Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Boobies Britney naked? (not safe for work)   (alldumb.com) divider line 236
    More: Boobies  
•       •       •

509149 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 May 2004 at 12:34 AM (10 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



236 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2004-05-10 11:38:18 PM  
If it's a fake, it's awesome.
 
2004-05-10 11:39:36 PM  
I woulda guessed that she'd shave it all...

I love Britney, but not in a lesbianic way.
 
2004-05-10 11:41:55 PM  
It caused me to ejaculate, therefore it's real in my mind.
 
2004-05-10 11:43:19 PM  
Just a lookalike. "Leaked photos" from an "inside source" should tell you it ain't kosher. Not to mention the website name plastered all over the pics to ensure hits. Keep dreamin, fellas (and some of you ladies)
 
2004-05-10 11:44:16 PM  
That looks nothing like Britney. Well, ok, it does look a little like her, but it is clearly not her.
 
2004-05-10 11:44:41 PM  
Doesn't she have a tatoo on her "hey=hey"? I think I read that somewhere
 
2004-05-10 11:55:18 PM  
Well, I, for one, think it just might be her....because, from months, are being listened some rumors of which the star would have posed for Playboy magazine in a 6 photographies serie, for the reasonable quantity of 40 million dollars.
 
2004-05-10 11:59:58 PM  
It's a fake in more recent photos, she has a tattoo right below her waist line that is visible while she is wearing either hiphuggers or a low cut bikini bottom.
/scared that he's ever even payed that much attention.
 
2004-05-11 12:02:22 AM  
Its been said before but Ill say it again.

If thats a fake its the best damn fake Ive ever seen!
 
2004-05-11 12:05:04 AM  
It's not a fake, there's a whole series of this girl.
 
2004-05-11 12:28:23 AM  
A lookalike. Whackable, but still just a lookalike.

No points there.
 
2004-05-11 12:38:23 AM  
The other pics don't look anything like Britney. That one just caught the right angle, I guess.

Pretty girl, though. And... no silicone. + three points.
 
lbn
2004-05-11 12:38:52 AM  
It's not like Playboy has ever airbrushed out a tattoo before.
 
2004-05-11 12:40:58 AM  
i had been looking at this pic for a few days now, and i think its either a fake or a lookalike. i looked at some other pics of britney where here panties where pushed very low (although not showing anything we really want to see) and there was a tattoo. this tattoo is not in that pic... so it probly a fake... or maybe jsut an older pic, i dont care ill still fap to it.
 
2004-05-11 12:41:24 AM  
"booiinngg"!!!!
 
2004-05-11 12:41:24 AM  
It's definitely NOT her. That girl is too thin to be britney. britney has thicker, more muscular legs.
 
2004-05-11 12:41:48 AM  
KungFuJesus

(and some of you ladies)


*snaps fingers*

My on going Britney lesbian fantsay bubble has just been busted.

THANKS! ;D
 
2004-05-11 12:41:57 AM  
not her. trust me, I know my two-bit whores
 
2004-05-11 12:41:58 AM  
Whoever she is, I'd hit her about as hard as the T-1000 hit Arnold Schwarzenegger in T2 with that I-beam near the end.
 
2004-05-11 12:42:01 AM  
damn someone beat me to the tatto thing.... i really need to learn to type faster.
 
2004-05-11 12:42:26 AM  
It's a lookalike... if it was really her you'd see her whole face, not a profile.


Duh!
 
2004-05-11 12:42:38 AM  
Other pics, for the lazy. Girl looks nothing like her, except in that one shot, from that angle.
 
2004-05-11 12:42:40 AM  
It's a pretty damn good fake/lookalike
 
2004-05-11 12:43:05 AM  
Frankly though, I'd still show this girl my 'O' face.
 
2004-05-11 12:43:16 AM  
She's close, but her face doesn't look like Britney's.

What? You didn't look at her face?
 
2004-05-11 12:43:53 AM  
Oh please. It is obvious that her boobs are bigger/smaller/bigger/smaller than that.


/seen the discrepancy
 
2004-05-11 12:44:23 AM  
I'm only seeing one picture... are there 5 more?
 
2004-05-11 12:45:00 AM  
damn. damn damn damn.
 
2004-05-11 12:45:12 AM  
Well, holy crap. I don't care who it is, she's gorgeous. (see other pics.)
 
2004-05-11 12:45:19 AM  
Fake? Looks like a real girl to me.
 
2004-05-11 12:45:25 AM  
sorry, but it's fake... all the photos here:

http://www.pajilleros.com/index.php?showtopic=15
 
2004-05-11 12:45:40 AM  
I would advise you not to hit it!
[image from photoshop.superdownloads.net too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 12:46:02 AM  
God damn, this one (NWFW) http://www.striffler.com/images/emily_swiss-montage.jpg is a piece of art.
 
