Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Register)   That nude selfie you sent on Snapchat? You may be seeing it again. And not just at your trial   (theregister.co.uk) divider line 67
    More: Scary, Snapchat, user information, consent decrees, Federal Trade Commission  
•       •       •

18382 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 May 2014 at 2:09 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



67 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-05-09 10:51:44 AM  
I've always suspected the admins at snapchat have quite a collection.
 
2014-05-09 12:51:33 PM  
nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.
 
2014-05-09 02:11:02 PM  

charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.


Are you implying that Fark is full of men or trannies?
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2014-05-09 02:11:14 PM  
There's not much we didn't know already, except that the company has the addresses to go with the boobies.
 
2014-05-09 02:11:43 PM  

flucto: I've always suspected the admins at snapchat have quite a collection.


Snapchat was secretly developed by ImageFap.
 
2014-05-09 02:12:07 PM  

charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.


Err... chicks with dicks?
 
2014-05-09 02:12:11 PM  
The very idea of "disappearing photos" was absurd.  Nobody thought that maybe somebody would film their phone with another phone?
 
2014-05-09 02:14:53 PM  
i.imgur.com
 
2014-05-09 02:15:36 PM  

charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.


That used to be my favorite breakfast cereal.
 
2014-05-09 02:18:26 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: The very idea of "disappearing photos" was absurd.  Nobody thought that maybe somebody would film their phone with another phone?


If the power button on my phone worked I could simply screenshot it.

/or just keep your face out of the picture
 
2014-05-09 02:18:33 PM  
You're a farking idiot if you believed the pictures would just "disappear".
 
2014-05-09 02:20:44 PM  
Too old, too jaded, just enough IT knowledge

I never believed them in the first place

/not hot, you wouldn't want to see ol'Huckleberry and the Twins anyways
 
2014-05-09 02:21:04 PM  
They are all at Naked.tumblr.com.
 
2014-05-09 02:22:06 PM  
EIP?
 
2014-05-09 02:23:22 PM  

charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.


One time I got an email from a Farkette who said she saw my profile picture and sent me BIE. She asked not to be named but she was pretty hot and cheered me up from a bad day!

/be optimistic
 
2014-05-09 02:23:54 PM  

Another Government Employee: They are all at Naked.tumblr.com.


im sorry where is this?
 
2014-05-09 02:24:34 PM  
If you're stupid enough to believe anything sent over the internet isn't stored somewhere, you deserve what you get.
 
2014-05-09 02:24:49 PM  

ArcadianRefugee: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

That used to be my favorite breakfast cereal.


There's nothing like sitting down to a big bowl of dicks in the morning.
 
2014-05-09 02:25:06 PM  

charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.


I'm female.  Pic in profile.  Let's see how great you look.  I'll be you have pointy knees.
 
2014-05-09 02:25:27 PM  
All I ever send are duckfaces and pictures of food... I think I'm good.
 
2014-05-09 02:26:27 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: The very idea of "disappearing photos" was absurd.  Nobody thought that maybe somebody would film their phone with another phone?


The "Analogue Hole" is why no DRM works, and why secure facilities get so upset and things like furbies. This issue goes beyond trusting the recipient; it was implicit that only the sender and recipient would have access to the image.
 
2014-05-09 02:28:20 PM  

Grapple: All I ever send are duckfaces and pictures of food... I think I'm good.


Im fapping to your sandwich right now
 
2014-05-09 02:28:50 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: The very idea of "disappearing photos" was absurd.  Nobody thought that maybe somebody would film their phone with another phone?


matthewatthemovies.files.wordpress.com  or i.imgflip.com

not sure which one applies here
 
2014-05-09 02:29:07 PM  
LOL
20 years of oversight?

For a company that will be lucky to still be relevant in a year?
 
2014-05-09 02:30:30 PM  
The odds of anything "disappearing" from the internet are inversely proportional to their salaciousness.

The answer to life, the universe and everything is more likely to fade from digital memory than the least-interesting nude selfie ever posted.
 
2014-05-09 02:30:51 PM  
Years ago in a FARK thread some guy insisted there was no information about him on the internet. That lasted about five minutes.
 
2014-05-09 02:32:45 PM  

skozlaw: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

Are you implying that Fark is full of men or trannies?


I think it's well established that Fark is full of men and trannies
 
2014-05-09 02:33:33 PM  

uncleacid: Years ago in a FARK thread some guy insisted there was no information about him on the internet. That lasted about five minutes.


come at me bro

(no not really)
 
2014-05-09 02:34:01 PM  

cyberspacedout: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

Err... chicks with dicks?


More accurate: Guys with tits.
 
2014-05-09 02:36:19 PM  
shiat just got real
 
2014-05-09 02:39:01 PM  

Honest Bender: LOL
20 years of oversight?

For a company that will be lucky to still be relevant in a year?


I was going to say this. Do you still think Snapchat will even be around in 2 years, let alone 20?
 
2014-05-09 02:44:19 PM  
I'm guessing this company's business plan started with two guys sitting around trying to find a way to make the world's largest spank bank.

"How do we convince women all over the world to send us pictures of their tits?"

"I know. We let them share them with other people and tell them they will be deleted."
 
2014-05-09 02:48:04 PM  

cgraves67: ArcadianRefugee: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

That used to be my favorite breakfast cereal.

There's nothing like sitting down to a big bowl of dicks in the morning.


We were poor or breakfast dicks came in a bag.
 
2014-05-09 02:54:38 PM  

Archie Goodwin: Honest Bender: LOL
20 years of oversight?

For a company that will be lucky to still be relevant in a year?

I was going to say this. Do you still think Snapchat will even be around in 2 years, let alone 20?


I wonder if whatever company inevitably buys them will have to follow the oversight as well? Or if they're too toxic to purchase now?

