If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Caller)   "If we don't grant amnesty, illegal aliens will become terrorists." Insert yourenothelping.jpg here   (dailycaller.com) divider line 41
    More: Dumbass, James Foley, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, meat packing plant, amnesty, Iowa Public Radio, Pat Murphy, Prime Minister David Cameron, Iowa House of Representatives  
•       •       •

696 clicks; posted to Politics » on 25 Aug 2014 at 12:04 PM (13 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



41 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-08-25 08:18:06 AM  
thesignalinthenoise.files.wordpress.com
 
2014-08-25 08:27:51 AM  
img.fark.net
 
2014-08-25 08:31:30 AM  
"If they're gonna be refugees, which several of them are going to be, we need to make sure that we have-one, we take care of them, and we create a pathway for citizenship and set up education for them so they don't become the same problem that we're currently having in the Middle East-that they'll be terrorists a generation from now."

Glossing over the fact that "terrorist" isn't a synonym for "oppressed minority pissed off about his home country trying to throw him out", he's not completely wrong.
 
2014-08-25 08:32:59 AM  
i2.photobucket.com
 
2014-08-25 08:33:25 AM  
Well yeah, how else is ISIS going to bomb Real America?
 
2014-08-25 08:35:22 AM  
Crank up the soylent brown machines.

//I know I know, one way ticket, extra smoking
 
2014-08-25 08:40:29 AM  

dookdookdook: Glossing over the fact that "terrorist" isn't a synonym for "oppressed minority pissed off about his home country trying to throw him out", he's not completely wrong.


"Terrorist" is a synonym for everything. It's like "smurf".
 
2014-08-25 08:56:43 AM  
TLDR version: 

Whargarble.
 
2014-08-25 09:00:28 AM  
Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance
 
2014-08-25 10:53:44 AM  

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance


Then smart people need to run for office.
 
2014-08-25 11:02:37 AM  

DeaH: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance

Then smart people need to run for office.


They never seem to make it past the primaries, for some reason

/the few that run, anyway
 
2014-08-25 11:10:39 AM  

DeaH: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance

Then smart people need to run for office.


This is not a chicken and egg situation.  It starts with voters.  They have to want smart politicians and vote for smart politicians.  Build it and they will come.
 
2014-08-25 11:23:07 AM  

mrshowrules: DeaH: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance

Then smart people need to run for office.

This is not a chicken and egg situation.  It starts with voters.  They have to want smart politicians and vote for smart politicians.  Build it and they will come.


In my locality, the ballot is not a brain trust.
 
2014-08-25 11:24:32 AM  

MaudlinMutantMollusk: DeaH: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance

Then smart people need to run for office.

They never seem to make it past the primaries, for some reason

/the few that run, anyway


I don't even see that many smart people running in the primaries. I donated o Elizabeth Warren, even though she isn't in a contiguous state, just because I wanted to encourage smart people to run.
 
2014-08-25 11:28:59 AM  

DeaH: mrshowrules: DeaH: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Please stop voting for stupid people

/I know... fat chance

Then smart people need to run for office.

This is not a chicken and egg situation.  It starts with voters.  They have to want smart politicians and vote for smart politicians.  Build it and they will come.

In my locality, the ballot is not a brain trust.


Well it would take several elections to make an impact.
 
2014-08-25 12:08:02 PM  
Soooooooo......

Send them to Guantanamo? Oh wait, 'bama closed Guantanamo on his first day in office; just like he promised in his campaign............
 
2014-08-25 12:11:57 PM  

Mugato: "Terrorist" is a synonym for everything. It's like "smurf".


it was a big terrorist that terroristed terrorist!
 
2014-08-25 12:15:32 PM  
Wouldn't it be tragic if they did become terrorists over here instead of guerillas over there?
 
2014-08-25 12:15:58 PM  

iheartscotch: Soooooooo......

Send them to Guantanamo? Oh wait, 'bama closed Guantanamo on his first day in office; just like he promised in his campaign............


It's always useful when the morons reveal themselves by their ignorance.
 
2014-08-25 12:19:04 PM  

Brick-House: I don't believe for a second that they will become terrorists. I do believe that they are dooming themselves to forever cutting my grass. I also believe that there are plenty of real terrorists comming across the southern boarder. Thanks Obama!  And should an attack suceed, it will be interesting to see who Obama blames, because of course nothing is his fault.

[www.subdude-site.com image 691x553]


Seems like you will be disappointment if there won't be an attack.  That pretty much puts you in the same camp as ISIS.  Congratulations.
 
2014-08-25 12:21:07 PM  
Daily Coward sounds very, very afraid.

Okay, maybe a little racist too.
 
2014-08-25 12:22:43 PM  

WippitGuud: Mugato: "Terrorist" is a synonym for everything. It's like "smurf".

it was a big terrorist that terroristed terrorist!


See, you are completely fluent.  Incoherent, but fluent.
 
2014-08-25 12:28:04 PM  
So what's the argument for not allowing anyone who isn't a criminal, or diseased, or insane into the country ?
 
2014-08-25 12:34:41 PM  

rubi_con_man: So what's the argument for not allowing anyone who isn't a criminal, or diseased, or insane into the country ?


Our infrastrucure is crumbling and we cannot support the ammount of people who would fit your allowable criterion.
 
2014-08-25 12:35:35 PM  
Hmmm ... should I respond to the obvious misinformation troll, or not? Decisions, decisions ...
 