2004-05-11 12:46:19 AM  
good ups to mailnride for finding the rest of the series.
I didn't pop a boner,so I was sure it wasn't her
 
2004-05-11 12:47:02 AM  
I thought, from the few pokies flooding the net, that her nips were pierced.. I am gonna call BS... And smoke some crack.
 
2004-05-11 12:47:10 AM  
Looks like the chicks name is Emily
 
2004-05-11 12:47:25 AM  
http://www.reedandcompany.org/model_portfolio.asp?ID=64

Lazy so no HTML, that's a link to that particular girl's portfolio

Her name is Emmie and she's NSFW
 
2004-05-11 12:47:28 AM  
elchip

No kidding!
 
2004-05-11 12:47:48 AM  
fake; playboy doesn't photography that artistically or realistically.
 
2004-05-11 12:47:56 AM  
Thanks for the link...it cleared up everything and makes me feel like someone else did their homework so I didn't have to.

/I'd Stil hit it
 
2004-05-11 12:48:15 AM  
why the hell did fark filter b*i*g ups with good ups? Freaking filter
 
2004-05-11 12:48:25 AM  
Irregardless...[sic]
 
2004-05-11 12:48:40 AM  
I have that chair. My girlfriend gave it to me after she got it from IKEA.
 
2004-05-11 12:49:26 AM  
I thought it looked more like Helen Hunt...from the neck up, at least.
 
2004-05-11 12:50:29 AM  
 
2004-05-11 12:50:57 AM  
If they're going to pay her $40 million bucks for the shoot, you think they'd fork over some cash to buy something better than a $30 Ikea chair for her to pose on.
 
2004-05-11 12:51:57 AM  
Not her -- lookie here -- soon to be farked link...

NSFW!!!!
http://www.pajilleros.com/index.php?showtopic=15&st=0entry38
 
2004-05-11 12:52:10 AM  
NO way that's a digitally altered fake.

after looking at those pajilleros.com pics, i am sure that it IS NOT Britney but IS a real pic of some other model
 
2004-05-11 12:53:30 AM  
No one has mentioned the fact that she has much smaller breast than Brit?
 
2004-05-11 12:55:30 AM  
Beautiful pictures, popfreak. Plus, for me, at least, it settles this issue: not Britney.
 
2004-05-11 12:55:56 AM  
it isn't Britney, but it is nice to look at comin home around one am.
 
2004-05-11 12:57:53 AM  
It may be fake, but I loooooooove baby bares on non-baby girls. Yum.
 
2004-05-11 12:58:19 AM  
I talked with spear's tonite and she said that is a real photo of her naked ;0)
 
2004-05-11 12:58:20 AM  
Just another link (NSFW) for Emmie:

http://www.reedandcompany.org/model_portfolio.asp?ID=64
 
2004-05-11 01:02:58 AM  
ah the power of fark.
 
2004-05-11 01:04:02 AM  
One thing's for sure: The English language got a beat-down today.
 
2004-05-11 01:04:20 AM  
Wangs need not know if it is really her or not. Boobies are boobies, that is that.
 
2004-05-11 01:05:07 AM  
At first glance it appears to be Britney because of the similar profile and the near identical belly-button ring, but it's definitely not. =P
 
2004-05-11 01:06:48 AM  
I don't care who she is. She's yummy.
 
2004-05-11 01:07:06 AM  
Ummm... Am I the only one that thinks that this hunny is hotter?


Sweet Baby Jebus that girl is fappable.
 
2004-05-11 01:07:45 AM  
It looks enough like Britney to imagine it's really her that you are sliding the meat into.

(while you whack off)
 
2004-05-11 01:08:56 AM  
Not her, but it did the trick.
 
2004-05-11 01:12:20 AM  
Can someone post that pajilleros.com link again, I don't think it has been linked nearly enough.
 
2004-05-11 01:12:50 AM  
--studdog--

Here ya go.

http://www.pajilleros.com/index.php?showtopic=15&st=0entry38 (nsfw)
 
2004-05-11 01:13:10 AM  
I'd go so far to say that she's better looking than Britney, or at least less flashy. Besides, she's fairly soft around the edges -- isn't Britney a hard core gym rat?
 
2004-05-11 01:13:17 AM  
Better looking than Britney, though I have to say, even after seeing the other photos, she's not a bad lookalike
 
2004-05-11 01:14:09 AM  
My Explorer window only displayed "Anal 96"
Just thought I would let everyone know...

Actually, it kinda sounds like a porno title...
 
2004-05-11 01:14:14 AM  
Not her ~ it would ruin part of the sexuality of it if she did go nude though. It's always the promise of catching a glimpse of something that your not supposed to see that always gets me worked up. Hmmm...maybe that was too much to share with everyo...wait, nm - much worst posts in the thread.
 
