Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post)   Virginia cops want to give a 17-year-old boy an erection so they can take pictures of it   ( ) divider line 256
    More: Obvious, Prince William County, NBC Washington, juvenile courts  
•       •       •

13109 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jul 2014 at 8:14 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

256 Comments   (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
2014-07-10 04:26:45 PM  
Manassas City Manager Patrick Pate acknowledged Thursday that the department and the city had been fielding irate calls from across the country and internationally after the story broke. He said the city was being portrayed unfairly, given the fact that the photos were never actually taken.

The only way to portray your city unfairly, Patrick Pate, would be to offer a positive comment regarding to it! You and the rest of the city employees are the lowest of the low!
2014-07-10 05:30:09 PM  

freetomato: And they've backed off....

Bullshiat. They haven't dropped all charges.

They are just lying, as cops do, to get a conviction at any cost, no matter how many innocents suffer.
2014-07-10 05:31:13 PM  

Feepit: freetomato: And they've backed off....

I'm surprised they didn't charge the aunt with obstruction of justice, although sending the kid out of state was a smart move. The defense could have forced an extradition hearing if those evil dirtbags tried to force him to return so they could execute their warrant.

Still, that a judge even signed that warrant stands as a symbol of how unfaithful the government has been to its people.

They probably didn't want to bring non pedophiles into the situation. After all, if a non pedophile saw what they were doing, they might have a problem with it.
2014-07-10 05:47:00 PM  

mr smart the great: Ivan the Tolerable: What I find even more troubling here is that teen girl first sexts teen boyfriend, and no charges for her. But when teen boyfriend sexts back, prosecution as an 'adult' for creating 'child porn' by taking a pic of his own dick, with prison terms and life as a sexual predator for 'exploiting' his 'child' self by his 'adult' self.

/so why isn't the girl in prison too?

because shes daddys little angle and wouldn't ever do anything like that!!

Is she acute?
2014-07-11 01:16:04 AM  
I, for one, am disappointed in the utter lack of Farkettes requesting WIE.

Phrased correctly, this is the perfect opportunity to ask without seeming slutty.

/make your own slashie
2014-07-11 07:26:47 AM  

Earguy: Because the girl's Dad is a cop.

In the interest of fairness I would like to withdraw this comment.  I read that on another web site, but I did some Googling and found no news reports that supported the notion.  Apparently the girl and her family are not identified publicly.  I'm not saying he's not a cop, but I'm not saying he is.
Displayed 6 of 256 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter

In Other Media

  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.