If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Forbes)   Raising taxes on the rich actually helped some people who make around $500k a year due to an obscure rule called AMT addback. This just happens to include people like the President   (forbes.com) divider line 80
    More: Obvious, Raising Taxes, Alternative Minimum Tax, President Obama, presidents, obamacare, itemized deductions, interest income, computing platform  
•       •       •

7866 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Apr 2014 at 7:16 PM (18 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



80 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-04-13 05:13:32 PM
images.sodahead.com
 
2014-04-13 05:29:46 PM
And 95% of Congress.
 
2014-04-13 05:31:44 PM
So, his effective rate went...*up*?
 
2014-04-13 06:46:24 PM
I'm not voting for him again. Seriously. This is the last straw. You hear me? Never forget!
 
2014-04-13 07:21:53 PM
Fark that noise. I'll see you plebes in Costa Rica, where I can sip on Mai Tais (or whatever) and have tanned cabaña boys (or whatever) bring me food without the tyranny of taxation.
 
2014-04-13 07:23:17 PM
a series of tax increases

I love how letting a portion of what was supposed to be a temporary tax cut expire counts as a tax increase.
 
2014-04-13 07:30:14 PM
That's it. Who let subby out of his derp cage?
 
2014-04-13 07:31:29 PM

gnosis301: Fark that noise. I'll see you plebes in Costa Rica, where I can sip on Mai Tais (or whatever) and have tanned cabaña boys (or whatever) bring me food without the tyranny of taxation.


Just as long as they don't tax your trannys right?
 
2014-04-13 07:34:23 PM
I love the extra 0.9% Medicare and 3.8% investment tax. Why do I have to pay it? Because fark you you do.
 
2014-04-13 07:34:49 PM
fusillade762: I love how letting a portion of what was supposed to be a temporary tax cut expire counts as a tax increase.

Seriously. That same thinking turns

Because the President's book revenue was down, he contributed $90,000 less to the Fisher House Foundation, an organization that helps military families.

into "President Obama took $90K away from military families."

 
2014-04-13 07:34:49 PM

Tiggobitties: gnosis301: Fark that noise. I'll see you plebes in Costa Rica, where I can sip on Mai Tais (or whatever) and have tanned cabaña boys (or whatever) bring me food without the tyranny of taxation.

Just as long as they don't tax your trannys right?


Now you're playing with power.
 
2014-04-13 07:36:00 PM
a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.
 
2014-04-13 07:38:04 PM
History's. Greatest. Monster.

Like Hitler and Super-Hitler had a baby type bad.
 
2014-04-13 07:43:19 PM
Quite often people get rich because they're smart.  News at 11.
 
2014-04-13 07:44:07 PM

Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.


A flat tax on what?

A flat income tax would make the super rich very, very, very happy.
 
2014-04-13 07:44:43 PM
Can anyone explain to li'l ole me what tfa has to do with the troll-y implications of subby's headline? Because my understanding of tfa is that President Obama basically paid the same amount this year as last year because expiring things in Column A canceled out new things in Column B. Whereas subby seems to be implying that the man with the most heavily scrutinized tax returns in the world manipulated the tax code for personal gain.

If it helps, I already recognize that subby is severely mentally deficient.
 
2014-04-13 07:46:35 PM

Dafatone: A flat income tax would make the super rich very, very, very happy.


The rich, maybe.

The super-rich are above making an "income".
 
2014-04-13 07:51:12 PM

TomD9938: Dafatone: A flat income tax would make the super rich very, very, very happy.

The rich, maybe.

The super-rich are above making an "income".


...which is why it would make them very, very, very happy.
 
2014-04-13 07:51:56 PM
"Obama Paid $2,310 In Obamacare Tax in 2013 ..."


Huh,   Obamacare tax.
 
2014-04-13 07:52:21 PM

Dafatone: Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.

A flat tax on what?

A flat income tax would make the super rich very, very, very happy.


No, but see, the tax is flat. Flat. Previously it was called Fair, and that was Fair, but this is less fair but more flat and that still starts with an F and that spells M-O-O-N. The F tax is suitable for even simple Folk who got an F in math...because there is no math! Just flatness.
 
