Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Hill)   Hawaii requests clarity on Trump's new partial travel ban. Trump administration says sorry, they've never provided clarity on anything and never will   ( thehill.com) divider line
    More: Obvious, Supreme Court, President of the United States, close family, close family members, close family member, privileges certain family, President Trump, travel ban  
•       •       •

2246 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Jul 2017 at 2:40 PM (23 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



54 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-07-04 10:36:03 AM  
Trump won and that's all that matters, obviously, so suck it libs.

/don't actually suck it
//NTTAWWT
 
2017-07-04 11:31:43 AM  
Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading
 
2017-07-04 01:07:03 PM  
Trump administration says sorry

Well, now I know this is fake news.
 
2017-07-04 02:42:55 PM  
No fat chicks.
 
2017-07-04 02:43:05 PM  

Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading


Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥
 
2017-07-04 02:44:13 PM  
They can't explain what they don't understand themselves.
 
2017-07-04 02:44:23 PM  
All I know is that Hawaiian birth certificates are obviously fake and do not count as a qualifying ID for a passport.
 
2017-07-04 02:45:13 PM  
They went to the trouble of putting "bonda fide" in quotation marks. Is this really all about Indian hushpuppies?
 
2017-07-04 02:47:58 PM  

eyeq360: All I know is that Hawaiian birth certificates are obviously fake and do not count as a qualifying ID for a passport.


Only if you are brown.
 
2017-07-04 02:49:41 PM  
Even if I was in favor of a travel ban-which I'm not-I can't imagine seeing this as anything other than what it is: glorified security theater.

Question: what's going to happen after that 90 and 120 day time limit? Does the ban just sputter our and die? Do they have to renew it?
 
2017-07-04 02:52:02 PM  

MattytheMouse: Even if I was in favor of a travel ban-which I'm not-I can't imagine seeing this as anything other than what it is: glorified security theater.

Question: what's going to happen after that 90 and 120 day time limit? Does the ban just sputter our and die? Do they have to renew it?


They have to go back to the Supreme Court and demonstrate that they have reviewed the vetting process and can show why it is so deficient it needs to be changed. It was in the decision.
 
2017-07-04 02:52:15 PM  
WOW! Clueless Fakedent's staff can't clarify bigoted Muslim ban for the courts! Maybe Trump can fake-wrestle a unicorn and fart clarification out his fat ass! #PhOnyTUS
 
2017-07-04 02:52:57 PM  
Trump never says sorry
 
2017-07-04 02:55:03 PM  
No Muslims allowed unless they're wealthy and willing to have a Trump tower built in their country, but shhhhh, that's supposed to be the secret.
 
2017-07-04 02:57:35 PM  

Gyrfalcon: MattytheMouse: Even if I was in favor of a travel ban-which I'm not-I can't imagine seeing this as anything other than what it is: glorified security theater.

Question: what's going to happen after that 90 and 120 day time limit? Does the ban just sputter our and die? Do they have to renew it?

They have to go back to the Supreme Court and demonstrate that they have reviewed the vetting process and can show why it is so deficient it needs to be changed. It was in the decision.


None of the court injunctions barred a vetting process review, did they? Is the supreme court really stooping so low as to maintain that charade?

/Obviously did not read the farking ruling
 
2017-07-04 03:00:34 PM  

griz13: Trump never says sorry


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-07-04 03:01:05 PM  
SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S AN ASTERISKS AFTER "Land of the Free"!
 
2017-07-04 03:08:37 PM  
Has France requested we return the Statue of Liberty yet?
 
2017-07-04 03:08:53 PM  
Maybe Hawaii can make an exception, and let in all the Muslims who like Ukelele music?
 
2017-07-04 03:12:57 PM  
Trump's response was, "Isn't Hawaii in Kenya?"
 
2017-07-04 03:13:07 PM  

Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading


I find it best to read comments on news sites, because they represent the majority of people, and remind you that while everyone may seem all smiles face to face, in the end, they're nasty, horrible monsters who will stab you in the back at any opportunity.
 
2017-07-04 03:15:12 PM  

MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥


Except for the assholes who voted for Trump, and the other farkers who refused to vote for Clinton and/or actively sabotage her campaign while denying responsibility for doing so *cough* basilisk_atmosphere *cough*
 
2017-07-04 03:17:52 PM  

MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥


Yeah I'm signing in to agree with that, most of you guys are well meaning, good people. Compared to the comment section on other sites, you guys are saintly.
 
