Chris Ween: Darwin explains this very well.
thetrenchcoat: Do we really need pandas?
bdub77: Yes, because humans need a species we can point to that's more useless and self-destructive than ourselves.
farkeruk: bdub77: Yes, because humans need a species we can point to that's more useless and self-destructive than ourselves.There were an estimated 5 million people on earth 10,000 years ago. Today it's 7 billion.
quatchi: You know who I blame here. That's right...[persephonemagazine.com image 400x300]
Gonzee: I read an article a couple years ago that asked whether we should be going to such great and expensive efforts to rescue a species that seemed to be on its way out. As I remember, it made a pretty good case that pandas were going extinct because of their mostly non-nutritious diet and territory needs. And some other things....Off to google...
ArkPanda: Have they tried Colt .45?
Meatybrain: The problem is pandas in captivity are bored, so they tend to get overstimulated too soon, spending so much time sniffing and licking the other panda that they climax before intromission, after which the male tends to lose interest and walk away.Hence the panda's reputation: eats shoots and leaves.
escherblacksmith: ArkPanda: Have they tried Colt .45?how often does it work?
If you like these links, you'll love
$5 a month since 19 aught diddly.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 15 2017 11:16:31
Runtime: 0.310 sec (310 ms)