Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Citizen)   Always drive in the right lane except to pass. The left lane is for gunfights   (thecitizen.com) divider line 85
    More: Misc, Hwy, Fayette County  
•       •       •

3086 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Jun 2014 at 11:44 PM (45 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



85 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-06-12 10:30:25 PM  
Should have been following the flowchart:

www.majhost.com

Though I didn't think of putting an option in here for "is the other driver firing a gun?"... maybe next time.
 
2014-06-12 10:39:04 PM  
Listen Betty, don't start up with your left lane sh*t again.
 
2014-06-12 11:48:35 PM  
img.fark.net
 
2014-06-12 11:50:23 PM  
FTA: Babb said there are no known witnesses or suspects at this time.

FTA: She then observed a late 1990's model green Toyota Camry speed past her in the right lane. The vehicle then pulled in front of her. She then observed a gold Jaguar behind her in the right lane. She observed several muzzle flashes coming from the Jaguar, said Babb.

Great reporting. Would read again.
 
2014-06-12 11:52:27 PM  

timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]


Quit it.  You're going to confuse the Americans.
 
2014-06-12 11:52:52 PM  
I always wondered about how the US wound up with left hand drive. You can't drive and shoot worth a damn, you need someone riding shotgun.
 
2014-06-12 11:54:38 PM  
The right lane is the best place to be at 3 in the morning when the drunks are using the exit ramps as entrance ramps.  Because they know they've been drinking they're always good about staying to the right and they rarely need to pass someone when driving the wrong farking way.
 
2014-06-12 11:57:20 PM  

Mr. Eugenides: The right lane is the best place to be at 3 in the morning when the drunks are using the exit ramps as entrance ramps.  Because they know they've been drinking they're always good about staying to the right and they rarely need to pass someone when driving the wrong farking way.


Lol
 
2014-06-12 11:58:13 PM  
Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.
 
2014-06-13 12:00:21 AM  
Yessum; it is!
 
2014-06-13 12:00:52 AM  
The free market will sort this out.
 
2014-06-13 12:00:58 AM  
is it just me, or is a gold jaguar in fayette county georgia going to be a fairly easy thing for the cops to track down?
the camry i get as pretty common, but how many british luxury cars are really tooling around that particular part of redneckia?
 
2014-06-13 12:02:04 AM  

Mr. Eugenides: The right lane is the best place to be at 3 in the morning when the drunks are using the exit ramps as entrance ramps.  Because they know they've been drinking they're always good about staying to the right and they rarely need to pass someone when driving the wrong farking way.


One of the roads on my morning commute goes from bi-directional to one way as it gets towards downtown.  There's a neighborhood that exits into it shortly after it turns one way, and on average every couple weeks there's somebody who turns the wrong way onto it and starts driving against traffic.

It gave me a fair share of 'holy shiat' moments at first, but now that I know to anticipate it it's amusing to watch how the drivers who suddenly see themselves driving towards oncoming traffic react.
 
2014-06-13 12:02:34 AM  
"If we outlaw vehicle-mounted weapons, only criminals will have guns."

-- Henry Colt Winchester Ford
 
2014-06-13 12:04:56 AM  

JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.


and other people speeding doesn't give you the right to kill people by riding in the left lane blocking them.
in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right. it saves lives, and riding the left lane here blocking speeders will get you pulled over much faster, and get a much larger fine, than speeding.
/as it should, as its much more dangerous
 
2014-06-13 12:08:19 AM  
I didn't see it in the article, but I hope the cops wrote her up a ticket.  Not only was she breaking the law by driving in the left lane, but it creates a very dangerous situation for people driving there correctly by executing an attempt to pass.
 
2014-06-13 12:13:09 AM  

JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.


Look, if you're in the left lane and not going at least 40 miles an hour over the speed limit, it's your own fault if you get run over.
 
2014-06-13 12:14:08 AM  
I had the lasagna.
 
2014-06-13 12:14:24 AM  
The right lane is for driving, except passing. There are no gunfights in the right lane.

