If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Slate)   A look at why certain regions have developed incorrect dialects that allow them to say words with unstressed syllables, like "Probly"   (slate.com) divider line 130
    More: Sick, stressed syllable, English Words, forms, Ly the Fairy  
•       •       •

12369 clicks; posted to Main » on 06 Apr 2014 at 6:28 PM (29 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



130 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-04-06 07:55:31 PM  

hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...


Oooh! I would lurve to latinate and knead with a thoughtful fun knight in a future chocolate covered f*ck!!!

*faints*
 
2014-04-06 07:56:12 PM  
I have trouble with "pacificist".  No wonder it got shortened.
 
2014-04-06 07:56:38 PM  

Marcus Aurelius: FizixJunkee: fusillade762: Do You Ever Say Probly Instead of Probably? Here's Why.

Probly because I was drunk.

I'm absolutely certain I've never said "probly" ever in my life. "Probly" just makes you sound lazy and/or uneducated.  Sort of like the people who pronounce "picture" the same way as "pitcher."

The one that gets me like fingernails on a blackboard is "I seen".


Real Craigslist ad -
Tell them you seen it on craigslist.
Another was advertising  "Mercedes Bends"
WTF people?
 
2014-04-06 07:56:50 PM  

Bondith: ko_kyi: It is mostly hubris to think that there are "incorrect" dialects.  Whatever gets your meaning across most effectively is correct.

Language has always been used to define social class, but whatever language and dialect anyone speaks, there is someone somewhere who looks down on you for it.

And if I can't understand someone's slab-tongued backwoods gabbling, they're not getting their meaning across effectively.


If you can't understand that "probly" and "prolly" are intended to convey "probably", it's not the speakers who are the less intelligent in this transaction. Or maybe you're just hearing impaired.
 
2014-04-06 07:57:04 PM  

Walt_Jizzney: What about loging the infinitive?

"The car needs washed."

instead of:

"The car needs to be washed

warshed"

Fixt.
 
2014-04-06 08:00:12 PM  

Zeeba Neighba: People trying to be all cute saying words like "presh" and "delish" make me want to stab myself in the ears.


Preach, sister. Or brother.

And in my daily wanderings this isn't done because of rapid speech, if anything I hear it done intentionally slower.

Ain't sayin nuthin critical. Used to say groovy and far out lol
 
2014-04-06 08:04:33 PM  

JoieD'Zen: Marcus Aurelius: FizixJunkee: fusillade762: Do You Ever Say Probly Instead of Probably? Here's Why.

Probly because I was drunk.

I'm absolutely certain I've never said "probly" ever in my life. "Probly" just makes you sound lazy and/or uneducated.  Sort of like the people who pronounce "picture" the same way as "pitcher."

The one that gets me like fingernails on a blackboard is "I seen".

Real Craigslist ad -
Tell them you seen it on craigslist.
Another was advertising  "Mercedes Bends"
WTF people?


Her man is Tiffany twisted.
 
2014-04-06 08:06:26 PM  

FizixJunkee: If I recall* correctly, "thought" was one of those words whose orthography in the Latin alphabet just couldn't be made to resemble its pronunciation, though runes---the original alphabet for English**---did a great job of representing English sounds.


Partly true.  English did lose the Middle English letter yogh - ȝ .  However, we *also* lost the sound that yogh used to make, in addition to the letter.  It used to be used to represent the sound of the "och" of the Scottish "loch", which has almost entirely vanished from English (though you'll still hear people sometimes use it in interjections like 'ugh' or 'yech'.)

And when the sound disappeared from our language, we replaced it with a wide variety of other sounds in different words - hence "enough" and "dough" don't even come close to rhyming, though enoȝ and doȝ did rhyme in Middle English.
 
2014-04-06 08:08:41 PM  
Because brain can only handle so many syllables while pondering if cat can actually has cheezburger.
 
