Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post)   Virginia cops want to give a 17-year-old boy an erection so they can take pictures of it   (washingtonpost.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious, Prince William County, NBC Washington, juvenile courts  
•       •       •

13112 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jul 2014 at 8:14 PM (1 year ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



256 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-07-09 10:20:54 PM  
Want to see an underage boy's peener in a hospital?  Jim'll fix it!

www.redicecreations.com
 
2014-07-09 10:23:31 PM  

firemanbuck: PhiloeBedoe: If he is sending unsolicited dick pics to anyone, no matter the age of the person he sends them to, he certainly should be in trouble.  He shouldn't be made erect and photographed but there should be other ways of proving whether or not he sent them...

Let he who hath never sent a dick pic, cast the first stone....


Before we do so am I casting it at the teen or the cops? Because I'm not throwing it at the teen for responding to BIE.
 
2014-07-09 10:28:47 PM  

farvour: FuzedBox: So let me get this straight: Someone pissing on the side of a highway, hundreds of miles from the nearest rest stop can be labeled a sex offender, yet police strapping down a 17 year old, forcing him to get a boner, and snapping pictures of it is considered a-ok?

Counter-sue the police for manufacture of child pornography. Bring the whole farkin' diseased, corrupt temple down on their heads. It'll be Biblical.

I am pretty sure most police and prosecutors have a "It's ok when we do it" attitude about many of the (too many) laws that we have. So yeah, I would not be surprised if they genuinely think your comparison is invalid.

It is sad really.


anguscarroll.files.wordpress.com
 
2014-07-09 10:36:39 PM  
Ivan the Tolerable:   life as a sexual predator for 'exploiting' his 'child' self by his 'adult' self.

files.sharenator.com
 
2014-07-09 10:42:04 PM  
West Virginia used to be part of Virginia. They broke off and formed their own state because they were that ashamed of being associated with ignorant asshats like this. True story.

That kid should definitely get himself to somewhere socially progressive and never look back. His family should certainly make efforts to involve the ACLU & FBI.

Every single person involved on the side of the prosecution should be placed on a sex offender registry and put in general population at the nearest prison. "Well, the prosecutor said we had to get his dick hard and take pictures because reasons, so that's what we're going to do." fark's sake, what a bunch of psychopaths. It drives me insane that none of these child abusing thugs has the guts and depth of character to say they're not going to do this and that they won't allow anyone else to do it either.
 
2014-07-09 10:45:42 PM  

Warlordtrooper: Considering this is the court system the girl won't be touched but the boy will be nailed for receiving it because vagina


Now now, girls will be girls....
 
2014-07-09 10:48:35 PM  

Deacon Blue: doglover: So to "protect" children, we have to spend taxpayer time and money to sexually assault them in hospitals in order to send them to jail?

fark that. There should be the option for a jury to, with a unanimous vote, to send the prosecutor to jail for the "crime" they were trying to prosecute instead.

Don't think that would be possible to implement, but I like the idea.

/off topic, you troll the fark outta the main page, don't you?  It's hilarious.


It's totally possible:


Please choose Guilty, Innocent, or Monte Cristo below:
_________________________
 
2014-07-09 10:49:30 PM  
What the fark did I just read?!

So a 17 year old boy makes a sexytime video and sends it to his (also juvenile) girlfriend and that = producing and possessing child pornography...but the police then want to forcibly give this same kid an erection and photograph his underage penis and that doesn't = child pornography? Or an unwanted sexual assault? Why are they even wasting their time with this? Or trying to go to such extreme lengths to make a case? This is utterly insane and if they wind up actually doing this to this kid, I hope he sues the pants off the department and alerts the FBI to the fact that they are in possession of child pornography on their department computers.
 
2014-07-09 10:52:50 PM  

doglover: So to "protect" children, we have to spend taxpayer time and money to sexually assault them in hospitals in order to send them to jail?

fark that. There should be the option for a jury to, with a unanimous vote, to send the prosecutor to jail for the "crime" they were trying to prosecute instead.