The left lane is for driving, except passing. There are no gunfights in the left lane.

The left lane is for gunfights only. There are no gunfights in the right lane.

No, the right lane is for gunfights. There is no passing in the left lane.

The right lane has always been for gunfights. There's never gunfights in the left lane.

Don't tell me which lane is for passing and which lane is for gunfights!

Listen, Betty, don't start up with your gunfight shiat again, There's just no gunfights in the right lane.

Oh really, Vernon? Why pretend? We both know perfectly well what this is about. You want me to shoot at a Toyota Camry .

It's really the only sensible thing to do, if it's done safely. Therapeutically, from a gold Jaguar, Sheriff Barry Babb says there's no danger involved.
 
2014-06-13 12:15:48 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: is it just me, or is a gold jaguar in fayette county georgia going to be a fairly easy thing for the cops to track down?
the camry i get as pretty common, but how many british luxury cars are really tooling around that particular part of redneckia?


They have a really good hiding spot.

www.natgeocreative.com
 
2014-06-13 12:21:05 AM  
Up here (Alberta) it's legal to pass on the right - the only requirement is that you're using a real lane and not the shoulder. It's goddamn hilarious how many people think it's illegal and start to road rage at you while they're doing 5k over the posted limit in the left lane of a major highway.
 
2014-06-13 12:25:30 AM  
So you're saying these aren't the decaying ruins of New York in the year 4000?
 
2014-06-13 12:25:56 AM  

ADHD Librarian: The right lane is for driving, except passing. There are no gunfights in the right lane.

The left lane is for driving, except passing. There are no gunfights in the left lane.

The left lane is for gunfights only. There are no gunfights in the right lane.

No, the right lane is for gunfights. There is no passing in the left lane.

The right lane has always been for gunfights. There's never gunfights in the left lane.

Don't tell me which lane is for passing and which lane is for gunfights!

Listen, Betty, don't start up with your gunfight shiat again, There's just no gunfights in the right lane.

Oh really, Vernon? Why pretend? We both know perfectly well what this is about. You want me to shoot at a Toyota Camry .

It's really the only sensible thing to do, if it's done safely. Therapeutically, from a gold Jaguar, Sheriff Barry Babb says there's no danger involved.


marks.dk
 
2014-06-13 12:25:56 AM  

Tourney3p0: timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]

Quit it.  You're going to confuse the Americans.


Prolly not as much as the Brits.
 
2014-06-13 12:26:18 AM  
I like that they make sure to specify "woman driver."
 
2014-06-13 12:27:12 AM  
Oh, FFS, another thread where people assume every state has the same traffic laws. fark you guys!
 
2014-06-13 12:38:18 AM  

timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]



fark that chart, I do 98% of my freeway driving in the city. When there's merging traffic on the right every mile or two, staying in the right lane is kind of dumb.

And during morning and afternoon drive times there's no such thing as a "passing lane".
 
2014-06-13 12:40:31 AM  

chitownmike: Oh, FFS, another thread where people assume every state has the same traffic laws. fark you guys!


georgia does. so so all sane states. only five states remain that -don't- have laws making it illegal to ride the left lane.
in fact, georgia has one of the harshest laws; NOT moving over for faster traffic is a not merely a simple moving violation, its a full-blown misdemeanor with up to one year in jail.

/ever since studies have shown traffic deaths linked more to left-lane bandits than to maximum speed, states have gotten on the ball to stop this idiotic behavior.
 
2014-06-13 12:41:38 AM  

JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.


I just want to let you know that your blinker has been on for the last five miles and you've been doing 45 in a 65
 
2014-06-13 12:54:31 AM  
Dear, yippie ki yay, dipsh*t, asshat tough guys.

We're all moved in now.  We have electricity and plumbing and individually wrapped cheese.