2014-04-06 08:09:47 PM  

lindalouwho: Zeeba Neighba: People trying to be all cute saying words like "presh" and "delish" make me want to stab myself in the ears.

Preach, sister. Or brother.

And in my daily wanderings this isn't done because of rapid speech, if anything I hear it done intentionally slower.

Ain't sayin nuthin critical. Used to say groovy and far out lol


I really hate it when it is a grown woman trying to be just SO FUNNY and CUTE and HIP, like all the young chicks! (insert a ridiculous giggle here)

I despise "cray-cray" and all forms such as that too.

AH!!! Now where is that ear knife?
 
2014-04-06 08:13:43 PM  

divgradcurl: hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...

the silent k helps distinguish those words from synonyms. what is your problem with 'thought'?

if you want it to be spelled 'thawt', i must insist upon calling you a 13 year old girl (which should be belittling to a man of your age and intelligence)


I've never been bothered by thought.
Yet I despise though. I was a secret anal grammar, puctuation nazi most of my life, but mostly only beat myself for being wrong. I was tramatized daily for a few yrs with texting. Could not abbreviate. It was wrong, and I know how to spell (usually). Some how I mellowed...year ago let a transposed set of letters be free, knowngly. It wasn't til commenting on fark that I went wild and deposed of though forever. First few times I did it from a foxhole, waiting for the attack. Fark em now THO ;-)
 
2014-04-06 08:23:31 PM  

Snarcoleptic_Hoosier: I still believe that the English language needs a passive-form informal collective pronoun. I nominate "y'all" because I use it.

You for the singular. Y'all for the collective.


I thought "y'all" was singular and "all y'alls" was the plural.
 
2014-04-06 08:25:10 PM  

KidKorporate: JoieD'Zen: Marcus Aurelius: FizixJunkee: fusillade762: Do You Ever Say Probly Instead of Probably? Here's Why.

Probly because I was drunk.

I'm absolutely certain I've never said "probly" ever in my life. "Probly" just makes you sound lazy and/or uneducated.  Sort of like the people who pronounce "picture" the same way as "pitcher."

The one that gets me like fingernails on a blackboard is "I seen".

Real Craigslist ad -
Tell them you seen it on craigslist.
Another was advertising  "Mercedes Bends"
WTF people?

Her man is Tiffany twisted.


Just can't kill the beast.
 
2014-04-06 08:29:26 PM  
And another thing:  "Anyways" It's not a fricken word, dang nab it; stop pretending it's proper English.
 
2014-04-06 08:32:08 PM  

Peter von Nostrand: Ya'll figure this out, am fix'n to git sumthin to eat


Djeet yet?
 
2014-04-06 08:35:12 PM  
Guilty. I live south of Mwakee and a bit east of Bloit.
 
2014-04-06 08:37:25 PM  
 
2014-04-06 08:49:57 PM  
+1 for the Sick tag. I snorted out loud.
 
2014-04-06 08:52:33 PM  

FizixJunkee: JoieD'Zen: Another was advertising  "Mercedes Bends"

I saw an eBay listing for a blouse with "sequence".

I assume she meant "sequins".

Sad, ain't it?

And:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/INC-TOP-SIZE-MEDIUM-SEQUENCE-TOP-NEW-WHITE-T OP -/151267272034?pt=US_CSA_WC_Shirts_Tops&hash=item23383b6562

and

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sheer-Sequence-black-top-/181370885760?pt=US _C SA_WC_Shirts_Tops&hash=item2a3a8c1680

And so many more!


It was a classic Bends so I imagined a 70's mexican soft core film with a contortionist, but maybe that's just me.
 
2014-04-06 08:55:26 PM  

nullptr: I hear the even shorter 'pry' when around my family. Perhaps it is the Pennsylvania Dutch?


Pry gets used often up in my area as well
 
2014-04-06 08:58:15 PM  

Flab: I thought "y'all" was singular and "all y'alls" was the plural.


