If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Leonardo Da Vinci was a loser - so imagine what you are by comparison   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 7
    More: Interesting, Leonardo da Vinci, Faraday, Last Supper, Marcel Proust  
•       •       •

7714 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Jul 2014 at 6:19 AM (22 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-07-15 07:00:05 AM  
2 votes:
He wasn't a commercial success because he spent most of his time designing gizmos for some Florentine parkour enthusiast.
2014-07-15 06:55:12 AM  
2 votes:

TinyFist: How is "discovering gravity" such a big deal?

Stuff falls. Oh my goodness!


How fast does it fall?  Why?  Do objects of different mass fall at different speeds?  No?  What do you know, Aristotle was full of it.  Do they fall at the same rate of speed?  What governs it?  What is that governing property called?  Where does it come from.  Is it something on earth?  In earth?  The heavens?  Both?  This was heady sh*t in the day.
2014-07-15 08:42:30 AM  
1 votes:
Well so what? I have more money than Albert Einstein, so that makes me BETTER.

i1.ytimg.com
Way to go, Einstein!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke9iShKzZmM
2014-07-15 06:44:37 AM  
1 votes:

GDubDub: Edison was a loser too. I mean, really, who the Fark fails to make a lightbulb 2000 times? Sheesh.


Mostly his pack on underpaid minions who did all the actual  work every time he farted out an idea.
2014-07-15 06:40:48 AM  
1 votes:
Edison was a loser too. I mean, really, who the Fark fails to make a lightbulb 2000 times? Sheesh.
2014-07-15 06:29:23 AM  
1 votes:
I do't know who is more loathsome.  The blithering idiot who scripted this piece of donkey excrement, or the posturing twat who narrated it.  Anybody can be dragged through the mud with a smirk and an "oh, dear".  You just take them out of the context of their time.  This is why we include that context when we write about history.
2014-07-15 12:34:38 AM  
1 votes:
This headline brought to you by Futurama!
 
Displayed 7 of 7 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report