We don't need any dope kingpins, dime store gangstahs, redneck buffoons, sh*tbag thugs or other ne'er do wells playing GTA on the highways.  They are full of people with jobs, lives, things to do and families and people who would miss them and as such, shouldn't have to put up with your wannabe cowboy shenanigans.  You have most of the world's accumulated knowledge at your fingertips, TeeVee shows, radio, several hobbies, food is laying around practically free and if you take your head out of your ass, maybe you'll meet a nice gal to hang out with before you accidentally install a zipper in her chest with your badass semi-automatic dick extension.

Stop sh*tting where other people eat.  Thanks.
 
2014-06-13 12:59:47 AM  
rishikajain.com
 
2014-06-13 01:01:18 AM  

JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.


I give you 7/10.
You'll catch a few because you chose such a topic many are passionate about.

-----
What drives ME nuts is if you're ever on six-lane highways (3-3) and driving just under speed trap speed, and a slow car in the middle lane jumps in front of you to pass an even slower car....when the right lane is free.

*cries*

/sorry. It's just nerves.
 
2014-06-13 01:06:48 AM  
The left zone is for unloading only. There is no unloading in the right zone.
 
2014-06-13 01:08:01 AM  

JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.


Here in Utah it does...

Kinda. Around here, if you are in the left lane and someone comes up behind you, you have to get over ASAP, regardless of how fast you're going. Doing 85 in a 65 and a car comes up behind you doing at least 100? You can get a ticket if you don't move. And it's up to the cop who he wants to pull over. He could let the other person skate with reckless driving if he decided to bag you instead...

Crazy...

I think the lady's story is bullshiat though, she embellished one detail a little too well... I don't think a Toyota Camry has sped past ANYTHING, let alone another car.
 
2014-06-13 01:09:25 AM  
i.dtinews.vn
 
2014-06-13 01:18:10 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.


Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.
 
2014-06-13 01:19:34 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Oh, FFS, another thread where people assume every state has the same traffic laws. fark you guys!

georgia does. so so all sane states. only five states remain that -don't- have laws making it illegal to ride the left lane.
in fact, georgia has one of the harshest laws; NOT moving over for faster traffic is a not merely a simple moving violation, its a full-blown misdemeanor with up to one year in jail.

/ever since studies have shown traffic deaths linked more to left-lane bandits than to maximum speed, states have gotten on the ball to stop this idiotic behavior.


Citations, please.

My non-cited assertion is highway deaths are caused by by asshats exceeding the speed limit, driving faster than traffic, distracted by whatever, or just assholes with a lead foot death wish. Not the car doing the posted limit in the left lane.
 
2014-06-13 01:22:54 AM  
Gold Jaguar? That leaves only two choices.

James Bond villain or drug dealer.

Occams razor says drug dealer.


Maybe the gold Jag was driving around without lights on and the green Camry flashed their lights at the Jag and unknowingly became the gold Jags initiation murder to get into a gang.
 
2014-06-13 01:23:57 AM  

doofusgumby: Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Oh, FFS, another thread where people assume every state has the same traffic laws. fark you guys!

georgia does. so so all sane states. only five states remain that -don't- have laws making it illegal to ride the left lane.
in fact, georgia has one of the harshest laws; NOT moving over for faster traffic is a not merely a simple moving violation, its a full-blown misdemeanor with up to one year in jail.

/ever since studies have shown traffic deaths linked more to left-lane bandits than to maximum speed, states have gotten on the ball to stop this idiotic behavior.

Citations, please.

My non-cited assertion is highway deaths are caused by by asshats exceeding the speed limit, driving faster than traffic, distracted by whatever, or just assholes with a lead foot death wish. Not the car doing the posted limit in the left lane.


...except where it's posted that the left lane is for passing only. But the last time I read about one of those areas it was in the context of probable cause for civil forfeiture in Buttf*ck Texas.
 
2014-06-13 01:27:17 AM  
this thread is going to be insanely full of people talking past each other in order to be technically correct.
 
2014-06-13 01:28:08 AM  
 
2014-06-13 01:28:15 AM  

cryinoutloud: JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.

Look, if you're in the left lane and not going at least 40 miles an hour over the speed limit, it's your own fault if you get run over.