I think you mean "you" and "you'en"
 
2014-04-06 09:00:24 PM  
I saw a craigslist ad for an "oxygen settling kit".

And wondered if playing IQ possum actually pulled anyone in.
 
2014-04-06 09:06:34 PM  

divgradcurl: hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...

the silent k helps distinguish those words from synonyms. what is your problem with 'thought'?

if you want it to be spelled 'thawt', i must insist upon calling you a 13 year old girl (which should be belittling to a man of your age and intelligence)


Actually, I was pointing out that the language has changed a fair amount over the years--absorption of the Anglo-Saxons and a attempt to represent the native pronunciations with a Romanticized alphabet, despite its Germanic origins--not to mention the Great Vowel Shift, and couple that with mass printing which meant that publishers were documenting their own dialects and spellings--as opposed to individual scribes which was far more the case, where spelling was concerned--began to lock down what was "proper" English.

The /k/ in /kn/ words WAS pronounced at one point. Was was /w/ in /wr/ words, and even the /g/ in "gnaw" and "gnat." Middle English was much closer to those Germanic roots, as The Canterbury Tales illustrates, and Chaucer's work was one of the major pieces of English literature, in that it embraced English with such verve and vigor, as well as embrasure of vernacular. As printing began to replace scribes, there was more emphasis on "proper" spelling, and that was a tool for promoting dialects of English as opposed to the local. Spelling in English was far more free form in the days of Middle English, and with the arrival of the printing press, we not only saw information disseminated to the masses, but likewise a promotion of dialects as a means of power projection. In many ways, the printing press helped promote not just a slowing of the evolution of the tongue--English as a trade tongue is remarkably versatile in its absorption of loan words from a variety of sources--it likewise promoted the use of particular dialects to entrench power structures. This evolution is further slowing, now that we have the technology to record the language not just in print, but with sound. What is "proper" English is not just a matter of local dialect promotion, but now we can seal the deal with recording. American English departed from British by the promotion of American dictionaries and grammars, as a means of power projection, and now we have very much a further entrenchment of class structures by recording what is "proper" English in popular entertainment. This doesn't stop local dialects' use by any means--as anyone in the South, South West, or even here deep in Yankeeland can attest to, even in just the differences in Boston alone, let alone what happens Down East in Maine to the tongue--but it does slow the  diffusion of these changes to the language as a whole.

English is an amazingly dynamic language--owing to its roots as a trade language. It continues to absorb words at an amazing rate, and even those loan words are twisted up by the internal logic of pronunciation and spelling. Its often confusing set of internal rules are dictated by this bastard fusion of a Germanic tongue, with Latinates like French--and yes the original Latin thanks to the influence of those pesky Romans and the Mother Church--and the deep roots of the languages that the Germanic foundation encountered upon the British Isles as raiders settled upon its green and pleasant shores.

I think that you misapprehend my comment, as I do have that pesky Language Arts degree, and an appreciation for the language as a wild and wooly sort of barreling, rollicking monster of a tongue. It has changed over the long years, and those changes have resulted from the infusion of peoples into the Isles, rubbing up against one another, and diffusing those changes as populations mixed and influenced one another. As a tongue, it is a brilliant mix of influences, both low and high, and dynamic in its ability to retain essential structures, while integrating those influences at a very basic level. It's still a difficult language to master, because the internal rules are NOT just of a Germanic language, but a fusion of several language families, and it is voracious in its ability to incorporate new words at a ferocious rate.
 
2014-04-06 09:15:03 PM  

JoieD'Zen: FizixJunkee: JoieD'Zen: Another was advertising  "Mercedes Bends"

I saw an eBay listing for a blouse with "sequence".

I assume she meant "sequins".

Sad, ain't it?

And:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/INC-TOP-SIZE-MEDIUM-SEQUENCE-TOP-NEW-WHITE-T OP -/151267272034?pt=US_CSA_WC_Shirts_Tops&hash=item23383b6562

and

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sheer-Sequence-black-top-/181370885760?pt=US _C SA_WC_Shirts_Tops&hash=item2a3a8c1680

And so many more!