2014-04-13 07:53:37 PM

netcentric: "Obama Paid $2,310 In Obamacare Tax in 2013 ..."


Huh,   Obamacare tax.


Dem death panels ain't gonna pay fer demselfs.
 
2014-04-13 07:54:25 PM

gnosis301: Fark that noise. I'll see you plebes in Costa Rica, where I can sip on Mai Tais (or whatever) and have tanned cabaña boys (or whatever) bring me food without the tyranny of taxation.


This is how I know you are just trying to impersonate a real conservative.

A true American who listens to conservative AM talk radio would know that Belize is the can't miss real estate investment opportunity of a lifetime. When 0maba and his cronies have finished destroying the American dream, the only safe haven where you can hide your hard-earned assets from the insatiable, socialistic beast of the IRS is overseas. Now, you can invest in your own personal Galt's Gulch in paradise.  Buy Belize now, before the secret is out!  That's Buy Belize, dot com!  Check it out... today!

/don't check it out
//or do, but for God's sake only for a laugh, and don't get suckered
 
2014-04-13 07:54:37 PM

dangelder: Dafatone: Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.

A flat tax on what?

A flat income tax would make the super rich very, very, very happy.

No, but see, the tax is flat. Flat. Previously it was called Fair, and that was Fair, but this is less fair but more flat and that still starts with an F and that spells M-O-O-N. The F tax is suitable for even simple Folk who got an F in math...because there is no math! Just flatness.


Like the Earth!
 
2014-04-13 07:55:07 PM

Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.


A flat tax would have to be absurdly high to be revenue neutral.  "America's taxes are too high - let's make them higher!" is rather derptastic.

And the graduated nature of taxes has absolutely nothing to do with stuff like Exxon.  What you are complaining about are exemptions.

If you removed the graduatedness but not the exemptions, Exxon still pays $0
If you removed the exemptions but not the graduatedness, Exxon pays a shiat-ton of money.
Therefore, flatness is irrelevant to your stated desire of Exxon paying $not-0.

BTW Removing both means Exxon pays a shiat-ton of money; it also means the average wage-earner would pay practically all their post-keep-myself-alive money in taxes.
 
2014-04-13 07:57:21 PM

Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


A flat tax would do an excellent job of transferring more of the tax burden onto the poor and middle classes.

You want an easy fix to our current system? Let's go back to taxing capital gains at the same rates as all other income.
 
2014-04-13 07:59:28 PM

Parthenogenetic: gnosis301: Fark that noise. I'll see you plebes in Costa Rica, where I can sip on Mai Tais (or whatever) and have tanned cabaña boys (or whatever) bring me food without the tyranny of taxation.

This is how I know you are just trying to impersonate a real conservative.

A true American who listens to conservative AM talk radio would know that Belize is the can't miss real estate investment opportunity of a lifetime. When 0maba and his cronies have finished destroying the American dream, the only safe haven where you can hide your hard-earned assets from the insatiable, socialistic beast of the IRS is overseas. Now, you can invest in your own personal Galt's Gulch in paradise.  Buy Belize now, before the secret is out!  That's Buy Belize, dot com!  Check it out... today!

/don't check it out
//or do, but for God's sake only for a laugh, and don't get suckered


To be fair, though, cave tubing in Belize is kinda awesome.
 
2014-04-13 08:00:26 PM
This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.
 
2014-04-13 08:09:10 PM

brimed03: ...subby seems to be implying that the man with the most heavily scrutinized tax returns in the world manipulated the tax code for personal gain.


Yup, because saving a few thousand dollars on a year's taxes would totally be the most important financial benefit of being President.
 
2014-04-13 08:10:27 PM
i1.ytimg.com
 
2014-04-13 08:14:36 PM
People who make $500,000 a year don't know they are rich. They think they are "just getting by". Just any Congress person.

Of course, in many places $500,000 won't get you a three-bedroom apartment.
 
2014-04-13 08:15:12 PM

cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.


Or we could do it like other countries do and let the IRS compute it. They already have your w2's, 1099s, etc. and their computer is going to check it anyway, so they could just send you a statement that says "this is what we calculated. If you're cool with that we're done. Otherwise you can send in your own paperwork."
 