2014-08-25 12:35:38 PM  
 
2014-08-25 12:39:19 PM  

Saiga410: rubi_con_man: So what's the argument for not allowing anyone who isn't a criminal, or diseased, or insane into the country ?

Our infrastrucure is crumbling and we cannot support the ammount of people who would fit your allowable criterion.


Sounds like an excellent opportunity to create jobs to me.
 
2014-08-25 12:40:36 PM  
They're only terrorists in the sense that poor people coming to this country looking for a better opportunity tend to have kids who vote for the party that helps them out, which is terrifying to Republicans.
 
2014-08-25 12:42:17 PM  
If they become terrorists in their country of origin, I don't really see the problem.
 
2014-08-25 12:51:03 PM  
I find it incredible how we ignore most crime is perpetrated by citizens OF the US. Not immigrants. The us vs. them derp is strong...with us.
 
2014-08-25 01:06:11 PM  

rubi_con_man: So what's the argument for not allowing anyone who isn't a criminal, or diseased, or insane into the country ?



A little difficult to interpret the the double negative.  However, I would say there is not a strong argument against letting sane, law-biding and healthy people into the country.
 
2014-08-25 01:52:47 PM  

Brick-House: mrshowrules: Brick-House: I don't believe for a second that they will become terrorists. I do believe that they are dooming themselves to forever cutting my grass. I also believe that there are plenty of real terrorists comming across the southern boarder. Thanks Obama!  And should an attack suceed, it will be interesting to see who Obama blames, because of course nothing is his fault.

[www.subdude-site.com image 691x553]

Seems like you will be disappointment if there won't be an attack.  That pretty much puts you in the same camp as ISIS.  Congratulations.

I live in CA and am never disappointed when there isn't an earthquake, but that doesn't change the fact that there will be another one. And when it occurs, I promise not to blame Obama, although if a real big one happens, any bets he screws up the federal response? Hell, he may even applaude it shoudl it result in a close putt being knocked into the hole.


What if it is some good old Timothy McVeigh type terrorism, how does feed into your rich fantasy world?
 
2014-08-25 04:38:16 PM  

1derful: If they become terrorists in their country of origin, I don't really see the problem.


1) Terrorists shoot up their home countries.
2) Refugees pile up on our borders.
3) Profit.  For the coyotes and the cheapskates who think minimum wage is zOMG SOOOOOCIALISM!, that is.

Seriously, the only thing that's going to cut down illegal immigration is for Mexico and all the rest to have some kind of a decent economy at home.  You don't see Canadians paying coyotes to sneak them across the border.
 
2014-08-25 05:43:00 PM  
You take away the economice incentive to come here illegally. Republicans are against this because they love cheap slave labor. The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats.

The two party system, raping the middle class and working poor since forever.
 
2014-08-25 06:03:01 PM  

Brostorm: You take away the economice incentive to come here illegally. Republicans are against this because they love cheap slave labor. The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats.

The two party system, raping the middle class and working poor since forever.


*facepalm*
 
2014-08-25 06:36:03 PM  

qorkfiend: Brostorm: You take away the economice incentive to come here illegally. Republicans are against this because they love cheap slave labor. The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats.

The two party system, raping the middle class and working poor since forever.

*facepalm*


Which part, exactly, is incorrect?
 
2014-08-25 08:15:40 PM  

Brostorm: qorkfiend: Brostorm: You take away the economice incentive to come here illegally. Republicans are against this because they love cheap slave labor. The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats.

The two party system, raping the middle class and working poor since forever.

*facepalm*

Which part, exactly, is incorrect?


The theory about pumping out Democratic Babies is very poorly supported.
 
2014-08-25 08:55:28 PM  

Hickory-smoked: Brostorm: qorkfiend: Brostorm: You take away the economice incentive to come here illegally. Republicans are against this because they love cheap slave labor. The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats.

The two party system, raping the middle class and working poor since forever.

*facepalm*

Which part, exactly, is incorrect?

The theory about pumping out Democratic Babies is very poorly supported.


How exactly do you figure? Lower income people in independent of race are much more likely to vote democratic. Hispanics voted for Obama at a 71% clip.

Do you actually have an argument?
 
2014-08-25 10:55:45 PM  

Brostorm: Hickory-smoked: Brostorm: qorkfiend: Brostorm: You take away the economice incentive to come here illegally. Republicans are against this because they love cheap slave labor. The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats.

The two party system, raping the middle class and working poor since forever.

*facepalm*

Which part, exactly, is incorrect?

The theory about pumping out Democratic Babies is very poorly supported.

How exactly do you figure? Lower income people in independent of race are much more likely to vote democratic. Hispanics voted for Obama at a 71% clip.

Do you actually have an argument?


You are proposing that the DNC has an incentive to permit illegal immigration because 18 years from now the Republicans will still be dicks to all non-whites.

You can disagree with legislation being proposed, but assigning that degree of foresight borders on conspiracy theory.
 
2014-08-26 04:12:45 AM  

phaseolus: Hmmm ... should I respond to the obvious misinformation troll, or not? Decisions, decisions ...


No? Would a resounding yet friendly No be good?
 
2014-08-26 04:53:18 AM  
The Democrats are against this because people that produce at well about the native populations rate and will create millions of poor people that will (correctly) vote for Democrats

And this will mean that now, according to the tea party, ab*rt**n will be a good thing cuz less demoncrats?!!??
 
Displayed 41 of 41 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report