What if the person doing 40 miles per hour over the speed limit is being herded by someone going 40 miles faster than them? And that person is being approached by someone going 40 miles faster than them? So, at which point is anyone actually required to follow the damn speed limit? Or should we always keep the left lane clear just in case someone wants to take the Enterprise for a quick trip down the 405 at warp 9? Otherwise, why post the damn signs in the first place? Who do they apply to?

/assuming the 405 was ever clear...
//stays the hell out of the left lane.
 
2014-06-13 01:28:20 AM  
Oh good, the racists are here too.  it's a farking party.
 
2014-06-13 01:31:16 AM  
Oh jeez the posters who cant get names right in trucker tea party protest threads are here.
 
2014-06-13 01:35:42 AM  

ThatBillmanGuy: cryinoutloud: JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.

Look, if you're in the left lane and not going at least 40 miles an hour over the speed limit, it's your own fault if you get run over.

What if the person doing 40 miles per hour over the speed limit is being herded by someone going 40 miles faster than them? And that person is being approached by someone going 40 miles faster than them? So, at which point is anyone actually required to follow the damn speed limit? Or should we always keep the left lane clear just in case someone wants to take the Enterprise for a quick trip down the 405 at warp 9? Otherwise, why post the damn signs in the first place? Who do they apply to?

/assuming the 405 was ever clear...
//stays the hell out of the left lane.


The first two cars are required to pull over.

If you're not a cop in a marked cruiser looking for speeders mind your own business.
 
2014-06-13 01:37:48 AM  

JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.


well, since the article is from georgia, i'll start with georgia. where it just got elevated from a moving violation to a full-blown misdemeanor for -not- moving over.
if you want to complete that list, there are at least 44-45 more states with similar laws; you move over. REGARDLESS of speed limit.
/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed.
//sorry, but you are just fundamentally, profoundly wrong on this one. i love to debate different perspectives, but here there really isn't any basis for challenging that. its pretty basic. learn and move on.
 
2014-06-13 01:49:52 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

well, since the article is from georgia, i'll start with georgia. where it just got elevated from a moving violation to a full-blown misdemeanor for -not- moving over.
if you want to complete that list, there are at least 44-45 more states with similar laws; you move over. REGARDLESS of speed limit.
/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed.
//sorry, but you are just fundamentally, profoundly wrong on this one. i love to debate different perspectives, but here there really isn't any basis for challenging that. its pretty basic. learn and move on.


maximum speed limit applies to all lanes, why is that hard to understand
 
2014-06-13 01:50:27 AM  

doofusgumby: Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Oh, FFS, another thread where people assume every state has the same traffic laws. fark you guys!

georgia does. so so all sane states. only five states remain that -don't- have laws making it illegal to ride the left lane.
in fact, georgia has one of the harshest laws; NOT moving over for faster traffic is a not merely a simple moving violation, its a full-blown misdemeanor with up to one year in jail.

/ever since studies have shown traffic deaths linked more to left-lane bandits than to maximum speed, states have gotten on the ball to stop this idiotic behavior.

Citations, please.

My non-cited assertion is highway deaths are caused by by asshats exceeding the speed limit, driving faster than traffic, distracted by whatever, or just assholes with a lead foot death wish. Not the car doing the posted limit in the left lane.


The reason so many states started changing laws dealing with left lane passing does have directly to do with traffic fatalities. Absolute traffic speed was far less of a factor than the overall delta of speed when looking into traffic accidents and deaths. in other words, a highway with traffic doing random speeds of anywhere between 50 and 75 had far more deaths than one where everyone was driving, say 85 mph.
Differing speeds and passing in all lanes kills. Overall high average speeds don't, if traffic flow (and as a second order effect following distance), is maintained.
/in other words, you want to hang in the left lane 'enforcing' some speed limit, you are more dangerous than any speeder. you aren't 'helping' the cops, and around here they will arrest you if you do it.
 
