Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(USA Today)   Joplin, MO teacher kicks "busty" teen out of class, tells her "plus sized women need to shop at stores for plus sized people." With a pic to help you decide   ( usatoday.com) divider line
    More: Asinine, Joplin High School, Education, Smaller busted women, larger busted women, School, dress code violation, Joplin school district, High School teacher  
•       •       •

24571 clicks; posted to Main » on 14 Sep 2017 at 8:16 AM (12 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2017-09-14 07:46:27 AM  
161 votes:
My God.  The traffic in her neighborhood must be backed up for miles from all the lawyers beating a path to her door.
2017-09-14 08:14:15 AM  
86 votes:
Teacher was obviously jealous.
2017-09-14 08:17:37 AM  
79 votes:

Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.


Kind of wanted a pic of the teacher for the sake of accuracy.
2017-09-14 08:20:59 AM  
75 votes:
Conservative outfit? Check
Moderate C/borderline D cup? Check
Teacher totes jelly? Check
2017-09-14 08:08:25 AM  
52 votes:
Back handed fat shaming at its finest.
2017-09-14 08:27:48 AM  
51 votes:
Not that this is the point at all, but she looks fine in that top.  Wtf is the teacher talking about?
2017-09-14 08:12:05 AM  
49 votes:
That is just...it's just...I can't find words for this. That poor child.
2017-09-14 09:01:47 AM  
38 votes:
That shirt is very cute and there is nothing inappropriate about it.  It isn't even tight.  The jeans are awful, but that's not really the student's fault - it's almost impossible to find jeans for teens that are not "skinny" and "low rise" which looks good on exactly 1% of the population (and they are the ones that do the modelling of them usually).  The best way to see how the fashion has completely skewed the choices that girls have in pants is to look at a school that has the "polo and khakis" uniform.  All the boys are walking around in comfortable looking, relaxed fit khakis, and all of the girls are walking around in skin tight khakis.  Not because that's what they wanted, because that is all there is.  I spent months trying to find relaxed fit khakis for my step-daughter and couldn't find anything.  Even Dickies were "skinny, low cut" style.  My step-daughter is one of those girls that looks good in them (which bothered me even more, because a 7th grader's pants should not look like they were painted on her body).  She's a senior in high school now, and can wear what she wants, and still can't find pants that fit her properly.  She is very active in sports and has muscular thighs because of it.  However, her waist is a size 1.  Skinny jean that fits a size 1 waist are hugely uncomfortable on her thighs.  After much searching, I found some relaxed fit jeans that fit her thighs and had them altered to fit her waist.  They look comfortable, and she can move easily in them, but I have a hard time getting her to wear them because they look so vastly different from what all of her peers are wearing she feels out of place.

Of course, the distressing of the jeans is annoying - but that's a different story.  When I had holes in my jeans, it's because I earned them the hard way - not because I bought them that way.
2017-09-14 08:34:27 AM  
32 votes:
She should go up a size in the pants.
2017-09-14 08:20:10 AM  
29 votes:
I think that top is really cute - I'd wear it.
2017-09-14 10:33:43 AM  
27 votes:
Apparently there is another side to the story (imagine that!).
The school dress code is No Boobs, bellies, or butts (im repeating what i saw on the Facebook comments, not my verbiage lol), and she was actually sent to the office for a bare midriff (oh the horror).
I'm not defending the school or teacher or any-such thing, but as a person whom likes to be objective, i do try to make sure the various sides are presented.

img.fark.netView Full Size

It is pretty clear from the pics, that its the same outfit she is wearing.
2017-09-14 08:45:27 AM  
27 votes:

weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.


I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.
2017-09-14 09:21:46 AM  
22 votes:
Ex got teased relentlessly at school by the biatchy clique for being a larger girl, also things such as not having a father, being dorky and weird, dating a chubby guy, etc. It was always the tits and weight comments that were worst. Little girls may be made of sugar and spice, but teenage girls are made of venom-dipped barbed knives freshly forged in the fires of hell.

In my ex's case, teachers always pulled the kids into line if they heard anything. It's very sad in this case the teacher was the instigator. Even if the girl had violated dress rules, there's a right way and a wrong way to correct that.

TL;DR Stop body shaming her, dog tits.
2017-09-14 09:03:26 AM  
22 votes:

RJReves: I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


Plus, looking good for guys may not be the only thing she thinks about when getting dressed. Maybe she likes the way she looks. Teens don't need goddamn teachers adding to their body image issues, that's what peers are for.
2017-09-14 08:54:46 AM  
22 votes:
There's nothing wrong with her outfit.

I have bigger boobs myself (G size) and especially back when I was a teen it was difficult to find cute tops that didn't look like I was wearing a mumu. I was at the weird size where plus size was too big but regular size too small, especially in the chest area.

Her outfit is fine and is like the stuff I wore back then. Teacher was on a power trip and probably thinks she should be in a burka.
2017-09-14 10:15:17 AM  
17 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:53:20 AM  
16 votes:
Why is this still happening
2017-09-14 08:41:05 AM  
16 votes:
Oh wow, I'm just one degree of separation from the student's mother. And yes, my Facebook has exploded. She's got a lot of angry people on her side. I'm not angry, but I'm on her side.
2017-09-14 09:01:35 AM  
14 votes:

Raspil: Why is this still happening


The Puritan trait runs strong in much of the US still.
2017-09-14 08:18:29 AM  
14 votes:

Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.


A pic of the teacher would solve this mystery I am guessing
2017-09-14 09:16:41 AM  
13 votes:
Those pants look like 10 pounds of sausage in a 5 pound casing.
2017-09-14 09:15:24 AM  
13 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size


Well, duh, lady.  Your daughter isn't wearing shoes.
2017-09-14 08:58:33 AM  
13 votes:

RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


Why does it matter what guys like?
2017-09-14 08:34:20 AM  
11 votes:
Top? No way. Covers everything a Puritanical administration would want covered?

Jeans? Only because called ripped jeans "distressed" and press as paying three figures does not make them anything but ripped jeans.

/have video of teachers not responding to the boy with the PENIS shirt, and she has them dead to rights
2017-09-14 11:03:16 AM  
10 votes:

xalres: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Therefore, sexualize an underage girl in front of her classmates, giving them ammo to make her life a living hell for the rest of her days there, then discuss her tits in front of her mom. Great strategy. Got any more diagrams there, Oliver Stone, maybe placed over a map connected with push pins and string?

/even if the top wasn't laced it wouldn't be all that revealing.


My point is that the article is obviously propaganda and you SHOULD have been thinking:

"Gee, I bet there is another side to this story." - Your Inner Voice


Do you FWD: FWD: FWD: fake news from your crazy uncle?  Perhaps you ARE that crazy uncle.  Turns out that the dress code violation was actually in regard to her exposed belly, not her chest.  The photo angle in TFA cleverly conceals this important detail.  You should always be suspicious of one-sided reporting, especially if you get a sense of outrage.

Learn that feeling... it is the feeling of being manipulated.
hej [TotalFark]
2017-09-14 08:51:35 AM  
10 votes:

DubyaHater: [img.fark.net image 284x345]


Gif would be 1,000x funnier with Dwayne Johnson's head instead.
2017-09-14 08:50:02 AM  
10 votes:
Are high schools still mostly staffed with adults who hated every goddamn minute of high school?
2017-09-14 08:44:46 AM  
10 votes:
The jeans are a bit too tight for my tastes, but overall I don't see anything inappropriate with the outfit.
2017-09-14 08:38:20 AM  
10 votes:
This teacher was worried about the girl's top when those jeans are about to blow out at any minute?
2017-09-14 11:50:14 AM  
9 votes:
FTA: The teacher said "your boobs are bigger than most girls, and you are gonna have to try harder."

False.
2017-09-14 11:47:18 AM  
9 votes:
FizixJunkee:
She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.

So do we want to know where you got her height and weight so you could figure her BMI?

She looks fine to me.
2017-09-14 10:41:53 AM  
9 votes:
I'm sure that's exactly how tight the strings were that control the cleavage when the teacher yelled at her.  No student has ever pulled their skirt higher, shirt more open, or rolled up their shorts to avoid dress codes, and then put it back when they got in trouble and claimed mistreatment.  That's unheard of.  It MUST be oppression.
2017-09-14 10:40:01 AM  
9 votes:

theknuckler_33: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

That would justify the manner in which the teacher treated the student?


You need to learn to identify FAKE NEWS.  My point was that TFA is so blatantly biased, you can't trust it's description of happened.  In other words, YOU DON'T KNOW the manner in which the teacher treated the student because the article has an obvious agenda that involves a financial benefit to the student and/or her mother.
2017-09-14 09:08:18 AM  
9 votes:
"I refuse to put my daughter in a situation where her self esteem is completely destroyed. She is there to learn. This whole time she was missing out on an education while we were all sitting in a room discussing her boobs. How often does this happen to your sons? Seems like another way to keep girls uneducated."

You poor, naive thing. That's ALL they talk about.
2017-09-14 09:05:44 AM  
9 votes:

LL316: Not that this is the point at all, but she looks fine in that top.  Wtf is the teacher talking about?


