you develop nukes? The POTUS is clearly not stable, and tearing up a deal with Iran would just confirm that agreements with the US are as worthless as the treaties the Native Americans signed.
 
2017-09-20 05:09:37 PM  
He's going to kill this years long negotiated, internationally cooperated deal out of spite of his black predecessor.
 
2017-09-20 05:10:05 PM  

Nogrhi: Serious Black: He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.

But it is Trump so he probably doesn't think Iran is IN Asia...


But isn't I really Asia minor?

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-09-20 05:11:52 PM  
too bad what he decides once he might redecide again... and again... and then undecide and then change his mind and decide again
 
2017-09-20 05:13:13 PM  
youru.comView Full Size
 
2017-09-20 05:14:49 PM  
Can one label his decision as "All Cotton?"
 
2017-09-20 05:15:55 PM  
So what happens if The Sentient Anus pulls out of the Iran Deal? Will inspections etc. still stand? What is to stop Iran from Nuking up?

We are going to end up with a Sino-Russo-Iranian trilateral union without a single check on Iran's behavior. What fun!
 
2017-09-20 05:16:21 PM  
Centrifuges, spinning.
 
2017-09-20 05:16:32 PM  

Serious Black: He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.


No. Trump won't fight a land war. He'll just Truman it.
 
2017-09-20 05:17:59 PM  
He's decided on the flavor of ice cream he wants while watching TV tonight.
 
2017-09-20 05:18:05 PM  

bthom37: Cagey B: Iran having nukes is going to all but assure that Saudi will start developing their own. This is not a situation that any sane person wants. Good thing we elected a possibly senile con artist with narcissistic personality disorder.

I believe it's understood that Saudi Arabia has a couple nukes on 'reserve's with Pakistan.

Also, at this point why wouldn't you develop nukes? The POTUS is clearly not stable, and tearing up a deal with Iran would just confirm that agreements with the US are as worthless as the treaties the Native Americans signed.


The US isn't the only participant in the agreement.
 
2017-09-20 05:18:39 PM  
Tthe Shart of the Deal.
 
2017-09-20 05:21:12 PM  
He is going to decide to pull out of the deal.  Problem with that is that the US is not the only party to the deal.  it was negotiated along with Britain, France, Germany, and Russia who will ignore Trump's call for additional sanctions.  Of course, sanctions are just a way to enrich those who will provide goods by circumventing the sanctions.  Often Russians.  Hmmm.
 
2017-09-20 05:22:09 PM  
He's decided that the blah man did it, so he's against it. Maybe he'll later walk it back, like his Paris accords idiocy.
 
2017-09-20 05:23:47 PM  
Another "you'll see" from him. He may not even have a plan.  Or he may just have some pathetic, pseudo-Machiavellian notion that he's creating unbearable suspense among his detractors.

Don't worry, Commander Sh#tgibbon, we already know your decision will be terrible.  Nobody is afraid of you.  More like disgusted.
 
2017-09-20 05:25:01 PM  

groppet: Nogrhi: Serious Black: He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.

But it is Trump so he probably doesn't think Iran is IN Asia...

But isn't I really Asia minor?

[img.fark.net image 243x207]


Asia Minor Pentatonic for all I care!
 
2017-09-20 05:25:12 PM  
"I've got a plan to defeat Isis in thirty days!" - Does anybody actually trust this piece of shiat?
 
2017-09-20 05:25:59 PM  

Serious Black: He's going to claim they were building a nuke, pull out of the agreement, and try to convince Congress to let him start a land war in Iran. Because fighting two massive land wars in Asia has worked out so well for us in the recent past.


It would be more on-brand for Trump to just talk a lot about how terrible the previous deal was, blame Obama and Hillary a bunch, then essentially leave the current deal in place, but now it's magically changed for the better because it somehow became Trump's deal. But we got dimensionally shifted to the Bizarro universe at some point in early 2016, so who the hell really knows.
 
2017-09-20 05:26:24 PM  

yakmans_dad: bthom37: Cagey B: Iran having nukes is going to all but assure that Saudi will start developing their own. This is not a situation that any sane person wants. Good thing we elected a possibly senile con artist with narcissistic personality disorder.

I believe it's understood that Saudi Arabia has a couple nukes on 'reserve's with Pakistan.

Also, at this point why wouldn't you develop nukes? The POTUS is clearly not stable, and tearing up a deal with Iran would just confirm that agreements with the US are as worthless as the treaties the Native Americans signed.

The US isn't the only participant in the agreement.


