If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   So I'm guilty, eh? Whatever. Can I get a drink?   (nypost.com) divider line 79
    More: Dumbass, Margaritaville, brooklyn federal court, minimum sentence, Akeem Monsalvatge  
•       •       •

8117 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Apr 2014 at 10:12 PM (28 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



79 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-04-05 07:42:49 PM  
Sorry pal, it's going to be orange drink fermented under a radiator for you.
 
2014-04-05 07:45:08 PM  
mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

www.themonolith.com
 
2014-04-05 07:49:49 PM  
LAUGHTER OL of course he cannot be provided with the drinking because that would be to treat this individual like the human as opposed to the commodity in the for profit prison system although this probably will be the new idea which would be to use the commissary account for the alcoholic beverages. The rule of this would also require the overnight stay in the drinking house to avoid any of the problems with the drunkenness. Do something stupid and you lose the privilege of this. You can do this once the month with the cap of 3 drinks. The room of the evening would cost $20 for you which is quite the bit in the commissary. Each drink would cost to you $10 for the beer or as they call this in the New York City happy hour pricing LAUGHTER OL.
 
2014-04-05 08:09:58 PM  
i.imgur.com
 
2014-04-05 08:26:19 PM  
Afterward, the childhood pals set out on a shopping spree from Manhattan to Beverly Hills, buying such luxury items as $1,600 Christian Louboutin shoes and $600 Louis Vuitton belts.

They deserve 30 years just for spending so much money on tacky.
 
2014-04-05 08:47:57 PM  
"They used masks and costumes to elude law enforcement, but as they have learned today, their disguises could not shield them from justice,"

t2.gstatic.com
 
2014-04-05 09:18:45 PM  
During the heist, the men flashed an employee a photo of her house to intimidate her. Cops found the picture at the scene and traced it to a nearby Walgreen's, where surveillance footage showed one of the men buying a printout of the image.

That's so cool. I think I might rob a bank if I wasn't 100% sure I'd make some weird mistake like this.
 
2014-04-05 09:45:28 PM  
Aping the crooks in the film, the men wore masks and splashed the scene with bleach.

thatsracistkid.gif
 
2014-04-05 10:20:54 PM  
i157.photobucket.com
 
2014-04-05 10:22:03 PM  
Pruno. Know it, live it, love it
 
2014-04-05 10:24:13 PM  
"Do I get a last wish?" Akeem Monsalvatge asked Judge Raymond Dearie. "I feel like it's an execution. Do I get a last meal? Can I get a Patrón margarita?"

www.morethings.com

"Are you sure you wouldn't rather have a ... White Russian?"

www.morethings.com

"White Russian ... I get it. White Russian, 'cause I'm black. That's a funny joke."
 
2014-04-05 10:24:20 PM  
Rookie mistake:  They should have dressed like Goldman-Sachs employees, no one would have batted an eye.
 
2014-04-05 10:24:46 PM  

God-is-a-Taco: During the heist, the men flashed an employee a photo of her house to intimidate her. Cops found the picture at the scene and traced it to a nearby Walgreen's, where surveillance footage showed one of the men buying a printout of the image.

That's so cool. I think I might rob a bank if I wasn't 100% sure I'd make some weird mistake like this.


They should have worn the masks to the Walgreen's.
 
2014-04-05 10:25:53 PM  
Interesting how the article explains to the world what they did wrong so you can do it right next time.
 
2014-04-05 10:26:15 PM  
I always figured "lavish spending" was one of the ways to get noticed after a big score in a heist .. what the hell is wrong with heading to a nice beach and drinking and womanizing until your liver is as hard as the jail time you've avoided?
 
2014-04-05 10:30:44 PM  

dobro: Interesting how the article explains to the world what they did wrong so you can do it right next time.


Won't help. Gyrfalcon's Law has never been disproven.
 
Ral
2014-04-05 10:36:14 PM  
A condemned man asking for Patron, of all the possible tequilas to choose from, illustrates more than anything for me how big of a tool this guy is.  Patron is, at best, a mediocre tequila even for mixed drinks.  I don't care how much it costs.  That's no guide to how good it is.  He only thinks it's baller because of the music he listens to and the celebrities he attempts to emulate.

/Sauza Hornitos is $16 a bottle and way better tequila than Patron
//friend is a bartender who thinks people who order Patron shots are hilarious
 
2014-04-05 10:39:08 PM  

dobro: Interesting how the article explains to the world what they did wrong so you can do it right next time.


I would hope there were other things that pointed them at the suspects which they weren't obligated to reveal in court, but yes it does seem overly detailed in listing all the things that made it possible to catch them, doesn't it?

Ghost Roach: I always figured "lavish spending" was one of the ways to get noticed after a big score in a heist .. what the hell is wrong with heading to a nice beach and drinking and womanizing until your liver is as hard as the jail time you've avoided?