I suspect the top part was not laced so as to purposefully show off cleavage. But in later photos for the AW article it is laced up fully to maximise the outrage.
2017-09-14 08:44:15 AM  
9 votes:
That chick reminds me of what I used to see on a daily basis when growing up in Wisconsin.
2017-09-14 08:28:01 AM  
9 votes:
Irony screencapped from the front page of the website
img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:19:48 AM  
9 votes:

Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.

The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women."


Seconded.
2017-09-14 12:46:23 PM  
8 votes:

FizixJunkee: RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


First of all, she's 17 and, therefore, not yet a "woman."

She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.


*looks at picture*

*looks at this post*

*looks at the picture again*

*looks at this post again*

At worst, she's a bit heavy. That's not obese, unless you are a woman-hating pig.
2017-09-14 11:17:52 AM  
8 votes:

Imp___12: Apparently there is another side to the story (imagine that!).
The school dress code is No Boobs, bellies, or butts (im repeating what i saw on the Facebook comments, not my verbiage lol), and she was actually sent to the office for a bare midriff (oh the horror).
I'm not defending the school or teacher or any-such thing, but as a person whom likes to be objective, i do try to make sure the various sides are presented.

[img.fark.net image 539x960]
It is pretty clear from the pics, that its the same outfit she is wearing.


Thanks, Imp___12.  I thought her single-pose, demure stance picture was pretty much the best possible way to conceal whatever might have made her stand out.
2017-09-14 09:15:31 AM  
8 votes:
Was hoping for a pic of the student punching the teacher. Don't ever talk about my kid's body that way on the clock. If you can't keep it professional then GTFO.
2017-09-14 08:25:35 AM  
8 votes:

Loaf's Tray: Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.

The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women."

Seconded.


(That is to say, I second your assessment of jealousy; I do not in any way condone the suppression of large-breasted women...)
2017-09-14 08:22:10 AM  
8 votes:

Wookie_Jesus: Do they have a store for ugly people in her town?


Based on your profile pic, your town apparently does.
2017-09-14 11:35:08 AM  
7 votes:

RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.



First of all, she's 17 and, therefore, not yet a "woman."

She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.
2017-09-14 11:07:51 AM  
7 votes:

thehobbes: WilderKWight: Dress codes are farkin' stupid. Stop worrying about what the kids are wearing or doing with their own bodies, and farkin' teach them about English, History, Math, Biology, Chemistry, Civics, and other things.

You aren't getting into my lab without proper attire.


That's what lab coats are for.
2017-09-14 10:20:11 AM  
7 votes:

LadySusan: WTF!!!??? That is the most demure and appropriate outfit short of a burka. WTF is wrong with that teacher?

/Was besties with someone with huge bewbs in high school. It was not fun for her. The creepy notice, the teasing and the laughter is relentless. She eventually had reduction surgery.


One of my friends did too. Her back hurt all the time. The attention was ridiculous. And she couldn't find any tops that fit. She totally blossomed after the surgery, it was amazing to see. She stood differently, interacted differently. It was a life-changer for her.

BTW, the girl in TFA is *not* busty at all.
2017-09-14 08:52:06 AM  
7 votes:
A big ol' country girl like that shouldn't have any problem getting on a roller derby roster somewhere.
2017-09-14 08:48:50 AM  
7 votes:

LL316: Not that this is the point at all, but she looks fine in that top.  Wtf is the teacher talking about?


Might be the jeans, actually.

From here, her top is fine. It's just loose enough to make her too-tight jeans all the more noticeable.

and they are too tight - she looks squished.
2017-09-14 08:27:54 AM  
7 votes:
It's a shiat town in the middle of a shiat state, but it does have some pretty cool art.  Thomas Hart Benton is one of America's greatest painters.  If you're every driving through what you should have flown over instead, I highly recommend stopping in at the Joplin town hall and taking a quick look at the mural there.

More info: http://www.joplinmo.org/175/Public-Art
2017-09-14 02:48:46 PM  
6 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size


She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed
2017-09-14 01:16:39 PM  
6 votes:

Shakin_Haitian: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Even if that were undone, it's not like it opens up to halfway down her chest.

What is wrong with you people?


I believe the point is, and try and keep with me here because it's complicated, that she could have been violating school dress code without changing outfits. There are further arguments to be made about not falling for the first clickbait one-sided story about what happened, even if it does fit with your pet peeve about society.
2017-09-14 12:44:32 PM  
6 votes:
To the idiot who called her obese? WRONG.
2017-09-14 12:25:33 PM  
6 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size

Gotta do everything around here myself...
2017-09-14 11:46:43 AM  
6 votes:

FizixJunkee: First of all, she's 17 and, therefore, not yet a "woman."

She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.


Nope.

Obesity is definitely attractive when placed correctly.
2017-09-14 10:33:00 AM  
6 votes:
Actually, the top she's wearing de-emphasizes her bust.
2017-09-14 10:11:31 AM  
6 votes:
WTF!!!??? That is the most demure and appropriate outfit short of a burka. WTF is wrong with that teacher?

/Was besties with someone with huge bewbs in high school. It was not fun for her. The creepy notice, the teasing and the laughter is relentless. She eventually had reduction surgery.
2017-09-14 10:04:38 AM  
6 votes:

coffeeburns: hmm, I'm in Joplin, and I'm hearing that students are saying the conversation didn't exactly go the way the article states.


So......want to elaborate a bit?
2017-09-14 09:22:09 AM  
6 votes:

vudukungfu: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

they did go out of fashion in 78.
I remember girls wearing them in high school.
 and think halters with no bras.

ah, the 70s.


Ahhh, the halters with no bra.  It was truly a magical time.
2017-09-14 09:16:34 AM  
6 votes:

Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.


they did go out of fashion in 78.
I remember girls wearing them in high school.
 and think halters with no bras.

ah, the 70s.
2017-09-14 08:59:38 AM  
6 votes:
This must be some entirely new use for the word "busty" with which I was previously unfamiliar. Back in my day, "busty" meant something.
2017-09-14 08:52:10 AM  
6 votes:
Good old southwest Missouri.  If Oklahoma and Kansas had an illegitimate child and it decided to overcompensate by becoming ultra-religious and racist, that would be southwest Missouri.

/went to college in Springfield, MO
//glad I left
2017-09-14 08:51:17 AM  
6 votes:

StrikitRich: [img.fark.net image 650x366]

edmo: Is the teacher a nun?

If so, give her a wide berth.


Oh, I don't know.....

starcasm.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:44:07 AM  
6 votes:
hmm, I'm in Joplin, and I'm hearing that students are saying the conversation didn't exactly go the way the article states.
2017-09-14 08:35:54 AM  
6 votes:

harleyquinnical: Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.

Kind of wanted a pic of the teacher for the sake of accuracy.


I'm guessing that teach is flat chested.
2017-09-14 08:32:57 AM  
6 votes:

johnny_vegas: Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.

A pic of the teacher would solve this mystery I am guessing


Here's an artist's rendering of the teacher:
sep.yimg.comView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:28:50 AM  
6 votes:
Anderson's story went viral after her mother, Melissa Barber, shared photos and videos expressing her outrage to Facebook.

More like Facepalm.
2017-09-14 01:13:58 PM  
5 votes:
FizixJunkee: Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.

It's not her job to give you a stiffy.
2017-09-14 11:24:40 AM  
5 votes:
"17 year old high school girls shy away from attention and drama." is something no one said, ever.
2017-09-14 11:06:21 AM  
5 votes:

WilderKWight: Dress codes are farkin' stupid. Stop worrying about what the kids are wearing or doing with their own bodies, and farkin' teach them about English, History, Math, Biology, Chemistry, Civics, and other things.


You aren't getting into my lab without proper attire.
2017-09-14 09:41:11 AM  
5 votes:

Wyalt Derp: Why does it matter what guys like?


Continuation of the species?
2017-09-14 09:32:09 AM  
5 votes:

coffeeburns: hmm, I'm in Joplin, and I'm hearing that students are saying the conversation didn't exactly go the way the article states.


Not surprised. The mother sounds like a bit of a nutcase, one of these people looking to be offended. One who if the facts are as she says would be right in this case, but a nutcase just the same.

Administration definitely should have moved the kid regardless. A whole lot of stupid in the article.
2017-09-14 09:12:01 AM  
5 votes:
It's Missouri.  I'm pretty she'll meth into those jeans midway through her first Senior year.
2017-09-14 09:01:54 AM  
5 votes:

shortymac: There's nothing wrong with her outfit.

I have bigger boobs myself (G size) and especially back when I was a teen it was difficult to find cute tops that didn't look like I was wearing a mumu. I was at the weird size where plus size was too big but regular size too small, especially in the chest area.

Her outfit is fine and is like the stuff I wore back then. Teacher was on a power trip and probably thinks she should be in a burka.


I think we should have a moment of silence in memory of your profile hit counter
2017-09-14 08:57:09 AM  
5 votes:

LL316: Not that this is the point at all, but she looks fine in that top.  Wtf is the teacher talking about?


