If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   Rachel Maddow explains Benghazi flap by way of Monty Python: 'Burn the witch! Burn her!'   (rawstory.com) divider line 50
    More: Amusing, Rachel Maddow, Monty Python, Benghazi, Benghazi flap, Mr. Speaker  
•       •       •

3037 clicks; posted to Politics » on 10 May 2014 at 5:15 PM (32 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-05-10 05:23:44 PM  
7 votes:

Destructor: Oh, thank God. I was afraid I was going to miss a day without something about Benghazi here. Dodged that bullet.


It's only the biggest scandal of empty suit tyranical nazi communism since Digonrugula gate doncha know.
2014-05-10 05:58:43 PM  
5 votes:

palelizard: Destructor: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

Can it please get more interesting faster? Because the Republicans have mismanaged this thing so badly, it's hard to see what good can come from it.

The Republicans haven't mismanaged anything. It's just that Clinton's propaganda machine has been in full force since before day 1 orchestrating the cover-up.  It's hard to get accurate facts from those involved when they've been threatened by Washington insiders.  I've no doubt that President Obama had no idea about what was really happening--but there's no way Clinton did not. Didn't she advertise about who Americans wanted to get the middle of the night call?  This whole thing is an attempt to discredit Obama, likely in a way that improves Hillary's chances in 2016.  I hope he doesn't let her drag him down.  He should appoint a special prosecutor, someone non-partisan and trusted by all, to get to the bottom of this.

Look at it this way--the Clintons got away with Vince Foster, Whitewater, an extramarital affair and perjury, all while we knew full well they'd done it but were stymied by their incredibly cover-up apparatus. Obama couldn't convince people he was born in the country.  Heck, he was on the ropes about the whole birth certificate thing when the Republican governor of Hawaii stepped in a bailed him out.  It's not his fault--without a teleprompter, he's just a community organizer who bit off more than he bargained for.  Out of the two, who do you think really orchestrated this cover-up?

Sadly, much like before, this has been done so well we may never be able to prove it and in twenty years, people who don't remember will just think of it as 'one more conspiracy theory', despite H. R. Clinton being in her fifth term.


This is what I hate about Saturday threads.  The A-list trolls all have the day off and we get the shiatty B-team trolls.
2014-05-10 09:06:56 PM  
3 votes:
There actually is a Benghazi scandal/conspiracy - it just isn't what most people think it is. The truth is, over the past couple years Obama has had a number of prominent Republicans abducted and forcibly fitted with mind-control devices. These Republicans were then directed to make publicly a series of incredibly stupid comments about (but certainly not limited to) Benghazi, thereby causing great political damage to the GOP.

I invite anybody who's skeptical about this to go back and watch the infamous "Please proceed, Governor" moment from the debates. Note the expression on Romney's face: this clearly isn't a person acting of his own volition. You can see him struggling against the mind control - as evidenced by the awkward and hesitant manner in which he's speaking - but ultimately he gives in and says precisely what Obama wanted him to say. Note also Obama's face throughout the exchange, which seems to be the look of a man who knows exactly what's about to happen.

However, Obama wasn't content with merely using these powers to ruin his election rival - he then proceeded to target the entire Congressional GOP leadership, and this may prove his undoing. There are just too many Republicans saying too many stupid things for it to be attributed to chance.
2014-05-10 05:28:11 PM  
3 votes:
Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.
2014-05-10 04:55:01 PM  
3 votes:
Oh, thank God. I was afraid I was going to miss a day without something about Benghazi here. Dodged that bullet.
2014-05-11 02:14:06 AM  
2 votes:
i172.photobucket.com
2014-05-10 10:28:35 PM  
2 votes:

Any Pie Left: Maddow is hands-down my favorite lesbian


She's a lesbian?

Awwww....

26.media.tumblr.com
2014-05-10 08:44:55 PM  
2 votes:
i.onionstatic.com

I've brought down bigger presidents than you, Obama
2014-05-10 07:27:46 PM  
2 votes:

Summoner101: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

You may be surprised by this, but we haven't gotten to the point where we can drop troops in somewhere automatically.


