If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Uproxx)   Nathan Fillion's cameo in Guardians of the Galaxy may be even better than the original rumors   (uproxx.com) divider line 94
    More: Cool, Guardians of the Galaxy, Nathan Fillion, universe  
•       •       •

6173 clicks; posted to Geek » on 25 Jun 2014 at 3:15 PM (5 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



94 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-06-25 12:19:43 PM
Nathan Fillion playing a dog, huh...

i.ebayimg.com

I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you
 
2014-06-25 12:59:12 PM
Naw, I want Fillion as the pre-wife beating Ant Man
 
2014-06-25 01:21:33 PM
That sounds more like fanwank than actual information.

NuttierThanEver: Naw, I want Fillion as the pre-wife beating Ant Man


Too late.  That's Michael Douglas.
 
2014-06-25 01:25:48 PM
As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.
 
2014-06-25 01:30:44 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.


[notsureifserious.jpg]

What makes you think it needs saving? I'm going opening night.
 
2014-06-25 01:40:54 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.



So you've seen the final cut already?

No, no you haven't.
 
2014-06-25 01:44:42 PM

scottydoesntknow: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

[notsureifserious.jpg]

What makes you think it needs saving? I'm going opening night.


1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.
2. The commercials look ridiculous and don't make the movie seem exciting or interesting.
3. It is trying to ride both the character movie and action movie lines, but with 5 characters so the movie will be stretched thin if it tries to do a good job on both.
4. The CGI looks pathetic.
5. The raccoon's lip synching is the worst I've seen in any recent movie. Maybe the scenes with Presidents in Forrest Gump might be worse.
6. Oh god, another comic book movie?

So anyway, tell us how it was on opening night.

My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.
 
2014-06-25 01:49:01 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: scottydoesntknow: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

[notsureifserious.jpg]

What makes you think it needs saving? I'm going opening night.

1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.
2. The commercials look ridiculous and don't make the movie seem exciting or interesting.
3. It is trying to ride both the character movie and action movie lines, but with 5 characters so the movie will be stretched thin if it tries to do a good job on both.
4. The CGI looks pathetic.
5. The raccoon's lip synching is the worst I've seen in any recent movie. Maybe the scenes with Presidents in Forrest Gump might be worse.
6. Oh god, another comic book movie?

So anyway, tell us how it was on opening night.

My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.


If any other studio was behind it, I might agree with you.

But if any studio can pull it off, it's Marvel.
 
2014-06-25 01:59:52 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: The raccoon's lip synching is the worst I've seen in any recent movie.


So you've seen the final cut already?

No, you haven't.
 
2014-06-25 02:09:25 PM

kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: The raccoon's lip synching is the worst I've seen in any recent movie.

So you've seen the final cut already?

No, you haven't.


You're right! They could just be putting shiatty dubbing into the trailers and commercials because that will make the audience more anxious to see the good dubbing in the actual movie.
 
2014-06-25 02:14:25 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.


They cast Heath Ledger as THE JOKER??? THE F*CKING JOKER??? Tell me you're kidding! They did not just cast that asshole from 10 Things I Hate About You as the JOKER! This movie is going to suck! I'm going to host a 1989 Batman viewing party on opening night of this sh*tfest so that people can see what a REAL actor playing the Joker is like!
 
2014-06-25 02:16:38 PM

Shostie: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

They cast Heath Ledger as THE JOKER??? THE F*CKING JOKER??? Tell me you're kidding! They did not just cast that asshole from 10 Things I Hate About You as the JOKER! This movie is going to suck! I'm going to host a 1989 Batman viewing party on opening night of this sh*tfest so that people can see what a REAL actor playing the Joker is like!


Michael Keaton? From Gung f*cking Ho? What, is Batman fighting the Japs?
 
2014-06-25 02:20:42 PM

Shostie: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

They cast Heath Ledger as THE JOKER??? THE F*CKING JOKER??? Tell me you're kidding! They did not just cast that asshole from 10 Things I Hate About You as the JOKER! This movie is going to suck! I'm going to host a 1989 Batman viewing party on opening night of this sh*tfest so that people can see what a REAL actor playing the Joker is like!


I think casting an actor that will ruin a movie is different from casting an actor to save a movie are completely different things. In the first case, the movie would supposably be fine without that actor. In the latter, the movie is already in trouble and bringing in the actor is a desperate move to save it.