Either the teacher was being a coont, or the girl had that lacing at the top of her shirt slightly undone during class.
2017-09-14 08:49:02 AM  
5 votes:

OtherLittleGuy: DubyaHater: [img.fark.net image 284x345]

Do you have the original?


img.fark.netView Full Size
I got ya, bro.
2017-09-14 08:18:50 AM  
5 votes:

harleyquinnical: Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.

Kind of wanted a pic of the teacher for the sake of accuracy.


img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:07:04 AM  
5 votes:
Do they have a store for ugly people in her town?
2017-09-14 03:06:17 PM  
4 votes:

Frankly Speaking: Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: [img.fark.net image 181x267]

She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed

See, here is the underlying problem, this asshole thinks that it is funny to body shame a young woman.


To her face? No. On a website who's mascot is a rodent with over-sized testicles where she will likely never see it, yes. Context matters.
2017-09-14 03:01:55 PM  
4 votes:

Frankly Speaking: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

So you are defending the teacher who body shamed this child. You suck as much as the teacher.


He's questioning the incident ever happened as described. So yes on the defending the teacher (or at least not jumping to condemn), no on the teacher definitely body-shaming the child.

It's complicated, I know.
2017-09-14 02:50:35 PM  
4 votes:

FizixJunkee: RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


First of all, she's 17 and, therefore, not yet a "woman."

She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.


I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.
2017-09-14 02:25:26 PM  
4 votes:

Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.


She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.
2017-09-14 02:10:21 PM  
4 votes:

nanim: ftfa:  The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women."
... Anderson said she was "mortified" that her teacher said those things in front of the class.

Gee, think the teacher will be released with an 'insanity' plea?

/ methinks the teacher has some issues... but won't be having them in front of a class any longer


Or you could read the thread.  There were several pics posted of the same girl, in the same outfit with her midriff exposed, which is against the dress code.  That's what got her in trouble.  She drama'ing it up, as 17 years girls often do.  Her pants also look ready to explode.
2017-09-14 01:36:50 PM  
4 votes:

Ashelth: Dress code for the undergraduate lab I'm stuck teaching this term:

Wearing clothes.
Not on fire.
Not bleeding.


How the hell does your campus allow students in a lab with open toed shoes? Our environmental safety guy would have me in my program director's office repeating OSHA safety classes as a punishment.


Captain Shaky: jst3p: I am wondering if maybe in class she was wearing the top off the shoulders exposing cleavage? That's the only reason I can imagine that top being a dress code violation and given the laces it looks like that top could be worn that way.

It really doesn't though.

Even without laces, it looks like she would have to be actively pushing her boobs together to see even a small amount of cleavage. The girl isn't super busty, and the shirt wouldn't be all that low even if it had no laces to it.


It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.
2017-09-14 12:47:33 PM  
4 votes:

LoneWolf343: Shakin_Haitian: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Even if that were undone, it's not like it opens up to halfway down her chest.

What is wrong with you people?

It's a woman's body! UNCLEAN UNCLEAN UNCLEAN


Worse than that. She has the audacity to be FAT on the Internet. The Studman Brigade are having their usual collective head explosion to cover up the sound of their secret fapping over That curvy girl who rejected them in high school.
2017-09-14 11:48:40 AM  
4 votes:
Don't talk about peoples weight.  Got it.  But diabetes is still cool though, right?
2017-09-14 11:29:36 AM  
4 votes:
pbs.twimg.comView Full Size


Man reporters are lazy as hell. She's a family and consumer science ed teacher (home ec)/  Typically these programs work directly with little children and daycares to get teens who are interested in early childhood ed/preschool education some certifications.

Here is from her twitter at a national conference for Family, Career and Community Leaders of America.

Not sure which one she is though.
2017-09-14 10:58:40 AM  
4 votes:
Dress codes are farkin' stupid. Stop worrying about what the kids are wearing or doing with their own bodies, and farkin' teach them about English, History, Math, Biology, Chemistry, Civics, and other things.

Back when I was in public school there was no dress code. The administrators and teachers had better, more important things to do than obsess over whether someone's clothes were too tight, too short, too torn, or too offensively screen-printed. They never said one word to me, whether I was wearing torn jeans, or wearing ripped fishnets, a knee-length skirt, and combat boots. Not one word about my multi-hued hair, not one detention or demerit over my smeared lipstick and eyeliner. They might say "cool outfit" sometimes, but they never got all bent out of shape and sent me out of class.

The same goes for the girls. I saw lots of cleavage, lots of tight t-shirts, lots of bare midriffs (actually, it was the 80s, so that was also popular with some guys, too), lots of short skirts... And yes, it was titillating, but that was MY problem, not the girls' problem, and certainly not the teachers' problem to solve.

Even if the girl in this story was showing her midriff (which is probably why the teacher was going on about "plus sized" girls) it's NOBODY'S BUSINESS but the girl's. I absolutely hate it when people try to tell other people how to dress.  You can say you don't like it. You can say they look tacky or slutty or dirty or whatever... But punishment and trying to enforce a specific code of dress always offends me.

The sole exceptions are in a courtroom or when you agree to an employer's code of dress. Otherwise, if you're not standing before a Judge or getting paid to be there, it should be up to you how you choose to dress, and if people stare that's for you to deal with, too. It's nobody else's business.
2017-09-14 10:41:48 AM  
4 votes:

TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]


Therefore, sexualize an underage girl in front of her classmates, giving them ammo to make her life a living hell for the rest of her days there, then discuss her tits in front of her mom. Great strategy. Got any more diagrams there, Oliver Stone, maybe placed over a map connected with push pins and string?

/even if the top wasn't laced it wouldn't be all that revealing.
2017-09-14 10:40:00 AM  
4 votes:

Imp___12: Apparently there is another side to the story (imagine that!).
The school dress code is No Boobs, bellies, or butts (im repeating what i saw on the Facebook comments, not my verbiage lol), and she was actually sent to the office for a bare midriff (oh the horror).
I'm not defending the school or teacher or any-such thing, but as a person whom likes to be objective, i do try to make sure the various sides are presented.

[img.fark.net image 539x960]
It is pretty clear from the pics, that its the same outfit she is wearing.


The fact school districts have a pretty solid policy (under advice of legal counsel) to not talk to the press about these issues in public, this makes sense. Good on the fellow student for posting the snap.
2017-09-14 10:30:33 AM  
4 votes:

TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]


That would justify the manner in which the teacher treated the student?
2017-09-14 10:29:06 AM  
4 votes:

coffeeburns: hmm, I'm in Joplin, and I'm hearing that students are saying the conversation didn't exactly go the way the article states.


Well Jimmy Olsen, what's the scoop, then?
2017-09-14 10:27:18 AM  
4 votes:

TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]


Deep Thoughts
by TheWhoppah
2017-09-14 10:27:03 AM  
4 votes:

MikeyFuccon: There is nothing indecent about that top, and Miss Barber is not at all "plus-sized."

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [img.fark.net image 695x948]

Intentional, or Freudian?

Aside from that, the outfit of the girl on the left is much less school appropriate than Miss Barber's, in my opinion. What is her excuse?

I suspect a personality conflict going beyond looks.


I was listening to a couple female high school teachers chat at a coffeehouse the other day. They were talking about how sadistic the students are.  IMHO, they shouldn't stoop so low to be offended by what a student says or does. That's a sign of immaturity on the teachers' side.
2017-09-14 10:00:30 AM  
4 votes:

coffeeburns: hmm, I'm in Joplin, and I'm hearing that students are saying the conversation didn't exactly go the way the article states.


I was going to make a comment about the fact that these days you need no proof to make a public accusation and have the mob eat the crap up.
2017-09-14 09:59:59 AM  
4 votes:
Dear teacher,

img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 09:43:36 AM  
4 votes:
I went to high school in the 70s, which makes me and my teachers dinosaurs by today's standards. And still, no teacher back then would call out this girl for that outfit. It's not like she's showing too much skin or something.
2017-09-14 09:40:46 AM  
4 votes:
People should look and dress how I want them to.
2017-09-14 09:12:51 AM  
4 votes:
RJReves:Lots of guys like "full figured" women.

Warmth in the winter and shade in the summer.
2017-09-14 09:05:03 AM  
4 votes:
I thought I was under a lot of pressure.  I'd hate to be her buttons.
2017-09-14 09:04:25 AM  
4 votes:
Oh man. That hair. <3 I could post a pic of myself at that age and we'd be almost twins.

(by the way, from one random person with really stupid fine hair to another, girl, you're gonna want to use some kind of light oil when you're older to cut down on knots and breakage)

I'm a bit surprised the teacher objected to her shirt. Her jeans on the other hand must be pretty uncomfortable to sit in.
2017-09-14 08:52:06 AM  
4 votes:

Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.


I was once sent home with a note regarding the unacceptable nature of my socks. "Note, socks must be white, without color or patterns"

Catholic school. White round-collar blouses, seer-sucker jumpers in your choice of 4 pastel colors.
2017-09-14 08:43:56 AM  
4 votes:
Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.
2017-09-14 08:03:28 PM  
3 votes:

dkulprit: advex101: Pretty one sided.  Nowhere does it specifically state what is wrong with the outfit that she has on.  But, OMG = clicks.

