If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(TMZ)   Woman suing James Cameron and Fox for making Titanic, claiming they stole her idea for a 3-D virtual simulator that would re-create the action of a ship hitting an iceberg   (tmz.com) divider line 27
    More: Strange, Titanic, TMZ  
•       •       •

1306 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 04 May 2014 at 2:54 PM (19 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



27 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-05-04 09:22:22 AM
Good luck you farking looney.
 
2014-05-04 10:44:06 AM
Well, this is a timely lawsuit.  Is she going to sue the White Star Line next for using bad rivets?
 
2014-05-04 10:50:40 AM
They should be sued for making Titanic, but I can think of a lot of better reasons
 
2014-05-04 11:33:35 AM
James Cameron doesn't do what James Cameron does for James Cameron, James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron is James Cameron.
 
2014-05-04 11:49:12 AM
I can see how this could be relevant. Maybe she just found out about the movie.
 
2014-05-04 01:06:35 PM
Is there a statute of limitations on how long after-the-fact you can sue for something? Even though it doesn't feel like it, 1997 was a long farking time ago.
 
2014-05-04 02:05:10 PM

ecmoRandomNumbers: Is there a statute of limitations on how long after-the-fact you can sue for something? Even though it doesn't feel like it, 1997 was a long farking time ago.


RTFA. She's not suing over the movie.

/guarantees Cameron's lawyer has a bigger dick than her lawyer
 
2014-05-04 02:51:12 PM
31.media.tumblr.com
 
2014-05-04 03:05:24 PM
img1.wikia.nocookie.net

/Frowns upon these shenanigans
//Probably obscure
 
2014-05-04 03:05:51 PM
People filing frivolous lawsuits need to be summarily arrested and lose 95% of their net worth.   So you know, they get the message.
 
2014-05-04 03:21:01 PM
Took her long enough....
 
2014-05-04 03:39:16 PM

AtlanticCoast63: Took her long enough....


Rose don't move so fast these days, but that necklace can buy a pretty fancy lawyer.
 
2014-05-04 03:47:47 PM

Fano: Rose don't move so fast these days, but that necklace can buy a pretty fancy lawyer.


Unfortunately, in the dumbest, most incomprehensible plot point in motion picture history, she threw it in the ocean.
 
2014-05-04 04:01:09 PM

Mugato: Fano: Rose don't move so fast these days, but that necklace can buy a pretty fancy lawyer.

Unfortunately, in the dumbest, most incomprehensible plot point in motion picture history, she threw it in the ocean.


Saved by the alternate cut where she taunts the salvage ship's crew first. That was comedy gold.
 
2014-05-04 04:03:03 PM

Fano: Mugato: Fano: Rose don't move so fast these days, but that necklace can buy a pretty fancy lawyer.

Unfortunately, in the dumbest, most incomprehensible plot point in motion picture history, she threw it in the ocean.

Saved by the alternate cut where she taunts the salvage ship's crew first. That was comedy gold.


I feel like that alternate ending makes more sense because she at least explains it a bit. As it is, there's basically no motivation behind her action.
 
2014-05-04 04:09:21 PM

Master Jason: I feel like that alternate ending makes more sense because she at least explains it a bit. As it is, there's basically no motivation behind her action.


I saw  that ending on youtube. Still doesn't explain it. She carries around this near priceless diamond, given to her by her evil, abusive fiance so it can't exactly be that sentimental for her. So instead of using it to put her kids through college or buying an island or curing cancer, she holds onto it for 90 years and throws it away. But not before making the guys who are searching for it sit through her 7 hour story.

If they would have thrown her over the side after she did that, it would have almost salvaged the movie.
 
2014-05-04 04:23:06 PM

Mugato: Master Jason: I feel like that alternate ending makes more sense because she at least explains it a bit. As it is, there's basically no motivation behind her action.

I saw  that ending on youtube. Still doesn't explain it. She carries around this near priceless diamond, given to her by her evil, abusive fiance so it can't exactly be that sentimental for her. So instead of using it to put her kids through college or buying an island or curing cancer, she holds onto it for 90 years and throws it away. But not before making the guys who are searching for it sit through her 7 hour story.

If they would have thrown her over the side after she did that, it would have almost salvaged the movie.