It was a classic Bends so I imagined a 70's mexican soft core film with a contortionist, but maybe that's just me.


Nope, my mind went to porn with that one, too.
 
2014-04-06 09:16:01 PM  

hubiestubert: divgradcurl: hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...

the silent k helps distinguish those words from synonyms. what is your problem with 'thought'?

if you want it to be spelled 'thawt', i must insist upon calling you a 13 year old girl (which should be belittling to a man of your age and intelligence)

Actually, I was pointing out that the language has changed a fair amount over the years--absorption of the Anglo-Saxons and a attempt to represent the native pronunciations with a Romanticized alphabet, despite its Germanic origins--not to mention the Great Vowel Shift, and couple that with mass printing which meant that publishers were documenting their own dialects and spellings--as opposed to individual scribes which was far more the case, where spelling was concerned--began to lock down what was "proper" English.

The /k/ in /kn/ words WAS pronounced at one point. Was was /w/ in /wr/ words, and even the /g/ in "gnaw" and "gnat." Middle English was much closer to those Germanic roots, as The Canterbury Tales illustrates, and Chaucer's work was one of the major pieces of English literature, in that it embraced English with such verve and vigor, as well as embrasure of vernacular. As printing began to replace scribes, there was more emphasis on "proper" spelling, and that was a tool for promoting dialects of English as opposed to the local. Spelling in English was far more free form in the days of Middle English, and with the arrival of the printing press, we not only saw information disseminated to the masses, but likewise a promotion of dialects as a means of power projection. In many ways, the printing press helped promote not just a slowing of the evolution of the tongue--English as a trade tongue is remarkably versatile in its absorption of loan words from a variety of sources--it likewise promoted the use of particular dialects to entrench power structures. This evolution is further slowing, now that we have the technology to record the language not just in print, but with sound. What is "proper" English is not just a matter of local dialect promotion, but now we can seal the deal with recording. American English departed from British by the promotion of American dictionaries and grammars, as a means of power projection, and now we have very much a further entrenchment of class structures by recording what is "proper" English in popular entertainment. This doesn't stop local dialects' use by any means--as anyone in the South, South West, or even here deep in Yankeeland can attest to, even in just the differences in Boston alone, let alone what happens Down East in Maine to the tongue--but it does slow the  diffusion of these changes to the language as a whole.

English is an amazingly dynamic language--owing to its roots as a trade language. It continues to absorb words at an amazing rate, and even those loan words are twisted up by the internal logic of pronunciation and spelling. Its often confusing set of internal rules are dictated by this bastard fusion of a Germanic tongue, with Latinates like French--and yes the original Latin thanks to the influence of those pesky Romans and the Mother Church--and the deep roots of the languages that the Germanic foundation encountered upon the British Isles as raiders settled upon its green and pleasant shores.

I think that you misapprehend my comment, as I do have that pesky Language Arts degree, and an appreciation for the language as a wild and wooly sort of barreling, rollicking monster of a tongue. It has changed over the long years, and those changes have resulted from the infusion of peoples into the Isles, rubbing up against one another, and diffusing those changes as populations mixed and influenced one another. As a tongue, it is a brilliant mix of influences, both low and high, and dynamic in its ability to retain essential structures, while integrating those influences at a very basic level. It's still a difficult language to master, because the internal rules are NOT just of a Germanic language, but a fusion of several language families, and it is voracious in its ability to incorporate new words at a ferocious rate.


tl;dr
 
2014-04-06 09:16:32 PM  

hubiestubert: As a tongue, it is a brilliant mix of influences, both low and high, and dynamic in its ability to retain essential structures, while integrating those influences at a very basic level. It's still a difficult language to master, because the internal rules are NOT just of a Germanic language, but a fusion of several language families, and it is voracious in its ability to incorporate new words at a ferocious rate.