Bullshiat.

Obama could have sent in drop pods and had squads of Terminators defending the embassy by round three, tops.

i1090.photobucket.com
2014-05-10 06:19:31 PM  
2 votes:

Summoner101: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

You may be surprised by this, but we haven't gotten to the point where we can drop troops in somewhere automatically.


My years of experience as a Command and Conquer Armchair General say differently.
2014-05-10 05:56:53 PM  
2 votes:

MindStalker: By "Goo Ball", I think he meant to replace the word "Tar Baby", because he knows its dangerous to use Tar Baby nowadays because people are ignorant.


Babies were better off in the olden days when they were covered in tar, which is a natural substance that protects the blah skin.  These days they depend on the government to give them free chemicals, which makes them lazy and they hang around on the porch all day long.
2014-05-10 05:51:46 PM  
2 votes:

Destructor: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

Can it please get more interesting faster? Because the Republicans have mismanaged this thing so badly, it's hard to see what good can come from it.


The Republicans haven't mismanaged anything. It's just that Clinton's propaganda machine has been in full force since before day 1 orchestrating the cover-up.  It's hard to get accurate facts from those involved when they've been threatened by Washington insiders.  I've no doubt that President Obama had no idea about what was really happening--but there's no way Clinton did not. Didn't she advertise about who Americans wanted to get the middle of the night call?  This whole thing is an attempt to discredit Obama, likely in a way that improves Hillary's chances in 2016.  I hope he doesn't let her drag him down.  He should appoint a special prosecutor, someone non-partisan and trusted by all, to get to the bottom of this.

Look at it this way--the Clintons got away with Vince Foster, Whitewater, an extramarital affair and perjury, all while we knew full well they'd done it but were stymied by their incredibly cover-up apparatus. Obama couldn't convince people he was born in the country.  Heck, he was on the ropes about the whole birth certificate thing when the Republican governor of Hawaii stepped in a bailed him out.  It's not his fault--without a teleprompter, he's just a community organizer who bit off more than he bargained for.  Out of the two, who do you think really orchestrated this cover-up?

Sadly, much like before, this has been done so well we may never be able to prove it and in twenty years, people who don't remember will just think of it as 'one more conspiracy theory', despite H. R. Clinton being in her fifth term.
2014-05-10 03:13:10 PM  
2 votes:
Goo ball
2014-05-11 04:01:34 PM  
1 votes:

Noam Chimpsky: ... I'll never have any common cause with Democrats because if they aren't on my side on this one, they never will be on my side.


Seriously?  You'll let this clusterfark of a non-issue irrevocably define which "side" you're on?

Here are some things worthy of taking up sides:
- Civil rights
- Universal suffrage
- Health care and related research
- Advancing scientific knowledge
- Ensuring safe water supplies
- Feeding the poor
- Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya ...

Not worthy:
- Tastes Great vs Less Filling
- Ginger vs Mary Ann
- The designated hitter rule
- Benghazi

Your honor, your allegiances and your principled stands have immeasurable value.  In my opinion, they're ultimately the only things that have any value, and you're saying that your litmus test regarding "support for free speech" involves someone who yelled "fire" in a movie theater?  And in response, you stand with the people who want to make it illegal for teachers to teach evolution or sex education?  And who pass laws making it illegal to mention "weather" in legislation?  And who've made it illegal to fund any research into gun violence?  Are these the free speech advocates who PASS your litmus test?
2014-05-11 02:30:42 PM  
1 votes:
I often find myself wondering what, exactly, a troll would have to do to make himself so obvious that nobody would reply to him.

I have yet to find the answer to that question.
2014-05-11 10:12:52 AM  
1 votes:
Bachman was talking about Benghazi on CNN this morning.  She didn't seem particularly stupid.  I realized why.  The Benghazi speaking points are just at her level of stupidity.  Every other Republican has just dropped down to her level.  When you are speaking at the same level as Bachman, that's not good.
2014-05-11 08:27:47 AM  
1 votes:

Summoner101: You may be surprised by this, but we haven't gotten to the point where we can drop troops in somewhere automatically.