Now, if you had said "OMG THEY CAST HARRISON FORD IN THAT STUPID SPACE WAR MOVIE?? I GUESS HE'S GIVEN UP ON HIS ACTING CAREER. TOTAL. CAREER. SUICIDE." that might have actually addressed my Boobies.

Address my Boobies, Shostie. They like to be called Ham and Shem.
 
2014-06-25 02:21:06 PM
South Park did it.

img.fark.net
 
2014-06-25 02:24:42 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: Shostie: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

They cast Heath Ledger as THE JOKER??? THE F*CKING JOKER??? Tell me you're kidding! They did not just cast that asshole from 10 Things I Hate About You as the JOKER! This movie is going to suck! I'm going to host a 1989 Batman viewing party on opening night of this sh*tfest so that people can see what a REAL actor playing the Joker is like!

I think casting an actor that will ruin a movie is different from casting an actor to save a movie are completely different things. In the first case, the movie would supposably be fine without that actor. In the latter, the movie is already in trouble and bringing in the actor is a desperate move to save it.

Now, if you had said "OMG THEY CAST HARRISON FORD IN THAT STUPID SPACE WAR MOVIE?? I GUESS HE'S GIVEN UP ON HIS ACTING CAREER. TOTAL. CAREER. SUICIDE." that might have actually addressed my Boobies.

Address my Boobies, Shostie. They like to be called Ham and Shem.


The overall point I'm getting at is prejudging a movie.

I think it looks pretty damn fun, but I've become a big fan of the MCU. I've seen almost all of them in the theater.

But, you know, if you're not into it, you're not into it. That's cool.
 
2014-06-25 02:27:14 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie


Who's been cast to save what now?
 
2014-06-25 02:29:10 PM

kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?


Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?
 
2014-06-25 02:34:44 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?


I had neglected before to openly deride the utterly absurd notion that a Nathan Fillion cameo is intended by anyone involved in any way with the production of this movie to be a move "to save [the] movie." You'd have to be completely disconnected from reality to draw that conclusion from the article.
 
2014-06-25 02:35:41 PM

kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?

I had neglected before to openly deride the utterly absurd notion that a Nathan Fillion cameo is intended by anyone involved in any way with the production of this movie to be a move "to save [the] movie." You'd have to be completely disconnected from reality to draw that conclusion from the article.


So you think this movie will be good? Why? Have you seen the final cut?
 
2014-06-25 02:36:05 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?


He's probably being facetious.
You don't cast Nathan Fillion to "save" a movie.  Because nobody outside of the geek world knows who the f*ck Nathan Fillion is.  If they were going to do sudden stunt casting a month before a film's release to get more asses in the seats, they'd put in a shirtless Channing Tatum (or a shirtless Christina Hendricks).
 
2014-06-25 02:37:19 PM

Rev. Skarekroe: a shirtless Christina Hendricks


I'd watch that.

At home.
 
2014-06-25 02:40:36 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?

I had neglected before to openly deride the utterly absurd notion that a Nathan Fillion cameo is intended by anyone involved in any way with the production of this movie to be a move "to save [the] movie." You'd have to be completely disconnected from reality to draw that conclusion from the article.

So you think this movie will be good? Why? Have you seen the final cut?


No, even stipulating that the movie stinks on ice, how the hell is a Nathan Fillion voice over cameo intended to "save it"? Your presumption has absolutely no connection to reality. It's not as though this story is about reshooting, recasting, delaying the opening, additional post-production, changing the ending, or any of the other things we see late in the post-production designed to "save" flawed movies. It's a goddamn teaser for a trivial voice over. You're just inventing shiat out of thin air.
 
2014-06-25 02:47:30 PM

kronicfeld: No, even stipulating that the movie stinks on ice, how the hell is a Nathan Fillion voice over cameo intended to "save it"? Your presumption has absolutely no connection to reality. It's not as though this story is about reshooting, recasting, delaying the opening, additional post-production, changing the ending, or any of the other things we see late in the post-production designed to "save" flawed movies. It's a goddamn teaser for a trivial voice over. You're just inventing shiat out of thin air.


Also, it's Nathan Fillion.
It's not like someone was on the fence going "Wow, that Guardians of the Galaxy movie looks awful.  Wait - what's that you say?  Nathan Fillion will be in it for 10 seconds!  Well sh*t the bed, I'm going now!"
 
