FARK.com: (875455) Totally gnarly surfer dude gets naked, total bummer that he needs Viagra. Not safe for work

If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Farkette)		Totally gnarly surfer dude gets naked, total bummer that he needs Viagra. Not safe for work (nakedmen-nudemen.com)		144
		More: Weeners

• • •

26964 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Mar 2004 at 8:32 AM | Favorite | share:

Share this link:

URL:

http://fark.com/go/875455

Bookmark:

Article Comments close

144 Comments (+0 »)

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

zerkalo		2004-03-17 08:37:14 AM

Hey! Not every boobies post has perky nips! You greedy farkettes!

ms.sin		2004-03-17 08:43:41 AM

What is this? we can no longer see erections because of censorship? Yet not one of the boobies sites are restricted in a similar manner. I call discrimination!! An erect penis is not obscene when the guy is just standing there posing.

kconkcon		2004-03-17 08:45:46 AM

Hah. 'Obscene'.
What if it's semi-erect?
"If the penis is over 50% engorged with blood, it's
obscene."

Thank God somebody is finally thinking of the children.

blundergirl		2004-03-17 08:47:19 AM

meh. did you see the ad of the guy stirring the coffee with his wang?

um, ew.

me in the night		2004-03-17 08:48:24 AM

"Hey dude, where'd you get this jacket?"

"...uh, the network gave it to me..."

[/FT@RH]

JimBob1015		2004-03-17 08:49:39 AM

Now I didn't "RTA" so to speak, but how do you know he needs Viagra? Is he not aroused? Do women really find erect penii more attractive than their flaccid counterparts? I thought they were just ugly all the time.

yorkdigger		2004-03-17 08:50:22 AM

ms.sin- you're just noticing the double standard now? LOL Let's face it...you can see a woman fully naked in a film and no one bats an eye, but show the sightest hint of a willy and everyone runs screaming for the hills.

delboy1970		2004-03-17 08:51:28 AM

"Erotica for women".

Yes, if by "women" you mean "teh gay".

ruta		2004-03-17 08:53:55 AM

I'm not 100% decided on what consitutes good women's porn, but this ain't it. That was about as arousing as a three-hole punch. He looks like he's modelling underwear for the Sears catalogue. Minus the underwear, of course.

DickTrickle		2004-03-17 08:55:09 AM

Okay, as much as I love weeners. The guy's gotta be at least mildly decent looking.

me in the night		2004-03-17 08:58:36 AM

JimBob1015 I briefly dated a girl in high school (years ago) who commented that her mother told her 'the penis is the ugliest thing on earth.' Even at that young age I felt pitty for her future-husband. I mean, c'mon - it's not like the counterpart is a beauty to behold - especially after dropping gob. It looks like my grandfather eating ice cream.

mutilato		2004-03-17 09:05:38 AM

This guy is:

1. not cute.

2. not seemingly interested in being there.

3. not sexy

4. not even ACTING sexy. It's like he's posing and Mom's shooting.

5. Incredibly likely to not be a real surfer considering how awkwardly he's holding the board.

Sorry about the "glass half empty" assessment.

Chapped		2004-03-17 09:07:24 AM

JimBob1015:
The plural of "penis" is "penises."

/just sayin'

at80eighty		2004-03-17 09:08:56 AM

wht3vr zerkalo said...

MyrnaMinkoff		2004-03-17 09:10:59 AM

The plural of "penis" is "penises."

Actually, it's technically "penes," I believe.

This guy sucks and/or blows. I'm not willing to find out which.

the_goodVSbad		2004-03-17 09:11:11 AM

yes, the gentleman stirring his coffee with his own wang disturbs me greatly and reminds me of a strip club called "phantasies" and a particular male dancer named anaconda.

equusdc		2004-03-17 09:12:12 AM

Well, it did say he was "gnarly." Although that knot is hairy, it's not very intimidating...

sweetangel		2004-03-17 09:13:18 AM

If not prettier, at least more interesting, in erect form. And this is defenitly teh gey. Can somebody please post some Hugh Jackman or at least similar goodness?

squealie		2004-03-17 09:17:05 AM

I love weeners just as much as the next Farkette, but I, too, would like to see a little excitement and liveliness aside from the goods. Guy looks like he's going in for dental work. Still, a weeners link on Hump Day-I shouldn't gripe.
/seems the ethnic guys *DO* work it for the camera, come to think of it

Chapped		2004-03-17 09:17:59 AM

JimBob1015 & MyrnaMinkoff:

My bad. MM, you're correct, it is penes, according to Merriam-Webster. Glad we got that straightened out ...

johnny_vegas		2004-03-17 09:19:40 AM

peni?

FLA Chickie		2004-03-17 09:22:40 AM

Feh, nothing to see here....move along

ms.sin		2004-03-17 09:24:27 AM

Hehehehe that coffee cup pic is something else. I was wondering if he couldn't make it to the rest room on time!

SherKhan		2004-03-17 09:25:51 AM

He's got fake boobs.

/inadequate and taking it out on others

Richard Pye		2004-03-17 09:26:10 AM

Looking at naked men makes me laugh. Ahahahaha!