2014-04-13 08:20:44 PM

Parthenogenetic: gnosis301: Fark that noise. I'll see you plebes in Costa Rica, where I can sip on Mai Tais (or whatever) and have tanned cabaña boys (or whatever) bring me food without the tyranny of taxation.

This is how I know you are just trying to impersonate a real conservative.

A true American who listens to conservative AM talk radio would know that Belize is the can't miss real estate investment opportunity of a lifetime. When 0maba and his cronies have finished destroying the American dream, the only safe haven where you can hide your hard-earned assets from the insatiable, socialistic beast of the IRS is overseas. Now, you can invest in your own personal Galt's Gulch in paradise.  Buy Belize now, before the secret is out!  That's Buy Belize, dot com!  Check it out... today!

/don't check it out
//or do, but for God's sake only for a laugh, and don't get suckered



Have you been to Belize? It may not be Galt's Gulch, but it seems like not a bad place to retire for mai tais.
 
2014-04-13 08:22:04 PM
And therefore, David Koch is president and everyone who makes less than 7 figures a year must give their entire paycheck to him. He'll give them something for it. If he feels like it. Damn poors.
 
2014-04-13 08:23:50 PM

revrendjim: cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.

Or we could do it like other countries do and let the IRS compute it. They already have your w2's, 1099s, etc. and their computer is going to check it anyway, so they could just send you a statement that says "this is what we calculated. If you're cool with that we're done. Otherwise you can send in your own paperwork."


As logical as that sounds, i think they want people to do it manually to not only a) be able to report things on your tax like internet purchases out of state (uh-huh) but to b) catch you in a lie.

that second part is probably important for their prosecution and subtly intimidates people.. what does the IRS know? File.. and find out.
 
2014-04-13 08:26:02 PM
How the fark is the president's effective federal tax rate lower than mine?
 
2014-04-13 08:26:07 PM
AMT Addback sounds like when the Terminator shot the gun shop clerk instead of paying for everything.

/because the .45 was an AMT
 
jbc [TotalFark]
2014-04-13 08:26:49 PM

revrendjim: cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.

Or we could do it like other countries do and let the IRS compute it. They already have your w2's, 1099s, etc. and their computer is going to check it anyway, so they could just send you a statement that says "this is what we calculated. If you're cool with that we're done. Otherwise you can send in your own paperwork."


The Want Taxes Flat (WTF) people will never go for that, because the IRS unfairly targets conservatives by making sure groups across the political spectrum aren't falsely claiming to be tax-exempt. Because Benghazicare.
 
2014-04-13 08:28:04 PM

lelio: I love the extra 0.9% Medicare and 3.8% investment tax. Why do I have to pay it? Because fark you you do.


Because that shiat's expensive, and you make more money than most.

A new payroll tax was born. Starting in 2013, taxpayers with earned income from wages or self-employment income in excess of $250,000 (if married filing jointly, $200,000 if single), will pay an extra 0.9% Medicare tax on the excess earnings.


Medicare is a Good Thing.  But it is indeed straight up redistribution of wealth.  It lets poor folks enjoy their grandparents for an extra five years before they kick the bucket.
 
2014-04-13 08:28:20 PM
Just curious how much the President has in bonds, etc to earn $6,575 in interest.

/not snarky, just curious...
 
2014-04-13 08:31:59 PM

Ex-Texan: [i1.ytimg.com image 850x478]


Sweet Jesus its a fire.
 
2014-04-13 08:35:32 PM

fusillade762: a series of tax increases

I love how letting a portion of what was supposed to be a temporary tax cut expire counts as a tax increase.


It is if you are paying the higher rate. Not to mention there are plenty of people who probably didn't earn as much over a decade ago when the top rates were previously that high.
 
2014-04-13 08:37:09 PM
If I was in charge, anyone 6'6" would not pay any taxes. See how it works.
 
2014-04-13 08:45:10 PM

Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.


What quarter was that?
 
2014-04-13 08:51:10 PM

cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.


They easily can unless they're wholly retarded.
 
2014-04-13 08:52:30 PM

IlGreven: And therefore, David Koch is president and everyone who makes less than 7 figures a year must give their entire paycheck to him. He'll give them something for it. If he feels like it. Damn poors.