2004-05-11 01:15:44 AM  
She's got a nice fupa in that 2nd pic on the pajilleros.com site that hasn't been linked enough.

But in all the other pictures, she's hot. I can't wait for fool some people with this picture tomorrow.
 
2004-05-11 01:15:57 AM  
The body is way too nice for that weatherbeaten poptart.
 
2004-05-11 01:17:13 AM  
what a shame
 
2004-05-11 01:18:07 AM  
From months, are being listened some rumors of which the star would have posed for Playboy magazine in a 6 photographies serie, for the reasonable quantity of 40 million dollars. Is this photo that we have just received and that, they tell us, has been filtered by a worker of the magazine, the confirmation of all these gossips? Anyway, if this would be false, she would be a very similar girl or a very well realized fake...
A thing is sure: Soon we will know the truth.


In a later interview, the writer commented, "Me fail ESL? That's unpossible!"

/lot of copy and paste for a cliche joke
 
2004-05-11 01:19:14 AM  
Way to go Stif-Meister!
 
2004-05-11 01:22:23 AM  
Britney... If you are out there reading this, can you please let us know if this is real?
 
2004-05-11 01:27:03 AM  
There profiles are nothing alike. That chick as an upturned nose. It's not even close.
 
2004-05-11 01:29:54 AM  
from that angle she looks like lita
 
2004-05-11 01:30:06 AM  
That ass shot is hot
 
2004-05-11 01:31:38 AM  
wow, the wee hours of the morning do nothing for my english. it's almost as shiatty as the grammar of whoever wrote the blurb next to the pics...
 
2004-05-11 01:33:31 AM  
I clicked on the 'book this model' link for Emmie, but I didn't see a single mention of a 'happy ending', wtf?

Goddamn
(nsfw)
 
2004-05-11 01:37:53 AM  
Obviously not. I have an excellent memory for cranial configurations.
 
2004-05-11 01:38:59 AM  
Here's more "Britney" courtesy of the Fake Detective (NSFW)

Check it out.
 
2004-05-11 01:40:52 AM  
Er, that's not Britney - that's just a model that looks like her - her entire photo shoot was available on TF either earlier today or yesterday.

Not only that, unless I am missing something, this girl looks next to nothing like Britney Spears.

I seriously think I could post a picture of a hog and people would debate over whether it is Ms. Spears.
 
2004-05-11 01:47:53 AM  
Nope not Britney. Still fine as fark.
 
2004-05-11 01:49:37 AM  
Who's going to clean up all the dead kittens?
 
2004-05-11 01:50:33 AM  
And here's our photographer:
Eric Striffler
 
2004-05-11 01:51:16 AM  
Eric Striffler's site is safe for work, by the way.
 
lbn
2004-05-11 01:53:01 AM  
Of course it's not her. Aside from the not-really-looking-like-her issue don't you think Playboy would have publicized the living fark out of this by now.

"WE HAVE BRITNEY NEKKIDD!!!!!1!1 OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOGMOGM! NEXT ISSUE"
 
2004-05-11 02:04:33 AM  
[image from photoshop.superdownloads.net too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 02:06:57 AM  
Who is that guy???
 
2004-05-11 02:12:34 AM  
I want to be the second(i think) person to say that last picture on one of the links is a beautiful work of art. If i wasn't under 18 that would be my desktop background.
 
2004-05-11 02:13:15 AM  
Whoever it was that thought they could pass that girl off as a Britney lookalike needs to be shot in the face for being a retard.
 
2004-05-11 02:16:16 AM  
Obviously fake.

BTW, $40M??? Right! Like Playboy isn't in enough financial straits... BS, all the way. This guy must be an eBayer...
 
2004-05-11 02:19:43 AM  
Your all missing one obvious point to this whole webpage, where the hell did the guy writing on it learn to speak english?

English that bad HAS to be translated somehow. It headache gives me an

/btw, who wouldn't spear britney?
 
2004-05-11 02:20:01 AM  
And of course we cannot have the word "Playboy" mentioned on FARK without someone using the word "airbrushed," despite the magazine using all digital photo retouching for over a decade now.

And for those saying "not even close, OBVIOUSLY not her"... shaddap and stop playing the superior game.
 
2004-05-11 02:22:46 AM  
I like the people that are just now posting "I think it is fake"

Read before you post...
 
2004-05-11 02:24:03 AM  
obviously fake.
 
2004-05-11 02:26:53 AM  
[image from rooftopsuicideclub.com too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 02:28:21 AM  
koob gobbler that is the funniest line I've ever read. I will now be using that line all across the world.
 
2004-05-11 02:33:17 AM  
[image from home.houston.rr.com too old to be available]

</obvious>
 
2004-05-11 02:41:02 AM  
I wanna put my pee-pee in her.
 