Don't forget incarceration and the label of being a sex offender, ensuring this guy will never be able to have a real job or life of any kind.
 
2014-07-09 10:57:31 PM  
Are all the Fark law enforcement officers at work tonight?
 
2014-07-09 10:57:35 PM  
And what is the point of looking at his erect penis? Is his defense denying that it is him in the video? Is his face not identifiable in the video? The purpose of this is just to embarrass and punish him, and I hope to good that is the only purpose and not something far more disgusting.
 
2014-07-09 11:00:14 PM  

buzzcut73: If this prosecutor and police department want dick pics so bad that they're willing to take a kid to a hospital to get them, people should help them out by sending any pictures of erected penises they can find to the sheriff's email.


Brilliant idea! There are plenty of expiring email services. Off to find the department address! And a picture of a penis since I only possess these dainty little lady parts...
 
2014-07-09 11:04:57 PM  

positronica: The article said the 17yo in question is a football player.  I have a sneaking suspicion that the 17yo is a black kid, and the 15yo is a white girl.  That would explain why the police and the prosecutor have such a hard-on for him.


Bingo. I would bet money on it if I could.
 
2014-07-09 11:09:08 PM  
Bet that kid's really enjoying his Male Privilege.
 
2014-07-09 11:13:40 PM  

oh_please: Lamberts Ho Man: Kalashinator: No ITG comments yet? Ok.

If I'm in the 17-year old's shoes, does some Manassas City cop really want to be murdered while attempting to force a minor to have an erection and manufacture child pornography?  And does the prosecutor who pushed for it and the judge who signed the warrant really want to facilitate all that?

/end ITG
//I hate needles THAT much
///almost as much as sexual assault

Want to know where that injection goes? No, you probably don't.

http://www.urologicalcare.com/other-ed-treatments/penile-injection-th e rapy/

Any body want to lay odds on white girl/black guy?

Read upthread. He's a white guy. Quit being a racist asshole.


Meh ... I've spent a lot of time in Virginia. And looks like I'm hardly the only person to have that thought. Glad I was wrong - makes the situation minisculy less asinine.
 
2014-07-09 11:23:22 PM  
http://www.manassascity.org/index.aspx?NID=1085

On mobile so no linky (sorry) but they actually have an "officer directory" where you can send an email to the specific cop...any of the stories happen to mention the name of the investigating officers?
 
2014-07-09 11:30:05 PM  
So, why aren't they forcing HER to get an erection so they can take photos of her genitalia to prove that... wait a second....

On a serious note, something tells me a lot more people would be cracking out the torches and pitchforks if they were suggesting they should photograph a female's genitals for more in-depth comparison. But he has one of those evil penises so it must be all his fault!
 
2014-07-09 11:36:41 PM  
*peruses crystal ball*
I see somebody with good intentions going on vacation in the near future.
 
2014-07-09 11:38:57 PM  

kronicfeld: PhiloeBedoe: If he is sending unsolicited dick pics to anyone, no matter the age of the person he sends them to, he certainly should be in trouble.  He shouldn't be made erect and photographed but there should be other ways of proving whether or not he sent them...

They've already seized the kids' electronic devices. They are really trying to prove it is HIS penis, not just A penis.


Why does it matter whose penis it is?  The girl said "Don't send me dick pics"; he sent dick pics.  Case closed.  Whose dick they were pictures of is totally irrelevant, only whether they were sent from his phone or not.
 
2014-07-09 11:40:49 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: *peruses crystal ball*
I see somebody with good intentions going on vacation in the near future.


Yeah. How dare we use the power of the internet for good, or to stop an injustice.

We should just laugh at this child's sexual assault and make money on click-through advertising from it.

/It's the moral, upstanding thing to do.
 
2014-07-09 11:44:47 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: *peruses crystal ball*
I see somebody with good intentions going on vacation in the near future.


