Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Sun)   Ceiling Google is watching your toddlers skinnydip (Not safe for work content on page)   ( thesun.co.uk) divider line
    More: Creepy, Google Earth, Google Street View, IPhone, Group Newspapers Limited, The Fylde, News Group Newspapers, Lancashire, Google  
•       •       •

7946 clicks; posted to Main » on 19 May 2017 at 4:50 PM (26 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



60 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-05-19 04:02:11 PM  
Maybe don't put your naked kids outside in front of your house where anyone passing by can see them.
 
2017-05-19 04:13:48 PM  
Their faces were blurred so here are a couple high res photos of the children for all you paedo's out there with Photoshop ability.
 
2017-05-19 04:38:19 PM  
"I mean, they had their faces blurred out but it was enough for a paedophile to get a kick out of it."

No it wasn't.
 
2017-05-19 04:41:16 PM  
Why the fark are you letting your kids run around naked in front of your house?  Yeah, the yard is "fenced in", but not in any privacy fencing way.  If you're actually concerned about pedos taking/using pics of your naked kids, do let them be out in public naked.

\Yes, Google is at fault for not blurring out the pics in they put up, too
 
2017-05-19 04:53:14 PM  
If you're outside and you're naked where anyone can take a picture, don't be surprised if someone takes a picture.
 
2017-05-19 04:53:37 PM  
Not creepy at all. If you don't want to be seen naked don't be naked where anyone driving by can see you naked.
 
2017-05-19 04:54:03 PM  
Mum is almost British hot .
 
2017-05-19 04:56:25 PM  
Those are very unsexy children
 
2017-05-19 04:56:44 PM  
There is zero chance of me clicking on a link with those words in it.
 
2017-05-19 04:57:43 PM  
Pedos just love cruising Google streetview trying to eventually, maybe, in a million years, potentially finding a naked kid to look at. Unless of course you point it out to them.
 
2017-05-19 04:59:43 PM  
What's up with the wierd boobs on the naked yoga chick in the side article??
 
2017-05-19 04:59:52 PM  
First of all... why assume the worst possible outcome? Secondly, why is there no backlash on her lack of supervision? Thirdly, otherwise known as "C", if you take my meaning, how are naked people ever going to be accepted in society if this fake outrage keeps happening?

/prudes ate my dingo
 
2017-05-19 04:59:55 PM  

Barfmaker: "I mean, they had their faces blurred out but it was enough for a paedophile to get a kick out of it."

No it wasn't.


Sorry it disappointed you.
 
2017-05-19 05:01:22 PM  

RottenEggs: Mum is almost British hot .


But how about those kids?
 
2017-05-19 05:05:03 PM  
Let's for a second imagine that some pedophile would discover those images (not that there isn't enough other images of that kind online) and would jerk off.

SO FARKING WHAT! Who the hell cares?
 
2017-05-19 05:07:13 PM  

foo monkey: RottenEggs: Mum is almost British hot .

But how about those kids?


WOOF !
 
2017-05-19 05:09:03 PM  
Pretty sure everyone who has kids knows what a naked kid looks like

We can probably dial back the hysteria
 
2017-05-19 05:10:19 PM  

Cosmic Cowboy: Barfmaker: "I mean, they had their faces blurred out but it was enough for a paedophile to get a kick out of it."

No it wasn't.

Sorry it disappointed you.


i.imgur.comView Full Size
 
2017-05-19 05:10:24 PM  
Keep scrolling.  Past the article.  It gets worse...

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-05-19 05:12:46 PM  

HempHead: What's up with the wierd boobs on the naked yoga chick in the side article??


Pixelated nipples. They look sharp. Same with her black box.
 
2017-05-19 05:17:45 PM  
Have we found the new one of these here?
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-05-19 05:19:10 PM  
Trump payed putin
 
2017-05-19 05:20:30 PM  

cyberspacedout: HempHead: What's up with the wierd boobs on the naked yoga chick in the side article??

Pixelated nipples. They look sharp. Same with her black box.


"Pixelated Nipples and the Black Boxes" is the name of my United Airlines cover band.

I don't know what I mean by that, either.
 