2004-05-11 02:41:41 AM  
Pepsi's new marketing campaign:
[image from homepages.ups.edu too old to be available]
With new-window goodness.
 
2004-05-11 02:45:08 AM  
This seems like a good place to share this... I was bored earlier today and I made an interesting photoshop of Britney from one of those pink bikini pics.

NSFW

I think it's pretty good!
 
2004-05-11 02:50:39 AM  
Not bad at all, Mungojerrie.
 
2004-05-11 02:52:39 AM  
Mungojerrie, now if you change the texture on her ass cheecks it'd be a lot better
 
2004-05-11 02:54:18 AM  
Yeah, it looks kind of blotchy, but maybe it is that way in real life?

Could someone else do better? I'm not really a photoshop pro... just messing around.
 
2004-05-11 02:55:12 AM  
Hm. Another link straight off of fazed.net.
 
2004-05-11 02:58:29 AM  
I agree. Real photo, different girl.


Wait.... lil' sis?
 
2004-05-11 03:00:38 AM  
I thought I recognized that pic, the photographer has 144 pics posted on the photo critique site, PhotoSig.

and here is his gallery: http://www.photosig.com/go/users/view?id=154996 note, you need to sign up to view fullsized pics of most except things posted in the past 24 hours.
 
2004-05-11 03:11:15 AM  
No-one's mentioned the pics of Britney in a see-thru top from a few months ago where we got a full view of her dugs and saucer sized nips, I'd put my money on a full South American jungle down below as well except when she's out in public.
 
2004-05-11 03:11:42 AM  
that emilymontage shot makes her look like a Greek statue. It's more art than porn, really
 
2004-05-11 03:18:53 AM  
william_m_hicks, can you find that picture somewhere? I don't remember that one.
 
2004-05-11 03:19:03 AM  
willam_m_hicks-

Where are these photos you speak of?
 
2004-05-11 03:20:01 AM  
I'm not sure why I should care that this chick isn't "Britney Spears." She's way hotter, and, unlike Britney, we don't *know* she can't sing. I think she's got as much a right to be Britney Spears as the flabby one in the pink bikini w/ the marlboro lights.
 
2004-05-11 03:33:50 AM  
Fake or not, fact of the matter is that this article contains some of the most hillarious Engrish of all time.
 
2004-05-11 03:46:05 AM  
Not Britney, but close enough for my purposes. Well, the purposes I'd have if I wasn't at work. And had a computer at home.
 
2004-05-11 03:53:15 AM  
willam_m_hicks, share the nips! I have to agree that this girl rates higher on the fap-o-meter than Britney. I cringe whenever I hear that weak, I-was-trained-to-sing-Annie-by-my-overbearing-parents-when-I-was-a-kid-but-now -I'm-selling-sex-so-I-try-to-sound-like-I'm-having-an-orgasm-while-I'm-singing voice. We need a photoshop where we place poptart girls' and models' heads on unattractive bodies.
 
2004-05-11 04:00:26 AM  
Mission not accomplished
 
2004-05-11 04:01:19 AM  
Real Britney or not, I'm not one to complain about this lass...
 
2004-05-11 04:11:40 AM  
Good god. Has no one mentioned the paparazzi shots at:

http://www.pajilleros.com/index.php?showtopic=15&st=0entry38

?

I'm diggin the turd-cutter, but that GUNT is brutal.
 
2004-05-11 04:14:41 AM  
If there's anything that all farkers should know, it's that Photoshop can do amazing things. This may be Britney -- the face, that is. I doubt the whole thing is real.
 
2004-05-11 04:36:46 AM  
That gave me a Striffler in the pants.

/to those who COTLTSIWB*

*clicked on the link that showed it wasn't Britney.

//I'd still hit it**

**to illustrate that, I'll post the following pic

[image from users.qwest.net too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 04:53:05 AM  
from mailnride's link...this one is just an outstanding work of art...
 
2004-05-11 05:09:42 AM  
Hmm.....youp Emmie can look like Britney, but mostly I thought she resembled Devon. MMMmmmmm.....Devon...oh, look at that pretty kitten.
 
2004-05-11 05:16:46 AM  
Okay, here is an improved version of my photoshop, now with better ass texturing.

NSFW
 
2004-05-11 05:18:15 AM  
I think it's safe to say that, although it's not truly Britney's naked ass, her naked ass must look almost exactly like that. That swimsuit doesn't hide much.
 
2004-05-11 05:59:13 AM  
Quite an amazing free link on that Britney page!

http://www.canal96.com/extra/live/17/index.php?x=0
 
2004-05-11 06:03:24 AM  
that montage picture is friggin' awesome.
/that is all
/and i want some more of this girls pics. . .damn!
 