Your post is nicely put.  English is a meat grinder of a language partly due to the utility of it as a trade language, whether we are talking about wheat, brandy, tobacco, jazz, or an internet product.   US english is the language of the port city whorehouse, and that is what gives it power.
 
2014-04-06 09:16:36 PM  

SpeelChuck: Peter von Nostrand: Ya'll figure this out, am fix'n to git sumthin to eat

Djeet yet?


Yeah. Jew?
 
2014-04-06 09:17:18 PM  

fappomatic: You mean it isn't caused by hoodies and saggy pants?


"Aks you a question" and "Go to the liberry" are the two notable corruptions I can think of.
 
2014-04-06 09:17:33 PM  

slotz: Yeah. Jew?


'Sgo.
 
2014-04-06 09:19:13 PM  

mrmopar5287: "Aks you a question" and "Go to the liberry" are the two notable corruptions I can think of.


And yet no one misunderstands it.  Dialect is a tool to define social status.
 
2014-04-06 09:33:57 PM  

Flab: Snarcoleptic_Hoosier: I still believe that the English language needs a passive-form informal collective pronoun. I nominate "y'all" because I use it.

You for the singular. Y'all for the collective.

I thought "y'all" was singular and "all y'alls" was the plural.


No. It is very much like the German "Sie." It is collective plural or the second person formal.
 
2014-04-06 09:49:04 PM  
This is an intristing thread.
 
2014-04-06 09:49:19 PM  

lindalouwho: divgradcurl: hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...

the silent k helps distinguish those words from synonyms. what is your problem with 'thought'?

if you want it to be spelled 'thawt', i must insist upon calling you a 13 year old girl (which should be belittling to a man of your age and intelligence)

I've never been bothered by thought.
Yet I despise though. I was a secret anal grammar, puctuation nazi most of my life, but mostly only beat myself for being wrong. I was tramatized daily for a few yrs with texting. Could not abbreviate. It was wrong, and I know how to spell (usually). Some how I mellowed...year ago let a transposed set of letters be free, knowngly. It wasn't til commenting on fark that I went wild and deposed of though forever. First few times I did it from a foxhole, waiting for the attack. Fark em now THO ;-)


When I was in school I had a professor who very much changed my view of the language. Jay Hoar was the first living professor to have a building named after him at the University of Maine at Farmington. He attended the school as an undergrad for teaching, and returned to teach English education, and had been there about fifty years by the time I rolled in. Each year for Linguistics, he gave one lecture that summed up the power of the language. "Ain't is a Beautiful Word."

The ability of the language to preserve the poetry of Chaucer and Shakespeare and Donne, as well as the travelogues of Melville and the adventure tales of Burroughs and the Beat Poets as well as The Sugarhill Gang, that is the power of English. It's not just for high tone literature, it's a language that sees firm use. It has dialects that are sturdy structures, that are burly and useful, and what is amazing about the language, is that folks can internally switch from Maine Skiddah Tahk, to commenting on UMaine Black Bears, or giving tourists intelligible directions, and each iteration sees a slightly differing use of vernacular and dialect. Sometimes that can be used to freeze folks from "Away" out entirely, or it can be a warm embrasure of the comforts of home and hearth, and then switch again to an entirely professional conversation that tones down the dialect for clearness and mutual intelligibility. Jay loved the language, in all its iterations, and its robustness as a tongue, not just for art, for technical use, but for use all around. That lecture he gave every year changed how I viewed the language as a whole. What is "proper English" changes. All the time. "Proper" depends on the audience. Depends on the context. It is an amazingly robust language in that its dialects and forms fit their use. As much as I love my mother's Nihongo, it isn't as versatile a language as English. Structurally, Nihongo is far more elegant, and its internal logic is sound, and beautiful, but it is often clumsy at integrating new words and structures. Wonderful for social contexts, with gradations of forms for a multitude of interactions, and yet English is a far better language for business. English is at home both in a bar and a salon, in a teahouse, at a wharf, a hospital, a gas station, at a symphony, at a game, and yes, it's all cockamamie with languages its absorbed bits from, but still, in maintains an internal logic, from Kingston to Bangor to London to Kuala Lumpur.