Did you look at the pictures?  There ISnothing wrong with her outfit.  It's not too revealing, she's not busting out of it.  They claim teenage boys getting distracted is the reason for the dress code preventing girls from wearing "revealing" clothing.  You know, like clavicles showing it whatever.  In my highschool days with what she was wearing I wouldn't have even noticed her.

So the story doesn't need to be two sided.  It's pretty straightforward.  She got kicked out of class for wearing clothes that were inappropriate.... That aren't actually inappropriate.  What more do you need to know?

This isn't that swimsuit article from a couple month ago where the lady claimed she was discriminated against for wearing a too form fitting for her size, but then in her pics showing her wearing it "proving" it wasn't showing too much has her completely covering her butt, but in the picture of her actually wearing it in the pool has it completely riding up her crack like a thong.


Lol, except she had her shirt hiked up so she could midriff.  It's all been explained in this thread but go ahead and get mad.  Get REALLY mad.  And then read the details.
2017-09-14 05:31:09 PM  
3 votes:

Jake Havechek: Ahhh, the halters with no bra. It was truly a magical time.


It's funny -- pretty much every woman's fashion has come and gone several times in my lifetime, except that one AND I'VE BEEN WAITING 40 YEARS FOR THEM TO COME BACK
2017-09-14 04:31:51 PM  
3 votes:

shortymac: Hug, sorry to hear about your wife.


Thank you. Its only been 3 months (breast cancer sucks, even if caught early) but my children give me a purpose to get out of bed (that and the dog and cat who want breakfast  & have a 6AM internal clock). My daughter has three aunts, including one who has two sons, who are happy to spoil her, plus many cousins & friends.
2017-09-14 04:22:20 PM  
3 votes:
The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women."

As a general rule, this statement is 180 degrees wrong.
2017-09-14 04:05:16 PM  
3 votes:
I like boobs. Just thought I'd share
2017-09-14 03:05:19 PM  
3 votes:

SkittlesAreYum: Frankly Speaking: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

So you are defending the teacher who body shamed this child. You suck as much as the teacher.

He's questioning the incident ever happened as described. So yes on the defending the teacher (or at least not jumping to condemn), no on the teacher definitely body-shaming the child.

It's complicated, I know.


The lady is a FACS Ed teacher. Those women are typically the nicest women. Modest, but sweet as hell. This incident did not go down like this, but the teacher and district don't comment by policy, so we get the teacher hate fest.
2017-09-14 02:36:08 PM  
3 votes:

Phelon Hardtimes: xalres: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

Got a link to back that up?

It's already in this thread *thumbs up*


It was deleted by mods, but yeah, a fellow student posted a shot from the girl's social media of her taking a selfie in the bathroom with the shirt hiked up.
2017-09-14 01:14:07 PM  
3 votes:
WTF?!  She looks fine.   What the hell is wrong with that teacher?!
2017-09-14 12:43:26 PM  
3 votes:

Shakin_Haitian: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Even if that were undone, it's not like it opens up to halfway down her chest.

What is wrong with you people?


It's a woman's body! UNCLEAN UNCLEAN UNCLEAN
2017-09-14 12:36:09 PM  
3 votes:

FizixJunkee: RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


First of all, she's 17 and, therefore, not yet a "woman."

She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.


img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 12:33:08 PM  
3 votes:

Satan's Superfluous Nipple: Good ole Farkers. One minute they're bashing fat Americans. The next minute they're whining about fat shaming.


You've been here for nine years.
2017-09-14 12:18:41 PM  
3 votes:

freetomato: I think that top is really cute - I'd wear it.


This is the real feedback we need around here.
2017-09-14 12:16:20 PM  
3 votes:

Captain Shaky: [...] Obesity is definitely attractive when placed correctly.


img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 12:08:19 PM  
3 votes:

rebelyell2006: TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.

I think you quoted the wrong person. But as someone who has fired black powder cannons on state and federal parks, I can assure you the powder charge alone would kill the person at that range, burn them really badly, and splinter the tree.


I feel like I must have really missed something.
2017-09-14 10:55:41 AM  
3 votes:

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: tillerman35: It's a shiat town in the middle of a shiat state, but it does have some pretty cool art.  Thomas Hart Benton is one of America's greatest painters.  If you're every driving through what you should have flown over instead, I highly recommend stopping in at the Joplin town hall and taking a quick look at the mural there.

More info: http://www.joplinmo.org/175/Public-Art

[img.fark.net image 850x796]


It looks like the soon to be victim is thinking "Ok, this seems a bit over the top. Really? A cannon?"
2017-09-14 10:39:17 AM  
3 votes:

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: tillerman35: It's a shiat town in the middle of a shiat state, but it does have some pretty cool art.  Thomas Hart Benton is one of America's greatest painters.  If you're every driving through what you should have flown over instead, I highly recommend stopping in at the Joplin town hall and taking a quick look at the mural there.

More info: http://www.joplinmo.org/175/Public-Art

[img.fark.net image 850x796]


That picture is appalling. Doubtless it depicts a real event, but still appalling.
2017-09-14 10:17:20 AM  
3 votes:
Came here for pics of what various busty teens may look like....leaving quite unsatisfied.
2017-09-14 09:56:11 AM  
3 votes:
First they came for the Muslims
Then they came for the gays
Then they came for the blacks
Now they've come for the bazoombas. Shiat just got real.
2017-09-14 09:35:11 AM  
3 votes:

Jake Havechek: vudukungfu: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

they did go out of fashion in 78.
I remember girls wearing them in high school.
 and think halters with no bras.

ah, the 70s.

Ahhh, the halters with no bra.  It was truly a magical time.


2 words

Daisy
Dukes
2017-09-14 09:33:32 AM  
3 votes:

FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]


17 years old and in high school?
2017-09-14 09:16:19 AM  
3 votes:

CaptainOrangeCat: That shirt is very cute and there is nothing inappropriate about it.  It isn't even tight.  The jeans are awful, but that's not really the student's fault - it's almost impossible to find jeans for teens that are not "skinny" and "low rise" which looks good on exactly 1% of the population (and they are the ones that do the modelling of them usually).  The best way to see how the fashion has completely skewed the choices that girls have in pants is to look at a school that has the "polo and khakis" uniform.  All the boys are walking around in comfortable looking, relaxed fit khakis, and all of the girls are walking around in skin tight khakis.  Not because that's what they wanted, because that is all there is.  I spent months trying to find relaxed fit khakis for my step-daughter and couldn't find anything.  Even Dickies were "skinny, low cut" style.  My step-daughter is one of those girls that looks good in them (which bothered me even more, because a 7th grader's pants should not look like they were painted on her body).  She's a senior in high school now, and can wear what she wants, and still can't find pants that fit her properly.  She is very active in sports and has muscular thighs because of it.  However, her waist is a size 1.  Skinny jean that fits a size 1 waist are hugely uncomfortable on her thighs.  After much searching, I found some relaxed fit jeans that fit her thighs and had them altered to fit her waist.  They look comfortable, and she can move easily in them, but I have a hard time getting her to wear them because they look so vastly different from what all of her peers are wearing she feels out of place.

Of course, the distressing of the jeans is annoying - but that's a different story.  When I had holes in my jeans, it's because I earned them the hard way - not because I bought them that way.


The boys are going to have issues too. The latest trend at Target, Belks, and so on when I went to Santa Fe for pants shopping last month was skinny/straight leg dress trousers. With stretch banding around the waist. And 0% cotton.  And lower waistbands too, so they ground into my balls very uncomfortably. I bought trousers online instead.
2017-09-14 08:49:15 AM  
3 votes:

RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


I've done worse... uh... when they were legal age.
2017-09-14 08:42:22 AM  
3 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size


edmo: Is the teacher a nun?


If so, give her a wide berth.
2017-09-14 08:40:20 AM  
3 votes:

Fano: Teacher followed up with "sometimes I park in handicapped spaces while handicapped people make handicapped faces."


img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:38:23 AM  
3 votes:
Let's get this out of the way.

 
img.fark.netView Full Size


img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 08:38:18 AM  
3 votes:
I told people that this is what would happen if the Rams were allowed to move to Los Angeles.

Without quality NFL role-models teaching women how to act, Missouri is turning into a lawless hellscape!
2017-09-14 08:32:32 AM  
3 votes:
Pretty one sided.  Nowhere does it specifically state what is wrong with the outfit that she has on.  But, OMG = clicks.
2017-09-14 10:20:46 PM  
2 votes:

John Buck 41: Yawp: "The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women"

That has been the exact opposite of my experience.

Yeah. For cryin' out loud, THIS.


She was referring to clothing, not life in general. Smaller busted women can get away with more in regards to clothing choices than larger busted women. She was insinuating that the girl bought the wrong clothes for her body type, and that she needed to be more selective in her choices because her large boobs made certain types of shirts more revealing/distracting on her than they would be on a small-breasted woman.