That's ridiculous! It's in our historical documents!
i.telegraph.co.uk
2014-05-11 02:51:47 AM  
1 votes:

FnkyTwn: loadmaster


heh...heheh...heheheh...
2014-05-11 02:47:02 AM  
1 votes:

Fantasta Potamus: Lionel Mandrake: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

Yeah, they should have sent in the FTL fighters with the special kill-only-bad-guys smart bombs.

Seriously?  People are still fkn this chicken?

I see the "they could have sent fighter jets during the attack" posted everywhere.

It boggles the mind as to what they think could be done. How do you even consider dropping a bomb on or around a building when there are actually people you don't want to kill?

That would be a real scandal.


I have a cousin who's an airforce loadmaster that honestly does work with special operations, and recently at a get together with a bunch of my radical right family, they begged him to recount how he was on a runway ready to go but they were not given the order and those brave American's had to die because of Obama's and Hillary's inability to deal with the situation.

I let him get his big spiel out while everybody salivated at his 'truth' and how, as a civilian I wouldn't and couldn't question his story. Welp.. To everyone's surprise I begged him to blow the doors wide open on the scandal. We have another cousin who is an aide for a former florida congressperson (R), and another who interned for John Goddamn McCain, so it wouldn't be hard to get him in front of Issa and get Obummer thrown right out of office for lies and deceit. He declined, and now everybody hates me because he'd be in danger of losing his job somehow, and that of course that's more important than bringing down.... Obama?. and Hillary?. or some shiat? They're story and anger kinda falls apart at that point.

Hi-Farking-Hilarious
2014-05-11 12:10:25 AM  
1 votes:

Witty_Retort: Noam Chimpsky: The motivation must have mattered to the Democrats enough to lie about it and send some guy to prison for exercising a basic 1st Amendment right.

If there was any initial confusion as to the motivations of the terrorist attack, there was no confusion at the time they rounded up the crappy video artist.

The guy who violated his parole? That guy?

Why does the Right continue to embrace criminals?


The problem you'll have is that it's going to be extremely tough for the people being grilled at these hearings to play dumb. Put yourself in their shoes and imagine trying to claim with a straight face that the jailing had nothing to do with the protests in Egypt or the attack in Benghazi. I'm not as certain as some seem to be, such as theknuckler33, that they will get up there and say that the guy would have been jailed without Benghazi going down. I think there might be a dilemma there for them. The followup question will be "Would he have been thrown into jail if the Egyptians hadn't protested?", and the answer will be "If the authorities knew he was posing videos as a parole violation, then yes". But then there is a followup to that one.

"So you wouldn't ever, no way no how, seek to prosecute someone for doing this sort of mocking of religious figures like Muhammad  unless they have a term against it in the conditions of their parole?"

What do you think he'll say? They can bring thousands of people up there to answer that question, and they should. My guess is that they won't say that a non parolee is free to  mock the prophet without being prosecuted. I'm 85% certain of it.
2014-05-10 09:06:07 PM  
1 votes:
i think we need hearings on the Benghazi hearings.  clearly its a false flag operation.  Issa is probably  drinking champagne from the skulls of dead American Christians with Obama right now.   seriously, seven hearings and not one damning fact!  That guy is a traitor.  Clive Bundy aught to ride his freedom cattle to dc and string him up.
2014-05-10 08:59:38 PM  
1 votes:

cameroncrazy1984: Noam Chimpsky: How come Democrats hate the Americans who were killed by the spontaneous protesters in Benghazi? Is it because most of them were Navy Seals?

Ooh ooh can you do the one where the Democrats are the exact same as Nazis again? That one was fun


They are always so hilarious, yet rational and deeply insightful.

i57.tinypic.com
2014-05-10 08:42:07 PM  
1 votes:

Zeb Hesselgresser: Fart_Machine: Zeb Hesselgresser: They told us it was a video protest that got out of hand. They told us this because a 37 yr old English major (with a masters in the fine art of creative writing) decided that that story was more politically expedient during an election year than the truth. How did that kid guy over rule the CIA?