I think hes a coastie.

They're always on vacation.
 
2014-07-09 11:44:48 PM  

UndeadPoetsSociety: kronicfeld: PhiloeBedoe: If he is sending unsolicited dick pics to anyone, no matter the age of the person he sends them to, he certainly should be in trouble.  He shouldn't be made erect and photographed but there should be other ways of proving whether or not he sent them...

They've already seized the kids' electronic devices. They are really trying to prove it is HIS penis, not just A penis.

Why does it matter whose penis it is?  The girl said "Don't send me dick pics"; he sent dick pics.  Case closed.  Whose dick they were pictures of is totally irrelevant, only whether they were sent from his phone or not.


The girl initiated the sexting. He sexted back. This "We told him to stop" is coming out now to make him look like the bad guy when all of this was mutual.
 
2014-07-10 12:06:27 AM  
So, let's see... Virginia allows its cops to abuse underaged suspects, ignore their due process, and manufacture evidence in their favor under the guise of a warranted search.

Yeah, who would have a problem with this?
 
2014-07-10 12:07:58 AM  

doglover: So to "protect" children, we have to spend taxpayer time and money to sexually assault them in hospitals in order to send them to jail?

fark that. There should be the option for a jury to, with a unanimous vote, to send the prosecutor to jail for the "crime" they were trying to prosecute instead.


Apparently - wtf am I reading?  And why am I in total agreement with doglover?

It must be the apocalypse.

I'm probably a sex offender for what I did as a teenager.

But I'm not gonna rape your daughters.....or your sons.

I won't even send them dirty pictures

WTF?  The court wants to make his dick hard and take pictures of it?  This sounds like a very bad gay porn movie plot.
 
2014-07-10 12:11:07 AM  

For people who are new to the thread:

He's a white boy.

The girl's mother reported him.

The girl sent pics first.

The cops just like teenage dick, I guess.


Hopefully, this answers all your questions.
 
2014-07-10 12:11:43 AM  
And I also didn't post anyone's email addresses; just the links to their department pages. If they wanna ban me for it though, fine, whatever. I've been on this site for over a decade and if being disgusted by whatever the hell is going on in this case gets me booted, then I'll live with it. I won't like it, but eh, if that's the price to pay for having a strong opinion against state sanctioned child sexual assault, so be it...
 
2014-07-10 12:17:56 AM  
Va cops are pedos?  I had no idea.
 
2014-07-10 12:20:21 AM  
Who activated the MRA beacon for this thread?
 
2014-07-10 12:21:28 AM  

JerkStore: Ivan the Tolerable:   life as a sexual predator for 'exploiting' his 'child' self by his 'adult' self.

[files.sharenator.com image 850x519]


lol
Where'd that come from?
 
2014-07-10 12:29:10 AM  

UndeadPoetsSociety: Why does it matter whose penis it is? The girl said "Don't send me dick pics"; he sent dick pics. Case closed. Whose dick they were pictures of is totally irrelevant, only whether they were sent from his phone or not.


Whether the penis is his or not is the key to the case; if it's his dick, he's a producer and interstate distributor of of child pornography. Interstate since it used the phone network, which means they could threaten him with federal charges if he won't plead guilty to a state felony. Getting a felony conviction is crucial to make sure prospective employers will be aware of his conviction for the rest of his life, that he won't be allowed to visit countries like Canada, that he effectively won't be able to live in towns that have schools, that he'll have to notify his neighbors of his status, that he'll have to post warning signs at his residence during Halloweens, etc.

There also hasn't been any suggestion of evidence that his girlfriend asked him not to send a dick pic. But either way, that's incidental the main charge, and would only be important if they want to try him for different crimes, or if his girlfriend's family wants to go after his family's property in a civil suit.
 
2014-07-10 12:35:14 AM  
coxrare.files.wordpress.com
 
2014-07-10 12:37:48 AM  

oh_please: Giltric: So if I say Obama should be impeached for whatever XYZ, and someone comes along and says I am only saying that because Obama is black, does that make them the racist?