That's not "gangsta" enough, apparently.  You gotta buy $1,600 shoes to show how loaded you are.

As far as I'm concerned, if you're going to spend more than $500 on a single piece of clothing it had better protect you from bullets, let you climb walls, be made of something REALLY exotic, or do something naughty to those "special" areas.
 
2014-04-05 10:40:34 PM  

gfid: God-is-a-Taco: During the heist, the men flashed an employee a photo of her house to intimidate her. Cops found the picture at the scene and traced it to a nearby Walgreen's, where surveillance footage showed one of the men buying a printout of the image.

That's so cool. I think I might rob a bank if I wasn't 100% sure I'd make some weird mistake like this.

They should have worn the masks to the Walgreen's.


DAMMIT!
 
2014-04-05 10:41:17 PM  

Ral: A condemned man asking for Patron, of all the possible tequilas to choose from, illustrates more than anything for me how big of a tool this guy is.  Patron is, at best, a mediocre tequila even for mixed drinks.  I don't care how much it costs.  That's no guide to how good it is.  He only thinks it's baller because of the music he listens to and the celebrities he attempts to emulate.

/Sauza Hornitos is $16 a bottle and way better tequila than Patron
//friend is a bartender who thinks people who order Patron shots are hilarious


My own bartender ex-girlfriend is a fan of Milagro.  She does however enjoy Patron too.  It IS a good tequila, it's just a lot more costly than what it should be because of brand recognition and whatnot.
 
2014-04-05 10:43:51 PM  

doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]


Simple. They dared to fark with the money.

They'd get less time if they just hurt or killed somebody, but they dared to fark with the money.
 
2014-04-05 10:48:25 PM  
Oh yeah, these idiots. grupycatgood.jpg

dobro:

Interesting how the article explains to the world what they did wrong so you can do it right next time.

The cases was quite the media shiatstorm in '10. Every little detail was breathlessly reported on.
 
2014-04-05 11:00:24 PM  

Ral: A condemned man asking for Patron, of all the possible tequilas to choose from, illustrates more than anything for me how big of a tool this guy is.  Patron is, at best, a mediocre tequila even for mixed drinks.  I don't care how much it costs.  That's no guide to how good it is.  He only thinks it's baller because of the music he listens to and the celebrities he attempts to emulate.

/Sauza Hornitos is $16 a bottle and way better tequila than Patron
//friend is a bartender who thinks people who order Patron shots are hilarious


Oh a bartender? Well a lifetime of popping beer caps for 2 bucks a hour certainly qualifies them as a tequila expert.
 
2014-04-05 11:00:29 PM  

doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]


Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.
 
2014-04-05 11:05:11 PM  
/approves

i2.cdn.turner.com
 
2014-04-05 11:06:55 PM  

gfid: God-is-a-Taco: During the heist, the men flashed an employee a photo of her house to intimidate her. Cops found the picture at the scene and traced it to a nearby Walgreen's, where surveillance footage showed one of the men buying a printout of the image.

That's so cool. I think I might rob a bank if I wasn't 100% sure I'd make some weird mistake like this.

They should have worn the masks to the Walgreen's.


farking THIS. Those guys get a thank you when they're done farking us in the ass. GET IT RIGHT, N00BS!!
 
2014-04-05 11:06:56 PM  

meow said the dog: LAUGHTER OL of course he cannot be provided with the drinking because that would be to treat this individual like the human as opposed to the commodity in the for profit prison system although this probably will be the new idea which would be to use the commissary account for the alcoholic beverages. The rule of this would also require the overnight stay in the drinking house to avoid any of the problems with the drunkenness. Do something stupid and you lose the privilege of this. You can do this once the month with the cap of 3 drinks. The room of the evening would cost $20 for you which is quite the bit in the commissary. Each drink would cost to you $10 for the beer or as they call this in the New York City happy hour pricing LAUGHTER OL.


That was poetry.
 
2014-04-05 11:08:51 PM  

Ghost Roach: I always figured "lavish spending" was one of the ways to get noticed after a big score in a heist


i.ytimg.com

Learned this the hard way.
 
2014-04-05 11:10:34 PM  

Gyrfalcon: dobro: Interesting how the article explains to the world what they did wrong so you can do it right next time.

Won't help. Gyrfalcon's Law has never been disproven.


At least the article didn't explain what a successful criminal did correctly.
 
2014-04-05 11:12:17 PM  

Stone Meadow: doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]

Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.


Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?
 
2014-04-05 11:13:48 PM  

Ral: illustrates more than anything


Spending $600 for a god damn belt didn't illustrate it for you?  Granted, the style these days is to show everyone that you take it up the ass by sagging your jeans, but you can buy a belt for $20.

Tequila is the first liquor I got drunk on so it all tastes like distilled hell to me.
 