2014-06-13 01:53:35 AM  

chitownmike: Ivan the Tolerable: JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

well, since the article is from georgia, i'll start with georgia. where it just got elevated from a moving violation to a full-blown misdemeanor for -not- moving over.
if you want to complete that list, there are at least 44-45 more states with similar laws; you move over. REGARDLESS of speed limit.
/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed.
//sorry, but you are just fundamentally, profoundly wrong on this one. i love to debate different perspectives, but here there really isn't any basis for challenging that. its pretty basic. learn and move on.

maximum speed limit applies to all lanes, why is that hard to understand


speeding is illegal. not moving over for faster traffic is illegal as well (often equally if not more so). why is that hard to understand?
/other people breaking the law is not an excuse for you to do so.
 
2014-06-13 01:59:10 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Ivan the Tolerable: JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

well, since the article is from georgia, i'll start with georgia. where it just got elevated from a moving violation to a full-blown misdemeanor for -not- moving over.
if you want to complete that list, there are at least 44-45 more states with similar laws; you move over. REGARDLESS of speed limit.
/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed.
//sorry, but you are just fundamentally, profoundly wrong on this one. i love to debate different perspectives, but here there really isn't any basis for challenging that. its pretty basic. learn and move on.

maximum speed limit applies to all lanes, why is that hard to understand

speeding is illegal. not moving over for faster traffic is illegal as well (often equally if not more so). why is that hard to understand?
/other people breaking the law is not an excuse for you to do so.


So then you agree that
"/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed."
Is a bullshiat statement?
 
2014-06-13 02:00:45 AM  

JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.


Yeah, he's actually correct. In most states it's the flow of traffic, not the speed limit, that determines whether or not you're supposed to move right. So if you're going 55 in the left lane and everyone around you is going 70, you need to move right. If you're making a pass on the left at 70 when most traffic is going 65 and one car comes up behind you at 90, they can wait until it's safe for you to pull right.

Left lane laws are NOT meant to accommodate the one jerk driving way faster than everyone else. They're for keeping people going similar speeds grouped by lane.

http://money.msn.com/saving-money-tip s/post--slowpoke-laws-target-lef t -lane-plodders
 
2014-06-13 02:01:24 AM  
I know that if I ever did snap and open fire, it'd be because of someone going 45 in a 55 in the left lane.

/Maryland: Second only to Massachusetts for Awful Drivers
 
2014-06-13 02:04:37 AM  
ITT:  Lots of self-righteous people cheesed off that someone was driving in the left lane, however improperly, and very little outrage over idjits shooting at each other on the highway.
 
2014-06-13 02:06:32 AM  
"You drive on my ass, my foot's on the gas, and the express lane's your last, 'cuz I got a bad habit and it ain't going away..."
 
2014-06-13 02:06:58 AM  
img1.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2014-06-13 02:11:32 AM  

chitownmike: Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Ivan the Tolerable: JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

well, since the article is from georgia, i'll start with georgia. where it just got elevated from a moving violation to a full-blown misdemeanor for -not- moving over.
if you want to complete that list, there are at least 44-45 more states with similar laws; you move over. REGARDLESS of speed limit.
/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed.
//sorry, but you are just fundamentally, profoundly wrong on this one. i love to debate different perspectives, but here there really isn't any basis for challenging that. its pretty basic. learn and move on.

maximum speed limit applies to all lanes, why is that hard to understand

speeding is illegal. not moving over for faster traffic is illegal as well (often equally if not more so). why is that hard to understand?
/other people breaking the law is not an excuse for you to do so.

So then you agree that
"/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed."
Is a bullshiat statement?


not seeing where you are going with that, other than desperately trying to salvage something from a clearly losing argument. really. help me out here. how laws being worded in such a way as to require a yield for faster traffic, regardless of speed, have anything to do with your statement is beyond me.
/i am going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume you are either just tired or drunk, and invite you to go back and read the thread again and gain some clarity, before you embarrass yourself.
 