2014-06-25 03:18:34 PM
The most obvious cameo is that he shows up looking suspiciously like a roguish pilot of a Firefly class starship.
 
2014-06-25 03:19:50 PM

kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?

I had neglected before to openly deride the utterly absurd notion that a Nathan Fillion cameo is intended by anyone involved in any way with the production of this movie to be a move "to save [the] movie." You'd have to be completely disconnected from reality to draw that conclusion from the article.


If anything, I think the "casting save" was Cooper as RR.

I know dick-all about Guardians, but Trailer #1 (where Rocket adjusts his bulge) combined with everyone telling me how much of a goofball universe it is, makes me want to see it all the more. Even before I knew Nathan Fillion would be appearing in a cameo as Captain Hammer.

// wait, he's not?
// BURN ALL THE THEATERS
 
2014-06-25 03:22:28 PM
The first official preview is one of my favorite previews of all time. I was already pretty on board and that preview alone put me in "Shut up and take my money" territory.

Not clicking the article because I want to be as spoiler free as possible, but you had me at Nathan Fillion. Now I'm up to "Shut the fark up and take my farking money."

Seriously, my money is yours to lose. There's a seat at the Alamo Drafthouse that's already got my name on it.
 
2014-06-25 03:22:51 PM

Dr Dreidel: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?

I had neglected before to openly deride the utterly absurd notion that a Nathan Fillion cameo is intended by anyone involved in any way with the production of this movie to be a move "to save [the] movie." You'd have to be completely disconnected from reality to draw that conclusion from the article.

If anything, I think the "casting save" was Cooper as RR.

I know dick-all about Guardians, but Trailer #1 (where Rocket adjusts his bulge) combined with everyone telling me how much of a goofball universe it is, makes me want to see it all the more. Even before I knew Nathan Fillion would be appearing in a cameo as Captain Hammer Mal Reynolds.

// wait, he's not?
// BURN ALL THE THEATERS



FTFY ;)
 
2014-06-25 03:24:17 PM

soporific: The first official preview is one of my favorite previews of all time. I was already pretty on board and that preview alone put me in "Shut up and take my money" territory.

Not clicking the article because I want to be as spoiler free as possible, but you had me at Nathan Fillion. Now I'm up to "Shut the fark up and take my farking money."

Seriously, my money is yours to lose. There's a seat at the Alamo Drafthouse that's already got my name on it.



And that is the ONLY way to watch a movie. That place has me spoiled.
 
2014-06-25 03:27:48 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: ...

My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.


And if you're wrong?


/hooray for Nathan Fillion!
//main reason I started to watch Castle...
///now enjoy Castle just as much as any other TV show I watch currently
 
2014-06-25 03:29:25 PM

Shostie: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

They cast Heath Ledger as THE JOKER??? THE F*CKING JOKER??? Tell me you're kidding! They did not just cast that asshole from 10 Things I Hate About You as the JOKER! This movie is going to suck! I'm going to host a 1989 Batman viewing party on opening night of this sh*tfest so that people can see what a REAL actor playing the Joker is like!


This was pretty much exactly what I said when I first heard about the casting.

Ever since that movie came out, it's forced me to stop thinking that and, ya know, watching a movie with no preconceived notions about it and just enjoy it for what it is.

That said, the trailers were what interested me in the movie in the first place, so we'll see.
 
2014-06-25 03:32:41 PM
In my head, I keep hearing Cosmo with the voice of Adelai Niska.

/"Do you know the writings of Shan Yu?"
 
2014-06-25 03:33:09 PM
This movie looks ridiculous and absurd, but in a well put together kind of way. The premise is bugfark crazy, but that can make a pretty awesome story sometimes.
 
2014-06-25 03:33:52 PM

smd31: AverageAmericanGuy: ...

My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.

And if you're wrong?


No skin off my back.
 
2014-06-25 03:35:07 PM
I was a fan of the other Marvel-verse films and knew NOTHING about this. I was sold on the idea of a wacky space action-adventure from the very first trailer.  Every one I've seen since then seems to indicate it's less wacky and more action-adventure and I'm FINE with that.  As long as it has some humor moments (Puny god and "I got that reference!") I'm good.
 