If anything the farkers suggesting the male involved might be black are almost calling the mother the racist in this scenario.

Maybe you've watered down racist to mean everything but in actuality it makes it mean nothing.

The reason I say this is because a lot of Farkers just want to immediately post that "I bet it's a BLACK MAN, see how it's unfair???", and try to turn it into a racial issue, when it's not, especially when they fail at reading comprehension...there have been at least two links posted before that show he's a white man, but they don't care about actually reading the farking thread, they just want to jump in and show everyone how cool they are.

Maybe you've watered down racist to mean everything but in actuality it makes it mean nothing.

You're right. Get it?


... Or maybe some of us have been to Mizzourah.

It is perfectly justified to assume racism. Heck, I'm still not convinced that the boy isn't black.
 
2014-07-10 12:39:11 AM  

gfid: doglover: So to "protect" children, we have to spend taxpayer time and money to sexually assault them in hospitals in order to send them to jail?

fark that. There should be the option for a jury to, with a unanimous vote, to send the prosecutor to jail for the "crime" they were trying to prosecute instead.

Apparently - wtf am I reading?  And why am I in total agreement with doglover?

It must be the apocalypse.

I'm probably a sex offender for what I did as a teenager.

But I'm not gonna rape your daughters.....or your sons.

I won't even send them dirty pictures

WTF?  The court wants to make his dick hard and take pictures of it?  This sounds like a very bad gay porn movie plot.


Modern pedophile laws are getting to be as silly as witchcraft and jim crow laws.

We're so far down the stupid hole police are actually trying rape kids to create child pornography to prosecute them with.

It's times like these when reactionary vitriol is a welcome balm to a man's ears. Pitchforks and torches all round. This will stop before that whole department and their prosecutors are all in jail where they belong, but we can at least save this one kid from being raped by emailing them, our local congressmen, the papers, and even the president about the outrage in Virginia.
 
2014-07-10 12:42:21 AM  
I had to re-read that headline a couple times, and I still thought it was a joke.

W. T. F.
 
2014-07-10 01:08:27 AM  

nyseattitude: I'd like to know why the police so hell bent on ruining this kids life.


Maybe the boy is dark skinned and the girl isn't?
 
2014-07-10 01:25:56 AM  

Yes this is dog: Who activated the MRA beacon for this thread?


Some people are just really against state sanctioned sexual assault on minors.
 
2014-07-10 02:12:57 AM  

Snausages75: Dear Manassas has an established history of being fascinated with such things. It was where John Wayne Bobbitt had his unfortunate accident. Three years ago, the town got a case of the pearl-clutching vapors because an "adult" store opened in Old Town. They subsequently changed their zoning laws so it could never happen again, which I think is considered spot zoning, which is illegal.

See here:

http://www.tbd.com/blogs/amanda-hess/2011/04/manassas-sex-shop-fight- c uts-across-class-lines-10502.html

Lastly but most disturbing, Bob Marshall is the state delegate for Manassas. Take a stroll through his Wikipedia page to get an idea of what kind of specimen he is.


When I read his wiki, each time I read the word 'election', I heard 'erection.'

Oh and this case is insane.
 
2014-07-10 02:28:58 AM  

Yes this is dog: Who activated the MRA beacon for this thread?


Motorcycle Racing Association?  Magnetic Resonance Angiography?

The only thing that could make this story weirder is a medical exam performed while the patient was on a motorcycle.
 
2014-07-10 02:30:34 AM  

gfid: Yes this is dog: Who activated the MRA beacon for this thread?

Motorcycle Racing Association?  Magnetic Resonance Angiography?

The only thing that could make this story weirder is a medical exam performed while the patient was on a motorcycle.


With a medically induced erection ordered by a court of law.

Does he at least get a happy ending?
 