2004-05-11 06:59:05 AM  
Ok so NOT Britney....

However, did anyone try to read the broken English caption on the side of that pic? My God... I'm almost tempted to seek out someone from France today to throw some of my broken French at them just for spite.

--h
 
2004-05-11 07:01:59 AM  
If Playboy took pictures of Britney Spears, they wouldn't keep it a secret. What would be the point? It's like the Doomsday Device in Dr. Strangelove- it's only useful if people know about it.
 
2004-05-11 07:17:23 AM  
It may not be Britney, but it would still be advisable to do the following:
[image from flamehq.com too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 07:19:32 AM  
I don't care who it is, she can join me in some sit-ups.
 
2004-05-11 07:37:45 AM  
Not her, but very close. The face of that model has more defined lines on the nose, chin, etc. Wouldn't surprise me if it was a celebrity impersonator.
 
2004-05-11 08:07:31 AM  
From all the other photos of Britney you can get an idea of what her breasts would like in all their exposed glory, and I must say, for a very brief moment, that's close to what they'd look like after primmed and propped.

She has very slugging round almost droopy boobs with downward point nipples.

Yes.. I've spent too much time thinking of her breasts..
 
2004-05-11 08:11:34 AM  
No way.... Fake. Face is not right.


How ever I am tired of holding my computer monitor up with one hand.
 
2004-05-11 08:12:35 AM  
She's trash.
 
2004-05-11 08:31:20 AM  
Damn! They keyboard needs to go into the dishwasher again!
 
2004-05-11 08:43:16 AM  
Anyone notice that every other folder in that subject has less than 3500 views and the one with the fake Britney pics has almost 47000?

Cool...
 
2004-05-11 08:43:25 AM  
Tits are too small.
 
2004-05-11 08:43:33 AM  
Not her. From the front page of the site:

IT WAS NOT BRITNEY. We felt pecador, but you will have to continue hoping: the L3roy friend informs to us into who the girl of the other day was not Britney Spears, but a called model Emmie that looks like to him a profile egg. That yes, although is not the famous singer, nobody can deny that paya is awhile good. Or no?

Thank the 'Fish for the "wonderful" translation.
 
2004-05-11 08:45:49 AM  
that imposter doesn't have enough acne to be britney spears, and she is also missing the tattoos that don't say the right thing in madonna's magic religion.

Now that Anna Kournikova is of age, the olson twins (nay, sisters) are going to be legal in 33 days, when does someone start the Jamie Lynn Spears countdown clock?
 
2004-05-11 08:46:54 AM  
goodbye little kittens
 
2004-05-11 09:08:18 AM  
Does anyone have any recommendations for good web site / image crawlers?
 
2004-05-11 09:08:43 AM  
how the...

no way that is her.


fools.
 
2004-05-11 09:17:41 AM  
The Speak & Spell is the best hit-it pic ever.
 
2004-05-11 09:22:57 AM  
Are you kidding me? The home of the FARK Photoshop Contest, and there are people claiming this is fake because they can't see her tattoo? Jesus, people....
 
2004-05-11 09:24:24 AM  
[image from mediaservice.photoisland.com too old to be available]
To the small handful of people who will get this reference, I salute you.
 
2004-05-11 09:28:02 AM  
ironically, with my screen resolution, when the picture opened, the text over the picture read:

anal 96
 
2004-05-11 09:28:52 AM  
Why are people still debating if its really Britney or not...did you guys miss the ton of links provided to the real girl in the photo? Its only been posted several times every few posts. Hypothetically speaking...if it were Britney (and it isn't) and it were a playboy shoot...Playboy is known for airbrushing tattoos out.
 
2004-05-11 09:29:42 AM  
Does it lookalike I care?
 
2004-05-11 09:32:01 AM  
Not her. Would hit it. End of story.
 
2004-05-11 09:37:47 AM  
GurneyHalleck:

Can I get at least a nod? I've read the book, but I can't place the reference.

Then again, I think I last read the book around 1989 or something. I usually just stick with re-reading the Burning Chrome shorts.
 
2004-05-11 09:39:15 AM  
I hate you. Yes, YOU. No, not that guy. YOU.

Need more coffee. Wouldn't hit it. Her armpits are freaky.
 
2004-05-11 09:42:56 AM  
WHere's the Lindsey Lohan pics when you need them!?
 
2004-05-11 09:48:45 AM  
on the plus side, I almost got that chick naked on starpoker! how in the living hell does she keep getting a full house?!
 
2004-05-11 09:49:19 AM  
2004-05-11 09:37:47 AM teedz

GurneyHalleck:

Can I get at least a nod? I've read the book, but I can't place the reference.


Yes, teedz, a nod it is then. Mona Lisa Overdrive had that character who was cosmetically modified to look like a famous porn star so that they could make bootleg porn with her. This "Britney" photo is the same idea.
 