2014-06-25 03:42:39 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: kronicfeld: AverageAmericanGuy: casting an actor to save a movie

Who's been cast to save what now?

Do you need someone to come pick you up, old man? Are you lost? 16 comments too long to remember what the entire thread is about?

I had neglected before to openly deride the utterly absurd notion that a Nathan Fillion cameo is intended by anyone involved in any way with the production of this movie to be a move "to save [the] movie." You'd have to be completely disconnected from reality to draw that conclusion from the article.

So you think this movie will be good? Why? Have you seen the final cut?


Here's my take on the movie: don't care.  Not interested.  Even if it is stupidly successful, I will probably only watch it if I'm at home with the flu and really very bored.  If I wanted a movie that had perfectly spaced one-liners,  and a lot of things blowing up, and will be something I forget most of after the first few hours, well, I can choose almost any "blockbuster" from this summer or last.

But to say it's not going to do well is a pointless argument.  It probably will, because it does have a lot of explosions and people dropping one-liners.  It's a perfect film in that regard.
 
2014-06-25 03:44:36 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: No skin off my back.


If this movie starts breaking records, can we quote you? We will be pointing and laughing at you, but can we quote you?
 
2014-06-25 03:49:24 PM

mr lawson: AverageAmericanGuy: No skin off my back.

If this movie starts breaking records, can we quote you? We will be pointing and laughing at you, but can we quote you?


If it means that much to you. Does it? Maybe you ought to ask yourself why you're so emotionally invested in white knighting this movie. That's just weird.
 
2014-06-25 03:59:39 PM

scottydoesntknow: AverageAmericanGuy: scottydoesntknow: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

[notsureifserious.jpg]

What makes you think it needs saving? I'm going opening night.

1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.
2. The commercials look ridiculous and don't make the movie seem exciting or interesting.
3. It is trying to ride both the character movie and action movie lines, but with 5 characters so the movie will be stretched thin if it tries to do a good job on both.
4. The CGI looks pathetic.
5. The raccoon's lip synching is the worst I've seen in any recent movie. Maybe the scenes with Presidents in Forrest Gump might be worse.
6. Oh god, another comic book movie?

So anyway, tell us how it was on opening night.

My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.

If any other studio was behind it, I might agree with you.

But if any studio can pull it off, it's Marvel.


Yeah, I agree here.  There's a significant risk that this movie will ultimately be terrible, but it looks like it'll be a hoot, and Marvel has a pretty decent track record of making entertaining movies.
 
2014-06-25 04:00:46 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: 1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.
2. The commercials look ridiculous and don't make the movie seem exciting or interesting.


I've never heard of GotG until the previews of this movie started showing up, and I plan on seeing it in the theater. It looks awesome. It looks like it will have a lot of action, and some good one-liners. I don't understand what part of this looks boring.

AverageAmericanGuy: The CGI looks pathetic.


Trailer CGI isn't the same as finished movie CGI. Even then, what CGI looks pathetic? I think it looks good.
 
2014-06-25 04:00:57 PM

whosits_112: soporific: The first official preview is one of my favorite previews of all time. I was already pretty on board and that preview alone put me in "Shut up and take my money" territory.

Not clicking the article because I want to be as spoiler free as possible, but you had me at Nathan Fillion. Now I'm up to "Shut the fark up and take my farking money."

Seriously, my money is yours to lose. There's a seat at the Alamo Drafthouse that's already got my name on it.


And that is the ONLY way to watch a movie. That place has me spoiled.


Never again, it took them over an hour to cook and serve a pair of burgers and a pizza for three people. Competent and snarky is fine, a lot of places have that as their schtick. Snarky and incompetent just makes me stabby.
 
2014-06-25 04:02:10 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: scottydoesntknow: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

[notsureifserious.jpg]

What makes you think it needs saving? I'm going opening night.

1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.
2. The commercials look ridiculous and don't make the movie seem exciting or interesting.
3. It is trying to ride both the character movie and action movie lines, but with 5 characters so the movie will be stretched thin if it tries to do a good job on both.
4. The CGI looks pathetic.
5. The raccoon's lip synching is the worst I've seen in any recent movie. Maybe the scenes with Presidents in Forrest Gump might be worse.
6. Oh god, another comic book movie?

So anyway, tell us how it was on opening night.

My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.


