some_beer_drinker: lindalouwho: Let me get this straight - the police and prosecutor want to commit child abuse and manufacture child porn?Wtf?pretty much this. we are through some sort of portal here...
rnatalie: Please, please, can we call it a tallywacker?
liam76: Coming on a Bicycle: Give it enough publicity and this fark of a DA will back off. This is the stuff you can boast about to your colleagues, not the country.Can we mention the DA by name?Because I think repeating that enough with "wants to look at a 17yr olds penis" to the point it is the first thing that comes up in google woudl help.
Langdon_777: Snausages75: Dear Manassas has an established history of being fascinated with such things. It was where John Wayne Bobbitt had his unfortunate accident. Three years ago, the town got a case of the pearl-clutching vapors because an "adult" store opened in Old Town. They subsequently changed their zoning laws so it could never happen again, which I think is considered spot zoning, which is illegal.See here:http://www.tbd.com/blogs/amanda-hess/2011/04/manassas-sex-shop-fight- c uts-across-class-lines-10502.htmlLastly but most disturbing, Bob Marshall is the state delegate for Manassas. Take a stroll through his Wikipedia page to get an idea of what kind of specimen he is.When I read his wiki, each time I read the word 'election', I heard 'erection.'Oh and this case is insane.
Nem Wan: Cops having special dick comparison software.
TuteTibiImperes: There's an update on the article with the police having released a statement, view it here.On first blush, if they're having to release a statement defending their actions, that likely means they're getting a lot of backlash over this, so that's good.They do mention that the girl asked him to stop sending her dick pics, which, if true, and he kept doing it, does make him sort of a jerk, but it's certainly not worth felony charges. If that was the actual situation the correct course of action would have been to have her parents tell his parents, and have them ground him and take away his phone. This entire situation does not warrant police involvement.
Werehamster: What really gets me is that a cop said that they would use "special software" to determine if the penis is the kid's. Huh? What's the name of the program? Who manufactured it? How in the world can anyone tell if it actually works? Will the prosecution be required to prove that the software does what it's supposed to do? If so, how will it do so?
Delay: What the fark is wrong with police today? Police get enormous pensions that we pay for, they bust peaceful people with a gram of marijuana and those hippies go to jail for life in prison, the police extort normal people and plant drugs on them when those normal people have done nothing wrong, then, when it all quiets down, the police shoot their dogs. Who are the folks that profit from this?
labman: So are they going to have a book of mugshots, only it's picture of underage penises?
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Apr 26 2017 20:48:26
Runtime: 0.424 sec (424 ms)