Nah, they just had to play the price is right sad trombone. It would be a great addition in the field of absurdist art. IIRC she makes an "oop" noise as she tosses it, she might has well said "yoink"
 
2014-05-04 05:10:42 PM

Mugato: Master Jason: I feel like that alternate ending makes more sense because she at least explains it a bit. As it is, there's basically no motivation behind her action.

I saw  that ending on youtube. Still doesn't explain it. She carries around this near priceless diamond, given to her by her evil, abusive fiance so it can't exactly be that sentimental for her. So instead of using it to put her kids through college or buying an island or curing cancer, she holds onto it for 90 years and throws it away. But not before making the guys who are searching for it sit through her 7 hour story.

If they would have thrown her over the side after she did that, it would have almost salvaged the movie.


Trolling, in her day, meant something.
 
2014-05-04 06:22:32 PM

Mugato: Master Jason: I feel like that alternate ending makes more sense because she at least explains it a bit. As it is, there's basically no motivation behind her action.

I saw  that ending on youtube. Still doesn't explain it. She carries around this near priceless diamond, given to her by her evil, abusive fiance so it can't exactly be that sentimental for her. So instead of using it to put her kids through college or buying an island or curing cancer, she holds onto it for 90 years and throws it away. But not before making the guys who are searching for it sit through her 7 hour story.

If they would have thrown her over the side after she did that, it would have almost salvaged the movie.


Would've been great had the movie ended with them throwing her over and them sailing away while she's on the board she was too selfish to share with Jack. Fade to black...
 
2014-05-04 06:47:25 PM
Should be suing Burger King.

images.wherearesueandmike.com
 
2014-05-04 06:47:44 PM

HighlanderRPI: [img1.wikia.nocookie.net image 341x259]

/Frowns upon these shenanigans
//Probably obscure


I love that game! Wish I could get it to work on my desktop, though...
 
2014-05-04 07:08:52 PM

flucto: Good luck you farking looney.


More like this is an obvious PR ploy with no actual intent on winning the lawsuit, and I've already failed as I'm posting in an attention whore thread.
 
2014-05-04 08:27:21 PM

Crotchrocket Slim: More like this is an obvious PR ploy with no actual intent on winning the lawsuit, and I've already failed as I'm posting in an attention whore thread.


I can no longer take you seriously.
 
2014-05-04 08:32:08 PM
Faan Qin is suing James Cameron, 20th Century Fox, Paramount and others involved in the hit film, "Titanic" ... claiming they jacked her idea for a 3D ride that recreates the magical experience of crashing into an iceberg and sinking to a watery grave.

Because nobody else in the history of ever had the idea of making a virtual reality simulator that created the experience of crashing into something and sinking into the water.
 
2014-05-04 08:48:36 PM

Gyrfalcon: Faan Qin is suing James Cameron, 20th Century Fox, Paramount and others involved in the hit film, "Titanic" ... claiming they jacked her idea for a 3D ride that recreates the magical experience of crashing into an iceberg and sinking to a watery grave.

Because nobody else in the history of ever had the idea of making a virtual reality simulator that created the experience of crashing into something and sinking into the water.


Ted Kennedy?
 
2014-05-04 09:27:07 PM

Gyrfalcon: Faan Qin is suing James Cameron, 20th Century Fox, Paramount and others involved in the hit film, "Titanic" ... claiming they jacked her idea for a 3D ride that recreates the magical experience of crashing into an iceberg and sinking to a watery grave.

Because nobody else in the history of ever had the idea of making a virtual reality simulator that created the experience of crashing into something and sinking into the water.


Bird strike https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZPvVwvX_Nc
 
2014-05-05 12:59:39 PM

nytmare: Gyrfalcon: Faan Qin is suing James Cameron, 20th Century Fox, Paramount and others involved in the hit film, "Titanic" ... claiming they jacked her idea for a 3D ride that recreates the magical experience of crashing into an iceberg and sinking to a watery grave.

Because nobody else in the history of ever had the idea of making a virtual reality simulator that created the experience of crashing into something and sinking into the water.

Bird strike https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZPvVwvX_Nc


Hold my scotch and cigar..watch this
 
Displayed 27 of 27 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report