2017-05-19 05:36:34 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size


CSB
I remember one of my major hangover mornings perusing the mean streets of Baltimore on GoogleEarth.  I saw two different instances of somebody scoring drugs.  The one guy was looking right at the camera like "wtf is dat shiat, man. dats some decepticon shiat right there" as he was passing something to an obvious walker.  You can find some interesting things when you have a little too much time on your hands.
/CSB
 
2017-05-19 05:53:55 PM  

HempHead: What's up with the wierd boobs on the naked yoga chick in the side article??


They're wired.

Isn't that weird?
 
FNG [TotalFark] [BareFark]
2017-05-19 05:58:40 PM  
Regardless about how dumb her manufactured outrage is, who does she think is going to be looking through Google maps for her house?  What are the chances anyone is going to see that in the first place?

Zero point zero?

*smack*
 
2017-05-19 06:07:25 PM  
I'm a photographer, and one game I find amusing is finding things on google street view or google earth that I have photographed. I have a pretty good map in my head, and can find remote places that I have been to months or years ago. Here is a dog I photographed at a rock pile.
img.fark.netView Full Size

And here is that rock pile on a remote Texas mountain road in google street view:
https://­www*g­oo­g­le­*c­om/maps/[nospam-﹫-backwards]0­3­*68­4­9734,-104.2438185,3a,75y,316.14h,7​8​.55t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDTNbeQznGgEY_O3-zgBIsA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
I wonder if Google blurs out a dogs face in street view...
 
2017-05-19 06:09:05 PM  

Barfmaker: Cosmic Cowboy: Barfmaker: "I mean, they had their faces blurred out but it was enough for a paedophile to get a kick out of it."

No it wasn't.

Sorry it disappointed you.

[i.imgur.com image 269x268]


Doh...

"It sure was!" would've worked better.
 
2017-05-19 06:12:22 PM  

Glendale: If you're outside and you're naked where anyone can take a picture, don't be surprised if someone takes a picture.


Fine, but I'm not paying for the damage to their camera. (or their psyche)
 
2017-05-19 06:43:11 PM  
Wait'll she realizes that it also sees the kid's search history.
 
2017-05-19 06:45:36 PM  
Our privacy has been violated on something virtually no one will see, quick let me get a big photo of us in a newspaper/TV show/website along with a handy picture of what I am upset about.
 
2017-05-19 06:57:36 PM  

Kegovitch: Her kids are all blurry.. was the father bigfoot?


Japanese.
 
2017-05-19 07:01:28 PM  

Kangaroo_Ralph: There is zero chance of me clicking on a link with those words in it.


But it has a link to a drop dead news reporter doing yoga with another drop dead naked yoga woman.  Great positions, very little blur or black bars.  Worth the clicky, clicky, clicky, clicky, clicky...
 
2017-05-19 07:15:05 PM  
Creepy?  That was stupid.

interstellar_tedium: Our privacy has been violated on something virtually no one will see, quick let me get a big photo of us in a newspaper/TV show/website along with a handy picture of what I am upset about.


^^^^^^^^^
 
2017-05-19 07:16:20 PM  

SpaceyCat: "fenced in"

 
Heh ... there's a gate, and the fence is only about as high as a car.

img.fark.netView Full Size


The building is also 2+ stories, which means adjacent buildings are likely as tall.

// but google drove by with a street view car and now you're concerned.
 
2017-05-19 07:21:11 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-05-19 07:21:17 PM  

Grahor: Let's for a second imagine that some pedophile would discover those images (not that there isn't enough other images of that kind online) and would jerk off.

SO FARKING WHAT! Who the hell cares?


Now he knows where to go to see them in person?
 
2017-05-19 07:33:26 PM  
gregscott: I wonder if Google blurs out a dogs face in street view...

It doesn't seem to care about statue heads.

img.fark.netView Full Size


http://www.fark.com/comments/9596031?fpost=mX6fMN9H1kE._._qfC58C9qo_y​S​Y3juYwKC6.teyzp5rrvYkn3.U#new

// have also taken a shiatload of photos ... but a lot of mine are out where street view doesn't go (not even the folks carrying backpacks).