Africa has the curse of Ebola, the above shows that this thread has the curse of Derpola and there is no cure.  Read derp like this long enough and your brain will liquify and run out your ear.
 
2014-04-13 08:56:19 PM

zimbomba63: Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.

What quarter was that?


Meanwhile, General Electric sits over there in the corner with a smug expression.
 
2014-04-13 09:01:41 PM

zimbomba63: Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.

What quarter was that?


Yeah, I'd be interested to know that.

It's probably a case of someone not understanding the difference between operating profit and profit paid out to shareholders. If you make a million dollars profit but invest it all back into the company, such as investing in new projects, then your profit as far as the IRS is concerned is zero, and you won't pay tax. That is the same if you are Exxon or a guy who mows lawns.
 
2014-04-13 09:05:14 PM

FlyinS: cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.

They easily can unless they're wholly retarded.



You're both right. The "average American" probably has a simple form to fill out (especially if they aren't overly perfectionist), but the tax code has been in dire need of simplification for a long time and anyone who either has a relatively high income or has an unusual situation tends to have a completely absurd tax return.
 
2014-04-13 09:08:34 PM

LL316: Quite often rarely people get rich because they're smart.  News at 11.


Drew is the exception, not the rule.
 
2014-04-13 09:08:41 PM

Flint Ironstag: zimbomba63: Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.

What quarter was that?

Yeah, I'd be interested to know that.

It's probably a case of someone not understanding the difference between operating profit and profit paid out to shareholders. If you make a million dollars profit but invest it all back into the company, such as investing in new projects, then your profit as far as the IRS is concerned is zero, and you won't pay tax. That is the same if you are Exxon or a guy who mows lawns.


Actually a quick look at Exxons figures shows it is someone who doesn't even understand the difference between turnover and profit. In 2013 its revenue was $420 billion, slightly more than the $90b a quarter figure given. But its profit was $40b for the whole year, $10b a quarter, not $90b.
 
2014-04-13 09:14:41 PM

revrendjim: cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.

Or we could do it like other countries do and let the IRS compute it. They already have your w2's, 1099s, etc. and their computer is going to check it anyway, so they could just send you a statement that says "this is what we calculated. If you're cool with that we're done. Otherwise you can send in your own paperwork."


That's been proposed, but the tax software lobby paid off enough people to stop it. There was actually a law banning the IRS from offering free tax software or preparation. Peter Roskam and Congressman Ron Kind of Wisconsin are the leading tax software company whores on this issue.

http://consumerist.com/2013/04/15/legislation-would-prevent-irs-from -p roviding-pre-filled-tax-returns/
 
2014-04-13 09:15:00 PM

FlyinS: cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.

They easily can unless they're wholly retarded.


The average American CAN do their return by hand in an afternoon. But they'll pay H&R BLock $250 to do their 1040-EZ so they can get their refund anticipation debit card product so they can get their refund 1 week faster, even though if they adjusted their withholding correctly they would have had that money all along instead of giving an interest free loan to the government.

Ergo, tax return = savings account for average people minus huge charges and fees that go to the private tax prep industry.
 
2014-04-13 09:22:31 PM

ultraholland: fusillade762: I love how letting a portion of what was supposed to be a temporary tax cut expire counts as a tax increase.

Seriously. That same thinking turns Because the President's book revenue was down, he contributed $90,000 less to the Fisher House Foundation, an organization that helps military families. into "President Obama took $90K away from military families."


When VA funding goes from a 5% increase to a 4% increase, headlines say, "REPUBLICANS SLASH VA FUNDING." Fair's fair.

Also since the president was including in the fark headline, subby is a racist.
 
2014-04-13 09:26:23 PM

insano: That's it. Who let subby out of his derp cage?


^THIS^

Who the hell considers AMT an "obscure tax rule"?!?
 
2014-04-13 09:28:21 PM

suburbanguy: insano: That's it. Who let subby out of his derp cage?

^THIS^

Who the hell considers AMT an "obscure tax rule"?!?


The poors.

/kidding.
//although it's not like they have any reason to need to know that.
 
2014-04-13 09:33:56 PM

Nabb1: suburbanguy: insano: That's it. Who let subby out of his derp cage?