That's some pathetically sad shiat, but considering the main actors in this drama, it's certainly no surprise. The fact that Hillary went along with it should cost her the nomination, because she can't win. The DNC won't can't abide that.

So what you're saying is that there really is no scandal. It's just a politically motivated attack against Hillary being a contender for 2016. Thanks for being honest.

A political stunt in response to a political stunt? Un-possible.


Funny how embassy attacks suddenly became political when a democrat becomes President.
2014-05-10 08:34:50 PM  
1 votes:

Noam Chimpsky: How come Democrats hate the Americans who were killed by the spontaneous protesters in Benghazi? Is it because most of them were Navy Seals?


You're like a cartoon character.  Towelie, maybe.
2014-05-10 08:19:37 PM  
1 votes:

Noam Chimpsky: How come Democrats hate the Americans who were killed by the spontaneous protesters in Benghazi? Is it because most of them were Navy Seals?


Ooh ooh can you do the one where the Democrats are the exact same as Nazis again? That one was fun
2014-05-10 08:01:51 PM  
1 votes:
Why do republicans continue to embolden the enemy and profit off the corpses of dead Americans?
They cut funding for diplomatic security.
Why aren't they taking responsibility for their actions?
2014-05-10 07:29:15 PM  
1 votes:

Lionel Mandrake: Goo ball


You realize that this is an insta-meme now.
2014-05-10 07:23:41 PM  
1 votes:

udhq: Destructor: I'm already satisfied there's incompetence

Care to elaborate?


It's outside the scope of this thread, but I hate leaving questions unanswered... so I'll keep it brief. ACA implementation, handling of sundry domestic issues (ex: Beer summit), various foreign policy issues (Iran nuke development, red line). Those are the big ones, I think.
2014-05-10 07:16:20 PM  
1 votes:
Maddow is hands-down my favorite lesbian and I just think the world of her.  However, I'm shocked that I seem to be the only one that knows how that Monty Python witch hunt bit concludes.  Sir Bedevere concocts, thru tremendously tortured logic, a test to identify if the woman is a witch or not, by seeing id she weighs the same as a duck.  They put her on the scales and they Do balance, with Carol Cleveland as the accused witch then admitting: "It's a far cop".  ( I.e. "I confess I am indeed a witch").

So, this clip was probably not what Rachel should have used to poke fun at the Senator's assertion that a witch must ipso-facto exist if there's a  witch hunt.


And I can't believe the internet was invented so I could waste all out time making this stupid distinction, but, there it is.
2014-05-10 07:12:29 PM  
1 votes:

Destructor: The problem with this slow march through this quagmire is it is painful for everyone. Get to the bottom of it (using whatever tools are required), and move on.


OK, fine.  Let's get to the bottom of this.

Destructor: At this point, I don't see how we're going to learn more.


Oh, you say we're already there.  Great then.  Job's done.
2014-05-10 06:57:46 PM  
1 votes:
and now on invented motive theater...
2014-05-10 06:53:53 PM  
1 votes:

Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.


Egads! a hither-to unknown flavor of derp!
2014-05-10 06:47:21 PM  
1 votes:

Destructor: The problem with this slow march through this quagmire is it is painful for everyone. Get to the bottom of it (using whatever tools are required), and move on.


again, there is no 'bottom' to get to - what you see is the desired outcome, not some poor method of getting to the bottom of something.

also, darryl farking issa and google? really? come the hell on. i can show you 14 million results for William Shatner and God combined together, as well an essay from a crazy bastard proclaiming all the red shirts died for our sins.
2014-05-10 06:39:02 PM  
1 votes:

cameroncrazy1984: What stonewalling?


Page after page of examples from a google search. And not just from the usual suspects (FoxNews, etc).

In a letter to Kerry, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said the State Department has shown a "disturbing disregard" for its legal obligations to Congress...

The news comes as recently released emails showed the administration withheld documents from congressional investigators.
-Source (5/5/2014)

Here are a dozen or so unanswered questions from 1/2013.

heap: then just what would have been corrected with altered timing?