2014-06-13 02:20:14 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: Ivan the Tolerable: JosephFinn: Ivan the Tolerable: in many states (the sane one anyway), its actually the law; regardless of speed limits, slower traffic moves right.

Name one state where that is regardless of speed limits.  Seriously.  Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

well, since the article is from georgia, i'll start with georgia. where it just got elevated from a moving violation to a full-blown misdemeanor for -not- moving over.
if you want to complete that list, there are at least 44-45 more states with similar laws; you move over. REGARDLESS of speed limit.
/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed.
//sorry, but you are just fundamentally, profoundly wrong on this one. i love to debate different perspectives, but here there really isn't any basis for challenging that. its pretty basic. learn and move on.

maximum speed limit applies to all lanes, why is that hard to understand

speeding is illegal. not moving over for faster traffic is illegal as well (often equally if not more so). why is that hard to understand?
/other people breaking the law is not an excuse for you to do so.

So then you agree that
"/in fact, i would challenge you to find one state with a law specifically mentioning the speed limit being a requirement for the left lane. because there isn't one. at all. its always relative speed."
Is a bullshiat statement?

not seeing where you are going with that, other than desperately trying to salvage something from a clearly losing argument. really. help me out here. how laws being worded in such a way as to require a yield for faster traffic, regardless of speed, have anything to do with your statement is beyond me.
/i am going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume you are either just tired or drunk, and invite you to go back and read the thread again and gain some clarity, before you embarrass yourself.


So, do you think the speed limit applies to the left lane or not because you seem to be all over the board on that, or just trolling?
 
2014-06-13 02:22:08 AM  

timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]


Depends on the state.  In some states, the left lane is the "passing lane".  In other states, the left lane is the "fast lane".  In the second group of states, it's fine to be in the left lane permanently, as long as you are moving faster than what traffic is in the other lanes (in any).
 
2014-06-13 02:25:06 AM  

Mikey1969:  I don't think a Toyota Camry has sped past ANYTHING, let alone another car.


A V6 Toyota Camry has a zero to sixty time of 5.7 seconds.
 
2014-06-13 02:27:56 AM  
You don't have a right to speed. You don't have a right to drive slower than traffic in the left lane.

When those collide, slow loses. Deal with it.
 
2014-06-13 02:35:03 AM  

chitownmike: So, do you think the speed limit applies to the left lane or not because you seem to be all over the board on that, or just trolling?


now you are just being either intentionally obtuse or trolling.
i can't say it any better than redmid17;
You don't have a right to speed. You don't have a right to drive slower than traffic in the left lane.
they are both true, they are in no way related or dependent on each other, and one does not somehow invalidate the other. deal with it.
 
2014-06-13 02:37:41 AM  
creditcardpayment.net
 
2014-06-13 02:41:27 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: So, do you think the speed limit applies to the left lane or not because you seem to be all over the board on that, or just trolling?

now you are just being either intentionally obtuse or trolling.
i can't say it any better than redmid17;
You don't have a right to speed. You don't have a right to drive slower than traffic in the left lane.
they are both true, they are in no way related or dependent on each other, and one does not somehow invalidate the other. deal with it.


And you have not said anything close to that this entire discussion
 
2014-06-13 03:10:40 AM  

Ivan the Tolerable: chitownmike: So, do you think the speed limit applies to the left lane or not because you seem to be all over the board on that, or just trolling?

now you are just being either intentionally obtuse or trolling.
i can't say it any better than redmid17;
You don't have a right to speed. You don't have a right to drive slower than traffic in the left lane.
they are both true, they are in no way related or dependent on each other, and one does not somehow invalidate the other. deal with it.


They are related. Get the fark out of the fast lane if you're moving slower. That rule is designed for safety, not your ego. The state prefers speeders to morons impeding the flow of traffic.
 
2014-06-13 03:17:58 AM  

Geotpf: timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]

Depends on the state.  In some states, the left lane is the "passing lane".  In other states, the left lane is the "fast lane".  In the second group of states, it's fine to be in the left lane permanently, as long as you are moving faster than what traffic is in the other lanes (in any).