2004-05-11 09:50:00 AM  
Beatle_Matt

Right Here

It's in spanish, but just scroll down a bit and look for foto foto2 ect...
 
2004-05-11 09:54:29 AM  
Russian brides are so pretty.
 
2004-05-11 10:02:08 AM  
She is quite nice. I gotta tell ya that first I doubt lil brittney will be in playboy, although it would be cool. second, all the latest playboy 'celebrities' do not show any furr, check out the latest June issue. Angel's star is in there and she only shows her boobies, but also check out Carmen DeSecareas are what ever her name is as Playmate of the YEAR....oh yeah
 
2004-05-11 10:08:55 AM  
teh f@keness
 
2004-05-11 10:23:35 AM  
Who submits this crap?
 
2004-05-11 10:24:32 AM  
[image from picserver.org too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 10:29:47 AM  
You'd think more people on FARK would be able to easily spot a [image from img.fark.com too old to be available].

Besides, what about some friggen common sense? Playboy hasn't done Black & White spreads since like 1950... this noob did it in Black & White because it's easier to fake.
 
2004-05-11 10:32:32 AM  
Good god william_m_hicks, you can't mention that and leave us hangin!
 
2004-05-11 10:35:27 AM  
byteblock:

it's not a photoshop. read the thread. it's some girl who just looks sort of like britney in that one shot. the picture isn't modified.
 
2004-05-11 10:40:45 AM  
Britney see thru nips

http://www.britneyspears.bz/bp2/pics/pics_world_files/la-04apr21_02.shtml

You're welcome
 
2004-05-11 10:50:10 AM  
I'd rather go back and hit that redhead...
 
2004-05-11 10:56:18 AM  
Britney wishes she looked that good naked.
 
2004-05-11 11:02:24 AM  
I guess I must be out of the loop, but this is the first I have heard of her considering a Playboy shoot. There were rumors going around a year or two back that Christina was going to do one, but that apparenly died on the vine as well.
All we have to do is just wait....one of these days, some papparazzi will catch her skinny dipping or sunbathing nude and there the sacred titties will be! If it happened t Jennifer Aniston, it can happen to her.

Mmmm....Jennifer Aniston....(drool drool)...
 
2004-05-11 11:04:09 AM  
JackBurton

Did the meaning of "see thru" suddenly change to include nipple bulges in shirts? I think I only saw one picture on there where you could kind of make out a nipple.
 
2004-05-11 11:10:40 AM  
Large anticipation I went to the 'see thru nips' site....
Still waiting to see the 'see thru nips' photos...
 
2004-05-11 11:18:20 AM  
jennifer aniston nipple what now?
 
2004-05-11 11:20:30 AM  
Did you go through all of them (all pages)? There are only two or three shots where you can see anything, but they are pretty good.

It's the best I could do. If there are better, I, for one, welcome the seethru britney link posting overlords.

/post 'em if ya got 'em
 
2004-05-11 11:24:01 AM  
Striffler?

[image from sacticket.com too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 11:33:04 AM  
Weakner

jennifer aniston nipple what now?
________________________

I was referring to the shot that some photog got of Jennifer reading a book topless beside her swimming pool. The one she sued over and won a buncha money....even though the picture had been slung from one end of the earth to another. It's not difficult to find. I know the day I discovered it, I was a changed man!

/big JA fan!
 
2004-05-11 11:37:07 AM  
Was I the only one more interested in the Russian girls link on the bottom corner?
 
2004-05-11 11:38:02 AM  
I mostly want to see Britney do the full monty thing just to see her career plummet. Mostly.

Her sister is better-looking anyways, and when she reaches legal age, everbody's gonna be saying "Britney who?" Can't wait.

/schadenfreude
 
2004-05-11 11:44:57 AM  
The rumor that i heard out here in La La Land is that they were still negotiating a photoshoot and that Hef's people had told Britney's people that she needed to shed a little weight first.
 
2004-05-11 12:08:35 PM  
wait...is the girl in the pink bikini britney?
if so, she looks terrible, maybe it's time for a little rest.
 
2004-05-11 12:15:57 PM  
Yeah, where's this supposed see-thru pic of britney's "Saucer sized" nips?
 
2004-05-11 12:18:55 PM  
Also, Britney has a nipple ring. This gal doesn't.
 
2004-05-11 12:24:38 PM  
Don't know why... but I too was fascinated with the Russian brides... Some cuties in there. Some that claim to be one age- but have birthdays in the mid 80's... YIKES!
 
2004-05-11 12:34:21 PM  
Oooops- just realised the year is 2004 not 1994... For some reason I was thinking if someone was born in '84 they would be 10 years old!


/failed pre-school math... 10 years in a row.
 