2014-07-10 02:39:05 AM  

Langdon_777: Snausages75: Dear Manassas has an established history of being fascinated with such things. It was where John Wayne Bobbitt had his unfortunate accident. Three years ago, the town got a case of the pearl-clutching vapors because an "adult" store opened in Old Town. They subsequently changed their zoning laws so it could never happen again, which I think is considered spot zoning, which is illegal.

See here:

http://www.tbd.com/blogs/amanda-hess/2011/04/manassas-sex-shop-fight- c uts-across-class-lines-10502.html

Lastly but most disturbing, Bob Marshall is the state delegate for Manassas. Take a stroll through his Wikipedia page to get an idea of what kind of specimen he is.

When I read his wiki, each time I read the word 'election', I heard 'erection.'

Oh and this case is insane.


That's just because he lives in Man'sass.
 
2014-07-10 02:40:53 AM  

lindalouwho: Let me get this straight - the police and prosecutor want to commit child abuse and manufacture child porn?

Wtf?


Everyone involved in this case should add themselves to the list.

Except the defendent, and defense lawyer. Wasn't thier idea.
 
2014-07-10 02:45:12 AM  
In a normal world, here's how this situation would be handled:

Guy's mother:  "OMG did you send naked pictures to that girl?"

Guy:  "Ummmmm....maybe"

Guy's mother:  "You're grounded for a month and I'm taking your phone while  you're grounded."

I'm pretty sure that's what would have happened if I did that when I was a teen except I probably would have been grounded for 3 months - and have to mow and rake the lawn without pay for 3 months too, but my parents were kind of strict.
 
2014-07-10 02:46:08 AM  
They could at least bring in a fluffer. And after they are done taking his pictures, are they going to send in somebody to help him take care of that boner? If they are using boner juice that thing is going to be erect for a while. I think they have a civic responsibility to help him through it once their needs are satisfied.
 
2014-07-10 03:03:48 AM  

seapig: What the fark did I just read?!

So a 17 year old boy makes a sexytime video and sends it to his (also juvenile) girlfriend and that = producing and possessing child pornography...but the police then want to forcibly give this same kid an erection and photograph his underage penis and that doesn't = child pornography? Or an unwanted sexual assault? Why are they even wasting their time with this? Or trying to go to such extreme lengths to make a case? This is utterly insane and if they wind up actually doing this to this kid, I hope he sues the pants off the department and alerts the FBI to the fact that they are in possession of child pornography on their department computers.


It's not a crime when it's AUTHORITY!!!!!
 
2014-07-10 03:14:08 AM  
Sounds like the Mannasas Police take a wide stance when it comes to child porn.
 
Ral
2014-07-10 03:45:23 AM  
The appropriate way for this to have been handled would be for the girl's father to contact the boy's father, and the boy's father should whip his son's ass and take his phone away.
 
Ral
2014-07-10 03:46:51 AM  
For that matter, why does it matter if the picture is of the kid's dick or not?  If he sent her dick pics, that should be easy to prove.  It doesn't matter whose dick it is.
 
2014-07-10 04:03:03 AM  

cyberspacedout: So, let's see... Virginia allows its cops to abuse underaged suspects, ignore their due process, and manufacture evidence in their favor under the guise of a warranted search.

Yeah, who would have a problem with this?


Oh, and I forgot, also that Miranda rights thing and that pesky 5th amendment. You have a right to remain flaccid.
 
2014-07-10 04:03:32 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: What I find even more troubling here is that teen girl first sexts teen boyfriend, and no charges for her. But when teen boyfriend sexts back, prosecution as an 'adult' for creating 'child porn' by taking a pic of his own dick, with prison terms and life as a sexual predator for 'exploiting' his 'child' self by his 'adult' self.

/so why isn't the girl in prison too?


because shes daddys little angle and wouldn't ever do anything like that!!
 
2014-07-10 04:21:45 AM  
I hope the NAACP catches wind of this and sues the department into the ground.
 
Displayed 50 of 256 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report