Avengers is going to suck
1) Iron Man 2 was terrible, and Thor, Hulk, and Captain America were all mediocre.  Let's mash them all together.
2) They're fighting some random aliens.  There's no story there.
3) Who cares about Hawkeye or Black Widow.  They're stupid characters.
4) The CGI's a joke
5) Joss Whedon's only success was Buffy and that was for a very niche audience.  He has no idea how to appeal to mainstream audiences.

In short, this whole experiment into Marvel movies will undoubtedly come crashing down once Avengers tanks at the box office.
 
2014-06-25 04:03:54 PM
movies.cosmicbooknews.com
 
2014-06-25 04:12:40 PM

Hoarseman: whosits_112: soporific: The first official preview is one of my favorite previews of all time. I was already pretty on board and that preview alone put me in "Shut up and take my money" territory.

Not clicking the article because I want to be as spoiler free as possible, but you had me at Nathan Fillion. Now I'm up to "Shut the fark up and take my farking money."

Seriously, my money is yours to lose. There's a seat at the Alamo Drafthouse that's already got my name on it.


And that is the ONLY way to watch a movie. That place has me spoiled.

Never again, it took them over an hour to cook and serve a pair of burgers and a pizza for three people. Competent and snarky is fine, a lot of places have that as their schtick. Snarky and incompetent just makes me stabby.


Interesting. Which one did you go to? The ones I frequented were very well staffed.
 
2014-06-25 04:13:21 PM

Shostie: AverageAmericanGuy: As charismatic as Fillion is, nothing is going to be able to save this movie.

They cast Heath Ledger as THE JOKER??? THE F*CKING JOKER??? Tell me you're kidding! They did not just cast that asshole from 10 Things I Hate About You as the JOKER! This movie is going to suck! I'm going to host a 1989 Batman viewing party on opening night of this sh*tfest so that people can see what a REAL actor playing the Joker is like!


Most would have gone with the obvious Brokeback Mountain, but 10 Things is a nice pull.
 
2014-06-25 04:14:33 PM

mr lawson: If this movie starts breaking records, can we quote you? We will be pointing and laughing at you, but can we quote you?


So breaking records would mean doing better than The Avengers. Do you honestly think this movie will bring more box office than The Avengers?
 
2014-06-25 04:26:36 PM
My prediction: Huge opening weekend as the comic book fans all rush to prove their hipster cred, but with a quick flat lining at the box office in the weeks following.

I don't know a single person that goes to movies to prove their hipster cred.  that is an odd prediction to make.
 
2014-06-25 04:27:48 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: 1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.


yeah, because the first Hellboy movie sure as shiat sucked.
 
2014-06-25 04:30:00 PM

whizbangthedirtfarmer: Here's my take on the movie: don't care.  Not interested.  Even if it is stupidly successful, I will probably only watch it if I'm at home with the flu and really very bored.  If I wanted a movie that had perfectly spaced one-liners,  and a lot of things blowing up, and will be something I forget most of after the first few hours, well, I can choose almost any "blockbuster" from this summer or last.

But to say it's not going to do well is a pointless argument.  It probably will, because it does have a lot of explosions and people dropping one-liners.  It's a perfect film in that regard.


Oh, my..

The "Dis-Interested, Uncaring, Yet Oddly Very Supportive, Crested Film Critic"..  I cannot honestly say I have ever seen such  a creature afore..

/..truly, no insult or disparagement intended..  I really don't think I've ever seen anyone take such an "I could care less..whatever..but it will still be great.." stance..  =)
 
2014-06-25 04:38:33 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: If it means that much to you. Does it? Maybe you ought to ask yourself why you're so emotionally invested in white knighting this movie. That's just weird.


Possibly because some of us have been waiting for this movie since 19-freakin'-76 when he was introduced as a new character in an issue of  Marvel Preview..?

I consider myself rather well adjusted to society's 'norms' and such..but don't mess with my comic books..  =)

I'm willing to bet you've an interest or two that *I'd* look at and think.."Gee, that's just dumb.."   Different strokes, and all that..
 
2014-06-25 04:43:55 PM

ManateeGag: AverageAmericanGuy: 1. It's an unknown comic book, so there's not a lot of built-in fanbase.

yeah, because the first Hellboy movie sure as shiat sucked.


http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=hellboy.htm

Initial bump and then flat line. Yep.
 
Displayed 50 of 94 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report