Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(USA Today)   Joplin, MO teacher kicks "busty" teen out of class, tells her "plus sized women need to shop at stores for plus sized people." With a pic to help you decide   ( usatoday.com) divider line
    More: Asinine, Joplin High School, Education, Smaller busted women, larger busted women, School, dress code violation, Joplin school district, High School teacher  
•       •       •

24573 clicks; posted to Main » on 14 Sep 2017 at 8:16 AM (12 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



407 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-09-14 12:47:33 PM  

LoneWolf343: Shakin_Haitian: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Even if that were undone, it's not like it opens up to halfway down her chest.

What is wrong with you people?

It's a woman's body! UNCLEAN UNCLEAN UNCLEAN


Worse than that. She has the audacity to be FAT on the Internet. The Studman Brigade are having their usual collective head explosion to cover up the sound of their secret fapping over That curvy girl who rejected them in high school.
 
2017-09-14 12:48:22 PM  

dustygrimp: Teacher's name is Elsie Morris and she is in the Family & Consumer science department.  Somebody gotta be able to find a picture of this lady. Home Ec teacher... Probably 80 and bitter.


I posted her up thread. She's one of the teachers on the ends.
 
2017-09-14 12:53:52 PM  

thehobbes: dustygrimp: Teacher's name is Elsie Morris and she is in the Family & Consumer science department.  Somebody gotta be able to find a picture of this lady. Home Ec teacher... Probably 80 and bitter.

I posted her up thread. She's one of the teachers on the ends.


You rock.  My guess is on the left.
 
2017-09-14 12:54:35 PM  
Oh. We deleted the post exonerating the teacher but left the demure pose. 
Nice.
 
2017-09-14 12:56:22 PM  

wndertwin: The Bunyip: She had 9/10 pants and a very big bra.

But you said he's just a friend!

/ [I_got_that_reference.jpg]


My favorite part of the song is the fact that even though he asks her name, she is referred to as "blah blah blah" multiple times.
 
2017-09-14 12:56:30 PM  
If the Teacher is a male he needs to be put on a watch list, if she's female she's jealous, but in no case is that inappropriate, even if the high school was in Amish country or Saudi Arabia.   I went to a Catholic High School in the 1980's and most girls there wore less than that...way less sometimes, to my delight
 
2017-09-14 12:57:09 PM  
tse1.mm.bing.netView Full Size

The Teacher.
 
2017-09-14 12:57:33 PM  

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [img.fark.net image 534x712]


Hanson aside, she's the kind of girl that would keep you fed and happy.

/ And there is a lot to be said for that.
 
2017-09-14 12:57:52 PM  
I am wondering if maybe in class she was wearing the top off the shoulders exposing cleavage? That's the only reason I can imagine that top being a dress code violation and given the laces it looks like that top could be worn that way.
 
2017-09-14 12:58:34 PM  

shortymac: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.


img.fark.netView Full Size

\You too can flash some skin and drive a multi-billion dollar company into the ground, because your tits weren't brains
 
2017-09-14 01:01:58 PM  

jst3p: I am wondering if maybe in class she was wearing the top off the shoulders exposing cleavage? That's the only reason I can imagine that top being a dress code violation and given the laces it looks like that top could be worn that way.


It really doesn't though.

Even without laces, it looks like she would have to be actively pushing her boobs together to see even a small amount of cleavage. The girl isn't super busty, and the shirt wouldn't be all that low even if it had no laces to it.
 
2017-09-14 01:03:19 PM  

This text is now purple: shortymac: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.

[img.fark.net image 600x630]
\You too can flash some skin and drive a multi-billion dollar company into the ground, because your tits weren't brains


That plane was on fire and headed for the ground when she took the wheel. She just jettisoned the cargo.
 
2017-09-14 01:05:08 PM  

advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.


I make a very decent salary and I am currently at work wearing a T-shirt and cargo shorts. Tell me more about what you know about "real life".
 
2017-09-14 01:05:56 PM  

dittybopper: rebelyell2006: TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.

I think you quoted the wrong person. But as someone who has fired black powder cannons on state and federal parks, I can assure you the powder charge alone would kill the person at that range, burn them really badly, and splinter the tree.

I feel like I must have really missed something.


Yes, yes you all did. See Parks and Recreation. Murals. Wamapoke Indians. Leslie Knope. Fiction.