English can stand a lot of use. Texting is use. Rap is use. Dialects are all about use. English is a language that works damn hard, because it's not just about high art and law and philosophy, it's a language for fishermen, for ranchers, for science, for cooks, for doctors, for clerks, and that we can switch up and see the beauty in the tongue in all these varied dialects and usages, that's a real gift.
 
2014-04-06 10:02:51 PM  

hubiestubert: lindalouwho: divgradcurl: hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...

the silent k helps distinguish those words from synonyms. what is your problem with 'thought'?

if you want it to be spelled 'thawt', i must insist upon calling you a 13 year old girl (which should be belittling to a man of your age and intelligence)

I've never been bothered by thought.
Yet I despise though. I was a secret anal grammar, puctuation nazi most of my life, but mostly only beat myself for being wrong. I was tramatized daily for a few yrs with texting. Could not abbreviate. It was wrong, and I know how to spell (usually). Some how I mellowed...year ago let a transposed set of letters be free, knowngly. It wasn't til commenting on fark that I went wild and deposed of though forever. First few times I did it from a foxhole, waiting for the attack. Fark em now THO ;-)

When I was in school I had a professor who very much changed my view of the language. Jay Hoar was the first living professor to have a building named after him at the University of Maine at Farmington. He attended the school as an undergrad for teaching, and returned to teach English education, and had been there about fifty years by the time I rolled in. Each year for Linguistics, he gave one lecture that summed up the power of the language. "Ain't is a Beautiful Word."

The ability of the language to preserve the poetry of Chaucer and Shakespeare and Donne, as well as the travelogues of Melville and the adventure tales of Burroughs and the Beat Poets as well as The Sugarhill Gang, that is the power of English. It's not just for high tone literature, it's a language that sees firm use. It has dialects that are sturdy structures, that are burly and useful, and what is amazing about the language, is that folks can internally switch from Maine Skiddah Tahk, to commenting on UMaine Black Bears, or giving tourists intelligible directions, and each iteration sees a slightly differing use of vernacular and dialect. Sometimes that can be used to freeze folks from "Away" out entirely, or it can be a warm embrasure of the comforts of home and hearth, and then switch again to an entirely professional conversation that tones down the dialect for clearness and mutual intelligibility. Jay loved the language, in all its iterations, and its robustness as a tongue, not just for art, for technical use, but for use all around. That lecture he gave every year changed how I viewed the language as a whole. What is "proper English" changes. All the time. "Proper" depends on the audience. Depends on the context. It is an amazingly robust language in that its dialects and forms fit their use. As much as I love my mother's Nihongo, it isn't as versatile a language as English. Structurally, Nihongo is far more elegant, and its internal logic is sound, and beautiful, but it is often clumsy at integrating new words and structures. Wonderful for social contexts, with gradations of forms for a multitude of interactions, and yet English is a far better language for business. English is at home both in a bar and a salon, in a teahouse, at a wharf, a hospital, a gas station, at a symphony, at a game, and yes, it's all cockamamie with languages its absorbed bits from, but still, in maintains an internal logic, from Kingston to Bangor to London to Kuala Lumpur.

English can stand a lot of use. Texting is use. Rap is use. Dialects are all about use. English is a language that works damn hard, because it's not just about high art and law and philosophy, it's a language for fishermen, for ranchers, for science, for cooks, for doctors, for clerks, and that we can switch up and see the beauty in the tongue in all these varied dialects and usages, that's a real gift.


That was beautiful.
 
2014-04-06 10:04:34 PM  
Has anyone mentioned "exackly"?
 