In California, the only requirement for the left lane is *drum roll* the speed limit.

Even though I drive on the right there's always a douchbagger riding my ass, so I go even slower to piss em off more.
 
2014-06-13 03:24:47 AM  

doofusgumby: Geotpf: timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]

Depends on the state.  In some states, the left lane is the "passing lane".  In other states, the left lane is the "fast lane".  In the second group of states, it's fine to be in the left lane permanently, as long as you are moving faster than what traffic is in the other lanes (in any).

In California, the only requirement for the left lane is *drum roll* the speed limit.

Even though I drive on the right there's always a douchbagger riding my ass, so I go even slower to piss em off more.


In California they also require everyone to Democrat and throw rocks at independents. Oh wait, were we saying things that exist in our mind or real life?

Reread the California statute.
 
2014-06-13 03:55:56 AM  

doofusgumby: In California, the only requirement for the left lane is *drum roll* the speed limit.


um, no.
/what part of "Notwithstanding the prima facie speed limits" did you not get?
//right there in the california code.
 
2014-06-13 03:59:07 AM  
Last time I had a gun in the car, I was half tempted to shoot 5 or 6 people in about 20 minutes. Now I leave the gun at home and just shoot Nazis in Wolfenstein.

/some folks just need killin
 
2014-06-13 07:27:49 AM  

wildcardjack: I always wondered about how the US wound up with left hand drive. You can't drive and shoot worth a damn, you need someone riding shotgun.


If you're left-handed you probably could.

/Lefty
 
2014-06-13 08:53:43 AM  

Geotpf: Mikey1969:  I don't think a Toyota Camry has sped past ANYTHING, let alone another car.

A V6 Toyota Camry has a zero to sixty time of 5.7 seconds.


V6? That's insane. OK, I take it back.

Gos2Slo: Last time I had a gun in the car, I was half tempted to shoot 5 or 6 people in about 20 minutes. Now I leave the gun at home and just shoot Nazis in Wolfenstein.

/some folks just need killin


Yeah, that's kind of a running joke I have. Sometimes the bullshiat I see, I wonder if it would actually be considered a public service to get some of these assholes off of the road. Around here, we don't have as many bad drivers as I saw in Az(Since we have half the population), but what we lack in quantity, we make up for in quality.
 
2014-06-13 09:42:54 AM  

JosephFinn: Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.


Georgia. This year, actually.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/government/2014-02-26/georgia-legi sl ation-targets-slow-poke-drivers-left-lane

Ivan the Tolerable: the camry i get as pretty common, but how many british luxury cars are really tooling around that particular part of redneckia?


Probably a ton, as Fayette county isn't exactly super redneck; it's full of upper-middle class yuppies who are too scared of black people to move to anywhere more fun in the metro.
 
2014-06-13 09:54:44 AM  

Tourney3p0: timujin: Should have been following the flowchart:

[www.majhost.com image 489x323]

Quit it.  You're going to confuse the Americans.


Just give 'em a roundabout. That'll do it
 
2014-06-13 10:15:30 AM  
In Minnesota, drivers are taught always to drive/cruise in the leftmost lane of a freeway, without any vehicles in the lanes to the right, preferably going below the speed limit.

Bonus points if you can have another Minnesotan also going below the speed limit in the right-hand lane, accomplishing the infamous "Minnesota Box In" manoeuvre.
 
2014-06-13 11:28:54 AM  
My non-cited assertion is highway deaths are caused by by asshats exceeding the speed limit, driving faster than traffic, distracted by whatever, or just assholes with a lead foot death wish. Not the car doing the posted limit in the left lane.


Your opinion is WRONG. Get to the right, please.
 
2014-06-13 11:36:44 AM  
The incident occurred in Fayette County, so I suspect it was a drug deal gone bad. It used to be a rather quiet place, but it's a crime-ridden shiathole now.
 
2014-06-13 12:20:49 PM  
Yes, you do have the right to speed, dickhead.
 