/One of my fav shows. Have watched the entire series multiple times.
 
2017-09-14 01:06:48 PM  

This text is now purple: shortymac: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

Then require business attire for schools instead of street clothes. Easy enough and maybe we can avoid this bullshiat constantly.

[img.fark.net image 600x630]
\You too can flash some skin and drive a multi-billion dollar company into the ground, because your tits weren't brains


Erm...that company was already a few feet past the topsoil when she took over. Would have taken a literal miracle to turn it around. But yeah, totally her fault because she had a vajoyjoy instead of a peener.
 
2017-09-14 01:06:54 PM  

Mr Guy: I'm sure that's exactly how tight the strings were that control the cleavage when the teacher yelled at her.  No student has ever pulled their skirt higher, shirt more open, or rolled up their shorts to avoid dress codes, and then put it back when they got in trouble and claimed mistreatment.  That's unheard of.  It MUST be oppression.


So assume that was COMPLETELY unlaced. WHat'ya got?  At worst less cleveage than a trip to a Ren Faire provides...and, last time I checked Students don;t face TOWARDS each other, so even if something was a bit more on display only the teacher saw it.   The Mean Girl who tried to "bust her" is suggesting that because an inch of navel was showing in a picture of her IN THE BATHROOM, the dress code violation was okay...
 
2017-09-14 01:12:25 PM  

Kouta: The jeans are a bit too tight for my tastes, but overall I don't see anything inappropriate with the outfit.


Dress code for the undergraduate lab I'm stuck teaching this term:

Wearing clothes.
Not on fire.
Not bleeding.
 
Now, after week 3 I do add:

Has not attempted previously to eat laboratory equipment.

(Depending on what was put in their mouth I may still allow entry if they tried to eat lab equipment.*)


*I hate my life.
 
2017-09-14 01:13:58 PM  
FizixJunkee: Obese isn't healthy, and it's not attractive.

It's not her job to give you a stiffy.
 
2017-09-14 01:14:07 PM  
WTF?!  She looks fine.   What the hell is wrong with that teacher?!
 
2017-09-14 01:16:39 PM  

Shakin_Haitian: TheWhoppah: [img.fark.net image 186x528]

Even if that were undone, it's not like it opens up to halfway down her chest.

What is wrong with you people?


I believe the point is, and try and keep with me here because it's complicated, that she could have been violating school dress code without changing outfits. There are further arguments to be made about not falling for the first clickbait one-sided story about what happened, even if it does fit with your pet peeve about society.
 
2017-09-14 01:19:53 PM  

jst3p: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

I make a very decent salary and I am currently at work wearing a T-shirt and cargo shorts. Tell me more about what you know about "real life".


I spend my day looking like I'm ready for bed.

(Hospital scrubs)
 
2017-09-14 01:23:50 PM  

Deep Contact: Teacher was obviously jealous.


And flat as a pancake.
 
2017-09-14 01:23:52 PM  

Gleeman: jst3p: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

I make a very decent salary and I am currently at work wearing a T-shirt and cargo shorts. Tell me more about what you know about "real life".

I spend my day looking like I'm ready for bed.

(Hospital scrubs)


There's almost no job that will let you bare your midriff or wear a wifebeater to work.
 
2017-09-14 01:24:16 PM  

Mr Guy: I'm sure that's exactly how tight the strings were that control the cleavage when the teacher yelled at her.  No student has ever pulled their skirt higher, shirt more open, or rolled up their shorts to avoid dress codes, and then put it back when they got in trouble and claimed mistreatment.  That's unheard of.  It MUST be oppression.


Agreed, it's much more sensible to assume she's a lying, deceptive POS. Just like your Mom.
 
2017-09-14 01:25:56 PM  

SkittlesAreYum: Gleeman: jst3p: advex101: Seems to be a lot of folks here blowing up at the very concept of a dress code.  just preparing the snowflakes for real life.

I make a very decent salary and I am currently at work wearing a T-shirt and cargo shorts. Tell me more about what you know about "real life".

I spend my day looking like I'm ready for bed.

(Hospital scrubs)

There's almost no job that will let you bare your midriff or wear a wifebeater to work.


I'd probably scare people if I bared my midriff.
 
2017-09-14 01:26:26 PM  

advex101: Pretty one sided.  Nowhere does it specifically state what is wrong with the outfit that she has on.  But, OMG = clicks.


