Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   There is no source of whom you need to be more skeptical than an "intelligence" source   ( nypost.com) divider line
    More: Followup, Publishing, fake news, Secret Intelligence Service, Editing, 2016, Trump, Intelligence agency, Donald Trump  
•       •       •

1552 clicks; posted to Politics » on 11 Jan 2017 at 1:16 PM (45 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



186 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all

 
vpb [TotalFark]
2017-01-11 11:58:19 AM  
Much better to believe Putin.
 
2017-01-11 12:03:28 PM  
This is exactly why I choose InfoWars for all my non-intelligence needs.
 
2017-01-11 12:06:00 PM  
Yeah!  What do those damn 'information' people know, anyway?
 
2017-01-11 12:14:19 PM  
Thank God for the journalistic integrity of the New York Post.

/sheesh
 
2017-01-11 12:18:58 PM  

Herb Utsmelz: This is exactly why I choose InfoWars for all my non-intelligence needs.


They've got INFO right there in the title!
 
2017-01-11 12:24:27 PM  
Actually I'd trust just about anything that wasn't printed in the NY Post.
 
2017-01-11 12:30:09 PM  
Thank you New York Post for keeping us infromed.
 
2017-01-11 12:30:55 PM  
I'd put "conservative think tank" way higher on the skeptical list.
 
2017-01-11 12:40:41 PM  
cloudfront.mediamatters.orgView Full Size
 
2017-01-11 12:51:23 PM  
The NY Post lecturing others about journalistic integrity? Are the [Irony] and [Facepalm] tags out back blowing each other or something?
 
2017-01-11 12:53:35 PM  
That's why it's important to note that this all started as opposition research. It isn't an intel report, it's from the private sector. Not that oppo research is always right, but it undercuts this thesis. Plus the leak came from McCain, meaning it wasn't even leaked by the intel community.

It is absolutely mind-numbing that 2017 started off with the President-Elect of the United States getting an intel briefing from the 4 heads of the US intel community about Putin's knowledge of PEOTUS' susceptibility to Russian blackmail from pee-parties with Russian prostitutes and shady financial dealings.
 
2017-01-11 01:16:07 PM  
The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today
 
2017-01-11 01:18:11 PM  
The Republican Mantra: Down With Intelligence!
 
2017-01-11 01:19:50 PM  

Sin_City_Superhero: The NY Post lecturing others about journalistic integrity? Are the [Irony] and [Facepalm] tags out back blowing each other or something?


I mean, we already have Comey refusing to comment on an ongoing investigation, and Republicans in general whining about unverified sources and questionable accusations, so why the fark not?
 
2017-01-11 01:20:03 PM  
No fake news! No fake news! You're the fake news.
 
2017-01-11 01:20:10 PM  
That's why I only trust my intelligents sources, more than one intelligent makes it intelligenter. Sorry, that's not right. More intelligenter.
 
2017-01-11 01:20:12 PM  

IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today


The NY Post is owned by Murdoch.  You must be thinking of something else.

And it's white knight.
 
2017-01-11 01:20:55 PM  
Thankfully, Murdoch will probably be dead within the decade. Unfortunately, said death is unlikely to come from being eaten alive by rats.
 
2017-01-11 01:21:08 PM  

IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today


You might be thinking of the NY Daily News.  The NYPost have been slobbing his knob since he was the clear GOP nominee.
 
2017-01-11 01:21:18 PM  
Okay, at what point do we reset the simulation?  I've got my list of desired bug-fixes and several unresolvable errors.

Tech support?  TECH SUPPORT!!!
 
2017-01-11 01:21:55 PM  
These same assholes gobbled up every piece of bs that was ever slung at Obama and Hillary. The sudden concern is noted.
 
2017-01-11 01:24:23 PM  

IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today


Are you kidding? Rupert Murdoch has his head so far up Trump's ass, he's sucking popcorn kernels out of Trump's teeth.
 
