Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Jezebel)   Today in Conservative Outreach to Women: Violence against women will end when all you sluts get married   (jezebel.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious, violence against women, Obama for America, Washington Post  
•       •       •

3256 clicks; posted to Politics » on 10 Jun 2014 at 7:29 PM (1 year ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



176 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-06-10 04:15:13 PM  
Uh yeah, and about domestic violence?

/She had it coming
/walked into a door
/she likes it rough
 
2014-06-10 04:16:35 PM  
 
2014-06-10 04:34:34 PM  
Huh.  I didn't actually think they'd go around calling women sluts.  What do I know.
 
2014-06-10 04:42:13 PM  
Nicole Brown Simpson was married once.  Just sayin'.
 
2014-06-10 04:45:05 PM  
I'm pretty sure rapists don't care if their victims are married or not.

And I'm pretty sure marrying a wifebeater will just give him tacit permission to beat his wife.

Just saying.
 
2014-06-10 04:48:38 PM  
It's bad that men sometimes date-rape, but the real question is why are those sluts dating rapists??
 
2014-06-10 04:48:45 PM  
From the comments:

Somebody needs to tell this to all those beaten and abused married women in Afghanistan. The married biological fathers over there didn't get the memo.
 
2014-06-10 04:54:39 PM  
Classical violinists don't commit many violent crimes. Therefore if we force everyone to obtain a violin, the nation's crime problems will be solved!
 
2014-06-10 04:55:35 PM  
It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?
 
2014-06-10 04:58:32 PM  

BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?


Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?
 
2014-06-10 05:02:04 PM  

grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?


It's almost like some females actually want to meet someone they really love before making a lifelong commitment!  Stupid broads!!
 
2014-06-10 05:02:45 PM  

grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?


Hmmph. Typical, more impossible standards from women for us men.
 
2014-06-10 05:04:17 PM  

grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?


if you want to add more preconditions, that is your prerogative. But that one should be at least the minimum, wouldn't you agree?
 
2014-06-10 05:04:51 PM  

BravadoGT: It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?


Many wife beaters are very nice until they're "under contract", then they turn all beaty because they figure they got the woman locked in.
 
2014-06-10 05:05:16 PM  
Cow is appropriate for the GOP.
 
2014-06-10 05:06:22 PM  

BravadoGT: grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?

if you want to add more preconditions, that is your prerogative. But that one should be at least the minimum, wouldn't you agree?


i1.ytimg.com
 
2014-06-10 05:07:14 PM  

BravadoGT: It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?


-- rand Paul
 
2014-06-10 05:12:02 PM  

Ambivalence: BravadoGT: It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?

Many wife beaters are very nice until they're "under contract", then they turn all beaty because they figure they got the woman locked in.


I think the reality is that you will stastically find very few women involved with guys who beat them and who were just caught by complete surprise (i.e. had no warning or clue about their guy's propensity for violence)
 
2014-06-10 05:16:34 PM  

BravadoGT: I think the reality is that you will stastically find very few women involved with guys who beat them and who were just caught by complete surprise (i.e. had no warning or clue about their guy's propensity for violence)


Without any evidence, the reality is whatever you choose it to be.
 
2014-06-10 05:19:23 PM  

BravadoGT: grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?

if you want to add more preconditions, that is your prerogative. But that one should be at least the minimum, wouldn't you agree?


Sure, but then I think not-beating is a pre-requisite for all civilized interaction.  If I want to buy a cup off coffee, not beating the barista or being beaten by the barista is definitely the minimum.
 
2014-06-10 05:21:45 PM  

Lionel Mandrake: BravadoGT: grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?

if you want to add more preconditions, that is your prerogative. But that one should be at least the minimum, wouldn't you agree?

Sure, but then I think not-beating is a pre-requisite for all civilized interaction.  If I want to buy a cup off coffee, not beating the barista or being beaten by the barista is definitely the minimum.


I'm a bartender, not a barista, but I'd like to point out that sometimes, asking us not to beat the customers is asking a lot of us.
 
2014-06-10 05:21:52 PM  

BravadoGT: Ambivalence: BravadoGT: It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?