2014-04-06 10:11:00 PM  
Ya'll just don't get me started on the proper spelling of 'Whupass'. If so, then I will jam a whooping crane with whooping cough up your whooping ass.
 
2014-04-06 10:13:29 PM  

Kamekoozie: Ya'll just don't get me started on the proper spelling of 'Whupass'. If so, then I will jam a whooping crane with whooping cough up your whooping ass.


I dunno, buddy.

Think the cheese stands alone.
 
2014-04-06 10:17:13 PM  
"That's one small step f'ra man, one giant leap for mankind."
 
2014-04-06 10:32:00 PM  

Snarcoleptic_Hoosier: I still believe that the English language needs a passive-form informal collective pronoun. I nominate "y'all" because I use it.

You for the singular. Y'all for the collective.


All all y'all need are all the varient's of  "y'all" all y'all've been using. Some of y'all use forms of "y'all" not all y'all use, though I think all y'all'd've used them if all y'all grew up hearing the "y'all"s some of y'all use.
 
2014-04-06 10:39:28 PM  

hubiestubert: and it is voracious in its ability to incorporate new words at a ferocious rate.


well said. mmm, voracious

www.absurdintellectual.com
 
2014-04-06 10:49:47 PM  
also i meant the whole thing was well said, not just the bit i included at the end.
 
2014-04-06 10:55:28 PM  
Whatever, to me the worst offenders will always be "business professionals" trying to sound smart with their misuse of technical terms and the much loathed "proactive."
 
2014-04-06 10:57:19 PM  

GentDirkly: I've heard "prolly" and "probly" every day but you will here "probably" when someone is trying to sound deliberate or professional.
The one that's interesting to me is "fave-rit".  I have never heard a single person say "fav-or-it".


I say "fav-or-it" and "choc-uh-lit". I am also, however, guilty of "comfterble".
 
2014-04-06 11:09:14 PM  

hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...


As someone who had learned English as a foreign language, let me assure you, that billions of people of our generation around the world have looked at English words and asked the same question already at least a hundred times each. In the contest of what level of suckery the spelling of a language achieves, English wins without contest.
 
2014-04-06 11:15:27 PM  
Yes I know I still have much to learn.
 
2014-04-06 11:25:17 PM  
Go read up your room.

I grew up being told it. Yes, I am PA Dutch.
 
2014-04-06 11:26:10 PM  

traylor: hubiestubert: What's fun, is that in the future, folks will look at these words and wonder, "Why in chocolate covered f*ck is it spelled like that when it's pronounced like this?"

Yes, I'm looking at you "knight" and "thought" and "knead" and let us not speak of what the French and the folks who lurve to Latinate the language have done to our spelling habits...

As someone who had learned English as a foreign language, let me assure you, that billions of people of our generation around the world have looked at English words and asked the same question already at least a hundred times each. In the contest of what level of suckery the spelling of a language achieves, English wins without contest.


pretend it's a mix of a representation of sound and ideograms, like modern Japanese.  The spelling is just a set of suggestions with the history of the word layered into it.
 
2014-04-06 11:32:35 PM  
My wife and I grew up in northern California and share the same regional dialect, for the most part, but she was raised by her midwestern grandparents, so I still can't tell if she's saying 'pen' or 'pin'. Her brother does it too, drives my inner grammar-nazi f*cking nuts.

Also, for the thread:www.veryicon.comwww.veryicon.comwww.veryicon.com
                                               'Dah-lek'                                                       'Dar-lek'                                                      'Day-lick'


/discus
 
2014-04-06 11:35:05 PM  

ko_kyi: It is mostly hubris to think that there are "incorrect" dialects.  Whatever gets your meaning across most effectively is correct.

Language has always been used to define social class, but whatever language and dialect anyone speaks, there is someone somewhere who looks down on you for it.


You sound dumb.
 
2014-04-06 11:35:27 PM  
Because they're stupid, that's why.  That's why everybody does everything.
 
Displayed 50 of 130 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report