But NONE OF THIS is the girl's problem. If people are distracted by her big boobs, that's their  problem, and she shouldn't be forced to wear a burlap sack to be less appealing. She was wearing a perfectly decent shirt, and the fact that her tits filled the shirt out more obviously than a small-breasted chick would doesn't change the fact that the shirt was not obscene or in violation of any sane dress code.
2017-09-14 08:39:50 PM  
2 votes:
6', 155#. Same as 45 years ago. Call me skinny, if you want. Better than being called fat.
2017-09-14 04:18:52 PM  
2 votes:
 "The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women"

That has been the exact opposite of my experience.
2017-09-14 03:33:07 PM  
2 votes:

Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.


Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.
2017-09-14 03:22:05 PM  
2 votes:

xalres: jst3p: Frankly Speaking: Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: [img.fark.net image 181x267]

She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed

See, here is the underlying problem, this asshole thinks that it is funny to body shame a young woman.

To her face? No. On a website who's mascot is a rodent with over-sized testicles where she will likely never see it, yes. Context matters.

He doesn't have the guts to say it to anyone in person. Regardless, it's still indicative of the type of person on the other end of the keyboard. And it's also saying "Hey ladies, your worth to me and society is solely based on how turgid you can make a dude."


Maybe. I know that sometimes I say some messed up shiat here but I do it for the lulz.
2017-09-14 03:15:11 PM  
2 votes:

Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: [img.fark.net image 181x267]

She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed


That naval what?  Is she wearing bell bottoms or something?
2017-09-14 03:04:55 PM  
2 votes:

Frankly Speaking: So you are defending the teacher who body shamed this child.


Do you have any evidence that this really happened? The story linked lied about why she was given the dress code violation, it seems likely that it probably made up the body shaming comments too, don't you think?
2017-09-14 02:54:41 PM  
2 votes:

Shocktopus: jst3p: Phelon Hardtimes: jst3p: thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.

That makes more sense. Got a link?

It's up thread.

Reposting for farkers lazier than I am.

[img.fark.net image 539x960]

OH MY GOD TWO AND ONE QUARTER INCHES OF TORSO SKIN!


Usually I am the first to decry silly, blanket, rules in school but in this case her being allowed to wear that would turn into this a day later:

ae01.alicdn.comView Full Size

"BUT BECKYS BELLY WAS SHOWING AND NO ONE SAID ANYTHING!!!!"
2017-09-14 02:52:42 PM  
2 votes:
Well, you all see, Joplin had a ttorrnado a few years back so chicks packing on the extra weight is jus' nature's way of makin' sure they all stay put if'n another tornado comes through.

If'n you'son God's side, then it's God's Will and if'n you on the wrong side, then it's Dawrinism's Hokus Pocus-smell my butt Evil-O-lushun
2017-09-14 02:36:29 PM  
2 votes:

Phelon Hardtimes: jst3p: thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.

That makes more sense. Got a link?

It's up thread.


Reposting for farkers lazier than I am.

img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 01:23:52 PM  
2 votes:

Gleeman: jst3p: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

I make a very decent salary and I am currently at work wearing a T-shirt and cargo shorts. Tell me more about what you know about "real life".

I spend my day looking like I'm ready for bed.

(Hospital scrubs)


There's almost no job that will let you bare your midriff or wear a wifebeater to work.
2017-09-14 01:05:08 PM  
2 votes:

advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.


I make a very decent salary and I am currently at work wearing a T-shirt and cargo shorts. Tell me more about what you know about "real life".
2017-09-14 01:01:58 PM  
2 votes:

jst3p: I am wondering if maybe in class she was wearing the top off the shoulders exposing cleavage? That's the only reason I can imagine that top being a dress code violation and given the laces it looks like that top could be worn that way.


It really doesn't though.

Even without laces, it looks like she would have to be actively pushing her boobs together to see even a small amount of cleavage. The girl isn't super busty, and the shirt wouldn't be all that low even if it had no laces to it.
2017-09-14 12:54:35 PM  
2 votes:
Oh. We deleted the post exonerating the teacher but left the demure pose. 
Nice.
2017-09-14 12:38:53 PM  
2 votes:

TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]


Even if that were undone, it's not like it opens up to halfway down her chest.

What is wrong with you people?
2017-09-14 12:10:34 PM  
2 votes:

rebelyell2006: WilderKWight: thehobbes: WilderKWight: Dress codes are farkin' stupid. Stop worrying about what the kids are wearing or doing with their own bodies, and farkin' teach them about English, History, Math, Biology, Chemistry, Civics, and other things.

You aren't getting into my lab without proper attire.

That's what lab coats are for.

Lab coats do not extend down to the ankles. And schools probably do not have 30 lab coats sitting around. Mine didn't when I took chemistry.


My lab wears his fur coat all the time.  And NO, you can't be in him you sick fark!
2017-09-14 11:49:15 AM  
2 votes:

advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.


Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.
2017-09-14 11:25:26 AM  
2 votes:
Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.
2017-09-14 11:19:57 AM  
2 votes:

vudukungfu: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

they did go out of fashion in 78.
I remember girls wearing them in high school.
 and think halters with no bras.

ah, the 70s.


Yes indeed, good Sir. With hiphuggers and short shorts / cutoffs.  70's were amazing in many ways.
2017-09-14 11:11:24 AM  
2 votes:

WilderKWight: thehobbes: WilderKWight: Dress codes are farkin' stupid. Stop worrying about what the kids are wearing or doing with their own bodies, and farkin' teach them about English, History, Math, Biology, Chemistry, Civics, and other things.

You aren't getting into my lab without proper attire.

That's what lab coats are for.


1) we use aprons- lab coats are harder to keep clean/hygienic.
2) Aprons don't protect your feet
2017-09-14 11:04:47 AM  
2 votes:

dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.


If you're going to defend your daughter, don't pick an outfit that's worse than hers.
2017-09-14 10:59:31 AM  
2 votes:

Imp___12: Apparently there is another side to the story (imagine that!).
The school dress code is No Boobs, bellies, or butts (im repeating what i saw on the Facebook comments, not my verbiage lol), and she was actually sent to the office for a bare midriff (oh the horror).
I'm not defending the school or teacher or any-such thing, but as a person whom likes to be objective, i do try to make sure the various sides are presented.

[Apple polishing omitted]

It is pretty clear from the pics, that its the same outfit she is wearing.


Well, yes, except the problem (such as it was) would have been easily corrected by having Miss Barber tuck her top in. Moreover, the dress code as a whole is clearly not consistently enforced.

I'm sure the teacher gets on great with Miss Wilson, but that just makes it look like favoritism. I remain convinced this is a personality conflict going beyond Miss Barber's choices of outfit---and her chest.
2017-09-14 10:53:19 AM  
2 votes:
Why do they never show you the angle you need?
2017-09-14 10:51:53 AM  
2 votes:

parasol: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

I was once sent home with a note regarding the unacceptable nature of my socks. "Note, socks must be white, without color or patterns"

Catholic school. White round-collar blouses, seer-sucker jumpers in your choice of 4 pastel colors.


Well, what's the pointing of educating someone who's already readying themselves for a life of whoredom by wearing coloured socks?
2017-09-14 10:48:42 AM  
2 votes:
I love the internet. Everything's a multi-level conspiracy planned weeks in advance.
2017-09-14 10:45:20 AM  
2 votes:

LadySusan: Was besties with someone with huge bewbs in high school. It was not fun for her. The creepy notice, the teasing and the laughter is relentless.


Well that's not how to be a friend!
2017-09-14 10:28:58 AM  
2 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 10:28:03 AM  
2 votes:
2017-09-14 10:21:03 AM  
2 votes:

uber humper: TommyDeuce: My God.  The traffic in her neighborhood must be backed up for miles from all the lawyers beating a path to her door.

Really???, do you think she'll make millions because she was insulted? Teacher should be suspended, but to think she deserves lots of hard cash for being offended is silly.


This isn't about what she deserves, it's about how lawyers operate.
2017-09-14 10:19:24 AM  
2 votes:

Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.


Or, more likely, tried to hit on her and was rebuffed.
2017-09-14 10:18:01 AM  
2 votes:

TommyDeuce: My God.  The traffic in her neighborhood must be backed up for miles from all the lawyers beating a path to her door.


Really???, do you think she'll make millions because she was insulted? Teacher should be suspended, but to think she deserves lots of hard cash for being offended is silly.
2017-09-14 10:13:49 AM  
2 votes:
Some girls' mothers are bigger than other girls' mothers.
2017-09-14 09:55:19 AM  
2 votes:
Teacher had a hair across her arse about something and too it out on this student.
2017-09-14 09:45:58 AM  
2 votes:

coffeeburns: hmm, I'm in Joplin, and I'm hearing that students are saying the conversation didn't exactly go the way the article states.