Many wife beaters are very nice until they're "under contract", then they turn all beaty because they figure they got the woman locked in.

I think the reality is that you will stastically find very few women involved with guys who beat them and who were just caught by complete surprise (i.e. had no warning or clue about their guy's propensity for violence)


Generally they're not punching you on the first date.  Generally.
 
2014-06-10 05:22:44 PM  

grumpfuff: I'm a bartender, not a barista, but I'd like to point out that sometimes, asking us not to beat off the customers is asking a lot of us.


No better way to increase your tips, though.
 
2014-06-10 05:23:28 PM  
Violent crime actually has more male victims. The reasons for that are that men have a nice little chemical in their bloodstream called testosterone and they're not about to let another man get away with anything.

img.photobucket.com

So I guess this legitimizes gay marriage so that men will have a nice husband to protect them from other men.
 
2014-06-10 05:24:10 PM  

BravadoGT: I think the reality is that you will stastically find very few women involved with guys who beat them and who were just caught by complete surprise (i.e. had no warning or clue about their guy's propensity for violence)


So?  Does that make it their fault?  It can be very difficult to accept something one doesn't want to believe, that doesn't mean they "have it coming" if their husband does turn out to be a beater. And it certainly demolishes the idea that marriage is the solution to violence against women.  Slut shaming doesn't solve anything.
 
2014-06-10 05:24:43 PM  

Because People in power are Stupid: Violent crime actually has more male victims. The reasons for that are that men have a nice little chemical in their bloodstream called testosterone and they're not about to let another man get away with anything.

[img.photobucket.com image 800x688]

So I guess this legitimizes gay marriage so that men will have a nice husband to protect them from other men.


Hey look, a non-sequitor.

Next, do the one where you call every guy who disagrees with you a gamma male.
 
2014-06-10 05:26:50 PM  

duppy: Classical violinists don't commit many violent crimes. Therefore if we force everyone to obtain a violin, the nation's crime problems will be solved!


Sex is violins.
 
2014-06-10 05:28:56 PM  

Dusk-You-n-Me: Link


Thank you. Jezebel may be 100% correct, but I still can't stand the tone of their website. Even if you are right, you don't have to always be mean and/or smug.
 
2014-06-10 05:29:07 PM  

grumpfuff: Hey look, a non-sequitor.

Next, do the one where you call every guy who disagrees with you a gamma male.


That was a sequitor and gammas seem to have a problem with reality.
 
2014-06-10 05:33:12 PM  
So:  Men sleeping around?  Stud.  Women sleeping around?  Slut.  Amrite?

Really would love to say this to a right-winger engaging in that line of bullshiat just to see their reaction.
 
2014-06-10 05:44:18 PM  

Because People in power are Stupid: grumpfuff: Hey look, a non-sequitor.

Next, do the one where you call every guy who disagrees with you a gamma male.

That was a sequitor and gammas seem to have a problem with reality.


[thread about domestic violence towards woman]
[graphic about violence with male victims]

Totally relevant.

And like it was previously pointed out to you, having to continually insist you're an alpha male generally means you aren't one.
 
2014-06-10 05:46:27 PM  

grumpfuff: Lionel Mandrake: BravadoGT: grumpfuff: BravadoGT: Why is that so hard to get?

Because women are generally looking for more than just "He doesn't beat me." ?

if you want to add more preconditions, that is your prerogative. But that one should be at least the minimum, wouldn't you agree?

Sure, but then I think not-beating is a pre-requisite for all civilized interaction.  If I want to buy a cup off coffee, not beating the barista or being beaten by the barista is definitely the minimum.

I'm a bartender, not a barista, but I'd like to point out that sometimes, asking us not to beat the customers is asking a lot of us.


I did say "civilized" interaction.  Bar patrons often do not live up to such standards.
 
2014-06-10 05:51:57 PM  

Rwa2play: Men sleeping around?  Stud


Nope: Men sleeping around? Philanderer

Our society holds little regard for anyone of either sex talking about their sexual conquests. Also noted is the regularity with which women online refer to other women as "sluts". It seems to be a shaming method that women use to humiliate one another rather than men somehow "shaming" women into proper behavior.
 