2004-05-11 12:57:29 PM  
I saw Britney in concert last month and she was faaaaaaaaaty fat fat Mcfatkins. The funniest part was when she'd dance, her booty would jiggle, but the boobies wouldn't.

I still love her.
 
2004-05-11 01:09:24 PM  
that is the girl who did MTV's I want a famous face to look more like britney
 
2004-05-11 01:13:10 PM  
No it isn't, dapharmer.
 
2004-05-11 01:15:07 PM  
meat_tray,

yu-huh. is so.

Good day sir. I said good day.
 
2004-05-11 01:20:49 PM  
It's definitely not her...but she's still hot, so she's got that goin' for her, which is nice.
 
2004-05-11 01:43:45 PM  
Perhaps this is a job for...The Fake Detective.


If any of you know who I'm talking about,that is ;)

The guy is vehement about getting massive hits to his site due to costs so I'll be the nice one and not post it, but if you do a search you should be able to find it fairly easily. He has countless pictures of women that he's verified to be true OR in most cases complete fakes. he researches into some of the most widely sought after pictures of supposed celebs.Well worth a look.
 
2004-05-11 01:46:00 PM  
It's not Britney - it's someone called Emily. She's been photographed a lot by Eric Striffler. His website is here
http://www.striffler.com/
 
2004-05-11 02:28:30 PM  
little late there chrisell.
 
2004-05-11 02:34:50 PM  
A quick review for those of you too lazy to read the thread and who mistakenly think you're a genius:

1. Yes, we know it's not Britney
2. No, it's not photoshopped
3. The models name is Emily, and only the one photo bears a passing resemblance.
4. A link to the series was initially posted at 2004-05-11 12:42:38 AM ... so we don't need yours.
5. Emily is MUCH hotter than Britney
 
2004-05-11 02:37:28 PM  
No links to the saucer nipples yet?

You make me sad. So be it...
 
wib
2004-05-11 02:46:22 PM  
Good day sir. I said good day.
Properly: "Good day, sir... I said good day!"
 
2004-05-11 02:54:00 PM  
That fake model looks a little like Page 3 girl Jakki Degg
 
2004-05-11 02:55:26 PM  
I ate an entire ham. I feel dizzy.
 
2004-05-11 03:04:20 PM  
Because I love farkin' websites:

www.fake-detective.com

Boobies galore.
 
2004-05-11 03:25:02 PM  
unfortunately, not only is it not britney, it's not this chick either, save the image, zoom it, and then look right at her neckline. Some wierd anatomy goign on there, and it becomes very evident that this a just a talented photoshopper at work, probably one of our own photoshop champions.

Back to lurking.
 
2004-05-11 03:49:14 PM  
Sorry guys, I've been at work all day and this is the best thumb I can find:

[image from domicile.dk too old to be available]
 
2004-05-11 03:54:58 PM  
I wonder if we could teach this real model how to lip sing?
 
2004-05-11 04:07:28 PM  
You don't have to go back to the fifties to find B&w photos in Playboy. Cindy Crawford comes to mind.
 
2004-05-11 04:15:08 PM  
I'd take this Emme girl over britany anyday. Wow!
 
2004-05-11 04:16:18 PM  
stutz, i just closed that window after aboot five or so minutes w/o blinking. not that i am a n00b to pron, by any means, just the fact that any pron site would let that just run like that is great.

LMB
 
2004-05-11 04:23:46 PM  
I dont think her neck is supposed to change colors like that, its a fake unless she had some wierd tan line.
 
2004-05-11 04:23:54 PM  
William, not only is there the possibility of those getting you banned, but I believe somewhere those were debunked as fakes.
 
2004-05-11 04:27:36 PM  
Those are fakes. Go to fake-detective.com and you will see that they are faked.

Too bad. I had hoped there were pictures out there that I didn't already have in my britney portfaplio.
 
2004-05-11 04:35:50 PM  
I'm glad it's not Britney. Truthfully, this girl is 100 times hotter and in a LOT better shape. And no visible tatoos which is another plus. I'd hit Britney, she has her good days, but this girl is near perfect.
 
2004-05-11 04:39:06 PM  
dapharmer and sackafire

you guys are both retards. it is not the girl from mtv's famous face. I just did a google search and that girl is still ugly. This chick is very hot--hotter than Britney. Also, as stated 300 times in this thread, the girl's name is Emily/Emmie, and the MTV girl's name is Mia.

Good day, sir. I said good day!
 
2004-05-11 04:39:55 PM  
Yay, I did my first hotlink.
 
2004-05-11 04:42:40 PM  
take the britney face off that fake, and that's still incredibly hot.
 
2004-05-11 04:43:49 PM  
william_m_hicks
quick change out that pic before the mods do
 
2004-05-11 05:08:38 PM  
Well whoever the fark she is...