I'm sorry, could perhaps be a bit more vague?  I almost have an understanding of what you mean, sort of.
2017-09-14 09:42:45 AM  
2 votes:

harleyquinnical: Prank Call of Cthulhu: johnny_vegas: I think we should have a moment of silence in memory of your profile hit counter

Here's the soundtrack to listen to as you watch the counter rapidly increase:

[YouTube video]

[iFrame https://www.youtube.com/embed/X2-MLipCuZY - 480x270]


And the classic.. (potentially NSFW on the big screen behind him)


#4 Joe Walsh "I like big tits" 19-08-15
Youtube DbKKUDRMFRA


/20 days & the quest begins again
//boy it's been a long summer
2017-09-14 09:36:50 AM  
2 votes:

rebelyell2006: The boys are going to have issues too. The latest trend at Target, Belks, and so on when I went to Santa Fe for pants shopping last month was skinny/straight leg dress trousers. With stretch banding around the waist. And 0% cotton.  And lower waistbands too, so they ground into my balls very uncomfortably. I bought trousers online instead.


I'm not even sure HOW normal boys FIT in the goddamn pants sold in chain stores. I'm so glad for the stretch waists coming back. My son is normal shaped (at least I assume he is), but everything's too tight around the thighs, tight through the crotch, loose as hell around the waist and hips... It's the worst. I think he wore sweatpants for 3 years solid.
2017-09-14 09:29:42 AM  
2 votes:

CaptainOrangeCat: That shirt is very cute and there is nothing inappropriate about it.  It isn't even tight.  The jeans are awful, but that's not really the student's fault - it's almost impossible to find jeans for teens that are not "skinny" and "low rise" which looks good on exactly 1% of the population (and they are the ones that do the modelling of them usually).  The best way to see how the fashion has completely skewed the choices that girls have in pants is to look at a school that has the "polo and khakis" uniform.  All the boys are walking around in comfortable looking, relaxed fit khakis, and all of the girls are walking around in skin tight khakis.  Not because that's what they wanted, because that is all there is.  I spent months trying to find relaxed fit khakis for my step-daughter and couldn't find anything.  Even Dickies were "skinny, low cut" style.  My step-daughter is one of those girls that looks good in them (which bothered me even more, because a 7th grader's pants should not look like they were painted on her body).  She's a senior in high school now, and can wear what she wants, and still can't find pants that fit her properly.  She is very active in sports and has muscular thighs because of it.  However, her waist is a size 1.  Skinny jean that fits a size 1 waist are hugely uncomfortable on her thighs.  After much searching, I found some relaxed fit jeans that fit her thighs and had them altered to fit her waist.  They look comfortable, and she can move easily in them, but I have a hard time getting her to wear them because they look so vastly different from what all of her peers are wearing she feels out of place.

Of course, the distressing of the jeans is annoying - but that's a different story.  When I had holes in my jeans, it's because I earned them the hard way - not because I bought them that way.


This post useless without pics.
2017-09-14 09:21:22 AM  
2 votes:

RJReves: weirdneighbour: Nothing wrong with her, she looks fine...just needs to lose a few pounds.

I wouldn't even say she needs to lose weight.

Lots of guys like "full figured" women.


...she isn't "busty", though.  If she loses the "full figure" weight, she's a stick like all the rest of the girls; the boobs go too.
2017-09-14 09:21:18 AM  
2 votes:

vudukungfu: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

they did go out of fashion in 78.
I remember girls wearing them in high school.
 and think halters with no bras.

ah, the 70s.


Ahhh, the halters
2017-09-14 08:38:02 AM  
2 votes:
What, no yoga pants?
/painted on jeans with busted out knees are always a classy statement.
2017-09-14 08:23:41 AM  
2 votes:
Thank god for post facto narratives en?
2017-09-14 08:23:25 AM  
2 votes:
img.fark.netView Full Size
go on....
2017-09-14 08:08:38 AM  
2 votes:

TommyDeuce: My God.  The traffic in her neighborhood must be backed up for miles from all the lawyers beating a path to her door.



Im sure she has to beat off alot of guys...

/sorry
2017-09-15 07:28:08 AM  
1 vote:

Frankly Speaking: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

So you are defending the teacher who body shamed this child. You suck as much as the teacher.


Anyone that reads a "news" article as one sided as this should be a little skeptical.

Actually, you should always be a little skeptical.

/why, yes, I have two teens
2017-09-15 01:58:08 AM  
1 vote:

Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.

Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.

Men still "average" well under 6 feet.  What is your point?

But the height has increased over the years, as well as the weight. It's disingenuous to just go by one measure.

[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 300x168]

True.  In fact you can often find me complaining the the airline threads as I am 6'3".  But let's be honest.  Just because we are getting taller doesn't mean we should be getting fat.  Look at some old pictures, anything before the 70's and fat people are a rarity.

I work in healthcare, not disagreeing with you on there being more fatties. But with the photos available and no measurable body data it's hard to say the girl in the article is obese. No size 0 model for sure, but she doesn't even have a muffin top in the belly photo.

Depends on the methodology too. My teenage son had a checkup the other day, he was 6'4"/202lbs and the doctor said he was 'textbook' overweight going by height/weight. But she also said that h/w is a 'useless' measurement and that he was fine. I worked with a guy in the Navy was an amateur body builder, going by h/w he got listed as overweight every PT cycle.

6'4" and 202 sounds healthy to me.  That's about my size.  Just a side note, I never, once commented about the size of the girl in the story other than saying her pants were about to explode.  She looks healty to me.

My comments ...


Your comments upthread were:

She's clinically obese.  Her outfit is fine, but that doesn't change the fact she's obese.  Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.

So yes you did indeed comment about the girl's size and criticized her appearance.
2017-09-14 11:10:00 PM  
1 vote:

TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]


So what it they were? It's not like it's cut to her navel for Christ sake. If she was warned about it, then whatever jealous female/ horny male have the warning, should quit and get a prison guard job, where being an idiotic authoritarian is rewarded. Laced, unlaced, or no laces, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that top.
2017-09-14 10:29:30 PM  
1 vote:

A_Listless_Wanderer: Phelon Hardtimes: A_Listless_Wanderer: Phelon Hardtimes: dkulprit: advex101: Pretty one sided.  Nowhere does it specifically state what is wrong with the outfit that she has on.  But, OMG = clicks.

Did you look at the pictures?  There ISnothing wrong with her outfit.  It's not too revealing, she's not busting out of it.  They claim teenage boys getting distracted is the reason for the dress code preventing girls from wearing "revealing" clothing.  You know, like clavicles showing it whatever.  In my highschool days with what she was wearing I wouldn't have even noticed her.

So the story doesn't need to be two sided.  It's pretty straightforward.  She got kicked out of class for wearing clothes that were inappropriate.... That aren't actually inappropriate.  What more do you need to know?

This isn't that swimsuit article from a couple month ago where the lady claimed she was discriminated against for wearing a too form fitting for her size, but then in her pics showing her wearing it "proving" it wasn't showing too much has her completely covering her butt, but in the picture of her actually wearing it in the pool has it completely riding up her crack like a thong.

Lol, except she had her shirt hiked up so she could midriff.  It's all been explained in this thread but go ahead and get mad.  Get REALLY mad.  And then read the details.

A photo in the bathroom and anecdotal Fark comments aside, it was still the teacher who caused any problems here, since she was the one to disrupt the educational process.
At worst, MAYBE the girl broke an arbitrarily applied BS school rule. Even if she did, she's still not the troublemaker here.

/also, I've been with fat girls
// she's not fat

No one, NO ONE except her mother, has claimed she disrupted classtime or called her fat except you?  Do you just read random shiat and say "oh that must be true"?  Christ.  I am Christian Bale.

Wait... If the teacher did nothing, then what does the student's midriff have to do with this?
Y ...


Jesus Christ man, get a hold of of yourself.  I can't help you if you aren't willing.
2017-09-14 10:22:52 PM  
1 vote:

Phelon Hardtimes: John Buck 41: 6', 155#. Same as 45 years ago. Call me skinny, if you want. Better than being called fat.

You are skinny  and that's fine!  I am skinny too.  My chubby friends are always saying "you need to put some meat on your bones".   No I Don't!  I don't want to be fat!


'Zackly.
2017-09-14 09:32:36 PM  
1 vote:

A_Listless_Wanderer: Phelon Hardtimes: dkulprit: advex101: Pretty one sided.  Nowhere does it specifically state what is wrong with the outfit that she has on.  But, OMG = clicks.

Did you look at the pictures?  There ISnothing wrong with her outfit.  It's not too revealing, she's not busting out of it.  They claim teenage boys getting distracted is the reason for the dress code preventing girls from wearing "revealing" clothing.  You know, like clavicles showing it whatever.  In my highschool days with what she was wearing I wouldn't have even noticed her.

So the story doesn't need to be two sided.  It's pretty straightforward.  She got kicked out of class for wearing clothes that were inappropriate.... That aren't actually inappropriate.  What more do you need to know?

This isn't that swimsuit article from a couple month ago where the lady claimed she was discriminated against for wearing a too form fitting for her size, but then in her pics showing her wearing it "proving" it wasn't showing too much has her completely covering her butt, but in the picture of her actually wearing it in the pool has it completely riding up her crack like a thong.

Lol, except she had her shirt hiked up so she could midriff.  It's all been explained in this thread but go ahead and get mad.  Get REALLY mad.  And then read the details.

