If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(STLToday)   Woman wins $7.5 million for having "the baddest body in the St. Louis area"   (stltoday.com) divider line 62
    More: Misc, St. Louis area, Missouri Attorney General, police officers, John Eccher, police board, settlement offer, jury, performance review  
•       •       •

18355 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Mar 2014 at 8:34 PM (21 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



62 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-21 08:16:55 PM
That story was useless without pictures.
 
2014-03-21 08:36:19 PM
Good.
 
2014-03-21 08:36:56 PM

fusillade762: That story was useless without pictures.


The normal fark expectation would lead me to say "NOPE" but a mock "wanted" poster make her out to actually be an attractive lady.
 
2014-03-21 08:39:20 PM
HEY! I gots the baddest body odor in the damn state. Where's my comp-en-sation? I need it to pay for sex cause nobody else will zug me. No wha i mean?
 
2014-03-21 08:47:20 PM
Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.
 
2014-03-21 08:50:07 PM
Google's not helping, but I did find this beautiful lady:

i1.ytimg.com
 
2014-03-21 08:50:41 PM

shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.


I wonder if she can sue them individually in civil court.
 
2014-03-21 08:51:31 PM
Dammit
 
2014-03-21 08:56:33 PM
Female badassery

dangerousromance.com
 
2014-03-21 09:11:22 PM
I can tell just from her name that you want nothing to do with her.  Congrats on her for being a scumbag playing the system.
 
2014-03-21 09:11:59 PM
Sorry, the baddest body in the STL area belongs to a horse trainer I knew.
 
2014-03-21 09:14:06 PM
http://www.yatedo.com/p/Tanisha+Ross-Paige/normal/e9141946166d9df0078d d04023c59767

Looks like a K9 officer so could be her, doesn't look like the baddest body in St Louis though.
 
2014-03-21 09:15:40 PM

shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.


I dunno, firing all the police at once might have unintended consequences.
 
2014-03-21 09:17:34 PM
It this a good bad, or bad bad, or a bad good?

Pictures would help.

If it's good bad or bad good, picture examples are welcome.

If bad bad... please restrain yourselves.
 
2014-03-21 09:23:21 PM

shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.


I am not a big fan of the police myself, but can you imagine no police force at all? Because that would be the result.
 
2014-03-21 09:26:23 PM

shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.


See, you ARE capable of making a rational statement that's easy for me to agree with.
 
2014-03-21 09:29:50 PM
This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?

She is a terrible 'person'.
 
2014-03-21 09:30:37 PM

Dragonflew: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

I am not a big fan of the police myself, but can you imagine no police force at all? Because that would be the result.


Not every cop lies.

img.myconfinedspace.com

They'd just have to stop being creative on police reports.

"7:03 PM Saw a n***er with a car, decided he needed harassed. Pulled him over, asked him for license and insurance. Cited him $20 for DWB."
 
2014-03-21 09:31:30 PM
Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.
 
2014-03-21 09:33:02 PM

oukewldave: I can tell just from her name that you want nothing to do with her.


Because she's black?  Well aren't you just the cutest.
 
2014-03-21 09:34:35 PM
Lost the discrimination claim, but won the retaliation claim.  Happens all the time in these suits,  discrimination is hard to prove but retaliation is easy....

And the fark head who refused the 100k settlement has some serious 'explaining to do to his bosses
 
2014-03-21 09:35:23 PM

shintochick: Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.


We usually have to pay to get humiliated and degraded.
 
2014-03-21 09:38:51 PM

Ready-set: This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?


So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.

She is a terrible 'person'.

Actually, you are. This woman is the victim of serious police misconduct, and here you are implying she's not even a human because she prevailed in her civil lawsuit.

You are a vile sh*tstain of an untermensch. You have no redeeming personal qualities. None.

Nothing personal.
 
2014-03-21 09:39:20 PM

shintochick: Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.


I have a couple hawt gals I work with. I would be ok with it. Though there are a few that would be nope.nope.nope.....
 
2014-03-21 09:46:23 PM

jtown: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

I wonder if she can sue them individually in civil court.


Or if future lawyers can use that lie to discredit them in future cases.
 
2014-03-21 09:47:54 PM

Dragonflew: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

I am not a big fan of the police myself, but can you imagine no police force at all? Because that would be the result.


If we retroactively fief them. Maybe just going forward!
 
2014-03-21 09:48:58 PM

Baz744: So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.


Awww how cute.  If only it really worked that way.
 
2014-03-21 09:49:00 PM

SquiggsIN: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

See, you ARE capable of making a rational statement that's easy for me to agree with.


Guess a brown clock is occasionally right
 
2014-03-21 09:52:43 PM

shintochick: Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.


Where do I send my resume?
 
2014-03-21 09:53:49 PM

shintochick: Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.