2017-01-11 01:24:35 PM  
Retired intelligence officer compiles report: Time to be skeptical
Letter about emails not yet even reviewed: Hard evidence of everything bad in the world being their fault.
 
2017-01-11 01:24:57 PM  
The BBC is reporting they have confirmed through an intermediary that tapes do exist and Russia has them. 4 minutes in

BBC 1 O Clock News: DONALD TRUMP RUSSIA LATEST
Youtube qckj0fGaoSI


Now it is a matter of time until one slips out. Putin's trump card versus an opportunistic Russian agent who think it is worth it for the pay day.
 
2017-01-11 01:25:13 PM  
I find this all very amusing. During the campaign so many silly things came out about hillary. From her health, to secret gun trades, pay for play, pizzagate, blood cults..and she got this information on trump back in August and didn't do anything with it, because of how silly it is. Samething she did with Obamas birth questions..this is an example of both sides not being equal.
 
2017-01-11 01:25:42 PM  
Buzzfeed is not a credible news source so is it any wonder that they would publish "news" that is not credible when...and lets be clear here....no reputable source would publish them. These memos have been all over DC for weeks. If there was any substantive truth to them they would have been published before now, by someone with more authority than Buzzfeed.
 
2017-01-11 01:26:26 PM  

Peter von Nostrand: These same assholes gobbled up every piece of bs that was ever slung at Obama and Hillary. The sudden concern is noted.


I keep pointing this out and they keep getting more upset.

It doesn't matter if it's fake anymore, it only matters if it sticks. They set these terms, I don't really see what the problem is.

"Debunk all you like, but Trump likes getting pissed on, and no 'stablishment political party can tell me different."
 
2017-01-11 01:26:30 PM  

tbhouston: I find this all very amusing. During the campaign so many silly things came out about hillary. From her health, to secret gun trades, pay for play, pizzagate, blood cults..and she got this information on trump back in August and didn't do anything with it, because of how silly it is. Samething she did with Obamas birth questions..this is an example of both sides not being equal.


What about Obama's birth questions?
 
2017-01-11 01:27:11 PM  

Tell Me How My Blog Tastes: It is absolutely mind-numbing that 2017 started off with the President-Elect of the United States getting an intel briefing from the 4 heads of the US intel community about Putin's knowledge of PEOTUS' susceptibility to Russian blackmail from pee-parties with Russian prostitutes and shady financial dealings.


Yeah, but Obama once worked without a tie on, so I guess it evens out.
 
2017-01-11 01:27:11 PM  
I get all my trustworthy intelligence form the Director of the FBI.
 
2017-01-11 01:27:27 PM  

worlddan: Buzzfeed is not a credible news source so is it any wonder that they would publish "news" that is not credible when...and lets be clear here....no reputable source would publish them. These memos have been all over DC for weeks. If there was any substantive truth to them they would have been published before now, by someone with more authority than Buzzfeed.


The post, CNN, bbc and the Guardian are covering it (at least). Might update the talking points.
 
2017-01-11 01:27:29 PM  

Tor_Eckman: IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today

The NY Post is owned by Murdoch.  You must be thinking of something else.

And it's white knight.


Yeah, if he's thinking then it's the NY Daily News he's thinking of.
 
2017-01-11 01:29:36 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: Peter von Nostrand: These same assholes gobbled up every piece of bs that was ever slung at Obama and Hillary. The sudden concern is noted.

I keep pointing this out and they keep getting more upset.

It doesn't matter if it's fake anymore, it only matters if it sticks. They set these terms, I don't really see what the problem is.

"Debunk all you like, but Trump likes getting pissed on, and no 'stablishment political party can tell me different."


Yep. I was thinking about this earlier. Even if someone partial to trump planted this, they have now anointed him president piss. He'll never live it down. Something about turn about and fair play.

/Probably isn't but that's the game now and they created it
 
2017-01-11 01:30:57 PM  
Trump can put these allegations to rest by releasing the financial information he promised us.