WorldCitizen		2004-03-17 09:27:20 AM

Straightdope.com did an article on the plural of "penis."

http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mplurals.html

"In this case, your first instinct is a good one. The English-style plural is usually acceptable and often preferred. When you don't know what the Latin plural is and don't have a dictionary handy, you should choose the English-style plural rather than try to guess. (Sometimes even dictionaries will steer you wrong; see below). In your example, penises is a perfectly good plural of penis in English. Many people who deal with penises professionally use the Latin-style plural penes instead. That's fine too, but even among urologists, penises seem to predominate. Seems, rather. "Penises" seems to predominate."

Sootsy1		2004-03-17 09:27:32 AM

Sigh. A hard man is good to find and now they consider it a bad thing. What about this doesn't make sense?

*Loves the Aussie males* mmmmm

Clever Dan		2004-03-17 09:29:05 AM

This is no where near "gay" enough to be considered arousing.

He doesn't look very into it.

He's not attractive at all.

JimBob1015, there are some women who feel that only erect penises are attractive.

I could see needing erect penises in porn, but in this mild erotica stuff it doesn't matter.

Erections are nice, but it's more important that the guy is attractive. This guy is not.

SherKhan		2004-03-17 09:31:20 AM

I don't understand the aversion to erections. Are they really considered too explicit? That's silly IMO.

crankychick		2004-03-17 09:34:58 AM

Maybe he's alpha male personified, but hey, I still love to look at weeners in the morning.

Give us good weeners. Erect or not erect, as long as the guy isn't a oiled, slicked, Fabio-wannabe, I'll be watching.

/weener slut

Shiftless		2004-03-17 09:35:16 AM

He looks dumb as a cock

lookanematode		2004-03-17 09:39:45 AM

I wish I could offer some constructive criticism, but the guy looks so much like my brother that I am now too busy trying to find the mental brillo pad. UGH.

Richard Pye		2004-03-17 09:41:11 AM

I bet that cup of coffee is nice n' creamy. But really...good God...coffee porn? No!

20/20		2004-03-17 09:42:54 AM

Carpet matches the dra... wait...
It's real, and not that spectacular...

/first (and probably last) post in a Weeners link- got nothin'

panda		2004-03-17 09:43:57 AM

Chapped:

What are you talking about? Penises is a correct spelling. They're both accepted spellings. I don't know what kind of blind spot hit you when you checked Merriam-Webster's dictionary, but I'm pretty confident it says

Inflected Form(s): plural penes /'pE-(")nEz/; or penises

I guess you stopped before the word "or"?

Bunny Ann		2004-03-17 09:44:20 AM

"Tee hee, it's so funny, he's naked, and since I'm so insecure about my sexuality I better accuse him of being gay!"

The Great Mutato		2004-03-17 09:44:50 AM

Haha! I love weeners threads because all you women complain every thread about how ugly and un-arousing the guy is.

Of course, you're right. Men ARE ugly an un-arousing. My theory is that you women can't find good weeners links because women are not attracted to a man's appearance (because men are ugly). You are attracted to his personality... thus there is no good porn for women because pictures don't capture personality.

Closed_eyes_2c		2004-03-17 09:49:24 AM

geez ms.sin
i think kconkcon was just playing with one of them there common Fark sayings.

manderx		2004-03-17 09:50:10 AM

silly girls, it's not that a boner is obscene. it's just not as profitable as making you sign up to see it.

Chapped		2004-03-17 09:52:54 AM

panda

Right you are! Why don't we just let it go and say "weeners?"

/still just sayin'

Closed_eyes_2c		2004-03-17 09:56:13 AM

i think it's just that an erect one implies action... naughty action! while flacid is just, well, an object laying/flopping around.

lookanematode		2004-03-17 10:00:00 AM

The Great Mutato: I was going to try to say something that expressed that in a previous weeners thread, but bless you for doing it better and more succinctly.

ruta		2004-03-17 10:04:51 AM

Men ARE ugly an un-arousing. My theory is that you women can't find good weeners links because women are not attracted to a man's appearance (because men are ugly).

I beg to differ

And I beg to be in the frame of that shot. (SFW-- fully clothed, but it still works for me!)

ruta		2004-03-17 10:06:52 AM

However, I concede that part of the reason that Viggo Mortensen works is because of knowlege of the personality he's supposed to have.

In real life, I'm deeply suspicious of a really good looking guy, because too many good looking guys I've known have also been deeply self-centered asshats, which is a turn-off for me.

brandied		2004-03-17 10:11:59 AM

And I beg to be in the frame of that shot. (SFW-- fully clothed, but it still works for me!)

This works better for me that weener-boy. Especially the shot with his britches not-quite-down. I think it's more the idea that men are a turn on--naked or not, but boys don't thrill me so much--naked or not.

OuchGirl		2004-03-17 10:12:02 AM

i love the pose in the second pic..."oops, my pants are falling down"...stooo-pid.

SherKhan		2004-03-17 10:13:32 AM

the personality he's supposed to have.

Is that what you kids call it these days? Would (homonym!) the plural would be personaliti?

;-)

ankmcfly		2004-03-17 10:18:25 AM

This dude needs a shave, must be winter bush. Also, as a man I can say most truthfully that I have never stirred my coffee with my wanker. However I have been known to soak it in cider.

Gabizoidal		2004-03-17 10:20:33 AM

ewww. nasty dude. he looks like zack morris' stunt double.

can we please get the naked ewan macgregor back in the house, snipped or not, damn it!

ruta		2004-03-17 10:23:21 AM

SherKhan

Well played, sir.

Displayed 50 of 144 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

Redisplay/refresh comments

This thread is closed to new comments.