I think you underestimate the male gender (or overestimate depending on perspective)
 
2014-03-21 09:56:05 PM

shtychkn: SquiggsIN: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

See, you ARE capable of making a rational statement that's easy for me to agree with.

Guess a brown clock is occasionally right


I'm sorry, I don't see color.  Are you racist or something?

/hoping that was a typo of 'broken'
 
2014-03-21 10:16:14 PM

SquiggsIN: shtychkn: SquiggsIN: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

See, you ARE capable of making a rational statement that's easy for me to agree with.

Guess a brown clock is occasionally right

I'm sorry, I don't see color.  Are you racist or something?

/hoping that was a typo of 'broken'


Yeah. The swype on my new phone sucks ass
 
2014-03-21 10:17:08 PM
Is she a bad enough dudette to rescue the president?
 
2014-03-21 10:19:55 PM

Baz744: Ready-set: This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?

So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.

She is a terrible 'person'.

Actually, you are. This woman is the victim of serious police misconduct, and here you are implying she's not even a human because she prevailed in her civil lawsuit.

You are a vile sh*tstain of an untermensch. You have no redeeming personal qualities. None.

Nothing personal.


You're right: except it should be $7.5 Billion. How dare you not suggest that she be fairly compensated. The filthy rich city of St. Louis can tell everyone from homeless people to homeless dogs that they'll be fine. This 'person' is the first priority.

In sure she would accept your personal financial contribution. After all, you're as guilty as the rest of us. So... How much?
 
2014-03-21 10:28:06 PM

shtychkn: SquiggsIN: shtychkn: SquiggsIN: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

See, you ARE capable of making a rational statement that's easy for me to agree with.

Guess a brown clock is occasionally right

I'm sorry, I don't see color.  Are you racist or something?

/hoping that was a typo of 'broken'

Yeah. The swype on my new phone sucks ass


FTFY.
 
2014-03-21 10:29:17 PM

Ready-set: Baz744: Ready-set: This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?

So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.

She is a terrible 'person'.

Actually, you are. This woman is the victim of serious police misconduct, and here you are implying she's not even a human because she prevailed in her civil lawsuit.

You are a vile sh*tstain of an untermensch. You have no redeeming personal qualities. None.

Nothing personal.

You're right: except it should be $7.5 Billion. How dare you not suggest that she be fairly compensated. The filthy rich city of St. Louis can tell everyone from homeless people to homeless dogs that they'll be fine. This 'person' is the first priority.

In sure she would accept your personal financial contribution. After all, you're as guilty as the rest of us. So... How much?


Then the tax payers need to demand beget from the police the employ.

Maybe tax payers should sue those police involved that cost them 7.5m
 
2014-03-21 10:31:00 PM

SquiggsIN: shtychkn: SquiggsIN: shtychkn: SquiggsIN: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

See, you ARE capable of making a rational statement that's easy for me to agree with.

Guess a brown clock is occasionally right

I'm sorry, I don't see color.  Are you racist or something?

/hoping that was a typo of 'broken'

Yeah. The swype on my new phone sucks ass

FTFY.


On my old phone it worked really well. This phone gives me Bullsh*t
 
2014-03-21 10:33:06 PM

proteus_b: oukewldave: I can tell just from her name that you want nothing to do with her.

Because she's black?  Well aren't you just the cutest.


Interesting how you went there.  I was more interested in the hyphened name.  Everyone knows hyphen named people are problems.  But that says a lot about you..
 
2014-03-21 10:40:01 PM

oukewldave: Interesting how you went there.  I was more interested in the hyphened name.  Everyone knows hyphen named people are problems.  But that says a lot about you..


Interesting that someone who "can tell that he wants nothing to do with someone" based only on their name thinks he can find fault with anyone else for anything.
 
2014-03-21 10:41:26 PM

shtychkn: Ready-set: Baz744: Ready-set: This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?

So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.

She is a terrible 'person'.

Actually, you are. This woman is the victim of serious police misconduct, and here you are implying she's not even a human because she prevailed in her civil lawsuit.

You are a vile sh*tstain of an untermensch. You have no redeeming personal qualities. None.

Nothing personal.

You're right: except it should be $7.5 Billion. How dare you not suggest that she be fairly compensated. The filthy rich city of St. Louis can tell everyone from homeless people to homeless dogs that they'll be fine. This 'person' is the first priority.

In sure she would accept your personal financial contribution. After all, you're as guilty as the rest of us. So... How much?

Then the tax payers need to demand beget from the police the employ.

Maybe tax payers should sue those police involved that cost them 7.5m



I'm not sure if you're a moron, a troll, or if you actually believe the shiat you're saying.

So every time a motivated individual with an obsequious attorney wins a bullshiat/astonishing amount of money, the taxpayers (who presumably have shiat like work and family to attend to, instead of organizing a grassroots countersuit) are to blame for their sloth?
 
