Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Farktography) Farktography Theme of Farktography Contest No. 467: "Muybridge". Details and rules in first post. LGT next week's theme   (farktography.net) divider line 22
    More: Farktography, LGT Bank, Eadweard Muybridge, premonitions, themes, Contests  
•       •       •

630 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Apr 2014 at 12:01 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



22 Comments   (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Votes

Archived thread
 
2014-04-12 08:27:56 PM  
Welcome to Farktography!

This Week's Theme: "Muybridge"

Description
: Multiple shots of an action a la Eadward Muybridge http://www.muybridge.org/ Image may be a string of multiple shots like Muybridge, or multiple exposures in a single image (stacked in post-processing is ok). If multiple shots, do try to keep it reasonable (3-6, maybe?) Any subject allowed (if using nudes a la Muybridge, keep it clickable behind a placeholder image).

We ask that before submitting your photos you read and adhere to the following submission rules, including but not limited to the following:
- Submissions must be photographs; screen captures do not count as photographs.
- You must be the original photographer of your entry. Do not submit anyone else's photography as your own.
- You are only allowed to enter a photograph once. Do not submit the same photo to another contest later.
- You may enter 3 photos in each contest as long as each photo is of a different composition.
- Please post each photo separately so they can be voted for individually.


Please note:
The overarching ideal behind Farktography is that image corrections are acceptable, while adding or removing elements in the image (e.g. removing telephone poles, adding Elvis) is not acceptable. Levels, curves, contrast, saturation, crop, and black-and-white conversion tools may be used judiciously, but not to cartoonish or unrealistic extremes. Avoid applying artistic filters for the purpose of mimicking film, tilt-shift, toy camera, etc type effects. HDR and panorama stitching either in-camera or in post processing are not allowed unless specified for a particular theme (true multiple exposures done in-camera are acceptable, however). See the rules for more information on acceptable modifications, or check in at the Farktography Forums.

Legal: All photographers submitting photos to this contest are the legal copyright holders for the photos submitted and the photos are not to be considered free for any other use without written consent from the submitting photographers.
- Drop by the Farktography Forum on Fark (new window) or Farktography.net (for chatting, critique, techtalk and so on)
- Stats can be found here.
 
2014-04-14 03:40:35 PM  

img.fark.net


OSU Spring Game

 
2014-04-16 05:15:36 PM  

farm8.staticflickr.com

 
2014-04-16 05:17:45 PM  

farm3.staticflickr.com

 
2014-04-16 06:39:34 PM  

farm4.staticflickr.com

 
2014-04-16 11:12:14 PM  
Never leave a salad unattended when your pet stegosaurus is in the room...

img.fark.net
 
2014-04-16 11:16:29 PM  
 
2014-04-17 12:02:28 AM  

farm3.staticflickr.com

 
2014-04-17 12:33:26 AM  
img.fark.net
 
2014-04-17 12:58:02 AM  
farm5.staticflickr.com
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.
 
2014-04-17 01:30:11 AM  

gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.


That's perfect for this contest!!
 
2014-04-17 02:14:50 AM  

gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.


Fuggin cool photo, man. You got a bigger scan of it? :-)
 
2014-04-17 03:18:39 AM  

gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.


Is that from E Indian Bend Road in Scottsdale AZ?
 
2014-04-17 03:22:05 AM  
 
2014-04-17 03:50:17 AM  
Progression of a Water Droplet
farm4.staticflickr.com
 
2014-04-17 10:05:31 AM  

uttertosh: gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.

Fuggin cool photo, man. You got a bigger scan of it? :-)


The image links to the flickr page.  Scanned the 8x10 and it is up there.  Enjoy!
 
2014-04-17 10:06:37 AM  

sir_jamesd: gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.

Is that from E Indian Bend Road in Scottsdale AZ?


Yes it is -- took individual shots and printed them all on the same page.  It was a lot of work in the darkroom.
 
2014-04-17 03:39:10 PM  

gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.


I wish I could vote for this twice.
 
2014-04-17 11:41:57 PM  
don't vote fr mine, after seeing what others submitted, mine has nothing to do with the category. mine has multiple elements and layers but was captured in one shot, sorry for clogging bandwidth...
 
2014-04-18 11:09:34 AM  

gorrck: uttertosh: gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.

Fuggin cool photo, man. You got a bigger scan of it? :-)

The image links to the flickr page.  Scanned the 8x10 and it is up there.  Enjoy!


Aww, sweet, dude! Thanks :-)
 
2014-04-18 11:14:39 AM  

uttertosh: gorrck: uttertosh: gorrck: [farm5.staticflickr.com image 500x359]
Dear Mods, I submitted this a long time ago in a previous Farktography and it got denied due to "photoshop" restrictions.  This was not photoshop.  This was 5 individual negatives from 35mm film printed onto one single sheet of Ilford Multigrade paper.  This was a multiple day project in the darkroom. If this is unacceptable for the Muybridge Farktography, please remove and I will understand.  Thank you.

Fuggin cool photo, man. You got a bigger scan of it? :-)

The image links to the flickr page.  Scanned the 8x10 and it is up there.  Enjoy!

Aww, sweet, dude! Thanks :-)


and for the rest of you here, it's well worth the click to get the bigger version - it is rather cool.
 
2014-04-19 10:08:47 PM  
I know this was a very specialized theme, and I thank everyone who participated this week.  It's always cool to see how people run with these kinds of themes! I'd like to take a moment to welcome Farktography First Timer justajonsin and welcome back gorrck, whom we hadn't seen in awhile--Hope you'll both be back next week!

Results aren't final until the thread closes sometime tomorrow, and this is another close one, so congrats to top finishers 36 Views of Mill Mountain, gorrck, and Pope Larry II!  Final winner (or winners, in the case of a tie) will, as always, receive all due praise and adulation at farktography.net and in the Fark Farktography Forum.

We have a whole series of more open themes coming up, starting with The Great Outdoors next week--hope to see everyone for that contest!
 
Displayed 22 of 22 comments

View Voting Results: Votes


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report