The problem with this slow march through this quagmire is it is painful for everyone. Get to the bottom of it (using whatever tools are required), and move on.
2014-05-10 06:27:21 PM  
1 votes:

mark12A: There is something seriously wrong with you.
No snark there. You should seek help.

I'm not the one who needs help.

Example: Back in the 80's, an Iranian-American co-worker of mine was trying to get his brother into the States. His brother had managed to escape Iran and the tender mercies of Ayatolla Khomeni after the Islamic revolution and got as far as Italy. I listened to Azimi on the phone, calling the State Department over and over again, begging for help. They kept blowing him off.

Finally, I told Azimi to call his Senator and explain the situation. The State Department simply does not care about private American citizens. The Senator's staff live for this kind of thing, cause they know the State Department fears congress, because congress will do naughty things to them, like force them to fly economy class, thus the Senator (whoever the Pennsylvania senators were in 1986)  stuck his foot up the State Department's ass and Azimi's brother  was promptly flown to the states. Typical story.

I once needed an emergency ex-fil after my idiot step father got mixed up with some Islamic Indonesian gun runners shipping arms to the southern Philippines, and they were going to shoot *my ass* as a warning to him, so, once again, the state department was all "do we know you??" until my uncle called congress and I was out the next day without anybody knowing about it.

The State Department is staffed by tools. Period. Benghazi is even worse, because they dicked over THEIR OWN PEOPLE.


You understand that if you are not just being a magnificent troll that you are a genuine crazy person.
2014-05-10 06:25:29 PM  
1 votes:

mark12A: There is something seriously wrong with you.
No snark there. You should seek help.

I'm not the one who needs help.

Example: Back in the 80's, an Iranian-American co-worker of mine was trying to get his brother into the States. His brother had managed to escape Iran and the tender mercies of Ayatolla Khomeni after the Islamic revolution and got as far as Italy. I listened to Azimi on the phone, calling the State Department over and over again, begging for help. They kept blowing him off.

Finally, I told Azimi to call his Senator and explain the situation. The State Department simply does not care about private American citizens. The Senator's staff live for this kind of thing, cause they know the State Department fears congress, because congress will do naughty things to them, like force them to fly economy class, thus the Senator (whoever the Pennsylvania senators were in 1986)  stuck his foot up the State Department's ass and Azimi's brother  was promptly flown to the states. Typical story.

I once needed an emergency ex-fil after my idiot step father got mixed up with some Islamic Indonesian gun runners shipping arms to the southern Philippines, and they were going to shoot *my ass* as a warning to him, so, once again, the state department was all "do we know you??" until my uncle called congress and I was out the next day without anybody knowing about it.

The State Department is staffed by tools. Period. Benghazi is even worse, because they dicked over THEIR OWN PEOPLE.


Well, I'm sold. If you can't believe a guy dropping Vince Foster references in his posts, who can you believe?
2014-05-10 06:23:24 PM  
1 votes:

palelizard: Vince Foster


DRINK!
2014-05-10 06:19:45 PM  
1 votes:
Republicans apparently tired of farking that chicken so they're pounding away at the corpses of four Americans.
2014-05-10 06:08:55 PM  
1 votes:
Everyone knows that as soon as Obama heard about the Benghazi attack he grabbed a Secret Service agent's gun and fired four shots out the White House window killing our brave State Department employees.
2014-05-10 06:04:55 PM  
1 votes:
She's gay, and her hair is short and not blonde, so her opinions can be discounted.

/in before those assclowns
2014-05-10 06:01:54 PM  
1 votes:

mark12A: Benghazi boils down to this: The State Department screwed up protecting it's people, so when they did get attacked, they tried to spin it as America's fault, because of that stupid First Amendment allowing "irresponsible Americans" to stir up the Muzzies.

That's what really sucks. OUR State Department trying to spin it as America bringing it on itself, WHEN THEY KNEW DAMM WELL it was an Al Quada attack.  It stinks of disloyalty to their fellow American citizens.

That's what I really hate about those goddam State Department Drones. These over educated, elitist PRINKS  constantly snicker at the America people, who give them the tax money for their way cool meetings, receptions, parties, etc. They run America down as they buddy up to foreign officials.

