Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Tampa Bay Online)   Disney should quit indoctrinating children with its pro-gay agenda and get back to its traditional family value roots, like evil stepmothers and Song of the South   (tbo.com ) divider line 31
    More: Unlikely, Disney Co., Robert Iger, Michael Eisner, Disney XD  
•       •       •

1603 clicks; posted to Politics » on 14 Aug 2014 at 1:13 PM (1 year ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2014-08-14 01:17:33 PM  
5 votes:
www.witnessesuntome.com

with Mimosas after
2014-08-14 01:59:10 PM  
4 votes:
Stop laughing, guys. It's real.

Watching Pocahontas made me a Powatan indian. Since that day I paint with all the colors of the wind.
Which are totally gay, BTW.
2014-08-14 01:56:19 PM  
3 votes:

FirstNationalBastard: DeaH: I stopped at, "Disney has made no secret that it pushes a pro-gay agenda." Because the colors of the rainbow will turn your kids gay. That's the argument. Really.

I followed a rainbow once. At the end of it, I saw a guy with some skittles being blown by a leprechaun.

So yes, Rainbows are responsible for gaydom.


As I was raised Catholic and I remember when the rainbow use to be a wholesome symbol of how God flooded the entire world in anger and almost entirely drowned every person and creature on earth.  Now it is just a sick and twisted representation of love and tolerance of diversity.  Disgusting.
2014-08-14 01:51:50 PM  
3 votes:
Bart Simpson: If there's anything fairy tales have taught us is that first wives are perfect and second wives are horrible.
Homer Simpson: Just the opposite of real life.
2014-08-14 01:20:47 PM  
3 votes:
Look at what's happened because of Disney's gay agenda!

media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com
2014-08-14 04:08:27 PM  
2 votes:

abb3w: Disney has made no secret that it pushes a pro-gay agenda. That is most certainly its right. But where does the company draw the line? A former Disney executive I spoke with told me the company has taken direct aim at children to indoctrinate them about gay lifestyles and gay marriage through shows it airs on The Disney Channel and Disney XD.


"A former streetwalker from East St. Louis told me that Douglas Mackinnon takes direct aim at a stuffed panda bear upon ejaculation after having been ferociously pegged by her. She continued to tell me that Mr. Mackinnon seeks to indoctrinate the pubescent kids in his neighborhood by giving them candy, before using cattle prods to force them to ejaculate over a vast array of stuffed animals, porcelain dolls, and 70s-era TV show-themed lunchboxes."

What? It's ever bit as substantive as what this silly little f*cknugget wrote.
2014-08-14 02:17:25 PM  
2 votes:

real_headhoncho: What was the gay agenda again?


to explain it i'll need a theater, chorus line, live orchestra and lots of fabulous costumes
2014-08-14 01:41:44 PM  
2 votes:

Kanemano: [www.witnessesuntome.com image 850x624]

with Mimosas Cosmopolitans after

ftfy

You know how I know you're not gay?

;)
2014-08-14 01:17:28 PM  
2 votes:
The Tampon Tribune should change theirs. It's been stinking for a while now.
2014-08-14 12:34:32 PM  
2 votes:

DeaH: I stopped at, "Disney has made no secret that it pushes a pro-gay agenda." Because the colors of the rainbow will turn your kids gay. That's the argument. Really.


I followed a rainbow once. At the end of it, I saw a guy with some skittles being blown by a leprechaun.

So yes, Rainbows are responsible for gaydom.
2014-08-14 06:14:40 PM  
1 vote:

qorkfiend: Confabulat: Let's face it, if you are offended the President or the First Lady appears on kids' TV, I have to question your patriotism.

I'm also having some trouble coming up with a substantive difference between the President appearing on kids' TV versus something like, say, reading a children's book to a class.


It depends on if the book is My Pet Goat.
2014-08-14 06:02:20 PM  
1 vote:

Confabulat: OK I POSTED SESAME STREET WHEN IT WAS ABOUT DISNEY CHANNEL.

OMG


That damn Obama driven around in cars, flying in planes. Lincoln didn't need no car, Washington and Jefferson didn't fly in no planes.
Obama is just showing that he is a communist, Muslim, Athiest, time-traveler by doing that. Trying to show he is better than real(I mean white) Presidents.
2014-08-14 05:55:57 PM  
1 vote:

abb3w: BojanglesPaladin: Off the top of your head, name any Disney depiction of a priest, monk, friar, reverend, cardinal, or other 'man of the cloth'.