^THIS^

Who the hell considers AMT an "obscure tax rule"?!?

The poors.

/kidding.
//although it's not like they have any reason to need to know that.


I'm not poor, nor upper middle class. Square in the middle, so I don't pay AMT. But I prepare taxes, and AMT is anything but obscure...
 
2014-04-13 09:37:22 PM

suburbanguy: Nabb1: suburbanguy: insano: That's it. Who let subby out of his derp cage?

^THIS^

Who the hell considers AMT an "obscure tax rule"?!?

The poors.

/kidding.
//although it's not like they have any reason to need to know that.

I'm not poor, nor upper middle class. Square in the middle, so I don't pay AMT. But I prepare taxes, and AMT is anything but obscure...


AMT has bitten us in the ass. Meh, that's life, I guess. My brother-in-law is a CPA, so I won't see him again until Wednesday, when he'll looke like an extra from the Walking Dead.
 
2014-04-13 09:41:50 PM

Nabb1: suburbanguy: Nabb1: suburbanguy: insano: That's it. Who let subby out of his derp cage?

^THIS^

Who the hell considers AMT an "obscure tax rule"?!?

The poors.

/kidding.
//although it's not like they have any reason to need to know that.

I'm not poor, nor upper middle class. Square in the middle, so I don't pay AMT. But I prepare taxes, and AMT is anything but obscure...

AMT has bitten us in the ass. Meh, that's life, I guess. My brother-in-law is a CPA, so I won't see him again until Wednesday, when he'll looke like an extra from the Walking Dead.


That's me. Not a CPA, but a account/financial advisor at a small/boutique CPA firm. Should be a CFP next summer.
 
2014-04-13 09:59:41 PM
You never go ATM.
 
2014-04-13 09:59:53 PM
I wish I could get away with just the 1040EZ. I've got to deal with the farking 2555, but at least this year the exchange rate is back to normal again, so at least I'm not going to need to scramble to pay taxes doubly this time.

Don't let anyone tell the average American guy's taxes are easily figured using the simplest forms. It's still a pain in the ass.
 
2014-04-13 10:20:58 PM

cchris_39: This is ridiculous. We need major simplification.

I took my masters in accounting in 1984 and passed the CPA exam a year later. That and 30 years experience and I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting that return correct without relying on tax preparation software.

The average American with the average return should be able to do their own return by hand in an afternoon.


So what if you are a CPA? That is irrelevant. Now tell us your experience in personal income taxes. Hell, I have done the taxes of a number of CPAs because the vast, vast majority don't do personal income taxes.

As a person without any designation who first saw a 1040 last year I could have cranked that 1040 out in a day manually, easy. When my manager sent it around to our team and nobody could believe how simple it was. The only question was what the laws are regarding state taxes for the President (the average person in his situation would have been taxable in pretty much every state with taxes, but we assume there is some protection for the President).
 
2014-04-13 10:24:42 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: I wish I could get away with just the 1040EZ. I've got to deal with the farking 2555, but at least this year the exchange rate is back to normal again, so at least I'm not going to need to scramble to pay taxes doubly this time.

Don't let anyone tell the average American guy's taxes are easily figured using the simplest forms. It's still a pain in the ass.


Any time you have foreign income it will get messy. Even for those nice easy countries in Europe. You could always see if FTCs make more sense than the FEIE.
 
2014-04-13 10:42:31 PM

dywed88: AverageAmericanGuy: I wish I could get away with just the 1040EZ. I've got to deal with the farking 2555, but at least this year the exchange rate is back to normal again, so at least I'm not going to need to scramble to pay taxes doubly this time.

Don't let anyone tell the average American guy's taxes are easily figured using the simplest forms. It's still a pain in the ass.

Any time you have foreign income it will get messy. Even for those nice easy countries in Europe. You could always see if FTCs make more sense than the FEIE.


I'm riding the edge of the FEIE, coming in income-wise just above but with deductions just under. As long as it remains this way, I'm happy just to spend an hour or two copying over information and writing -0- on that last line.

I was thinking of doing that a couple years ago when the American dollar was devalued like a motherfarker. But tax rates here in Japan are pretty low, I'm not sure how much the FTC would help me (and I'm too cheap to get an accountant when I don't have to).
 
