Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Metro)   A burger within a burger that's only 10,000 calories? Sounds burgerey   ( divider line
    More: Weird  
•       •       •

7790 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Mar 2014 at 8:22 PM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-03-24 06:48:42 PM  
5 votes:
2014-03-24 08:54:50 PM  
2 votes:

zvoidx: [ image 650x365]

I don't get it... you would have to divide that into separate sandwiches or hurt your mouth trying to eat the whole thing....
2014-03-24 06:49:27 PM  
2 votes:
I wish " now a thing" would stop being a thing
2014-03-24 10:29:43 PM  
1 vote:
Is it considered bulimia if you puke  beforeyou eat it?
2014-03-24 09:24:42 PM  
1 vote:

grimlock1972: waste of good beef.   the thing looks like shiat.

Well, that's an unwarranted accusation. It's the U.K. so there is a good chance it's at least 80% horse.
2014-03-24 09:04:12 PM  
1 vote:
Burgerey is still against the law in some places.
2014-03-24 08:43:28 PM  
1 vote:

skinink: And we shall christen thee, "Burger Time"!

[ image 650x590]
/Stop! Burger Time
2014-03-24 08:37:17 PM  
1 vote:
Where's Adam Richman?
2014-03-24 08:35:38 PM  
1 vote:

neongoats: The meat in that thing looks even worse than the grey, dessicated, pseudo meat you get at mcdonalds. Or the greasy flaps of overcooked carbon they try and pass off as burgers at 5 guys.

/wishes there was still a fudruckers here.

Ah yes, sex at the retirement home. Good times.
2014-03-24 08:35:16 PM  
1 vote:

meyerkev: So I hate to be *that* guy, but:

* You get 2000-4000 calories a day depending on body type, activity levels, and inbuilt metabolism.  Probably much closer to that low end unless you're in a seriously physical job.  Going below about 1500 or so kicks in famine mode, which tends to fark you over long-term.
* A pound is ~3.5K calories.
* Any Biggest-Loser-style weight loss FARKS you long-term as you tend to lose metabolism faster than you lose weight.  The absolute most you should EVER be losing is 2 pounds a week.  1 pound is actually probably more sustainable.

So if you eat this, you'll gain 2.5 pounds (with the other half pound being your normal calorie burn for the day).  And then you'll spend the next week and a half to 2 weeks burning it off.

Just saying.

Chances are that the diseased meat would give you some kind of diarrhea, and between it leaving your body too fast for you to be able to harvest the calories from it, and the dehydration caused by your dysentery you might even lose weight!
2014-03-24 07:52:02 PM  
1 vote:
Meat that could have been used to make like eight delicious hamburgers was used instead to create something inedible. I'm going to go kick a dog.
2014-03-24 07:19:01 PM  
1 vote:

Contrabulous Flabtraption: I wish " now a thing" would stop being a thing

Yo, Dog, I heard " now a thing" is not your thing, so I made that a thing.  Now you can "is now not a thing" or "not is now a thing" while you "is now a thing".
Displayed 12 of 12 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.