Yah, us pulling out won't make the other five signatories suddenly abandon the agreement. I imagine they will keep the agreement chugging along.  We will simply be making the US look like international bumblefarks for no gain. Again
 
2017-09-20 05:26:42 PM  
He's going to decide on regime change back to the hard-line clerics by betraying the pro-western faction?
 
2017-09-20 05:27:14 PM  
Seriously, fark this guy.
 
2017-09-20 05:29:45 PM  
Any Nuclear deal with Iran is bad mmkay, because Its about the money:

"On Wednesday, Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs and Oversight Committee reported that Flynn failed to disclose that he worked for oil companies and had attended a meeting on their behalf promoting a US-Russian Saudi-financed program to build nuclear reactors in the Arab world"

The Saudis want a monopoly on nuclear power in the middle east and more.  It isn't that they don't want Iran to have "nukes".  They don't want a competitor that could provide materials, maintenance, construction, administration, etc.
 
2017-09-20 05:38:55 PM  

Eddie Adams from Torrance: I'm gonna go out on a limb and speculate that he's decided to fark it up completely.


I'm gonna go out on a limb and say he's got nothing (like his health care plan, his tax plan, his whole presidenting  plan), but he will announce a time and day when he will make the big reveal, I mean make the announcement. Then we will all await his speech with trepidation and nausea at which point he will announce nothing.
 
2017-09-20 05:42:43 PM  
It never ceases to amaze me that conservatives and idiots(but I repeat myself) fail to realize that America pulling out of the treaty will have approximately no effect. Like, they realize this isn't just an American and Iranian deal, right?
 
2017-09-20 05:47:50 PM  
He'll float several different decisions to see which one pisses off the most people, then roll with it.
 
2017-09-20 05:55:58 PM  
This has nothing to do with Iran or nukes. It has to do with it being agreed to by Obama. That's about it. Obama was for it? He's against it. Pure reflex motion.
 
2017-09-20 06:02:57 PM  
I'm torn.

Is this governance by "Season ending cliffhanger" or governance via "magic 8-ball"?
 
2017-09-20 06:03:51 PM  
That's not how this works. That's not how ANY of this works.  Like the Paris Agreement, like the UN , like any complicated 'deal' made by our country with other countries, this was something that was researched, discussed, debated, and agreed upon after months or even  years of negotiations between multiple world leaders, multiple diplomatic agencies, and multiple lawyers..... one farkin guy can't just stand up and say "nope, not gonna happen," walk away from the table, and have it go away.

Goddamn it you farking orange buffoon. You don't know shiat about shiat, sit the fark down, shut the fark up, and go the fark away.
 
2017-09-20 06:09:24 PM  

RedT: Eddie Adams from Torrance: I'm gonna go out on a limb and speculate that he's decided to fark it up completely.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say he's got nothing (like his health care plan, his tax plan, his whole presidenting  plan), but he will announce a time and day when he will make the big reveal, I mean make the announcement. Then we will all await his speech with trepidation and nausea at which point he will announce nothing.


He'll announce he's opening a new hotel.
 
2017-09-20 06:09:56 PM  
He hasn't decided anything. That's one of the phrases he uses when he doesn't know what is going on and doesn't want to answer a question.  He's stalling. See also: "You're going to be very happy"
 
2017-09-20 06:24:08 PM  

berylman: "I've got a plan to defeat Isis in thirty days!" - Does anybody actually trust this piece of shiat?


He is The President Who Cried Wolf, and his credibility was blown when he sent Spicer out to make that ridiculous claim about inauguration crowd size. At this point, I'd trust the Tooth Fairy over Trump.
 
2017-09-20 06:24:39 PM  

HoboCop: Centrifuges, spinning.


Trumpers winning,
The whole world's gone to hell but how are you?

Sorry, it just reminded me of Big Gay Al's song.
 
2017-09-20 06:29:21 PM  

Petey4335: Any Nuclear deal with Iran is bad mmkay, because Its about the money:

"On Wednesday, Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs and Oversight Committee reported that Flynn failed to disclose that he worked for oil companies and had attended a meeting on their behalf promoting a US-Russian Saudi-financed program to build nuclear reactors in the Arab world"

The Saudis want a monopoly on nuclear power in the middle east and more.  It isn't that they don't want Iran to have "nukes".  They don't want a competitor that could provide materials, maintenance, construction, administration, etc.


This.
 
2017-09-20 06:49:24 PM  
Sorry Trump, that nickname's taken. GWB was "The Decider". You're "The shiatty Guesser".
 
Displayed 50 of 58 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report