2017-07-04 03:19:24 PM  
Is he sticking it to Obama's "homeland"?  Then flawless victory
 
2017-07-04 03:19:27 PM  

anwserman: MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥

Except for the assholes who voted for Trump, and the other farkers who refused to vote for Clinton and/or actively sabotage her campaign while denying responsibility for doing so *cough* basilisk_atmosphere *cough*


Honestly, even the inherently infuriating people over here are still leagues better than most Facebook comments you find on news articles.
 
2017-07-04 03:22:56 PM  

MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥


This is wishful thinking and staying in the dark about reality. You have to realize most people want to hurt you, if not kill you. Ignoring this can and will be a fatal mistake.
 
2017-07-04 03:31:30 PM  

daphne: Is he sticking it to Obama's "homeland"?  Then flawless victory


68.media.tumblr.comView Full Size
 
2017-07-04 03:31:42 PM  
DOJ response: "The travel ban speaks for itself."
/ I'm the first? Really?
// FARK, I'm diasppoint
 
2017-07-04 03:34:43 PM  
muslim ban
 
2017-07-04 03:52:55 PM  
Covfefe
 
2017-07-04 03:59:13 PM  
The ban might be bullshiat but the response did clarify the definition the administration is using.
 
2017-07-04 04:16:21 PM  
The Department of Justice asked a federal judge in Hawaii to deny the state's request for clarification on President Trump's travel ban Monday, saying any order limiting the scope of the travel restrictions should be considered by the Supreme Court.

What are they trying to hide?
 
2017-07-04 04:25:19 PM  

eyeq360: daphne: Is he sticking it to Obama's "homeland"?  Then flawless victory

[68.media.tumblr.com image 370x208]


...wow.  Somebody actually rendered a Trump -> Shang Tsung mashup.
 
2017-07-04 04:28:31 PM  

Thenixon: Gyrfalcon: MattytheMouse: Even if I was in favor of a travel ban-which I'm not-I can't imagine seeing this as anything other than what it is: glorified security theater.

Question: what's going to happen after that 90 and 120 day time limit? Does the ban just sputter our and die? Do they have to renew it?

They have to go back to the Supreme Court and demonstrate that they have reviewed the vetting process and can show why it is so deficient it needs to be changed. It was in the decision.

None of the court injunctions barred a vetting process review, did they? Is the supreme court really stooping so low as to maintain that charade?

/Obviously did not read the farking ruling


When the first round of stays went to appeal, Trump's ninth-tier lawyers were asked if they had made any progress on reviewing the vetting procedures which had been the reason for imposing the ban in the first place. With wide-eyed innocence, the alleged lawyers said that no, since the order had been stayed by the courts, they assumed that meant they couldn't work on the vetting procedures.

Hence the somewhat biting language in the SCOTUS ruling on producing some actual progress on why the vetting process needs fixing.
 
2017-07-04 04:40:51 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-07-04 04:46:58 PM  

Pichu0102: MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥

This is wishful thinking and staying in the dark about reality. You have to realize most people want to hurt you, if not kill you. Ignoring this can and will be a fatal mistake.


wow... fearmonger much? There might be a leaf blowing across your driveway, better get to your panic room.
 
2017-07-04 04:49:19 PM  

anwserman: MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥

Except for the assholes who voted for Trump, and the other farkers who refused to vote for Clinton and/or actively sabotage her campaign while denying responsibility for doing so *cough* basilisk_atmosphere *cough*


...just doing your part to make this place feel more like The Hill, eh?
 
2017-07-04 04:58:15 PM  
Seems simple enough. They want someone with a vested interest in the United States- has a family, a career, a home-- that can take accountability for your being here rather than in the hands of someone who care less why you are here or has nothing to lose should the visitor engage in bad behavior.

Guests will tear up a home when they party in someone else's place.  Very careful about the invites when the party is in their own home.
 
2017-07-04 05:05:19 PM  
Pffft. Like Hawaii's even a state.
 
2017-07-04 05:11:04 PM  
Muslims travelling domestically is non-Ec.
 
2017-07-04 05:12:11 PM  

someonelse: Pffft. Like Hawaii's even a state.


It's the farthest West, and the farthest South that you can be and be in the USA.
 
