Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WRAL)   M. circinelloides can develop drug resistance two different ways, either stably through permanent mutations or transiently through reversible epimutations   (wral.com) divider line 9
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

524 clicks; posted to Geek » on 27 Jul 2014 at 11:15 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



9 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2014-07-27 10:18:43 PM  
In my day we didn't have any of this newfangled RNAi. My textbooks didn't even have Archaea. We had bacteria and fungus and plants and animals and if you got an infection you toughed it out like a real man because we didn't have AIDS or immune suppressors. And we liked it.
 
2014-07-27 11:14:16 PM  
But enough about the Material Girl...
 
2014-07-28 12:00:08 AM  
Duke still sucks.
 
2014-07-28 12:52:33 AM  
So, buy now?
 
2014-07-28 12:58:30 AM  
Intredasting. Please, elusivate.
 
2014-07-28 02:16:17 AM  
I understood all of those words and what they mean and this article.
 
2014-07-28 03:45:56 AM  

natmar_76: I understood all of those words and what they mean and this article.


Me too.

Are we seeing a dumbing-down of Fark?

/morans
 
2014-07-28 09:22:58 AM  
I saw the title for this story -- Scientists discover new, noncommittal mechanism of drug resistance -- and thought to myself, "noncommittal? What kind of nonsense are these science-illiterate news hacks spewing now?" See, I'm just a lowly programmer, but I've been working in biotech, so I know some of the jargon (and even some of the concepts).

By the time I got two-thirds of the way through, I was pretty much into "wading through biology paper" mode.

I don't know how this story came into being. It's a bit over-technical even for a press release, but not technical enough for an abstract. It looks for all the world like a reporter who really knows this stuff read the actual paper, and then tried to summarize it -- completely forgetting who the target audience was.

Anyhow, it'd been awhile since I'd seen the "OBVIOUS" meme show up, and this seemed like as good a candidate as any.

/subby, of course
 
2014-07-28 11:13:53 AM  
That is quite possibly the most boring Fark title I've ever read.
 
Displayed 9 of 9 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report