2014-04-13 10:43:56 PM
Whenever rich people, like D.C. insiders, tell you that something they are doing will hurt the rich, they are lying. They do not do things which hurt themselves.
 
2014-04-13 10:46:38 PM

Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.


Exxon: managed to profit 90 billion one quarter and didn't pay any taxes on it.  now that is talent.


That must have revenue, not profit.
 
2014-04-13 10:51:12 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: dywed88: AverageAmericanGuy: I wish I could get away with just the 1040EZ. I've got to deal with the farking 2555, but at least this year the exchange rate is back to normal again, so at least I'm not going to need to scramble to pay taxes doubly this time.

Don't let anyone tell the average American guy's taxes are easily figured using the simplest forms. It's still a pain in the ass.

Any time you have foreign income it will get messy. Even for those nice easy countries in Europe. You could always see if FTCs make more sense than the FEIE.

I'm riding the edge of the FEIE, coming in income-wise just above but with deductions just under. As long as it remains this way, I'm happy just to spend an hour or two copying over information and writing -0- on that last line.

I was thinking of doing that a couple years ago when the American dollar was devalued like a motherfarker. But tax rates here in Japan are pretty low, I'm not sure how much the FTC would help me (and I'm too cheap to get an accountant when I don't have to).


Generally, low foreign tax rates favour FEIE (especially if you have significant US source income) and high foreign tax rates favour FTCs (with the carryforwards). Of course if you have income in excess of the threshold and/or investment income you will want to do both if you are in low tax country. It is just something a lot of people forget to think about and I know people that claimed up to the FEIE limit and then let the US fully tax their excess income.
 
2014-04-13 11:13:12 PM

dywed88: AverageAmericanGuy: dywed88: AverageAmericanGuy: I wish I could get away with just the 1040EZ. I've got to deal with the farking 2555, but at least this year the exchange rate is back to normal again, so at least I'm not going to need to scramble to pay taxes doubly this time.

Don't let anyone tell the average American guy's taxes are easily figured using the simplest forms. It's still a pain in the ass.

Any time you have foreign income it will get messy. Even for those nice easy countries in Europe. You could always see if FTCs make more sense than the FEIE.

I'm riding the edge of the FEIE, coming in income-wise just above but with deductions just under. As long as it remains this way, I'm happy just to spend an hour or two copying over information and writing -0- on that last line.

I was thinking of doing that a couple years ago when the American dollar was devalued like a motherfarker. But tax rates here in Japan are pretty low, I'm not sure how much the FTC would help me (and I'm too cheap to get an accountant when I don't have to).

Generally, low foreign tax rates favour FEIE (especially if you have significant US source income) and high foreign tax rates favour FTCs (with the carryforwards). Of course if you have income in excess of the threshold and/or investment income you will want to do both if you are in low tax country. It is just something a lot of people forget to think about and I know people that claimed up to the FEIE limit and then let the US fully tax their excess income.


The pillow is pretty soft when you bite it. And after a while you kind of get used to it.
 
2014-04-13 11:23:15 PM

jfarkinB: brimed03: ...subby seems to be implying that the man with the most heavily scrutinized tax returns in the world manipulated the tax code for personal gain.

Yup, because saving a few thousand dollars on a year's taxes would totally be the most important financial benefit of being President.


Right. Another good point.
 
2014-04-13 11:30:47 PM

fusillade762: a series of tax increases

I love how letting a portion of what was supposed to be a temporary tax cut expire counts as a tax increase.


Brilliant, isn't it?  I could swear hearing some talking head on FOX News talking about how they were hoping that the expiration would happen on a Democrat's watch, so they could blame him.

Rubes.
 
2014-04-13 11:41:38 PM
I was trying to find where he came up with the $2,310 figure at, but I have no f*cking clue.

My guess is, he's just trying to get all the right-wing news to pick up the headline without actually noting that he never actually shows where that figure came from or cites what tax it is.
 
2014-04-14 12:14:22 AM

Cubansaltyballs: I was trying to find where he came up with the $2,310 figure at, but I have no f*cking clue.

My guess is, he's just trying to get all the right-wing news to pick up the headline without actually noting that he never actually shows where that figure came from or cites what tax it is.