Can you even post a picture of her in a t-shirt (sans bra) on fark?  Even if she is 18?  If neither of them are true, then Drew better apologize to teach for this link (and ideally bring back the boobies tag and tab).

I'm not sure which I trust less: USA today to make sure the picture is what she was wearing, or a Joplin, MO. teacher to have a clue.  [whynotboth.jpg]
 
2017-09-14 01:33:26 PM  

WhiskeyBender: TommyDeuce: My God.  The traffic in her neighborhood must be backed up for miles from all the lawyers beating a path to her door.


Im sure she has to beat off alot of guys...

/sorry


aaand we are done here.
 
2017-09-14 01:36:50 PM  

Ashelth: Dress code for the undergraduate lab I'm stuck teaching this term:

Wearing clothes.
Not on fire.
Not bleeding.


How the hell does your campus allow students in a lab with open toed shoes? Our environmental safety guy would have me in my program director's office repeating OSHA safety classes as a punishment.


Captain Shaky: jst3p: I am wondering if maybe in class she was wearing the top off the shoulders exposing cleavage? That's the only reason I can imagine that top being a dress code violation and given the laces it looks like that top could be worn that way.

It really doesn't though.

Even without laces, it looks like she would have to be actively pushing her boobs together to see even a small amount of cleavage. The girl isn't super busty, and the shirt wouldn't be all that low even if it had no laces to it.


It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.
 
2017-09-14 02:10:21 PM  

nanim: ftfa:  The female teacher allegedly added: "Smaller busted women could get away with more than larger busted women."
... Anderson said she was "mortified" that her teacher said those things in front of the class.

Gee, think the teacher will be released with an 'insanity' plea?

/ methinks the teacher has some issues... but won't be having them in front of a class any longer


Or you could read the thread.  There were several pics posted of the same girl, in the same outfit with her midriff exposed, which is against the dress code.  That's what got her in trouble.  She drama'ing it up, as 17 years girls often do.  Her pants also look ready to explode.
 
2017-09-14 02:20:23 PM  
That is the most average, unprovocative looking outfit I've ever seen in one of these stories. Unless she untied the neck and hucked her tits out the top, I'm baffled as to what even the most bluenosed biddy could object to.

Besided, the poor child is obviously poor, look at her ripped and bedraggled pants!

gannett-cdn.comView Full Size
 
2017-09-14 02:20:31 PM  
Her pants seem a bit tight.  looks like it is uncomfortable.  But the breasts look like they are well contained in that top she has on.

/bring her to me when she turns 18
 
2017-09-14 02:22:27 PM  

Wave Of Anal Fury: Wookie_Jesus: Do they have a store for ugly people in her town?

Based on your profile pic, your town apparently does.


ohsnap.gif
 
2017-09-14 02:22:45 PM  
What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.
 
2017-09-14 02:25:26 PM  

Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.


She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.
 
2017-09-14 02:27:48 PM  

thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.


That makes more sense. Got a link?
 
2017-09-14 02:30:02 PM  

jst3p: thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.

That makes more sense. Got a link?


It's up thread.
 
2017-09-14 02:30:06 PM  

Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.


Got a link to back that up?
 
2017-09-14 02:30:48 PM  

LadySusan: dittybopper: rebelyell2006: TelemonianAjax: dittybopper: FirstDennis: Just the way I like 'em. Both of 'em.

[img.fark.net image 850x971]

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 850x637]

You know, you two girls have everything. You're tall and short and slim and stout and blonde and brunette. And that's just the kind of a girl I crave.

Please tell me you tell me you are going to regale us with the mechanics of actually executing someone with a cannon like the mural. Because I am actually interested in a knowledgeable take on the subject now that it crosses my mind.

I think you quoted the wrong person. But as someone who has fired black powder cannons on state and federal parks, I can assure you the powder charge alone would kill the person at that range, burn them really badly, and splinter the tree.

I feel like I must have really missed something.

Yes, yes you all did. See Parks and Recreation. Murals. Wamapoke Indians. Leslie Knope. Fiction.

/One of my fav shows. Have watched the entire series multiple times.


But the comments after mine aren't related in any way to what I was posting about.  Hence my confusion.
 
2017-09-14 02:30:50 PM  

Persnickety: Well, duh, lady.  Your daughter isn't wearing shoes.