2014-06-13 12:47:31 PM  

cryinoutloud: JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.

Look, if you're in the left lane and not going at least 40 miles an hour over the speed limit, it's your own fault if you get run over.


I see you are from the Philly area too!
 
2014-06-13 01:15:16 PM  

Loreweaver: cryinoutloud: JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.

Look, if you're in the left lane and not going at least 40 miles an hour over the speed limit, it's your own fault if you get run over.

I see you are from the Philly area too!


PA...where trucks doing 40 mph are forced to stay in the left lane.
 
2014-06-13 02:42:47 PM  
Geotpf:

 In someALL states, the left lane is the "passing lane".  In other NOstate, the left lane is the "fast lane". It's NEVER fine to be in the left lane permanently,


/FTFY, moron.
//Stick with public transport.
 
2014-06-13 08:48:12 PM  

doofusgumby: My non-cited assertion is highway deaths are caused by by asshats exceeding the speed limit, driving faster than traffic, distracted by whatever, or just assholes with a lead foot death wish. Not the car doing the posted limit in the left lane.


As someone who regularly cheats death by driving in Greater Boston, I'd argue ANY driver distracted enough not to be able to avoid oncoming traffic from any direction, or not having the capacity to react properly to said traffic, is the dangerous driver.  Speed is immaterial to how unprepared someone is to handle the other people around them.  Not to mention, in my experience at least, the people I've met who swear they have carte blanche to drive in the left lane whenever the fark they want are usually not the most attuned to reality in general.

\then again, I also have that crazy idea that laws designed to deal with specific sources of distraction are pointless when a general law exists to cover any reckless driving of any kind
\\I know, weird, right?
 
2014-06-14 12:17:46 AM  

CitizenjaQ: Yeah, he's actually correct. In most states it's the flow of traffic, not the speed limit, that determines whether or not you're supposed to move right.


Up to the speed limit, of course.  People speeding don't enter into the conversation.  You do not have to move over for anyone who is going over the speed limit.
 
2014-06-14 12:22:21 AM  

Cheeseface: JosephFinn: Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

Georgia. This year, actually.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/government/2014-02-26/georgia-legi sl ation-targets-slow-poke-drivers-left-lane


You might want to read the actual bill that passed and was signed.  It says nothing about moving over for speeders.

http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/display/20132014/HB/459
 
2014-06-14 12:57:50 AM  

JosephFinn: CitizenjaQ: Yeah, he's actually correct. In most states it's the flow of traffic, not the speed limit, that determines whether or not you're supposed to move right.

Up to the speed limit, of course.  People speeding don't enter into the conversation.  You do not have to move over for anyone who is going over the speed limit.


No most states specifically say speed or flow of traffic.
 
2014-06-14 01:00:49 AM  

JosephFinn: Cheeseface: JosephFinn: Name one state where, in the actual statute, it says that you have to be right of speeders.

Georgia. This year, actually.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/government/2014-02-26/georgia-legi sl ation-targets-slow-poke-drivers-left-lane

You might want to read the actual bill that passed and was signed.  It says nothing about moving over for speeders.

http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/display/20132014/HB/459


(a)(1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation.

I hate to say it, but normal and reasonable traffic pretty much always has people breaking the speed limit. If it didn't, the law wouldn't say that and cops would pull over everyone speeding. The law also says it's only for passing as well, minus circumstances where the road is down to one lane.
 
2014-06-14 10:32:20 AM  

Giltric: Loreweaver: cryinoutloud: JosephFinn: Oh god, here come the people claiming being in the left lane gives them carte blanche to speed.

Look, if you're in the left lane and not going at least 40 miles an hour over the speed limit, it's your own fault if you get run over.

I see you are from the Philly area too!

PA...where trucks doing 40 mph are forced to stay in the left lane.


I cant argue there .. PA is one messed up state. Depending on where you are, you run into situations where traffic is either always 20 under or 20 over the posted speed limit.
 
Displayed 85 of 85 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report