2014-06-10 05:52:35 PM  

grumpfuff: [thread about domestic violence towards woman]


RTFA. It's not about domestic violence.
 
2014-06-10 05:55:56 PM  

Because People in power are Stupid: grumpfuff: [thread about domestic violence towards woman]

RTFA. It's not about domestic violence.


My fault. In a thread about violence against women, you post a chart about violence against men.

Better?
 
2014-06-10 05:59:37 PM  

grumpfuff: you post a chart about violence against men.


Nope. What's your education level? It's a chart listing violence by both sex and race.

My point is that BOTH sides of the argument are wrong. (So vote for MRA's)

Also

grumpfuff: having to continually insist you're an alpha male


upload.wikimedia.org

Although I realize that you are just some feminist trying to derail an argument at the expense of reason, you should make more of an effort as it's bad form to just put words in someone's mouth.
 
2014-06-10 06:03:57 PM  

Because People in power are Stupid: Nope. What's your education level? It's a chart listing violence by both sex and race.


Because People in power are Stupid: Violent crime actually has more male victims.



Yea, you were really interested in having a conversation about violence, and not just pointing out how terrible men have it.

Because People in power are Stupid: Although I realize that you are just some feminist trying to derail an argument at the expense of reason, you should make more of an effort as it's bad form to just put words in someone's mouth.


That's nice. I still find it amusing you insist you want equality and insist some men are inherently inferior to others.

Anyway, I've wasted enough time with you. I'm sure someone else will be along eventually to play with you. Have fun!
 
2014-06-10 06:08:31 PM  

grumpfuff: insist some men are inherently inferior to others.


upload.wikimedia.org
 
2014-06-10 07:10:08 PM  

Theaetetus: grumpfuff: I'm a bartender, not a barista, but I'd like to point out that sometimes, asking us not to beat off the customers is asking a lot of us.

No better way to increase your tips, though.


Homonyms are awesome!

/zip
 
2014-06-10 07:17:42 PM  

Doctor Funkenstein: Theaetetus: grumpfuff: I'm a bartender, not a barista, but I'd like to point out that sometimes, asking us not to beat off the customers is asking a lot of us.

No better way to increase your tips, though.

Homonyms are awesome!

/zip


Oh geez, I just saw that.

/coulda sworn i said "beat on"
//paging Dr. Freud?
 
2014-06-10 07:28:11 PM  
Mark Regnerus is a notorious anti-gay-rights figure at the University of Texas at Austin. Link

WaPo is so liberal!
 
2014-06-10 07:32:19 PM  
Durrrrrr
 
2014-06-10 07:33:09 PM  

BravadoGT: It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?


Because guys cant control themselves, amirite?
 
2014-06-10 07:35:24 PM  
I suppose I shouldn't be shocked that we have a Fark Independent White Knighting this bullshiat.
 
2014-06-10 07:36:19 PM  

BravadoGT: The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.


It's almost as if you identified a critical issue, felt totally comfortable with blame-shifting, then felt really neat about yourself.
 
2014-06-10 07:43:15 PM  
Hey lets extrapolate statistics to a completely illogical conclusion.
 
2014-06-10 07:43:31 PM  

Bane of Broone: BravadoGT: It's not brain surgery.  The more partners you have, the more likely you will end up smacked around by one or more of them.  Safest choice is to find one guy who doesn't, and get him under contract.

Why is that so hard to get?

Because guys cant control themselves, amirite?


I think the logic here is:

Women should change and accept lower standards because we can't get men to change to stop beating them.

See it's the women's responsibility to make the changes to not get the shiat beat out of them. See how nice of a guy he is?
 
2014-06-10 07:45:08 PM  
On a side note, Eric Cantor is going to lose and be out of congress.
 
2014-06-10 07:45:21 PM  
not clicking the "we'll cut your dick off" link.
 
2014-06-10 07:46:02 PM  
I guess the moral of this story is that if you want to beat up some women, lessen their chances of calling the cops by combining your assets and possibly throw some kids into the mix. If you want to beat it then you gotta put a ring on it.
 
Displayed 50 of 176 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report