Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Alaska Dispatch News)   If a gun shop leaves a homeless man unattended and finds a rifle missing with $200 left on the counter, tells the police it was stolen but tells the bank it was a sale, who gets sued when the homeless man shoots a random stranger? Show your work   (adn.com ) divider line
    More: Fail, Fred Meyer, target shooting, paperwork, Alaska Supreme Court, rifles, tort law, homeless, shootings  
•       •       •

6787 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 May 2014 at 2:38 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2014-05-09 02:28:54 PM  
21 votes:
optimalhumanmodulation.files.wordpress.com
2014-05-09 02:41:30 PM  
5 votes:
If the gun costs 100 dollars more than the bullet,  and the total was $110 dollars how much was the gun?


/ I know this....
2014-05-09 02:36:49 PM  
3 votes:
Wait, go back to the part where the homeless guy had $200.


/take the gun, leave the canolli
2014-05-09 12:32:52 PM  
3 votes:
No lawsuit.

BATFE busts them for straw sale. FBI follows up with fraud.

Police taze everyone involved.
2014-05-09 04:09:01 PM  
1 vote:

Because People in power are Stupid: [optimalhumanmodulation.files.wordpress.com image 209x111]


media2.giphy.comimg.fark.net

"That magnificent b*tch."                                                     "MIC DROP, HIER KOMMT!"
2014-05-09 03:14:10 PM  
1 vote:

LazyMedia: fruitloop: Who gets sued?  That's easy.  The gun manufacturer.

[i171.photobucket.com image 600x753]

That has been impossible to do under federal law since 2005. Thanks, Obama!


I, for one, am utterly disgusted that a manufacturer of a legal product cannot be held liable for the criminal actions of an unrelated third party.
2014-05-09 03:03:51 PM  
1 vote:

fruitloop: Who gets sued?  That's easy.  The gun manufacturer.

[i171.photobucket.com image 600x753]


That has been impossible to do under federal law since 2005. Thanks, Obama!
2014-05-09 02:51:18 PM  
1 vote:
Just assume that everybody in Alaska is on the lam.
2014-05-09 02:49:24 PM  
1 vote:
ts4.mm.bing.net
2014-05-09 02:48:09 PM  
1 vote:
He shot a man named Simone, just to watch him die?
2014-05-09 02:47:05 PM  
1 vote:
This is impossible, gun shop owners have never been known to commit crimes, and actually sell freedom.
2014-05-09 02:46:17 PM  
1 vote:
He shot a man in Juneau, just to watch him die?
2014-05-09 02:46:07 PM  
1 vote:
img4.wikia.nocookie.net
everyone gets a cavity search no matter what.
2014-05-09 02:42:36 PM  
1 vote:

cgraves67: Because People in power are Stupid:

I have never seen that gif before. I love it.


can't....stop....watching....it
2014-05-09 02:40:41 PM  
1 vote:
Because People in power are Stupid:

I have never seen that gif before. I love it.
2014-05-09 02:40:34 PM  
1 vote:
BENGHAZI!
2014-05-09 12:26:35 PM  
1 vote:
No one, because the Second AMendment
 
Displayed 17 of 17 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report