2014-04-05 11:29:51 PM  
Sorry pal, the drinks aren't on the house; they're in the house -- the big house.
 
2014-04-05 11:29:51 PM  

God-is-a-Taco: During the heist, the men flashed an employee a photo of her house to intimidate her. Cops found the picture at the scene and traced it to a nearby Walgreen's, where surveillance footage showed one of the men buying a printout of the image.

That's so cool. I think I might rob a bank if I wasn't 100% sure I'd make some weird mistake like this.


I've had this conversation with friends bored and after too many beers, and the consensus is that a smart enough person who puts enough effort into it can figure out a close to "perfect crime", but there's always going to be the "random chance" factor.  It's going to be some stupid little thing that  slips through because it's impossible to prepare for every possible contingency. (The unexpected traffic accident/off duty cop who happened to be in the store at that moment/prior night's water pipe burst that sends technicians to where you hid the whatever device...).

Most intelligent but greedy people realize it's just not worth the risk.  So people with more balls than brains wind up being the ones getting caught.
 
2014-04-05 11:30:14 PM  
I live in a little town of 200 folks. Some dude robbed the bank here yesterday. Awesome disguise too.
 
2014-04-05 11:30:40 PM  
he's confusing conviction with the death penalty

although you probably don't even get a margarita then anymore, do you?


/sad state of affairs
 
2014-04-05 11:31:53 PM  

Abacus9: Stone Meadow: doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]

Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.

Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?


There are punishments other than jail. Jail time is the stupidest idea anyone's ever come up with. It does nothing but destroy people. 32 years in jail minimum? That's worse than the punishment reserved for high treason. All it will do is destroy them, and if they even survive they will continue to be a burden to society because they'll be too old to work, too unemployable to get jobs even if they weren't felons, and they'll probably wind up robbing another bank just to go back to jail where there's food and blankets.

They've successfully stolen a few million more dollars from us all and we've reinforced their particular chapter of the 415 KUMI by giving them two more potential thugs. 32 years is a life sentence and if you're in for what's gonna be life, why not add another lifetime on top of that and kill some Aryan Brotherhood leader with your toothbrush shiv in exchange for some butt smuggled drugs or a few hundred in your commissary account? It's the kind of thing that happens in prisons.

Meanwhile, if we just had them to do menial labor for low pay till the money they stole was repaid and take them on a tour of local high schools in chains to explain to the kids that if you want to rob a bank, you have to work your way up to manager first or this will be your fate we'd wind up doing basically the same exact sentence but, and this is really the crux of the issue, it would be morally acceptable. We'd be training them for life in the real world by giving them at least a decade of vocational experience. We could even teach them some of the trades. Give them some books on plumbing. What else do you have to do while in a prison cell but read? We might actually rehabilitate them into productive citizens by the end of such a work program. Always gonna be clogged toilets. Instead of lining a private prison's pockets, they'd be paying taxes and , if they fark up, we could just shoot them dead on the spot. Bingo-bango.

And, with a lighter prisoner load from all the vice laws I would see repealed, prisons would actually have the resources to focus on rehabilitation, reintegration, and elimination as individual prisoners' needs and potential demanded.

But no one elects me king of everything. I'm always a write in.
 
2014-04-05 11:32:37 PM  
d6673sr63mbv7.cloudfront.net
 
2014-04-05 11:35:20 PM  
32 years in prison over a robbery with no casualties? This tough on crime bullshiat has to stop.
 
2014-04-05 11:36:04 PM  
farking vodka, man!

076dd0a50e0c1255009e-bd4b8aabaca29897bc751dfaf75b290c.r40.cf1.rackcdn.com
 
2014-04-05 11:37:14 PM  
Hell, if we dumped a quarter of the resources from the failed war on drugs into education for impoverished districts instead, the US might actually be number one at something academic.
 
2014-04-05 11:38:56 PM  

Abacus9: Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?


I think he's just talking about consistency. 32 years seems pretty steep. Yeah I know they shouldn't have done it and they should be punished but people get less than that for murder.

Anyway, he should have asked for something 100 proof, make the most of it.
 
2014-04-05 11:40:23 PM  

Abacus9: Stone Meadow: doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]

Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.

Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?


In New York the mandatory minimum sentence for first degree murder is 20 years. How do they come up with 32 years for a robbery in which no one was even injured, much less killed?

Or are you white knighting murderers?
 
2014-04-05 11:56:19 PM  

doglover: Abacus9: Stone Meadow: doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]

Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.

Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?

There are punishments other than jail. Jail time is the stupidest idea anyone's ever come up with. It does nothing but destroy people. 32 years in jail minimum? That's worse than the punishment reserved for high treason. All it will do is destroy them, and if they even survive they will continue to be a burden to society because they'll be too old to work, too unemployable to get jobs even if they weren't felons, and they'll probably wind up robbing another bank just to go back to jail where there's food and blankets.