The ACA introduced two taxes: 0.9% Additional Medicare Tax on earned income (employment and self-employment) over $250,000 (MFJ, $125,000 MFS, $200,000 single) and 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax on net investment above that threshold.

Obama paid $2,174 of the former and $136 of the latter, combined for $2,310 as reported on line 60 of the 1040.
 
2014-04-14 12:23:42 AM
Nabb1: My brother-in-law is a CPA, so I won't see him again until Wednesday, when he'll looke like an extra from the Walking Dead.

I once rented a room from a CPA. The stress of tax season triggered her latent schizophrenia.
 
2014-04-14 12:27:58 AM
Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.

And yet it is always the liberals who are always opposed to the flat tax system, because it will only benefit the rich, who pay vastly higher taxes than anyone else in America.

Funny how that works.
 
2014-04-14 03:07:19 AM
500k a year isn't that much money when you consider mortgage, doc fees for the boat, kids college, etc... It doesn't go as  far as you'd think.
 
2014-04-14 03:17:06 AM

Dwindle: Linux_Yes: a flat tax would fix everthing and be much simpler, but the wealthy/big business folks would never allow that because then they and their high priced tax lawyers wouldn't be able to game the system.

And yet it is always the liberals who are always opposed to the flat tax system, because it will only benefit the rich, who pay vastly higher taxes than anyone else in America.

Funny how that works.


This.

Look, I'm for a  *straighter* tax because I'd much rather pay a straight 40% (and if I'm at a third now, then yes, next year is 40% at minimum) than an official 90 where I figured out how to write off half of my income.   Helps everyone, and not *just* the politically connected who can write favorable exemptions.  .

But flat tax is counterproductive.

/Among other things, I don't get why it's at least possible to pay taxes while being on welfare. Seems like you'd want to fix that if only to remove the deadweight losses.
 
2014-04-14 03:42:54 AM

Phony_Soldier: 500k a year isn't that much money when you consider mortgage, doc fees for the boat, kids college, etc... It doesn't go as  far as you'd think.


I've always found it instructive to think in terms of Midwest and Coast.  (AKA Red State + Midwest/Blue State or Not-dense city vs. Dense city)

General Rule of thumb: $1 of house in Midwest is $5-10 of house in Coast.  $1 of YARD is $10-100 in Coast. (Not joking  There's these MULTI-million dollar mansions with a smaller yard than I had growing up as a kid.  If they have one at all).

This leads to the Rule:.  $1 of after-tax income in Midwest is ~$2 in Coast.  (Obviously, this is an average)  And of course, because you have progressive taxes, that's $3 after-tax.

So $500K Coast (and if you're making $500K, you're on the Coast or you did something REALLY right) is ~$150K Midwest.  Sure, it's nice to HAVE, but it's not "Fark you" money by any means.

Especially if you're in NYC, and your tradeoff is between spending a few hundred thousand over the kid's lifetime shipping the kid off to private school or getting a house in a *really* nice neighborhood (or shipping the kid to shiatty publics, but if that was actually an option, the 2-income trap wouldn't exist).
 
2014-04-14 06:51:10 AM
I love how Farkers are downplaying and deflecting simply because the President is involved. The same people that would crucify Romney for taking advantage of the same things.
 
GBB [TotalFark]
2014-04-14 07:27:09 AM

TerminalEchoes: I love how Farkers are downplaying and deflecting simply because the President is involved. The same people that would crucify Romney for taking advantage of the same things.


Until Romney's effective tax rate at least matches mine, he'll still be crucified.  Obama's effective rate is much higher than mine, and apparently went up this past year.  Yeah, he gets a pass.
 
2014-04-14 07:35:20 AM

TerminalEchoes: I love how Farkers are downplaying and deflecting simply because the President is involved. The same people that would crucify Romney for taking advantage of the same things.


TFA: a farking FORBES writer saying Obama's return "remains remarkable in just how unremarkable it is"
You: Farkers are downplaying this!!!
 
2014-04-14 11:00:30 AM
I paid $2 in fed taxes in 2013. Got over $250 back. Just the way I like it. Slick.

/Why? I'm a leech.
 
Displayed 80 of 80 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report