I'D HIT IT
 
2004-05-11 05:24:10 PM  
It just makes me want to scream how dense some people are. This is a picture of a model named Emily or Emmie that was photographed by a photographer named Erik Striffler. It was not photoshopped to look like Britney. If, indeed, it was 'shopped, it was done by the original artist to cover a blemish or something. Some moron thought it looked like Britney, copied it to their site, and started a rumor. End of story. LEARN TO READ, RETARDS.
 
2004-05-11 05:29:45 PM  
there should be a "I'd hit it" photoshop contest if their hasn't been one already.
 
2004-05-11 05:31:34 PM  
can anyone correct my grammer??
 
2004-05-11 05:33:31 PM  
what about my spelling?
 
2004-05-11 05:34:13 PM  
its been said already but I have to add my own comment... its obviously not Britney but it will hold me off untill the real ones come out someday. Because its obviously that it will happen.
 
2004-05-11 05:42:31 PM  
The question is not "would I hit it?" it is "how many toes would I give to hit it?"

Current answer is hovering somewhere around 3, 3.5
 
wib
2004-05-11 05:51:20 PM  
It was for the effect of the quote. I don't give a crap about the grammer.
Aaaaannnnd: WOOT! This is now a top links!
 
2004-05-11 06:06:07 PM  
It should be obvious is ain't britney, that Emily chick's ass is about half as big as Britney's big ol turd cutter.

Not that I'm complaining about Britney's ass, I think it's her best (only good???) feature.
 
2004-05-11 07:00:55 PM  
emily shot by eric striffler...

amazing how that chick looks like britney at some angles...

nsfw 1

nsfw 2
 
2004-05-11 08:14:30 PM  
wtf? this chick does not look like Britney.

/this chick is much better looking.
 
2004-05-11 08:57:39 PM  
Anyone know what concert these are from?

http://www.disc.itgo.com/images/britneyspears_-_see_through_pink_top_(1).jpg
 
2004-05-11 09:13:04 PM  
Mungojerrie
http://videosean.gotgeeks.com/images/1634x.jpg - NSFW quite possibly. My take on the image Mungojerrie started toying with.

If you have PS8/CS use the healing brush, luminosity only, source = any other are of skin that has the desired texture.
 
2004-05-11 09:48:54 PM  
http://videosean.gotgeeks.com/images/1634xx.jpg NSFW too, topless as well.
 
2004-05-11 09:59:59 PM  
XTRoss

Yeah, they're fake. Obviously too. Go to www.fake-detective.com

case 296.
 
2004-05-11 10:15:47 PM  
Britney's tits aren't that big.
 
2004-05-11 10:42:51 PM  
William, they're fake. (NSFW)
 
2004-05-11 10:43:27 PM  
Fake, rather.
 
2004-05-11 11:29:52 PM  
videosean, if you have PSCS/PS8 the patch tool (hidden behind heal) will do basically the same for you but much more quickly.
 
2004-05-11 11:38:08 PM  
These show some nip... sort of... (NSFW)

Click 1 (Bottom row, first 2, 1 in the row above it)
Click 2

As for the other chick, hotter than britney.
 
2004-05-12 12:07:11 AM  
[image from starwolf.biz too old to be available]

It's a FAKE!!!!
 
2004-05-12 03:56:27 AM  
videosean, those are really nice. Thanks for the tip.
 
2004-05-12 04:02:11 PM  
Looks like a pretty good fake job to me. It's not like we don't have enough photo material already to be able to assemble a perfect collage of head and body poses to fit the style. I just find the picture looks too plasticcy.
 
2004-05-12 07:31:23 PM  
I find Britney too plasticcy too for that matter...

Hef' is wasting his money on Britney if she is indeed his 40 million dollar girl. Give it 10 years, 15 tops on her downward spiral...and we'll be getting the erotic Britney coffee book full of raunchy nudes....
10 years....I'll come back and say "Told you so..."
 
2004-05-14 04:51:33 PM  
I think you're giving Brit way too much credit, SMC. Ten years? In that time no one will remember who Britney Spears was.

No, sir, I predict her downward spiral is starting much sooner than that. Hopefully she gets naked during a skinny week.
 
2004-05-15 08:55:06 PM  
Sorry guys, to all those who were SO sure this was a photoshopped fake, congratulations... You are officially a fool. The first link below goes to the portfolio of the model in the pics, and the second is a link to a blog that originally included the rest of the pics from the series the original image came from. It included a few shots where the model had her head turned towards the camera, removing any doubt whether it was Britney or not.

http://www.reedandcompany.org/model_portfolio.asp?ID=64

http://www.pajilleros.com/index.php?showtopic=15&st=0
 
Displayed 236 of 236 comments



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report