Still, it's surprising how long some companies you'd never expect to can last.
 
2014-05-09 02:59:19 PM  
20 years of oversight? That's like the FTC came in said, "You are so guilty you will only get a trial cause we have to. We don't think you need will survive jail though."
 
2014-05-09 03:00:25 PM  

Cold_Sassy: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

I'm female.  Pic in profile.  Let's see how great you look.  I'll be you have pointy knees.


Indeed, Mr Martel is wrong. You are on FARK. And you are quite attractive.
 
2014-05-09 03:01:07 PM  

CADMonkey79: cgraves67: ArcadianRefugee: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

That used to be my favorite breakfast cereal.

There's nothing like sitting down to a big bowl of dicks in the morning.

We were poor or breakfast dicks came in a bag.


i30.photobucket.com
 
2014-05-09 03:01:24 PM  

kvinesknows: Grapple: All I ever send are duckfaces and pictures of food... I think I'm good.

Im fapping to your sandwich right now


I didn't remember this sandwich usually having mayo on it...
 
2014-05-09 03:02:07 PM  

CADMonkey79: cgraves67: ArcadianRefugee: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

That used to be my favorite breakfast cereal.

There's nothing like sitting down to a big bowl of dicks in the morning.

We were poor or breakfast dicks came in a bag.


I must be really poor. My breakfast (or lunch, dinner and midnight snack) dick is still attached to its, uh, grower.
 
2014-05-09 03:03:36 PM  

foxyshadis: Archie Goodwin: Honest Bender: LOL
20 years of oversight?

For a company that will be lucky to still be relevant in a year?

I was going to say this. Do you still think Snapchat will even be around in 2 years, let alone 20?

I wonder if whatever company inevitably buys them will have to follow the oversight as well? Or if they're too toxic to purchase now?

Still, it's surprising how long some companies you'd never expect to can last.


The one I still don't get is Twitter. Except for some snarky jokes I don't see why anyone cares. But yet they make millions of dollars...(for the owners at least)
 
2014-05-09 03:05:14 PM  
(Almost) Everybody in this thread is a sick bastard. I love you all!
 
2014-05-09 03:05:37 PM  

kvinesknows: Another Government Employee: They are all at Naked.tumblr.com.

im sorry where is this?


Can't Google-Fu @ work.

Needless to say ir is NSFW.
 
2014-05-09 03:07:26 PM  

Tellingthem: foxyshadis: Archie Goodwin: Honest Bender: LOL
20 years of oversight?

For a company that will be lucky to still be relevant in a year?

I was going to say this. Do you still think Snapchat will even be around in 2 years, let alone 20?

I wonder if whatever company inevitably buys them will have to follow the oversight as well? Or if they're too toxic to purchase now?

Still, it's surprising how long some companies you'd never expect to can last.

The one I still don't get is Twitter. Except for some snarky jokes I don't see why anyone cares. But yet they make millions of dollars...(for the owners at least)


Most users don't even tweet. It's like socially acceptable electronic stalking. Actually, most of it seems to be advertising by companies and self-promotion by celebrities.
 
2014-05-09 03:12:55 PM  

unfarkingbelievable: Cold_Sassy: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

I'm female.  Pic in profile.  Let's see how great you look.  I'll be you have pointy knees.

Indeed, Mr Martel is wrong. You are on FARK. And you are quite attractive.


What I don't believe (especially after 9 years of this) is how many always presumed I was a guy.  Now, what self-respecting red blooded male would have himself the handle "Cold Sassy" for crying out loud?

PS I was right about charles, he is a big fat purple guy with a green tummy ;)

Thank you for your compliment.
 
2014-05-09 03:17:00 PM  

foxyshadis: Archie Goodwin: Honest Bender: LOL
20 years of oversight?

For a company that will be lucky to still be relevant in a year?

I was going to say this. Do you still think Snapchat will even be around in 2 years, let alone 20?

I wonder if whatever company inevitably buys them will have to follow the oversight as well? Or if they're too toxic to purchase now?

Still, it's surprising how long some companies you'd never expect to can last.


For example a company based on the idea that regularly eating crushed bits of corn smushed together would stop your kids masturbating - who would expect that still be going strong over 100 years later?


/well, ok, everyone that knows the US puritanical streak well enough would probably expect anything that claimed to reduce masturbation would sell well
 
2014-05-09 03:18:21 PM  

Grapple: All I ever send are duckfaces and pictures of food... I think I'm good.


You're doing it wrong, you should be on Instagram.
 
2014-05-09 03:26:34 PM  
I'm just surprised the torrenting/piracy community hasn't protested this site and its feeble attempt to stop the signal.  Content providers purposely trying to make their products exclusive and all those virtual robin hoods out there should be setting it free.
 
2014-05-09 03:58:19 PM  
I work with college kids and at least 3 of them have some kind of app that saves Snapchat content. They're gay and/or fruit flies, though, so they enjoy dick pics.
 
2014-05-09 04:23:53 PM  

unfarkingbelievable: CADMonkey79: cgraves67: ArcadianRefugee: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

That used to be my favorite breakfast cereal.

There's nothing like sitting down to a big bowl of dicks in the morning.

We were poor or breakfast dicks came in a bag.

I must be really poor. My breakfast (or lunch, dinner and midnight snack) dick is still attached to its, uh, grower.


That doesn't mean you're poor. The cream filled ones cost extra. I hear it does wonders for the skin.
 
2014-05-09 05:35:22 PM  

Cold_Sassy: charlesmartel11235: nobody on fark is a hot chick so i doubt anyone will care about their dick snaps.

I'm female.  Pic in profile.  Let's see how great you look.  I'll be you have pointy knees.


So, how YOU doin'?
 
Displayed 50 of 67 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report