Cpl.D: leadmetal:The 97% thing was debunked ages ago. But even if true all it would mean is that 97% of scientists receiving money to study man made climate change believe it exists to continue the lifestyle they've become accustomed to.Sure it was. I appreciate the proof you've offered. And sure, scientists just love the glitsy lifestyles with all the glamor and fast cars and fancy women they get because all scientific grants also come with million dollar per diem giveaways, while those poor oil industry executives who have NO PAST HISTORY WHATSOEVER of doing anything slightly wrong in the interest or protecting their profits in the history of ever have to suffer with the small incomes they all probably make.
libranoelrose: It's getting hot in here.
ongbok: The tornado alarms just went off over here.
RedVentrue: This ^^^^^
MrEricSir: The comment section is that article is just sad. We've completely failed at teaching critical thinking skills in this country.
My text is green, your argument is invalid.
Even the libtards in the Department of Defense are buying into this climate change malarkey.
symbolset: If you warmists weren't a herd of jerks you might win some hearts and minds.
Noam Chimpsky: The hoaxycrats will need to continously fabricate hotter months to keep up the human warming weather hoax . It only appeals to the sub 80 IQ community at this point. Unfortunately, it's the fastest growing demographic in the US right now
SlothB77: 98% of scientists agree, there is man-made global warming when using falsified data.The NOAA has been adjusting past temperatures down and recent temperatures up. They have been manipulating the data. it isn't accurate. It is falsified.Wanna talk about unskewing the statisticals? NOAA is the king of unskewing.
mark12A: Whatever is going on the difference so far is so slight people can sling this argument back and forth. So lets start building nukes, because pumping out all that CO2 indefinitely can't be good, and hold off seizing control of people's lives until we have something absolutely solid to go on. And stop hyping the goddam models. So far they've been useless. None of their predictions are happening. Storms are NOT getting more numerous and intense, and claiming that it will just hurts scientific credibility. A whole bunch of greedy government/socialist types are drooling at the chance to tax our current lifestyle into oblivion.We're not going to turn into Venus, mmm'kay? The CO2 levels in our atmosphere have been far higher in the past, and the earth recovered. No reason why it won't again. IF the science is solid, AGW will be established/verified at some point. Right now it is just too politicized. The non-stop ideological war over this is destroying public trust in science. People will tune it all out, and when something really needs to be done, the people will ignore it.
kvinesknows: anyone dare me to fark my wife in this humidity tonight?
austin_millbarge: SlothB77: The NOAA has been adjusting past temperatures down and recent temperatures up.Did you read the article? They said 1936 was reinstated as the warmest year, not because 2012 numbers were moved down, but because 1936 numbers were moved up.So tell me how this changes anything?
Mikey1969: Wait, is the scandal that they listed 2012 as the "hottest", that they fixed the error, or that they "quietly" made 1936 the "hottest" again? I don't quite follow these scandals.
jim32rr: thefonz37: Time to sell the Prius and go buy a big gas guzzling v8 I guess? Seems legit.They make V-12's you know
thefonz37: Time to sell the Prius and go buy a big gas guzzling v8 I guess? Seems legit.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jul 26 2017 17:00:54
Runtime: 0.931 sec (931 ms)