It's Missouri and she isn't attending a wedding, funeral, or church so that's normal.
 
2017-09-14 02:30:58 PM  

xalres: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

Got a link to back that up?


It's already in this thread *thumbs up*
 
2017-09-14 02:33:59 PM  

thehobbes: Here is from her twitter at a national conference for Family, Career and Community Leaders of America.

Not sure which one she is though.


The one on our left. The only old one. The one wearing a watch.
 
2017-09-14 02:36:08 PM  

Phelon Hardtimes: xalres: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

Got a link to back that up?

It's already in this thread *thumbs up*


It was deleted by mods, but yeah, a fellow student posted a shot from the girl's social media of her taking a selfie in the bathroom with the shirt hiked up.
 
2017-09-14 02:36:29 PM  

Phelon Hardtimes: jst3p: thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.

That makes more sense. Got a link?

It's up thread.


Reposting for farkers lazier than I am.

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-09-14 02:37:13 PM  

thehobbes: Phelon Hardtimes: xalres: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

Got a link to back that up?

It's already in this thread *thumbs up*

It was deleted by mods,


I found one in this thread.
 
2017-09-14 02:37:14 PM  

thespindrifter: thehobbes: Here is from her twitter at a national conference for Family, Career and Community Leaders of America.

Not sure which one she is though.

The one on our left. The only old one. The one wearing a watch.


Couldn't tell on far right tbh. I could see her passing for 22-23 (new teacher)
 
2017-09-14 02:37:53 PM  

nocable2: Jake Havechek: In '84, a girl got sent home from my high school for wearing a tube top.

I remeber that happend in my school to


remeber that happend in my school to WHAT ?
 
2017-09-14 02:38:39 PM  

jst3p: thehobbes: Phelon Hardtimes: xalres: Phelon Hardtimes: Frankly Speaking: What's really amazing here is not the fact that this child was treated inappropriately by her teacher, but the fact that adult men in this forum feel that it is appropriate to criticize this child's body. Ultimately, this is indicative of the larger issue of patriarchy and how the male gaze seeks to define a woman's existence. Of course I'm sure the Fark hat squad will be quick to correct this observation, but just remember they will be defending the sexual exploitation of a minor.

She wasn't treated poorly.  She, and her mother are drama queening.  She was addressed for havind her midriff exposed in school.  Do you believe everything you read immediately?

Because I am Tom Hanks.

Got a link to back that up?

It's already in this thread *thumbs up*

It was deleted by mods,

I found one in this thread.


Ah. Now I'm curious what comment I referenced that got deleted. Oh well.
 
2017-09-14 02:40:38 PM  

jst3p: Phelon Hardtimes: jst3p: thehobbes: It was likely the fact she was wearing it hiked up and her belly was showing.

The girl had posted to social media how she was wearing it from the school bathroom before the incident.

That makes more sense. Got a link?

It's up thread.

Reposting for farkers lazier than I am.

[img.fark.net image 539x960]


Thanks. I didn't see it the first time. May have been deleted then undeleted or something.
 
2017-09-14 02:41:14 PM  

NoahBuddy: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: tillerman35: It's a shiat town in the middle of a shiat state, but it does have some pretty cool art.  Thomas Hart Benton is one of America's greatest painters.  If you're every driving through what you should have flown over instead, I highly recommend stopping in at the Joplin town hall and taking a quick look at the mural there.

More info: http://www.joplinmo.org/175/Public-Art

[img.fark.net image 850x796]

That picture is appalling. Doubtless it depicts a real event, but still appalling.


It's also not what is on the webpage. Unless they changed it since the screencap was made.
 
2017-09-14 02:43:34 PM  

Shocktopus: NoahBuddy: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: tillerman35: It's a shiat town in the middle of a shiat state, but it does have some pretty cool art.  Thomas Hart Benton is one of America's greatest painters.  If you're every driving through what you should have flown over instead, I highly recommend stopping in at the Joplin town hall and taking a quick look at the mural there.

More info: http://www.joplinmo.org/175/Public-Art

[img.fark.net image 850x796]

That picture is appalling. Doubtless it depicts a real event, but still appalling.

It's also not what is on the webpage. Unless they changed it since the screencap was made.


It's from Parks & Recreation. The town's appalling history with the natives is a running joke.
 
Displayed 50 of 407 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report