A photo in the bathroom and anecdotal Fark comments aside, it was still the teacher who caused any problems here, since she was the one to disrupt the educational process.
At worst, MAYBE the girl broke an arbitrarily applied BS school rule. Even if she did, she's still not the troublemaker here.

/also, I've been with fat girls
// she's not fat


No one, NO ONE except her mother, has claimed she disrupted classtime or called her fat except you?  Do you just read random shiat and say "oh that must be true"?  Christ.  I am Christian Bale.
2017-09-14 07:52:31 PM  
1 vote:

advex101: Pretty one sided.  Nowhere does it specifically state what is wrong with the outfit that she has on.  But, OMG = clicks.


Did you look at the pictures?  There ISnothing wrong with her outfit.  It's not too revealing, she's not busting out of it.  They claim teenage boys getting distracted is the reason for the dress code preventing girls from wearing "revealing" clothing.  You know, like clavicles showing it whatever.  In my highschool days with what she was wearing I wouldn't have even noticed her.

So the story doesn't need to be two sided.  It's pretty straightforward.  She got kicked out of class for wearing clothes that were inappropriate.... That aren't actually inappropriate.  What more do you need to know?

This isn't that swimsuit article from a couple month ago where the lady claimed she was discriminated against for wearing a too form fitting for her size, but then in her pics showing her wearing it "proving" it wasn't showing too much has her completely covering her butt, but in the picture of her actually wearing it in the pool has it completely riding up her crack like a thong.
2017-09-14 05:59:32 PM  
1 vote:
lord knows she ain't gonna get any thinner as time goes on.
2017-09-14 04:12:54 PM  
1 vote:

Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.

Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.

Men still "average" well under 6 feet.  What is your point?

But the height has increased over the years, as well as the weight. It's disingenuous to just go by one measure.

[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 300x168]

True.  In fact you can often find me complaining the the airline threads as I am 6'3".  But let's be honest.  Just because we are getting taller doesn't mean we should be getting fat.  Look at some old pictures, anything before the 70's and fat people are a rarity.


I work in healthcare, not disagreeing with you on there being more fatties. But with the photos available and no measurable body data it's hard to say the girl in the article is obese. No size 0 model for sure, but she doesn't even have a muffin top in the belly photo.

Depends on the methodology too. My teenage son had a checkup the other day, he was 6'4"/202lbs and the doctor said he was 'textbook' overweight going by height/weight. But she also said that h/w is a 'useless' measurement and that he was fine. I worked with a guy in the Navy was an amateur body builder, going by h/w he got listed as overweight every PT cycle.
2017-09-14 04:04:30 PM  
1 vote:

Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.

Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.

Men still "average" well under 6 feet.  What is your point?

But the height has increased over the years, as well as the weight. It's disingenuous to just go by one measure.

[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 300x168]


Speaking of disingenuous...we are definitely not double the size of someone from the 19th century. Perhaps that graph could be slightly more realistic...
2017-09-14 03:58:19 PM  
1 vote:

Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.

Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.

Men still "average" well under 6 feet.  What is your point?

But the height has increased over the years, as well as the weight. It's disingenuous to just go by one measure.

[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 300x168]


True.  In fact you can often find me complaining the the airline threads as I am 6'3".  But let's be honest.  Just because we are getting taller doesn't mean we should be getting fat.  Look at some old pictures, anything before the 70's and fat people are a rarity.
2017-09-14 03:54:25 PM  
1 vote:

Phelon Hardtimes: Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.

Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.

Men still "average" well under 6 feet.  What is your point?


But the height has increased over the years, as well as the weight. It's disingenuous to just go by one measure.

encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.comView Full Size
2017-09-14 03:53:33 PM  
1 vote:

Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: Frankly Speaking: Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: [img.fark.net image 181x267]

She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed

See, here is the underlying problem, this asshole thinks that it is funny to body shame a young woman.

Easy there skippy.   I would hit that like the fist of an angry god if she was 18

/not sure underlying or asshole is appropriate.


You'll have to fight most Farkers for it but I am not one of them. By all means enjoy that 17 age of consent and I will be at the bar. Or sitting on the sideline drinking and watching you guys fight over a chance I wouldn't take.
2017-09-14 03:38:05 PM  
1 vote:

Gleeman: Phelon Hardtimes: Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.

First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.

Yes, but they also averaged several inches under 6 foot.


IRT tightness of the girl's pants, lotta people around here didn't see the Jordache/Calvins era. Took half the date to get your girlfriend back out of them.


Guy walks into a bar a bar and sees a woman wearing pants so tight it looks like they are painted on. She catches him staring and asks "Can I help you with something?"
He is still amazed at how tight these pants are and is now a little embarrassed. "I am really sorry, but I couldn't help but stare, how do you get into those pants?" he asks.
"Well, tiger" she replies, "you can start by buying me a drink."
2017-09-14 03:33:44 PM  
1 vote:
I'm sure this will be the bust challenge to school dress codes this year as teating young women this way should be nipped in the bud. I want to stay abreast of this story as it develops.   After racking up so much support on social meeting, it seems odds are stacked in her favor. I hope she milks it for all it's worth!
2017-09-14 03:25:43 PM  
1 vote:

Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: Frankly Speaking: Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: [img.fark.net image 181x267]

She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed

See, here is the underlying problem, this asshole thinks that it is funny to body shame a young woman.

Easy there skippy.   I would hit that like the fist of an angry god if she was 18

/not sure underlying or asshole is appropriate.


Age of consent is 17 where she lives, so you are good.
2017-09-14 03:15:26 PM  
1 vote:

jst3p: Frankly Speaking: Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: [img.fark.net image 181x267]

She had the shirt hiked up.   Perhaps that bloated pre-menstrual gut made some sick ?

/you could hide in that naval.  jeezus.   corn fed

See, here is the underlying problem, this asshole thinks that it is funny to body shame a young woman.

To her face? No. On a website who's mascot is a rodent with over-sized testicles where she will likely never see it, yes. Context matters.


He doesn't have the guts to say it to anyone in person. Regardless, it's still indicative of the type of person on the other end of the keyboard. And it's also saying "Hey ladies, your worth to me and society is solely based on how turgid you can make a dude."
2017-09-14 03:15:01 PM  
1 vote:

Frankly Speaking: SkittlesAreYum: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

Meh, I get what you're saying and don't disagree that women are judged more by their looks than men. On the other hand, I've seen some pretty cruel Fark threads involving slightly overweight males as well. People just like to make fun of fat people, and it's not always about sex.

I'm sure that belief is reassuring to you no matter how much actual events contradict it.


You have a good point, we only mock fat women here...
img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 03:00:49 PM  
1 vote:

Latinwolf: I'm guessing your ideal woman is slim as a toothpick, build like a model, most of who are below average in body size.


First off, you were replying to a woman.  Next, "average" doesn't mean that's a good thing.  The people who won our freedom were about 145 - 160lbs, on "average".  Just because you can become fat doesn't mean you should.
2017-09-14 02:59:29 PM  
1 vote:

Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.


So you are defending the teacher who body shamed this child. You suck as much as the teacher.
2017-09-14 02:54:24 PM  
1 vote:
tu9srvbirvvtmjmkaw1hz2vzlmfnb3jhbwvkaweuy29t.g00.everydayhealth.comView Full Size
2017-09-14 02:48:23 PM  
1 vote:

jst3p: Phelon Hardtimes: jst3p: thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.

That makes more sense. Got a link?

It's up thread.

Reposting for farkers lazier than I am.

[img.fark.net image 539x960]


I wish the mods would just scrap any of these one sided school drama links.  It inevitably turns out to be bullshiat and just more dragging people through the mud.
2017-09-14 02:47:51 PM  
1 vote:

Shocktopus: WalMartian: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

If you're going to defend your daughter, don't pick an outfit that's worse than hers.

Man there is a whole lot o' deletin' goin' on up in here. I'm quite curious what keeps getting nuked.


Probably has to do with creepos eye-banging underage girls.
2017-09-14 02:45:09 PM  
1 vote:

WalMartian: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

If you're going to defend your daughter, don't pick an outfit that's worse than hers.


Man there is a whole lot o' deletin' goin' on up in here. I'm quite curious what keeps getting nuked.
2017-09-14 02:43:34 PM  
1 vote:

Shocktopus: NoahBuddy: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: tillerman35: It's a shiat town in the middle of a shiat state, but it does have some pretty cool art.  Thomas Hart Benton is one of America's greatest painters.  If you're every driving through what you should have flown over instead, I highly recommend stopping in at the Joplin town hall and taking a quick look at the mural there.

More info: http://www.joplinmo.org/175/Public-Art

[img.fark.net image 850x796]

That picture is appalling. Doubtless it depicts a real event, but still appalling.

It's also not what is on the webpage. Unless they changed it since the screencap was made.


It's from Parks & Recreation. The town's appalling history with the natives is a running joke.
2017-09-14 02:30:06 PM  
1 vote:

Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.


Got a link to back that up?
2017-09-14 02:22:45 PM  
1 vote:
What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.
2017-09-14 01:23:50 PM  
1 vote:

Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.