They've successfully stolen a few million more dollars from us all and we've reinforced their particular chapter of the 415 KUMI by giving them two more potential thugs. 32 years is a life sentence and if you're in for what's gonna be life, why not add another lifetime on top of that and kill some Aryan Brotherhood leader with your toothbrush shiv in exchange for some butt smuggled drugs or a few hundred in your commissary account? It's the kind of thing that happens in prisons.

Meanwhile, if we just had them to do menial labor for low pay till the money they stole was repaid and take them on a tour of local high schools in chains to explain to the kids that if you want to rob a bank, you have to work your way up to manager first or this will be your fate we'd wind up doing basically the same exact sentence but, and this is really the crux of the issue, it would be morally acceptable. We'd be training them for life in the real world by giving them at least a decade of vocational experience. We could even teach them some of the trades. Give them some books on plumbing. What else do you have to do while in a prison cell but read? We might actually rehabilitate them into productive citizens by the end of such a work program. Always gonna be clogged toilets. Instead of lining a private prison's pockets, they'd be paying taxes and , if they fark up, we could just shoot them dead on the spot. Bingo-bango.

And, with a lighter prisoner load from all the vice laws I would see repealed, prisons would actually have the resources to focus on rehabilitation, reintegration, and elimination as individual prisoners' needs and potential demanded.

But no one elects me king of everything. I'm always a write in.


Tldr, Tolstoy. Just put a bullet in their head. Bullets are cheap, I guess. I don't know, are bullets cheap?
 
2014-04-06 12:01:01 AM  

Stone Meadow: Abacus9: Stone Meadow: doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]

Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.

Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?

In New York the mandatory minimum sentence for first degree murder is 20 years. How do they come up with 32 years for a robbery in which no one was even injured, much less killed?

Or are you white knighting murderers?


Interesting logic, but no. How about execute murderers and take violent crime seriously?
 
2014-04-06 12:11:35 AM  

Abacus9: Just put a bullet in their head.


Because, in the execution of their crime no one was hurt but insurance companies and they showed a hell of a lot more brain power than anyone on Fark.com ever has. It's not quite the same as one of Dick Turpin's bungling attacks.

Also, bullets are wasteful and messy. A guillotine or sword works just fine, if it comes to that.
 
2014-04-06 12:15:08 AM  
You would think these village idiots learn from this, it seems to be the same ol story - they get rich and blow the money within minutes on items they clearly can't afford.

Remembered a story of this guy who worked for an armored car company, his buddy and him decided to rob the armored car and stash the money, the police and FBI were dumbstruck, until his ol lady started buying up every expensive item in the town.
They planned to stash the money for a number of years, only use the money to pay off bills and such, not over spend. Didn't take long for the one dudes wife to start buying up thousands of dollars in antiques and a million dollar home.

/the wife was so greedy she tried to buy a million dollar home, and sell her double wide through the bank, didn't take long before chief wiggum to figure this one out.
 
2014-04-06 12:16:32 AM  
Kanye let himself go now...
 
2014-04-06 12:17:02 AM  

Abacus9: Tldr, Tolstoy. Just put a bullet in their head. Bullets are cheap, I guess. I don't know, are bullets cheap?


Not anymore. Thanks Obama.
 
2014-04-06 12:22:29 AM  
Do'h!
 
2014-04-06 12:27:23 AM  
*inserts obligatory "pedophiles do less time than that" line*
 
2014-04-06 12:37:35 AM  
This black guy at work got pissed at me last week because I made the joke that from my expirence waiting tables black people always order blended parton margaritas. Mayber I should send him this article, I'm sure that would help the situation.
 
2014-04-06 12:45:35 AM  

frozenhotchocolate: Mayber I should send him this article, I'm sure that would help the situation


How would that help the fact that he has an insensitive and unfunny coworker?
 
2014-04-06 12:46:51 AM  

frozenhotchocolate: This black guy at work got pissed at me last week because I made the joke that from my expirence waiting tables black people always order blended parton margaritas. Mayber I should send him this article, I'm sure that would help the situation.


As a diner in Japan, I always notice girls get white wine or a fruity cocktail while men get a beer.

But, when I was a waiter, every damn time a couple came in and ordered a beer and fruity cocktail, the girl took the beer and the guy took the fruity drink. It was weird.

Maybe it's a perspective thing.
 
2014-04-06 12:55:30 AM  

proteus_b: frozenhotchocolate: Mayber I should send him this article, I'm sure that would help the situation

How would that help the fact that he has an insensitive and unfunny coworker?


I was just told today he was bi-polar, I didn't know. I should not have said that, he hates me now. But I thought it was funny and that's all that matters to me.
 
2014-04-06 01:02:21 AM  

doglover: Abacus9: Just put a bullet in their head.

Because, in the execution of their crime no one was hurt but insurance companies and they showed a hell of a lot more brain power than anyone on Fark.com ever has. It's not quite the same as one of Dick Turpin's bungling attacks.