[www.thehunchblog.com image 850x467]

Frolo and Tuck also sprang to mind; plus Tim Curry's scenery-chewing Richelieu, in the non-animated stuff.


img.fark.net

www.theblaze.com

/sorry
2014-08-14 04:28:04 PM  
1 vote:
Wholesome children's television:

img.fark.net

Proof of secret liberal agenda:

encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com
2014-08-14 03:52:35 PM  
1 vote:
s25.postimg.org
2014-08-14 03:10:03 PM  
1 vote:

BojanglesPaladin: Or are you the thread police, and we will get a ticket if we stop talking about the gheys for a minute? No one asked you to post.


The difference is we're asking you not to post.
2014-08-14 02:25:38 PM  
1 vote:

qorkfiend: BojanglesPaladin: I will say this. There is a strong case to be made that Disney has a noticeable anticlerical bias in their movies. I lost a bet with someone over this, so I'll throw it out to the Fark team:

Off the top of your head, name any Disney depiction of a priest, monk, friar, reverend, cardinal, or other 'man of the cloth'.

Now how many of them are depicted in a negative light? Evil, drunk, bafoonish, uncaring, unhelpful, etc.
Now how many are depicted in a positive light?

I'm honestly having a tough time coming up with any clerical figures other than Friar Tuck and Rafiki. Did you have someone specific in mind?


Let's not forget the horny priest in Little Mermaid.

www.oddfilms.com
2014-08-14 02:20:57 PM  
1 vote:
Disney is not much pro-gay, as they are anti anti-gay.

Personally, I wouldn't describe myself as pro-gay. Just willing to punch anti-gays in the mouth.
2014-08-14 02:11:04 PM  
1 vote:

ladodger34: Plus, the 'former executive' is freaking vague as all get out. Disney is a gigantic corporation. For all we know, this former executive could have worked for ESPN or Miramax and have zero knowledge of the animation or Disney Channel stuff.


Yeah, the home of super-macho, tight-pants, butt-slapping, body-grinding, ball-catching football and the studio that made Chasing Amy. Definitely no gay agenda at THOSE places!

Chexmix, homolibs.
2014-08-14 02:04:34 PM  
1 vote:
The former executive said one of the more subtle techniques is to incorporate the colors of the gay-pride flag in as many shots as possible.

31.media.tumblr.com
Apparently, they've been doing it for a while.
Sneaky bastards- using ALL THE COLORS!
Whatever happened to this Family-Friendly Disney?
4.bp.blogspot.com
2014-08-14 02:04:33 PM  
1 vote:

abb3w: While some on the left have gone out of their way to smear his memory and name,


How dare they smear a racist and anti-Semite!

// he may have been no more racist or anti-Semitic than his peers, but at best that's damning with faint praise
// and his peers weren't inviting Nazi propagandists over for tea
2014-08-14 01:45:03 PM  
1 vote:
i.imgur.com
2014-08-14 01:39:07 PM  
1 vote:

Mikey1969: How DARE they use pink, red, orange, yellow, green, turquoise, blue or purple in their goddamn shows!! Why, if black and white TV was good enough for John Wayne and Ronald Reagan, why should we add COLORS?


No, no, no. Pint and turquoise are fine. The gay flag is the colors of the rainbow. Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, and Violet - those are the bad colors. The really scarey part is that the American flag is already two-thirds gay! That's why White is so important. It keeps the gay away.
2014-08-14 01:34:14 PM  
1 vote:
The former executive said one of the more subtle techniques is to incorporate the colors of the gay-pride flag in as many shots as possible.

How DARE they use pink, red, orange, yellow, green, turquoise, blue or purple in their goddamn shows!! Why, if black and white TV was good enough for John Wayne and Ronald Reagan, why should we add COLORS?

Y'all know it's the gays who invented color, right? They are the entire reason that Communism rose, did you know that? Without red, we wouldn't HAVE Reds. Same with the Nazis, they used red, too, and look where THAT got us.

Farking gays and their colors...
2014-08-14 01:29:17 PM  
1 vote:
abb3w: via Google Cache:
(...)
The former executive said one of the more subtle techniques is to incorporate the colors of the gay-pride flag in as many shots as possible.