And flat as a pancake.
2017-09-14 01:06:54 PM  
1 vote:

Mr Guy: I'm sure that's exactly how tight the strings were that control the cleavage when the teacher yelled at her.  No student has ever pulled their skirt higher, shirt more open, or rolled up their shorts to avoid dress codes, and then put it back when they got in trouble and claimed mistreatment.  That's unheard of.  It MUST be oppression.


So assume that was COMPLETELY unlaced. WHat'ya got?  At worst less cleveage than a trip to a Ren Faire provides...and, last time I checked Students don;t face TOWARDS each other, so even if something was a bit more on display only the teacher saw it.   The Mean Girl who tried to "bust her" is suggesting that because an inch of navel was showing in a picture of her IN THE BATHROOM, the dress code violation was okay...
2017-09-14 01:06:48 PM  
1 vote:

This text is now purple: shortymac: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.

[img.fark.net image 600x630]
\You too can flash some skin and drive a multi-billion dollar company into the ground, because your tits weren't brains


Erm...that company was already a few feet past the topsoil when she took over. Would have taken a literal miracle to turn it around. But yeah, totally her fault because she had a vajoyjoy instead of a peener.
2017-09-14 01:05:56 PM  
1 vote:

dittybopper: rebelyell2006: TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.

I think you quoted the wrong person. But as someone who has fired black powder cannons on state and federal parks, I can assure you the powder charge alone would kill the person at that range, burn them really badly, and splinter the tree.

I feel like I must have really missed something.


Yes, yes you all did. See Parks and Recreation. Murals. Wamapoke Indians. Leslie Knope. Fiction.

/One of my fav shows. Have watched the entire series multiple times.
2017-09-14 01:03:19 PM  
1 vote:

This text is now purple: shortymac: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.

[img.fark.net image 600x630]
\You too can flash some skin and drive a multi-billion dollar company into the ground, because your tits weren't brains


That plane was on fire and headed for the ground when she took the wheel. She just jettisoned the cargo.
2017-09-14 12:58:34 PM  
1 vote:

shortymac: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.


img.fark.netView Full Size

\You too can flash some skin and drive a multi-billion dollar company into the ground, because your tits weren't brains
2017-09-14 12:57:52 PM  
1 vote:
I am wondering if maybe in class she was wearing the top off the shoulders exposing cleavage? That's the only reason I can imagine that top being a dress code violation and given the laces it looks like that top could be worn that way.
2017-09-14 12:57:33 PM  
1 vote:

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [img.fark.net image 534x712]


Hanson aside, she's the kind of girl that would keep you fed and happy.

/ And there is a lot to be said for that.
2017-09-14 12:48:22 PM  
1 vote:

dustygrimp: Teacher's name is Elsie Morris and she is in the Family & Consumer science department.  Somebody gotta be able to find a picture of this lady. Home Ec teacher... Probably 80 and bitter.


I posted her up thread. She's one of the teachers on the ends.
2017-09-14 12:21:32 PM  
1 vote:
"I refuse to put my daughter in a situation where her self esteem is completely destroyed."

WTF? Your 17 year old daughter will have her self esteem "completely destroyed" because ONE teacher was an asshole about her tits? Honey, you failed at momming years ago. Calling your daughter a weak-ass little pussy because you want air time does not make you a good parent. It is, however, a great way to get your daughter's self esteem completely destroyed. So make up your mind, you bloody twit.

I think Little Miss Bigtits should get to tell off the stupid biatch teacher in front of the entire school. An obvious case of either titty envy (if teacher is small) or perky envy (if she's not).
2017-09-14 12:20:42 PM  
1 vote:

dittybopper: TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowing_from_a_gun


Used within 100 years. Interesting.
2017-09-14 12:20:34 PM  
1 vote:

dittybopper: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowing_from_a_gun


"The prisoner is generally tied to a gun with the upper part of the small of his back resting against the muzzle. When the gun is fired, his head is seen to go straight up into the air some forty or fifty feet; the arms fly off right and left, high up in the air, and fall at, perhaps, a hundred yards distance; the legs drop to the ground beneath the muzzle of the gun; and the body is literally blown away altogether, not a vestige being seen." - George Carter Stent



Well... that's one way to lose weight.
2017-09-14 12:17:55 PM  
1 vote:

LadySusan: Was besties with someone with huge bewbs in high school. It was not fun for her. The creepy notice, the teasing and the laughter is relentless. She eventually had reduction surgery.


You knew Chestica?

Cool!
2017-09-14 12:16:30 PM  
1 vote:

TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowing_from_a_gun
2017-09-14 12:14:24 PM  
1 vote:
Yesterday, Fark led me to believe that we were to call them "fabulous" from now on.
2017-09-14 11:52:51 AM  
1 vote:

advex101: Don't talk about peoples weight.  Got it.  But diabetes is still cool though, right?


I think diabetes is still cool.
2017-09-14 11:45:17 AM  
1 vote:

TheWhoppah: Learn that feeling... it is the feeling of being manipulated.


I just googled "What does it feel like to be manipulated by a busty teen" and I was amazed to find that hang on, be right back, someone at the door.
2017-09-14 11:38:52 AM  
1 vote:
I have no problem believing a teacher did something stupid and humiliated a kid in front of a classroom of her schoolmates. I also have no problem believing a 17 year old girl wore something otherwise acceptable that could be altered to get the attention of that bad boy 2 rows over, only to get called on it by the teacher, then make a federal case out it to make up for the embarrassment.

I guess what I'm trying to say is most people suck.
2017-09-14 11:38:34 AM  
1 vote:

Wyalt Derp: LadySusan: Was besties with someone with huge bewbs in high school. It was not fun for her. The creepy notice, the teasing and the laughter is relentless.

Well that's not how to be a friend!


LOL!
2017-09-14 11:27:05 AM  
1 vote:

thehobbes: NoahBuddy: That picture is appalling. Doubtless it depicts a real event, but still appalling

It is a joke from Parks and Recreation...


This didn't look 'shopped. I couldn't tell from any of the pixels, and I've only seen a few 'shops in my time.

/Jokes on me then
2017-09-14 11:26:31 AM  
1 vote:

BigKaboom: Jake Havechek: vudukungfu: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

they did go out of fashion in 78.
I remember girls wearing them in high school.
 and think halters with no bras.

ah, the 70s.

Ahhh, the halters with no bra.  It was truly a magical time.

Those tube tops and halters were responsible for "the jack in the box" boners that always occurred when I stood up in front of the class. Darn high school days.


Isn't that the truth? Plus either Farrah Fawcett feathered hair or long straight pretty hair. It doesn't take much for teenage boys.
2017-09-14 11:23:34 AM  
1 vote:

rebelyell2006: TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.

I think you quoted the wrong person. But as someone who has fired black powder cannons on state and federal parks, I can assure you the powder charge alone would kill the person at that range, burn them really badly, and splinter the tree.


Oh no, I quoted the right person. If you enjoy shooting black powder and haven't met ditty, then consider this the start of a beautiful friendship.
2017-09-14 11:20:46 AM  
1 vote:
How exactly is she even supposed to wear MORE clothes?
 FFS
She seems fully clothed to me
Girls  were allowed to wear tank tops to my high school
2017-09-14 11:15:43 AM  
1 vote:

TheWhoppah: xalres: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Therefore, sexualize an underage girl in front of her classmates, giving them ammo to make her life a living hell for the rest of her days there, then discuss her tits in front of her mom. Great strategy. Got any more diagrams there, Oliver Stone, maybe placed over a map connected with push pins and string?

/even if the top wasn't laced it wouldn't be all that revealing.

My point is that the article is obviously propaganda and you SHOULD have been thinking:

"Gee, I bet there is another side to this story." - Your Inner Voice
Do you FWD: FWD: FWD: fake news from your crazy uncle?  Perhaps you ARE that crazy uncle.  Turns out that the dress code violation was actually in regard to her exposed belly, not her chest.  The photo angle in TFA cleverly conceals this important detail.  You should always be suspicious of one-sided reporting, especially if you get a sense of outrage.

Learn that feeling... it is the feeling of being manipulated.


img.fark.netView Full Size
2017-09-14 11:13:47 AM  
1 vote:

TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.


I think you quoted the wrong person. But as someone who has fired black powder cannons on state and federal parks, I can assure you the powder charge alone would kill the person at that range, burn them really badly, and splinter the tree.
2017-09-14 11:04:49 AM  
1 vote:

rebelyell2006: TelemonianAjax: rebelyell2006: CaptainOrangeCat: That shirt is very cute and there is nothing inappropriate about it.  It isn't even tight.  The jeans are awful, but that's not really the student's fault - it's almost impossible to find jeans for teens that are not "skinny" and "low rise" which looks good on exactly 1% of the population (and they are the ones that do the modelling of them usually).  The best way to see how the fashion has completely skewed the choices that girls have in pants is to look at a school that has the "polo and khakis" uniform.  All the boys are walking around in comfortable looking, relaxed fit khakis, and all of the girls are walking around in skin tight khakis.  Not because that's what they wanted, b