// I also shoot critters

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-05-19 07:33:56 PM  

gregscott: I'm a photographer, and one game I find amusing is finding things on google street view or google earth that I have photographed. I have a pretty good map in my head, and can find remote places that I have been to months or years ago. Here is a dog I photographed at a rock pile.[img.fark.net image 850x556]
And here is that rock pile on a remote Texas mountain road in google street view:
https://wwwgooglecom/maps/036849734,-104.2438185,3a,75y,316.14h,78.55t​/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDTNbeQznGgEY_O3-zgBIsA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
I wonder if Google blurs out a dogs face in street view...


Or the dog's butt, 'cause no one needs to see that.
 
2017-05-19 07:34:36 PM  
 
2017-05-19 07:36:23 PM  
I wish I knew when they were in town, I like to pee  off the porch.
 
2017-05-19 08:00:29 PM  
Wait'll she finds out her kids are naked under their clothes
 
2017-05-19 08:03:42 PM  

Barfmaker: "I mean, they had their faces blurred out but it was enough for a paedophile to get a kick out of it."

No it wasn't.


Slacker.
 
2017-05-19 08:08:43 PM  

Barfmaker: "I mean, they had their faces blurred out but it was enough for a paedophile to get a kick out of it."

No it wasn't.


Unblurring sure wouldn't have helped. Those are some homely girls.

I love the Mirror and their "Look sad!" photography in these stories.
 
2017-05-19 08:15:36 PM  

Grahor: Let's for a second imagine that some pedophile would discover those images (not that there isn't enough other images of that kind online) and would jerk off.

SO FARKING WHAT! Who the hell cares?


I know a guy (one degree of separation, we have a friend in common) spending his life on the sex offender registry for a single photo in a browser cache that was tamer than these photos sound.  That came from the 145th page of some 4Chan thread or something like that he didn't even read.  That his ISP reported him for remotely.  I wish I was kidding.  Naked people under 18 years old are a one-way-ticket to permanent criminal blacklisting in the US almost regardless of circumstance, mitigating or otherwise.  It's almost bad enough I'd consider a career that did not require using the internet at all, given the apparent risk.  Honestly what guarantee do you really have that any given link you click on is correct?  It doesn't even have to go to actual child porn, it could go to some random family's bathtime photos and you're still legally a criminal pervert forever...

Because everyone knows even being unwillingly exposed to a single instance of unasked-for, innocent child nudity automatically makes males into helpless pedophile rapists.  Never let a kid who isn't yours have your mobile number, or they can destroy your life with one click if they ever get pissed at you.  I wish that was sarcasm, but it isn't.
 
2017-05-19 08:24:32 PM  
lordargent:

// have also taken a shiatload of photos ... but a lot of mine are out where street view doesn't go (not even the folks carrying backpacks).
OOps, wrong link (meant to post google maps) :P
https://wwwgooglecom/maps/435700013,-114.3963275,3a,39.3y,312.17h,86.4​1t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scWoJqkYO1Ta5BSG_tXuX-w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656


Hmm ...
 
2017-05-19 09:08:16 PM  

pikov.yndropov: [img.fark.net image 630x317]

CSB
I remember one of my major hangover mornings perusing the mean streets of Baltimore on GoogleEarth.  I saw two different instances of somebody scoring drugs.  The one guy was looking right at the camera like "wtf is dat shiat, man. dats some decepticon shiat right there" as he was passing something to an obvious walker.  You can find some interesting things when you have a little too much time on your hands.
/CSB


Where is that pic?  Because that looks like some future very expensive townhouses to me.
 
2017-05-19 09:11:22 PM  
Way more interesting link found on that page (yeah, it's NSFW):  https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3571053/presenter-jenny-scordamaglia-co​m​pletely-naked-yoga/
 
2017-05-19 09:20:44 PM  
What's the point of mentioning she's engaged and then just dropping it?   Why is that even in the story?  Someone help me.
 
2017-05-19 09:20:47 PM  
More people saw those kids in person that day than will ever see them on Google Earth. Silly biatch.
 
Displayed 50 of 60 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report