/The man has bragged about buying off politicians with cash donations.  This is what the framers would have considered a bribe.  Anyone that has paid a bribe is not eligible to hold the office.
 
2017-01-11 01:31:03 PM  

Peter von Nostrand: worlddan: Buzzfeed is not a credible news source so is it any wonder that they would publish "news" that is not credible when...and lets be clear here....no reputable source would publish them. These memos have been all over DC for weeks. If there was any substantive truth to them they would have been published before now, by someone with more authority than Buzzfeed.

The post, CNN, bbc and the Guardian are covering it (at least). Might update the talking points.


I'm wondering what satisfaction there is in posting obviously false, easily verifiable statements on FARK.  Is it solely for the attention of being immediately corrected?

/In any case, it's gotta be done, so thanks
 
2017-01-11 01:31:14 PM  
I have zero sympathy for Trump. He ran on a platform of falsity, bigotry and hatred, creating an environment in which false news flourishes. He's just reaping his own whirlwind.
 
2017-01-11 01:31:23 PM  

Tor_Eckman: IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today

The NY Post is owned by Murdoch.  You must be thinking of something else.

And it's white knight.


Fart_Machine: IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today

You might be thinking of the NY Daily News.  The NYPost have been slobbing his knob since he was the clear GOP nominee.


stoli n coke: IgG4: The NY Post has no love of Trump, so I'm a little surprised they are white nighting for him. I was kind of expecting a classic snarky piss-related front page from them today

Are you kidding? Rupert Murdoch has his head so far up Trump's ass, he's sucking popcorn kernels out of Trump's teeth.


Doh, was thinking of the Daily News. Sorry, not a New Yorker, obviously
 
2017-01-11 01:31:50 PM  

Peter von Nostrand: The post, CNN, bbc and the Guardian are covering it (at least). Might update the talking points.


They have to now that Buzzfeed published them...but the fact that no reputable source would go FIRST is what is telling.
 
2017-01-11 01:32:40 PM  
Yeah go ahead and click on Podhoretz's name and see an impressive trump bootlicking cornucopia.
 
2017-01-11 01:33:36 PM  
Did it say Trump was a lizard person or that he was running a pedophilia ring out of the basement of Trump Tower? No? Then it did not.
 
2017-01-11 01:33:37 PM  

born_yesterday: I'm wondering what satisfaction there is in posting obviously false, easily verifiable statements on FARK.


Such as yours...
 
2017-01-11 01:33:53 PM  
Bruno und Klauss...
Youtube D9FauQOXN90
 
2017-01-11 01:34:10 PM  

worlddan: Peter von Nostrand: The post, CNN, bbc and the Guardian are covering it (at least). Might update the talking points.

They have to now that Buzzfeed published them...but the fact that no reputable source would go FIRST is what is telling.


Hold on, get some help before you move those goal posts. They can be heavy.
 
2017-01-11 01:34:15 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-01-11 01:36:48 PM  
Given that the people that are most trusting of the report were whining about fake news just last week makes me believe this is ultimately  be shown to be fake news.
 
2017-01-11 01:37:19 PM  
Except for the New York Post.
 
2017-01-11 01:38:24 PM  
I question the validity of document Buzzfeed published.

I don't question the FBI and CIA's assessment that Putin was influencing the elect that was shared before Congress.
 
2017-01-11 01:39:33 PM  
"Buzzfeed is not credible" says folks who get all their information from Breitbart or Red State.
 
2017-01-11 01:40:22 PM  
The NYPost wants to lecture us on vetting information responsibly?
 
2017-01-11 01:40:38 PM  

Blathering Idjut: "Buzzfeed is not credible" says folks who get all their information from Breitbart or Red State.


It may or may not be credible, only time will tell. It does remind me a bit of John Edwards and the national enquirer, though.
 
Displayed 50 of 186 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report