Also, bullets are wasteful and messy. A guillotine or sword works just fine, if it comes to that.


Armed robbery. No one got hurt. Would you make the same argument about drunk driving?
 
2014-04-06 01:06:56 AM  

frozenhotchocolate: proteus_b: frozenhotchocolate: Mayber I should send him this article, I'm sure that would help the situation

How would that help the fact that he has an insensitive and unfunny coworker?

I was just told today he was bi-polar, I didn't know. I should not have said that, he hates me now. But I thought it was funny and that's all that matters to me.


So, you're telling us you're an asshole on many levels?
 
2014-04-06 01:07:47 AM  

Abacus9: doglover: Abacus9: Just put a bullet in their head.

Because, in the execution of their crime no one was hurt but insurance companies and they showed a hell of a lot more brain power than anyone on Fark.com ever has. It's not quite the same as one of Dick Turpin's bungling attacks.

Also, bullets are wasteful and messy. A guillotine or sword works just fine, if it comes to that.

Armed robbery. No one got hurt. Would you make the same argument about drunk driving?


Really, Judge Dredd. What about shoplifting? It's stealing too, just not with a gun. That has to be worth at least 5 years.
 
2014-04-06 01:31:12 AM  

Abacus9: doglover: Abacus9: Just put a bullet in their head.

Because, in the execution of their crime no one was hurt but insurance companies and they showed a hell of a lot more brain power than anyone on Fark.com ever has. It's not quite the same as one of Dick Turpin's bungling attacks.

Also, bullets are wasteful and messy. A guillotine or sword works just fine, if it comes to that.

Armed robbery. No one got hurt. Would you make the same argument about drunk driving?


I do. Frequently. America is set up in such a way that to enjoy the legal boon of alcohol at a bar, you have to drive in most places. Then, instead of helping people with a reasonable time frame where they can sober up or drink till they pass out and sleep it, they force everyone out onto the road at 2 AM. Then, to make things even extra special, they have DUI checkpoints near the bars to catch "dangerous" drunk drivers. Thanks to the laws, at certain hours, there's more drunks than sobers on the road.That's not crime prevention, that's criminalization by proxy.

You know where DUI isn't a big problem? Tokyo. Public drinking is legal, it goes 24 hours, and there's enough light rail, bus, and taxi goodness that you can get fall down drunk and still make it home without even owning a car. Plenty of crash space oriented business, as well. Europe is like this too. In the Netherlands, drunk cycling is encouraged. It's safer than operating cars. If DUI was such a big problem, We could easily regulate it out of existence with a few simple rules changes, easing up on alternative, and an investment in public transport. Harm reduction, works every time.


But America's legal system imprisons Justice in stone and plants her outside with a blindfold and her back to the proceedings. That's your first clue something is dreadfully wrong with it. When an armed robbery with no shots fired, no deaths or injuries, nets a mandatory MINIMUM sentence that is less than that of first degree murder. That's just insanity.
 
2014-04-06 02:02:54 AM  

Mugato: Abacus9: doglover: Abacus9: Just put a bullet in their head.

Because, in the execution of their crime no one was hurt but insurance companies and they showed a hell of a lot more brain power than anyone on Fark.com ever has. It's not quite the same as one of Dick Turpin's bungling attacks.

Also, bullets are wasteful and messy. A guillotine or sword works just fine, if it comes to that.

Armed robbery. No one got hurt. Would you make the same argument about drunk driving?

Really, Judge Dredd. What about shoplifting? It's stealing too, just not with a gun. That has to be worth at least 5 years.


Don't be so dramatic. Armed robbery is different because it involves arms.
 
2014-04-06 02:13:55 AM  

doglover: Abacus9: doglover: Abacus9: Just put a bullet in their head.

Because, in the execution of their crime no one was hurt but insurance companies and they showed a hell of a lot more brain power than anyone on Fark.com ever has. It's not quite the same as one of Dick Turpin's bungling attacks.

Also, bullets are wasteful and messy. A guillotine or sword works just fine, if it comes to that.

Armed robbery. No one got hurt. Would you make the same argument about drunk driving?

I do. Frequently. America is set up in such a way that to enjoy the legal boon of alcohol at a bar, you have to drive in most places. Then, instead of helping people with a reasonable time frame where they can sober up or drink till they pass out and sleep it, they force everyone out onto the road at 2 AM. Then, to make things even extra special, they have DUI checkpoints near the bars to catch "dangerous" drunk drivers. Thanks to the laws, at certain hours, there's more drunks than sobers on the road.That's not crime prevention, that's criminalization by proxy.