When Americans get in trouble abroad, the State Department looks the other way until CongressCritters scream and yell at them to DO THEIR JOBS. I've seen it happen over and over again. The State Department needs to understand the American People are their customers, not the assorted dictators/crooks they hob nob with.


You know, they can work wonders with modern pharmaceuticals.
2014-05-10 05:59:02 PM  
1 votes:

Agneska: leftists


mark12A: Benghazi boils down to this


Keep up the outrage, kids. Maybe you'll get to the bottom's bottom of this soon. Those other reports mean nothing, this new investigation will reveal everything.
2014-05-10 05:56:18 PM  
1 votes:
global warming is not the problem.
global humidity via conservative tear puddling is clearly the problem.
and of course, global stupidity
2014-05-10 05:53:25 PM  
1 votes:
Grey poupon is like $3 a bottle

SO FANCY
2014-05-10 05:52:03 PM  
1 votes:

mark12A: Benghazi boils down to this: The State Department screwed up protecting it's people, so when they did get attacked, they tried to spin it as America's fault, because of that stupid First Amendment allowing "irresponsible Americans" to stir up the Muzzies.

That's what really sucks. OUR State Department trying to spin it as America bringing it on itself, WHEN THEY KNEW DAMM WELL it was an Al Quada attack.  It stinks of disloyalty to their fellow American citizens.

That's what I really hate about those goddam State Department Drones. These over educated, elitist PRINKS  constantly snicker at the America people, who give them the tax money for their way cool meetings, receptions, parties, etc. They run America down as they buddy up to foreign officials.

When Americans get in trouble abroad, the State Department looks the other way until CongressCritters scream and yell at them to DO THEIR JOBS. I've seen it happen over and over again. The State Department needs to understand the American People are their customers, not the assorted dictators/crooks they hob nob with.


What the hell is a PRINK? Is it an acronym?

/People's Republic Intelligence: North Korean Spy
//Through the looking glass
///watching out fro reverse vampires
2014-05-10 05:49:56 PM  
1 votes:

mark12A: Benghazi boils down to this: [insert spittle flecked ranting here]



There is something seriously wrong with you.
No snark there. You should seek help.
2014-05-10 05:46:05 PM  
1 votes:
Benghazi boils down to this: The State Department screwed up protecting it's people, so when they did get attacked, they tried to spin it as America's fault, because of that stupid First Amendment allowing "irresponsible Americans" to stir up the Muzzies.

That's what really sucks. OUR State Department trying to spin it as America bringing it on itself, WHEN THEY KNEW DAMM WELL it was an Al Quada attack.  It stinks of disloyalty to their fellow American citizens.

That's what I really hate about those goddam State Department Drones. These over educated, elitist PRINKS  constantly snicker at the America people, who give them the tax money for their way cool meetings, receptions, parties, etc. They run America down as they buddy up to foreign officials.

When Americans get in trouble abroad, the State Department looks the other way until CongressCritters scream and yell at them to DO THEIR JOBS. I've seen it happen over and over again. The State Department needs to understand the American People are their customers, not the assorted dictators/crooks they hob nob with.
2014-05-10 05:42:15 PM  
1 votes:

Destructor: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

Can it please get more interesting faster? Because the Republicans have mismanaged this thing so badly, it's hard to see what good can come from it.


The funn

Surool: Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.

+1 funny


The funny thing is how leftists react to the word Benghazi as if someone just gave them an atomic wedgie. Instinctively they know something went wrong that night, and the whole truth hasn't come out yet. Be patient. Soon it'll be funny^2.
2014-05-10 05:38:31 PM  
1 votes:

Agneska: Someone in the White House decided not to send help when the attacks were happening. I'm sure they had a good and valid reason to give the stand down order. This is about to get very interesting.


Toilet paper has never touched your ass?
2014-05-10 05:23:51 PM  
1 votes:

LordJiro: And they're upset at Lois Lerner because she wouldn't tie herself to the stake.


She does weigh more than a duck.
 
Displayed 50 of 50 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report