2017-07-04 05:23:07 PM  

Gyrfalcon: MattytheMouse: Even if I was in favor of a travel ban-which I'm not-I can't imagine seeing this as anything other than what it is: glorified security theater.

Question: what's going to happen after that 90 and 120 day time limit? Does the ban just sputter our and die? Do they have to renew it?

They have to go back to the Supreme Court and demonstrate that they have reviewed the vetting process and can show why it is so deficient it needs to be changed. It was in the decision.


Does anyone actually believe the Trump admin will be able to do that?

I mean, they've had all this extra time, what with the courts blocking things, but I'm willing to bet that they haven't even started yet.
 
2017-07-04 05:25:37 PM  

IlGreven: anwserman: MattytheMouse: Nocrash: Sometimes I read the comments on the Hill to be reminded what a warm and friendly place we have on Fark.

/take shower after reading

Seriously. Despite all of our squabbles, I love you guys. Y'all are inherently good people and I hope you never change. ♥

Except for the assholes who voted for Trump, and the other farkers who refused to vote for Clinton and/or actively sabotage her campaign while denying responsibility for doing so *cough* basilisk_atmosphere *cough*

...just doing your part to make this place feel more like The Hill, eh?


Nah, my comments reflect upon, observe, and actually have a factual basis in reality.
 
2017-07-04 05:33:24 PM  

Gyrfalcon: Thenixon: Gyrfalcon: MattytheMouse: Even if I was in favor of a travel ban-which I'm not-I can't imagine seeing this as anything other than what it is: glorified security theater.

Question: what's going to happen after that 90 and 120 day time limit? Does the ban just sputter our and die? Do they have to renew it?

They have to go back to the Supreme Court and demonstrate that they have reviewed the vetting process and can show why it is so deficient it needs to be changed. It was in the decision.

None of the court injunctions barred a vetting process review, did they? Is the supreme court really stooping so low as to maintain that charade?

/Obviously did not read the farking ruling

When the first round of stays went to appeal, Trump's ninth-tier lawyers were asked if they had made any progress on reviewing the vetting procedures which had been the reason for imposing the ban in the first place. With wide-eyed innocence, the alleged lawyers said that no, since the order had been stayed by the courts, they assumed that meant they couldn't work on the vetting procedures.

Hence the somewhat biting language in the SCOTUS ruling on producing some actual progress on why the vetting process needs fixing.


Does it?  Or does it make it even easier for them to say, "well we're working on it but nobody knew vetting processes could be so complicated!  We need more time, and a longer ban!"
 
2017-07-04 06:25:30 PM  
Oh dip! Thank you Sass-o-Rev for the total fark!
 
2017-07-04 07:20:20 PM  

Gordon Bennett: griz13: Trump never says sorry

[img.fark.net image 480x480]


Sorry if...is ones the worst, at least judging by how many time Republicans have used it to basically flip off their critics.
 
2017-07-04 07:24:49 PM  

El Trolo: someonelse: Pffft. Like Hawaii's even a state.

It's the farthest West, and the farthest South that you can be and be in the USA.


Alaska is the farthest west. Also the farthest east and the farthest north.
 
2017-07-04 07:35:26 PM  

Gordon Bennett: El Trolo: someonelse: Pffft. Like Hawaii's even a state.

It's the farthest West, and the farthest South that you can be and be in the USA.

Alaska is the farthest west. Also the farthest east and the farthest north.


Respect for knowing the furthest east thing. That's one of my favorite US travel trivia things
 
2017-07-04 07:40:23 PM  
The transcripts are out there so it wouldn't be too difficult to get done but besides words such as "the, he, is, to, and..." I just about guarandamntee that Press Secretary Sean Spicer's two biggest words in a word cloud would be "very" and "clear." "President" and "Trump" might win but the guy seemingly says "very clear" fifty times a press conference.
 
2017-07-04 08:01:00 PM  

TheManofPA: Gordon Bennett: El Trolo: someonelse: Pffft. Like Hawaii's even a state.

It's the farthest West, and the farthest South that you can be and be in the USA.

Alaska is the farthest west. Also the farthest east and the farthest north.

Respect for knowing the furthest east thing. That's one of my favorite US travel trivia things


I learned that fact on a shuttle from airport to hotel in vegas. Always stuck with me.
 
Displayed 50 of 54 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report