You know where DUI isn't a big problem? Tokyo. Public drinking is legal, it goes 24 hours, and there's enough light rail, bus, and taxi goodness that you can get fall down drunk and still make it home without even owning a car. Plenty of crash space oriented business, as well. Europe is like this too. In the Netherlands, drunk cycling is encouraged. It's safer than operating cars. If DUI was such a big problem, We could easily regulate it out of existence with a few simple rules changes, easing up on alternative, and an investment in public transport. Harm reduction, works every time.


But America's legal system imprisons Justice in stone and plants her outside with a blindfold and her back to the proceedings. That's your first clue something is dreadfully wrong with it. When an armed robbery with no shots fired, no deaths or injuries, nets a mandatory MINIMUM sentence that is less than that of first degree murder. That's just insanity.


Armed robbery is a serious crime. The fact that the perp didn't actually pull the trigger means nothing. They were still willing to waste someone, a human, over a few bucks. They don't deserve to live, and I thought you understood that.
 
2014-04-06 02:43:11 AM  

Abacus9: Armed robbery is a serious crime.


And slavery is a serious punishment. But, as the judge said "Each of you showed great potential," he said. "You had the benefit of youth, which will be squandered behind bars."

That's what's wrong with the US legal system. We make criminals out of everyone, stuff 'em in with sardines, and to what end? It just overloads the system so that when guys like this crop up we can only stick them in a hole and let them rot. We're squandering our own people.

We could easily utilize these guys to help society instead of lining the pockets of a for-profit prison system if we had enough free prison resources.

You know who else was an armed bank robber who never shot anyone, if you'll believe him: Ice T.

assets-s3.rollingstone.com

Don't know how much of that confession on air was an act, but he did confess to doing some robberies after the military and he's pretty much the opposite of a drain on society. And every veteran of every war ever fought was a violent criminal during their time on the battlefield. Somehow, most of them turn out alright, too.

The whole point of crime and punishment is to prevent future crimes by rehabilitation or removal. 32 years in jail is neither and I can't justify the death penalty for someone who didn't kill anyone or order others to kill for them.
 
2014-04-06 02:59:03 AM  

doglover: I do. Frequently. America is set up in such a way that to enjoy the legal boon of alcohol at a bar, you have to drive in most places. Then, instead of helping people with a reasonable time frame where they can sober up or drink till they pass out and sleep it, they force everyone out onto the road at 2 AM. Then, to make things even extra special, they have DUI checkpoints near the bars to catch "dangerous" drunk drivers. Thanks to the laws, at certain hours, there's more drunks than sobers on the road.That's not crime prevention, that's criminalization by proxy.

You know where DUI isn't a big problem? Tokyo. Public drinking is legal, it goes 24 hours, and there's enough light rail, bus, and taxi goodness that you can get fall down drunk and still make it home without even owning a car. Plenty of crash space oriented business, as well. Europe is like this too. In the Netherlands, drunk cycling is encouraged. It's safer than operating cars. If DUI was such a big problem, We could easily regulate it out of existence with a few simple rules changes, easing up on alternative, and an investment in public transport. Harm reduction, works every time.


But America's legal system imprisons Justice in stone and plants her outside with a blindfold and her back to the proceedings. That's your first clue something is dreadfully wrong with it. When an armed robbery with no shots fired, no deaths or injuries, nets a mandatory MINIMUM sentence that is less than that of first degree murder. That's just insanity.


Then go live in Tokyo, jackass... Oh wait, you already do. America must have seriously wounded you, that you still complain about it even after having left its shores. The way that you whine about it, you make it sound like "they" designed the country just to make it hard for you to get drunk. What are you, twelve years old?
 
2014-04-06 03:07:33 AM  

doglover: Abacus9: Armed robbery is a serious crime.

And slavery is a serious punishment. But, as the judge said "Each of you showed great potential," he said. "You had the benefit of youth, which will be squandered behind bars."

That's what's wrong with the US legal system. We make criminals out of everyone, stuff 'em in with sardines, and to what end? It just overloads the system so that when guys like this crop up we can only stick them in a hole and let them rot. We're squandering our own people.

We could easily utilize these guys to help society instead of lining the pockets of a for-profit prison system if we had enough free prison resources.

You know who else was an armed bank robber who never shot anyone, if you'll believe him: Ice T.



Don't know how much of that confession on air was an act, but he did confess to doing some robberies after the military and he's pretty much the opposite of a drain on society. And every veteran of every war ever fought was a violent criminal during their time on the battlefield. Somehow, most of them turn out alright, too.

The whole point of crime and punishment is to prevent future crimes by rehabilitation or removal. 32 years in jail is neither and I can't justify the death penalty for someone who didn't kill anyone or order others to kill for them.


You originally suggested that prison is slavery. So it's that or death, unless you're suggesting they walk free.

I don't give a flying fark about a washed up rapper on a third rate show on a fifth rate network out of four.

I like you, but you should stop talking out of you're ass. No offense.
 