Well, we should blame the Big Guy who started the trend.
1.bp.blogspot.com
2014-08-14 01:28:17 PM  
1 vote:
"Mandalay!  I've come aflame again!"
2014-08-14 01:20:57 PM  
1 vote:
companies SHOULD stay out of politics.

except of course when I agree with a company's politics, like Hobby Lobby or W.W. Bridal Boutique.  because then it's a matter of Free Speech and Freedom of Religion and StopOppressingMe.

but all those other companies should shut the fark up.
2014-08-14 01:19:48 PM  
1 vote:
I prefer the Armature-Gay Agenda.  They do it because they love it, not just for the money.
2014-08-14 12:19:58 PM  
1 vote:

abb3w: Huh. Looks like TBO has pulled TFA.


First the takeover of Disney and now this.

The gaygenda is getting stronger every day...
2014-08-14 12:17:00 PM  
1 vote:

Huh. Looks like TBO has pulled TFA.

MacKinnon's "WAHHHH", via Google Cache:

In many ways, the Walt Disney Co. is an exceptional business model. I can't think of a corporation that produces more smiles on the faces of children and adults than the company created by animator Walt Disney in the 1920s.

For the majority of people, everyday life can be a struggle, and the magic of Disney makes those struggles more bearable. Disney shows and movies gave me a much-needed escape when I was a child growing up in poverty. And as an adult, I have enjoyed the company's parks and ships.

That said, since at least 1984, many believe the company has also been in the business of advancing a left-leaning agenda. While some on the left have gone out of their way to smear his memory and name, Walt Disney the man was conservative in nature, and anyone who remembers "The Wonderful World of Disney" knows he created wholesome entertainment.

Beginning with the takeover of the company by Michael Eisner in 1984 and continuing under the leadership of Robert Iger since 2005, it can be argued that Disney has been working overtime to redefine "family values."

Back in the late 1990s when I worked with former Sen. Bob Dole, I had the pleasure to interact with Iger. He was professional, respectful and could not have been more kind or considerate. Since taking over, he has only made the company more profitable. But beyond his fiscal responsibility to shareholders, does Iger have an even greater responsibility to impressionable children?

Disney has made no secret that it pushes a pro-gay agenda. That is most certainly its right. But where does the company draw the line? A former Disney executive I spoke with told me the company has taken direct aim at children to indoctrinate them about gay lifestyles and gay marriage through shows it airs on The Disney Channel and Disney XD.

The former executive said one of the more subtle techniques is to incorporate the colors of the gay-pride flag in as many shots as possible. The colors are woven in as a wink and nod to the gay community and show up on shirts, hats, posters, stacked cups and rings. The practice has been picked up by other children's networks and national advertisers.

Disney also pushes the gay agenda by introducing openly gay characters and couples on its children's programing. Again, that is their right, but should they be in the business of entertaining children or indoctrinating them?

Beyond its pro-gay agenda, which now includes halting funding to the Boy Scouts of America, Disney also leans left in its politics. Once again, that is their right. But going back to their children's programming, Michelle Obama has become a fixture on seemingly every Disney Channel show or Disney commercial, with President Barack Obama also incorporated in as many ways as possible.

Last year, Disney reportedly had revenue of more than $45 billion and a net income of more than $6 billion, so there is a good chance Iger and his team don't care if half the nation is troubled that Disney's children's programming is shilling for the Obama White House or any other liberal cause. They have made the corporate decision to push their adult ideology upon children ages 2 to 12, and who's to stop them?

While those who cherish traditional values may not like it, the left controls most of the media, entertainment and "education" in our country. As such, it allows them to re-educate our youth whenever the mood strikes them.

The Disney Co. does much good and brightens the lives of millions around the world, especially children. Because of that, I wish they had stayed in the business of entertaining those children and left the indoctrination to someone else.
2014-08-14 12:12:19 PM  
1 vote:

DeaH: I stopped at, "Disney has made no secret that it pushes a pro-gay agenda." Because the colors of the rainbow will turn your kids gay. That's the argument. Really.


Really? I stopped at the headline.

Anytime someone says "gay agenda" I immediately tune them out for being bigoted morons. Nothing worthwhile can come after that.
 
Displayed 31 of 31 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report