2014-03-21 10:45:10 PM

shtychkn: Ready-set: Baz744: Ready-set: This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?

So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.

She is a terrible 'person'.

Actually, you are. This woman is the victim of serious police misconduct, and here you are implying she's not even a human because she prevailed in her civil lawsuit.

You are a vile sh*tstain of an untermensch. You have no redeeming personal qualities. None.

Nothing personal.

You're right: except it should be $7.5 Billion. How dare you not suggest that she be fairly compensated. The filthy rich city of St. Louis can tell everyone from homeless people to homeless dogs that they'll be fine. This 'person' is the first priority.

In sure she would accept your personal financial contribution. After all, you're as guilty as the rest of us. So... How much?

Then the tax payers need to demand beget from the police the employ.

Maybe tax payers should sue those police involved that cost them 7.5m


More lawsuits. Bad idea.

If this woman bankrupted the guilty parties then it would look like justice.

Being generous with other people's money does not make you a good person.
 
2014-03-21 10:48:13 PM
GISed "Tanisha Paige"

Scrolled down for about 30 seconds.

Found this:

  fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net
 
433 [TotalFark]
2014-03-21 10:51:43 PM
Eccher said he asked jurors to send a message with a verdict that was high enough that "everyone will take notice that retaliation and discrimination in the workplace ends today."


Yeah, OK.
 
2014-03-21 10:54:22 PM

Sloppy Wreck: shintochick: Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.

I have a couple hawt gals I work with. I would be ok with it. Though there are a few that would be nope.nope.nope.....


If you are ok with it, it essentially isn't harassment. It's when the nope nope nopes repeatedly make advances that is harassment.  As someone that has been sexually harassed, it was definitely a nope situation where the nope got told nope repeatedly but still continued.
 
2014-03-21 10:56:58 PM

shintochick: Shame on you guys for needing pics. It shouldn't matter what she looks like. How would you feel if your female co-workers wanted you to sit on their laps and check out your package to see what you had to work with? I bet you would feel humiliated and degraded being treated like a piece of meat.


You're missing the point... we are just trying to figure out what he meant by "baddest body"... it's confusing.

How can we judge him if we are clueless about the representation and meaning of his words.
 
2014-03-21 11:04:14 PM
FTFA: "He speculated that jurors returned the large punitive damages verdict because Ross-Paige's lawyers repeatedly caught officers lying on the witness."

That'd do it.
 
2014-03-21 11:31:59 PM

doglover: Google's not helping, but I did find this beautiful lady:

[i1.ytimg.com image 850x478]


what a drag
 
2014-03-21 11:38:29 PM

Serious Post on Serious Thread: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

I dunno, firing all the police at once might have unintended consequences.


less crime and less costs to the city??
LOL
 
2014-03-21 11:50:40 PM

TanHamster: shtychkn: Ready-set: Baz744: Ready-set: This is awful. She deserves compensation, but the taxpayers didn't harm her. Why should they have to pay so damn much?

So that the mayor and city council will take seriously the need to roll heads to put a stop to sexual harassment and retaliation in their police department. Or if they don't, they can explain to angry voters like you why they didn't find a $7.5 million damage award sufficient reason to clean up the city's act.

She is a terrible 'person'.

Actually, you are. This woman is the victim of serious police misconduct, and here you are implying she's not even a human because she prevailed in her civil lawsuit.

You are a vile sh*tstain of an untermensch. You have no redeeming personal qualities. None.

Nothing personal.

You're right: except it should be $7.5 Billion. How dare you not suggest that she be fairly compensated. The filthy rich city of St. Louis can tell everyone from homeless people to homeless dogs that they'll be fine. This 'person' is the first priority.

In sure she would accept your personal financial contribution. After all, you're as guilty as the rest of us. So... How much?

Then the tax payers need to demand beget from the police the employ.

Maybe tax payers should sue those police involved that cost them 7.5m


I'm not sure if you're a moron, a troll, or if you actually believe the shiat you're saying.

So every time a motivated individual with an obsequious attorney wins a bullshiat/astonishing amount of money, the taxpayers (who presumably have shiat like work and family to attend to, instead of organizing a grassroots countersuit) are to blame for their sloth?


Can't say everytime. But in this case they couldn't order the firing of the police involved, so they fined the department.

Would honestly be better if they could have sued the people involved individually instead of the tax payers.
 
2014-03-21 11:51:46 PM

shtychkn: Dragonflew: shtychkn: Every cop caught lying should be terminated from law enforcement.

I am not a big fan of the police myself, but can you imagine no police force at all? Because that would be the result.

If we retroactively fief them. Maybe just going forward!


Fushing fief!
 
Displayed 50 of 62 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report