2014-04-06 04:13:55 AM  

doglover: But America's legal system imprisons Justice in stone and plants her outside with a blindfold and her back to the proceedings. That's your first clue something is dreadfully wrong with it. When an armed robbery with no shots fired, no deaths or injuries, nets a mandatory MINIMUM sentence that is less than that of first degree murder. That's just insanity.


OK, well, to put a cap on your ire, part of the issue here, I've found, after a bit of research, is that one reason for the harsh sentence is that these guys were tried in FEDERAL court, not state court. The Feds have different mandatory minimums for crimes than state courts do; so comparing a standard murderer's sentence (20 years) to what these douchebags got (30) is comparing apples to oranges in this instance.

Second, one of the guys, Monsalvatge, isn't on his first time around. He committed at least one other armed robbery in 2010, so this isn't his first time at the dock. Repeat offenders are always looking at harder time than first-timers, because they had their chance to be idiots and blew it. Also, Monsalvatge was no kid with a future and a chance of redemption. He's 37 and on his Facebook and LinkedIn page touts himself as some kind of professional.

Third, this wasn't a quick stick-up at the 7-11. These robbers arguably committed a "terroristic act" by taking a picture of the check-casher's house and showing it to her during the robbery. That indicates a degree of planning and an intent to follow through that's normally not seen in your typical convenience store heist. So does the purchase of $3000 full-face masks and disguising themselves as cops during the robbery.

Fourth, the dollar amount was pretty substantial. On the sentencing grid, after "threats uttered" and "weapons used" one of the key factors is "money taken." A $200 robbery isn't going to garner the kind of sentence that a $200,000 robbery is.

There are times and places to be outraged at excessively harsh sentences; but I'm not really sure this one is it.
 
2014-04-06 04:14:10 AM  

yukichigai: As far as I'm concerned, if you're going to spend more than $500 on a single piece of clothing it had better protect you from bullets, let you climb walls, be made of something REALLY exotic, or do something naughty to those "special" areas.


That's why I was willing to spend so lavishly on my velvet lined titanium posing pouch with built in grappling hook.
 
2014-04-06 04:59:30 AM  
Yeah, they're crazy armed robbers. Give 'em a scythe, let 'em cut grass for $10 an hour.

200,000+damages/10. Probably the same sentence.

But, the grass will be cut along I-79.
 
2014-04-06 05:21:36 AM  

doglover: Yeah, they're crazy armed robbers. Give 'em a scythe, let 'em cut grass for $10 an hour.

200,000+damages/10. Probably the same sentence.

But, the grass will be cut along I-79.


Actually, that would be less than a 10 yr sentence.
 
2014-04-06 05:22:40 AM  
mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years

the fark?

outrageous robbery of a Queens check-cashing store

they robbed a bank like store. Hang 'em high.

Meanwhile, in my country, someone who evaded taxes in excess of 30 million Euros gets ~3 years behind bars.
 
2014-04-06 07:56:20 AM  
I wonder what the sentence would have been were they white pretending to be black.
 
2014-04-06 08:04:28 AM  

Pichu0102: 32 years in prison over a robbery with no casualties? This tough on crime bullshiat has to stop.


Small wonder the US has so many in prison. In most countries first degree murder wouldn't even get you that.
 
2014-04-06 08:12:26 AM  

Abacus9: So, you're telling us you're an asshole on many levels?


Abacus9: Don't be so dramatic.


Abacus9: They don't deserve to live, and I thought you understood that.


Abacus9: you should stop talking out of you're ass


Dude, what the fark?  Can you post anything that's not hostile?
 
2014-04-06 08:43:57 AM  

Abacus9: Armed robbery is a serious crime. The fact that the perp didn't actually pull the trigger means nothing. They were still willing to waste someone, a human, over a few bucks. They don't deserve to live, and I thought you understood that.


You're a fool.
 
2014-04-06 08:46:33 AM  

proteus_b: Then go live in Tokyo, jackass... Oh wait, you already do. America must have seriously wounded you, that you still complain about it even after having left its shores. The way that you whine about it, you make it sound like "they" designed the country just to make it hard for you to get drunk. What are you, twelve years old?


You go with the "love it or leave it" response then ask HIM if he's twelve?

I love me some FARK sometimes...
 
2014-04-06 09:20:24 AM  

laid back w/bud light: doglover: Yeah, they're crazy armed robbers. Give 'em a scythe, let 'em cut grass for $10 an hour.

200,000+damages/10. Probably the same sentence.

But, the grass will be cut along I-79.

Actually, that would be less than a 10 yr sentence.


Damages could be in the millions.

Show me my own home and threaten it. If I can, I'll sue you down to the marrow, and more!
 
2014-04-06 09:23:15 AM  

doglover: Abacus9: Stone Meadow: doglover: mandatory minimum sentence of 32 years.

[www.themonolith.com image 292x302]

Yeah...wut?! Let's see...simple armed robbery with no one getting hurt gets a  MINIMUM sentence of 32 years? Fark me, New York, this bullshiat is why you can't have nice things.

From another article: "A recent report found the city's annual cost per inmate was $167,731 in 2012."

So lessee, in today dollars $167,731 x 3 guys x 32 years = $16,102,176. That's SIXTEEN MILLION DOLLARS. The city is going to spend more than twice what these guys stole the very first year of their incarceration. And then they're going to keep doing it for 30+ more years. Good luck with that.

Are you actually white knighting armed robbery?

There are punishments other than jail. Jail time is the stupidest idea anyone's ever come up with. It does nothing but destroy people. 32 years in jail minimum? That's worse than the punishment reserved for high treason. All it will do is destroy them, and if they even survive they will continue to be a burden to society because they'll be too old to work, too unemployable to get jobs even if they weren't felons, and they'll probably wind up robbing another bank just to go back to jail where there's food and blankets.

They've successfully stolen a few million more dollars from us all and we've reinforced their particular chapter of the 415 KUMI by giving them two more potential thugs. 32 years is a life sentence and if you're in for what's gonna be life, why not add another lifetime on top of that and kill some Aryan Brotherhood leader with your toothbrush shiv in exchange for some butt smuggled drugs or a few hundred in your commissary account? It's the kind of thing that happens in prisons.

Meanwhile, if we just had them to do menial labor for low pay till the money they stole was repaid and take them on a tour of local high schools in chains to explain to the kids that if you want to rob a bank, you have to work your way up to manager first or this will be your fate we'd wind up doing basically the same exact sentence but, and this is really the crux of the issue, it would be morally acceptable. We'd be training them for life in the real world by giving them at least a decade of vocational experience. We could even teach them some of the trades. Give them some books on plumbing. What else do you have to do while in a prison cell but read? We might actually rehabilitate them into productive citizens by the end of such a work program. Always gonna be clogged toilets. Instead of lining a private prison's pockets, they'd be paying taxes and , if they fark up, we could just shoot them dead on the spot. Bingo-bango.

And, with a lighter prisoner load from all the vice laws I would see repealed, prisons would actually have the resources to focus on rehabilitation, reintegration, and elimination as individual prisoners' needs and potential demanded.

But no one elects me king of everything. I'm always a write in.


I hope the current king of everything reads fark.

Even if he did, he couldn't do anything about it short of starting a war for pretext. People accept change when scared, otherwise the attitude is if it ain't broke don't fix it. I know it is indeed broken, but Joe 6 pack might want it to stay a hellhole because he served a few and got out. Or someone would say there are not enough jobs around to let folks out of jail (willfully ignoring your job training portion).

To them, jail is supposed to just lock you away, break you, like an animal, and there are plenty of folks who would gladly do that, let alone get paid to do it! These institutions and ideas are immortal and I'm not sure if anyone can change that.
 
2014-04-06 05:38:26 PM  

ecmoRandomNumbers: Afterward, the childhood pals set out on a shopping spree from Manhattan to Beverly Hills, buying such luxury items as $1,600 Christian Louboutin shoes and $600 Louis Vuitton belts.

They deserve 30 years just for spending so much money on tacky.


If somebody robs a bank to feed their starving family, pay for their poor but smart daughter to go to college, or pay for the operation their mother needs to save her life, you might feel some sympathy and look to at least reduce the jail sentence.
A$$sholes like this, you start wondering why we don't have hard-labour chain gangs anymore.
 
2014-04-06 10:33:33 PM  

Gunboat: Abacus9: So, you're telling us you're an asshole on many levels?

Abacus9: Don't be so dramatic.

Abacus9: They don't deserve to live, and I thought you understood that.

Abacus9: you should stop talking out of you're ass

Dude, what the fark?  Can you post anything that's not hostile?


1. Racist comments and comments denigrating the mentally ill make my statement correct.
2. Calling someone dramatic isn't hostility.
3. Armed robbery is a very serious crime. I agree our system is too harsh in many cases, but some people just need to be thrown away.
4. Did you miss the part where I mentioned that I like him? He's always good for a spirited debate. I'm really not that hostile, but don't suffer foolish arguments gladly.
 
2014-04-06 10:35:41 PM  

Geoff Peterson: Abacus9: Armed robbery is a serious crime. The fact that the perp didn't actually pull the trigger means nothing. They were still willing to waste someone, a human, over a few bucks. They don't deserve to live, and I thought you understood that.

You're a fool.


In what way? Are you saying violent crime shouldn't be punished?
 
2014-04-07 12:35:04 AM  

Geoff Peterson: You go with the "love it or leave it" response then ask HIM if he's twelve?


It's not really "love it or leave it", it's just "shut up about it". Neither he nor I live in America.
 
Displayed 79 of 79 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report